Hand Washing

Model NO.: DF-001 Usage: Household Appliance, Clothes, Tableware & Cookware, Skin, Fruit, Vegetables and So on Type: Chlorine Disinfectant Effect: Efficient Products: Disinfectant Trademark: DR. DO

The invention provides disinfecting body wash, which comprises a surfactant, a humectant, a chelant, a bactericide, a thickener and essence, wherein the bactericide may be stable liquid chlorine dioxide, stable solid chlorine dioxide or sodium chlorite. The body wash prepared by the invention overcomes the drawbacks of the traditional bacteriocidal body wash and realizes synchronous cleaning, body moisturizing and sterilization. The body wash is mild in nature, safe and environmentally friendly.

Use on your back, chest, backs of arms, upper thighs, wherever your skin is susceptible to skin irritations. Specially formulated for dermatological use. Gentle, hypoallergenic and fragrance-free. Inactivates and removes allergens and irritants that accumulate on the skin. Supports the natural de...

The world is facing a medical crisis amid the CoViD-19 pandemic and the role of adequate hygiene and hand sanitisers is inevitable in controlling the spread of infection in public places and healthcare institutions. There has been a great surge in demand ...

**** [Not FDA approved}

****!!!!**** Alcohol-Free Hand Cleanser - 150 ppm electrolyzed Hypochlorous Acid (HOCl)

****!!!! Alcohol-Free Hand Cleanser - 150 ppm HOCl

"Alcohol free hand foamers, gels, soaps and hand wipes are specially formulated to kill bacteria in seconds. The product gives an immediate fresh and clean feel to the skin. Remains effective after application for at least 6 hours using Advanced Barrier Control. No need to rinse and is kind to your hands."

(2021)

amazing 4 hours hand sanitizer, patented hand sanitizer, no alcohol hand sanitizer, no water hand sanitizer, no petroleum products hand sanitizer

****!!!!**** "Our clinical study showed that EBD [ethanol-based disinfectants] effectiveness against IAV [influenza A virus] in mucus was extremely reduced compared to IAV in saline. IAV in mucus remained active despite 120 s of AHR; however, IAV in saline was completely inactivated within 30 s. Due to the low rate of diffusion/convection because of the physical properties of mucus as a hydrogel, the time required for the ethanol concentration to reach an IAV inactivation level and thus for EBDs to completely inactivate IAV was approximately eight times longer in mucus than in saline. On the other hand, AHR inactivated IAV in mucus within 30 s when the mucus dried completely because the hydrogel characteristics were lost. Additionally, AHW [antiseptic hand washing] rapidly inactivated IAV. Until infectious mucus has completely dried, infectious IAV can remain on the hands and fingers, even after appropriate AHR [antiseptic hand rubbing] using EBD, thereby increasing the risk of IAV transmission. We clarified the ineffectiveness of EBD use against IAV in infectious mucus." "IMPORTANCE Antiseptic hand rubbing (AHR) and antiseptic hand washing (AHW) are important to prevent the spread of influenza A virus (IAV). This study elucidated the situations/mechanisms underlying the reduced efficacy of AHR against infectious mucus derived from IAV-infected individuals and indicated the weaknesses of the current hand hygiene regimens. Due to the low rate of diffusion/convection because of the physical properties of mucus as a hydrogel, the efficacy of AHR using ethanol-based disinfectant against mucus is greatly reduced until infectious mucus adhering to the hands/fingers has completely dried. If there is insufficient time before treating the next patient (i.e., if the infectious mucus is not completely dry), medical staff should be aware that effectiveness of AHR is reduced. Since AHW is effective against both dry and nondry infectious mucus, AHW should be adopted to compensate for these weaknesses of AHR."

"The ingredient group, chlorine dioxide, resulted in comparable reductions to the iodine group for streptococcal isolates. The ingredient group, iodine combined with lactic acid, resulted in the greatest reduction of staphylococcal isolates. When observing products individually, a product containing 1.6% w/w lactic acid combined with hydrogen peroxide was the most effective at reducing streptococcal isolates on the teat skin, whereas a product containing lactic acid combined with 0.6% w/w chlorhexidine was the most effective against staphylococcal isolates." "...some teat disinfectant products achieve a higher reduction in bacterial levels against different specific bacterial groups on teat skin than other products. Therefore, when choosing a teat disinfectant product, the bacteria in the dairy herds' environment should be considered."

We conclude that the main sources of drinking water, hand washing before water drawing from a storage container, domestic waste disposal place and use of soap for hand washing were the most important factors for the prevention of childhood diarrhea."

Patent for Hand soap with chlorine dioxide. Co-inventor John Thangaraj. "a relatively high yield of chlorine dioxide is obtained from a solid composition that has a relatively greater amount of acid and a relatively lesser amount of alkali chlorite salt. Conversely, a relatively low yield of chlorine dioxide is obtained from a solid composition that has a relatively lesser amount of acid and a relatively greater amount of alkali chlorite salt. For example, a solid composition comprising five (5) weight percent of sodium chlorite and forty (40) weight percent of acid will generate far more chlorine dioxide than a solid composition comprising seventy (70) weight percent of sodium chlorite and twenty (20) weight percent of acid. " "Coloring agents, dyes and fragrances are also not recommended for use in the solid compositions disclosed herein because they rapidly react with chlorine dioxide"

C n101766543 a

Sept 2016. Companies will no longer be able to market antibacterial washes with these 19 [although a few were granted deferred rulings] ingredients because manufacturers did not demonstrate that the ingredients are both safe for long-term daily use and more effective than plain soap and water in preventing illness and the spread of certain infections.

Disposable wipes are made for baby care, hand washing, feminine and other personal cleansing, removing makeup, and applying products such as deodorants and sunless tanners, among other uses. Many wipes, but not all, are regulated as cosmetics.

{Interesting photos of effectiveness of washing hands for varying amounts of time}

***A 10-week, open-label, crossover study was performed on 420 elementary school-age children. Students were given a brief orientation immediately prior to the start of the study on the relationship of germs, illness, and hand washing. Each student in the treatment group then received the test product in individual bottles, with instructions to apply one to two ***sprays to the hands*** after coming into the classroom, before eating, and after using the restroom, in addition to their normal hand washing with soap and water... After 4 weeks of treatment and a 2-week wash-out period, the control and experimental groups were reversed. Data gathered on absenteeism were classified as gastrointestinal or respiratory related and normalized for nonillness-related absenteeism and school holidays. ** RESULTS: Compared to the hand washing-only control group, students using CleanHands were found to have 41.9% fewer illness-related absence days, representing a 28.9% and a 49.7% drop in gastrointestinal- and respiratory-related illnesses, respectively. Likewise, absence incidence decreased by 31.7%, consisting of a 44.2% and 50.2% decrease in incidence of gastrointestinal- and respiratory-related illnesses, respectively.

June 2016. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today issued a proposed rule requesting additional scientific data to support the safety and effectiveness of certain active ingredients used in topical consumer antiseptic rubs (including hand sanitizers) marketed over-the-counter (OTC). The FDA’s request for more data is intended to help the agency ensure that regular use of these products does not present unknown safety and efficacy concerns, and does not mean the FDA believes these products are ineffective or unsafe.

Hand sanitizer must ***only*** contain ethanol alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, Glycerin, Hydrogen peroxide, sterile water

Current use of OTC antiseptics in the food handler setting and testing criteria to establish the general recognition of safety and effectiveness of these products

Hypochlorous Acid hand sanitizer

Scotmas Hand Gel is a powerful hand gel which kills a wide range of bacteria, viruses and spores without the need for water. Not alcohol based and will not dry the skin or cause chafing.

{Advantages} Hand sanitisers for infection prevention. Help and information on choosing the right hand sanitiser for your needs.

{Alcohol-based}