Since the 1990s, Fairfax County planners have imagined turning Tysons into “a place where people want to be.” How’s that going? Let’s look at the state of walkability and bikeability in Tysons, and how to make it better.

Local governments that follow a “mindlessly pro-business” approach sacrifice community well-being in the name of commerce, but end up devastating their cities’ downtowns by misunderstanding what helps an area succeed economically. It’s time to realize that helping local businesses means helping the

These micro wastelands drain the life from cities. It’s time we imagine better.

We put too much trust in drivers to follow traffic laws. We can't have police at every dangerous intersection but we can use cameras.

Eric Diller says community needs to see true cost of parking in debate over bicycling lanes

We need to fix both systems, which were created by Big Gas and Big Auto so long ago that they feel like personal choices. A great essay by Kea Wilson.

As much development as we see, it’s simply not enough to keep up.

The city should reduce the amount of land devoted to cars, so more housing can be built.

Your thoughts on changes to parking minimums ranged from "hell no" to "absolutely" to "mixed feelings."

Op-ed: In the decade or so before driverless cars roll out en masse, lawmakers must take the time to develop regulations that maximize their benefits and minimize their harms.

Op-Ed: If we want to address barriers to access, and the public health and climate impacts of car-dependence, we must make it easier for non-drivers to get around our communities.

The city shouldn’t require parking that never gets used.

Wisconsin Public Radio features in-depth news from WPR’s seven bureaus and NPR, entertainment programs, classical music and discussions on the Ideas Network.

"There is a real solution: end the off-street parking requirements mandated by archaic zoning laws enacted when gas was cheap and full of lead, elevated trains were being torn down, and flying cars were the future. With climate change now posing an existential threat, it is time to move on."

Cities often cling to parking requirements because Californians have come to expect abundant free parking. That comes at the expense of affordable housing.

If urban highways enforce racial barriers between neighborhoods, why do officials keep spending so much to expand them?

Governor Newsom should sign A.B. 2097

The expansion of highways will do far more harm than the expansion of mass transit will avert.

In most California cities, whenever developers construct a new building, local governments force them to provide a certain amount of parking as well. These rules – minimum parking requirement…

While driving extends our ability to move at high speed, it comes at the cost of almost every other kind of action.

The paper of record in Southern California is on the record in support of parking reforms.

If state leaders are serious about making California affordable, they should block local laws that require parking that may be unnecessary and costly.

A recent editorial argued that bike advocates left out the marginalized in their advocacy for new bike infrastructure on Summit Avenue. What if we applied that analysis to cars?

So why do transportation leaders spend so much time drafting “pedestrian master plans” and “bike master plans” without accompanying “car master plans” aimed at b…

Toronto’s motor champions still operate under the delusion cars are crucial to urban mobility, instead of mainly getting in the way of better options.

Mandatory parking rules make housing more expensive. California’s legislature should undo them.

City Council Member Lincoln Restler offers his plan to solve the problem.

This year, California has a unique opportunity to grapple with the consequences of one of the most misguided planning ideas: parking minimums. For

Over 200 other cities in the U.S. have removed on-site parking requirements in some form or another. ... [Annapolis doesn't] have to blaze this path, but we should heed the lessons learned by others who already have.