Suggested Reads

Suggested Reads

54937 bookmarks
Newest
A Case for SPIFFE & SPIRE - Software Identity Management
A Case for SPIFFE & SPIRE - Software Identity Management
How do you manage software identity for your Kubernetes workloads, Kubernetes nodes, virtual machines (VMs) and other software entities? In this video, Lukonde Mwila explains the concepts behind SPIFFE and SPIRE, an open source universal security standard for managing software identity. SPIFFE & SPIRE: https://spiffe.io/ #AWS #Kubernetes #EKS
·youtube.com·
A Case for SPIFFE & SPIRE - Software Identity Management
Justice Department Announces Court-Authorized Disruption of the Snake Malware Network Controlled by Russia's Federal Security Service
Justice Department Announces Court-Authorized Disruption of the Snake Malware Network Controlled by Russia's Federal Security Service
“Russia used sophisticated malware to steal sensitive information from our allies, laundering it through a network of infected computers in the United States in a cynical attempt to conceal their crimes.  Meeting the challenge of cyberespionage requires creativity and a willingness to use all lawful means to protect our nation and our allies,” stated United States Attorney Peace.  “The court-authorized remote search and remediation announced today demonstrates my Office and our partners’ commitment to using all of the tools at our disposal to protect the American people.”
·justice.gov·
Justice Department Announces Court-Authorized Disruption of the Snake Malware Network Controlled by Russia's Federal Security Service
Unconscious Bias Training That Works
Unconscious Bias Training That Works
To become more diverse, equitable, and inclusive, many companies have turned to unconscious bias (UB) training. By raising awareness of the mental shortcuts that lead to snap judgments—often based on race and gender—about people’s talents or character, it strives to make hiring and promotion fairer and improve interactions with customers and among colleagues. But most UB training is ineffective, research shows. The problem is, increasing awareness is not enough—and can even backfire—because sending the message that bias is involuntary and widespread may make it seem unavoidable. UB training that gets results, in contrast, teaches attendees to manage their biases, practice new behaviors, and track their progress. It gives them information that contradicts stereotypes and allows them to connect with colleagues whose experiences are different from theirs. And it’s not a onetime session; it entails a longer journey and structural organizational changes. In this article the authors describe how rigorous UB programs at Microsoft, Starbucks, and other organizations help employees overcome denial and act on their awareness, develop the empathy that combats bias, diversify their networks, and commit to improvement.
·hbr.org·
Unconscious Bias Training That Works
4 Core Principles of GitOps
4 Core Principles of GitOps
It's at the point where GitOps is getting enough notice that a brief on its principles is appropriate. Here are four ground rules to keep in mind.
·thenewstack.io·
4 Core Principles of GitOps
Blog: Kubernetes 1.27: In-place Resource Resize for Kubernetes Pods (alpha)
Blog: Kubernetes 1.27: In-place Resource Resize for Kubernetes Pods (alpha)
Author: Vinay Kulkarni (Kubescaler Labs) If you have deployed Kubernetes pods with CPU and/or memory resources specified, you may have noticed that changing the resource values involves restarting the pod. This has been a disruptive operation for running workloads... until now. In Kubernetes v1.27, we have added a new alpha feature that allows users to resize CPU/memory resources allocated to pods without restarting the containers. To facilitate this, the resources field in a pod's containers now allow mutation for cpu and memory resources. They can be changed simply by patching the running pod spec. This also means that resources field in the pod spec can no longer be relied upon as an indicator of the pod's actual resources. Monitoring tools and other such applications must now look at new fields in the pod's status. Kubernetes queries the actual CPU and memory requests and limits enforced on the running containers via a CRI (Container Runtime Interface) API call to the runtime, such as containerd, which is responsible for running the containers. The response from container runtime is reflected in the pod's status. In addition, a new restartPolicy for resize has been added. It gives users control over how their containers are handled when resources are resized. What's new in v1.27? Besides the addition of resize policy in the pod's spec, a new field named allocatedResources has been added to containerStatuses in the pod's status. This field reflects the node resources allocated to the pod's containers. In addition, a new field called resources has been added to the container's status. This field reflects the actual resource requests and limits configured on the running containers as reported by the container runtime. Lastly, a new field named resize has been added to the pod's status to show the status of the last requested resize. A value of Proposed is an acknowledgement of the requested resize and indicates that request was validated and recorded. A value of InProgress indicates that the node has accepted the resize request and is in the process of applying the resize request to the pod's containers. A value of Deferred means that the requested resize cannot be granted at this time, and the node will keep retrying. The resize may be granted when other pods leave and free up node resources. A value of Infeasible is a signal that the node cannot accommodate the requested resize. This can happen if the requested resize exceeds the maximum resources the node can ever allocate for a pod. When to use this feature Here are a few examples where this feature may be useful: Pod is running on node but with either too much or too little resources. Pods are not being scheduled do to lack of sufficient CPU or memory in a cluster that is underutilized by running pods that were overprovisioned. Evicting certain stateful pods that need more resources to schedule them on bigger nodes is an expensive or disruptive operation when other lower priority pods in the node can be resized down or moved. How to use this feature In order to use this feature in v1.27, the InPlacePodVerticalScaling feature gate must be enabled. A local cluster with this feature enabled can be started as shown below: root@vbuild:~/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes# FEATURE_GATES=InPlacePodVerticalScaling=true ./hack/local-up-cluster.sh go version go1.20.2 linux/arm64 +++ [0320 13:52:02] Building go targets for linux/arm64 k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubectl (static) k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kube-apiserver (static) k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kube-controller-manager (static) k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/cloud-controller-manager (non-static) k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubelet (non-static) ... ... Logs: /tmp/etcd.log /tmp/kube-apiserver.log /tmp/kube-controller-manager.log /tmp/kube-proxy.log /tmp/kube-scheduler.log /tmp/kubelet.log To start using your cluster, you can open up another terminal/tab and run: export KUBECONFIG=/var/run/kubernetes/admin.kubeconfig cluster/kubectl.sh Alternatively, you can write to the default kubeconfig: export KUBERNETES_PROVIDER=local cluster/kubectl.sh config set-cluster local --server=https://localhost:6443 --certificate-authority=/var/run/kubernetes/server-ca.crt cluster/kubectl.sh config set-credentials myself --client-key=/var/run/kubernetes/client-admin.key --client-certificate=/var/run/kubernetes/client-admin.crt cluster/kubectl.sh config set-context local --cluster=local --user=myself cluster/kubectl.sh config use-context local cluster/kubectl.sh Once the local cluster is up and running, Kubernetes users can schedule pods with resources, and resize the pods via kubectl. An example of how to use this feature is illustrated in the following demo video. Example Use Cases Cloud-based Development Environment In this scenario, developers or development teams write their code locally but build and test their code in Kubernetes pods with consistent configs that reflect production use. Such pods need minimal resources when the developers are writing code, but need significantly more CPU and memory when they build their code or run a battery of tests. This use case can leverage in-place pod resize feature (with a little help from eBPF) to quickly resize the pod's resources and avoid kernel OOM (out of memory) killer from terminating their processes. This KubeCon North America 2022 conference talk illustrates the use case. Java processes initialization CPU requirements Some Java applications may need significantly more CPU during initialization than what is needed during normal process operation time. If such applications specify CPU requests and limits suited for normal operation, they may suffer from very long startup times. Such pods can request higher CPU values at the time of pod creation, and can be resized down to normal running needs once the application has finished initializing. Known Issues This feature enters v1.27 at alpha stage . Below are a few known issues users may encounter: containerd versions below v1.6.9 do not have the CRI support needed for full end-to-end operation of this feature. Attempts to resize pods will appear to be stuck in the InProgress state, and resources field in the pod's status are never updated even though the new resources may have been enacted on the running containers. Pod resize may encounter a race condition with other pod updates, causing delayed enactment of pod resize. Reflecting the resized container resources in pod's status may take a while. Static CPU management policy is not supported with this feature. Credits This feature is a result of the efforts of a very collaborative Kubernetes community. Here's a little shoutout to just a few of the many many people that contributed countless hours of their time and helped make this happen. @thockin for detail-oriented API design and air-tight code reviews. @derekwaynecarr for simplifying the design and thorough API and node reviews. @dchen1107 for bringing vast knowledge from Borg and helping us avoid pitfalls. @ruiwen-zhao for adding containerd support that enabled full E2E implementation. @wangchen615 for implementing comprehensive E2E tests and driving scheduler fixes. @bobbypage for invaluable help getting CI ready and quickly investigating issues, covering for me on my vacation. @Random-Liu for thorough kubelet reviews and identifying problematic race conditions. @Huang-Wei , @ahg-g , @alculquicondor for helping get scheduler changes done. @mikebrow @marosset for reviews on short notice that helped CRI changes make it into v1.25. @endocrimes , @ehashman for helping ensure that the oft-overlooked tests are in good shape. @mrunalp for reviewing cgroupv2 changes and ensuring clean handling of v1 vs v2. @liggitt , @gjkim42 for tracking down, root-causing important missed issues post-merge. @SergeyKanzhelev for supporting and shepherding various issues during the home stretch. @pdgetrf for making the first prototype a reality. @dashpole for bringing me up to speed on 'the Kubernetes way' of doing things. @bsalamat , @kgolab for very thoughtful insights and suggestions in the early stages. @sftim , @tengqm for ensuring docs are easy to follow. @dims for being omnipresent and helping make merges happen at critical hours. Release teams for ensuring that the project stayed healthy. And a big thanks to my very supportive management Dr. Xiaoning Ding and Dr. Ying Xiong for their patience and encouragement. References For app developers Resize CPU and Memory Resources assigned to Containers Assign Memory Resources to Containers and Pods Assign CPU Resources to Containers and Pods For cluster administrators Configure Default Memory Requests and Limits for a Namespace Configure Default CPU Requests and Limits for a Namespace
·kubernetes.io·
Blog: Kubernetes 1.27: In-place Resource Resize for Kubernetes Pods (alpha)
When Your Employee Tells You They’re Burned Out
When Your Employee Tells You They’re Burned Out
Burnout is affecting both leaders and employees — and contributing to a talent shortage that’s challenging and costly to navigate. It can be challenging for even the most enlightened managers to have conversations about employee burnout while managing the needs of the business. The author offers five steps to take when an employee comes to you expressing burnout: 1) Treat their concerns seriously; 2) Understand their experience of burnout; 3) Identify its root causes; 4) Consider short- and long-term solutions; and 5) Create a monitoring plan.
·hbr.org·
When Your Employee Tells You They’re Burned Out
Blog: Kubernetes 1.27: Avoid Collisions Assigning Ports to NodePort Services
Blog: Kubernetes 1.27: Avoid Collisions Assigning Ports to NodePort Services
Author: Xu Zhenglun (Alibaba) In Kubernetes, a Service can be used to provide a unified traffic endpoint for applications running on a set of Pods. Clients can use the virtual IP address (or VIP ) provided by the Service for access, and Kubernetes provides load balancing for traffic accessing different back-end Pods, but a ClusterIP type of Service is limited to providing access to nodes within the cluster, while traffic from outside the cluster cannot be routed. One way to solve this problem is to use a type: NodePort Service, which sets up a mapping to a specific port of all nodes in the cluster, thus redirecting traffic from the outside to the inside of the cluster. How Kubernetes allocates node ports to Services? When a type: NodePort Service is created, its corresponding port(s) are allocated in one of two ways: Dynamic : If the Service type is NodePort and you do not set a nodePort value explicitly in the spec for that Service, the Kubernetes control plane will automatically allocate an unused port to it at creation time. Static : In addition to the dynamic auto-assignment described above, you can also explicitly assign a port that is within the nodeport port range configuration. The value of nodePort that you manually assign must be unique across the whole cluster. Attempting to create a Service of type: NodePort where you explicitly specify a node port that was already allocated results in an error. Why do you need to reserve ports of NodePort Service? Sometimes, you may want to have a NodePort Service running on well-known ports so that other components and users inside o r outside the cluster can use them. In some complex cluster deployments with a mix of Kubernetes nodes and other servers on the same network, it may be necessary to use some pre-defined ports for communication. In particular, some fundamental components cannot rely on the VIPs that back type: LoadBalancer Services because the virtual IP address mapping implementation for that cluster also relies on these foundational components. Now suppose you need to expose a Minio object storage service on Kubernetes to clients running outside the Kubernetes cluster, and the agreed port is 30009 , we need to create a Service as follows: apiVersion : v1 kind : Service metadata : name : minio spec : ports : - name : api nodePort : 30009 port : 9000 protocol : TCP targetPort : 9000 selector : app : minio type : NodePort However, as mentioned before, if the port (30009) required for the minio Service is not reserved, and another type: NodePort (or possibly type: LoadBalancer ) Service is created and dynamically allocated before or concurrently with the minio Service, TCP port 30009 might be allocated to that other Service; if so, creation of the minio Service will fail due to a node port collision. How can you avoid NodePort Service port conflicts? Kubernetes 1.24 introduced changes for type: ClusterIP Services, dividing the CIDR range for cluster IP addresses into two blocks that use different allocation policies to reduce the risk of conflicts . In Kubernetes 1.27, as an alpha feature, you can adopt a similar policy for type: NodePort Services. You can enable a new feature gate ServiceNodePortStaticSubrange . Turning this on allows you to use a different port allocation strategy for type: NodePort Services, and reduce the risk of collision. The port range for NodePort will be divided, based on the formula min(max(16, nodeport-size / 32), 128) . The outcome of the formula will be a number between 16 and 128, with a step size that increases as the size of the nodeport range increases. The outcome of the formula determine that the size of static port range. When the port range is less than 16, the size of static port range will be set to 0, which means that all ports will be dynamically allocated. Dynamic port assignment will use the upper band by default, once this has been exhausted it will use the lower range. This will allow users to use static allocations on the lower band with a low risk of collision. Examples default range: 30000-32767 Range properties Values service-node-port-range 30000-32767 Band Offset min(max(16, 2768/32), 128) = min(max(16, 86), 128) = min(86, 128) = 86 Static band start 30000 Static band end 30085 Dynamic band start 30086 Dynamic band end 32767 pie showData title 30000-32767 "Static" : 86 "Dynamic" : 2682 JavaScript must be enabled to view this content very small range: 30000-30015 Range properties Values service-node-port-range 30000-30015 Band Offset 0 Static band start - Static band end - Dynamic band start 30000 Dynamic band end 30015 pie showData title 30000-30015 "Static" : 0 "Dynamic" : 16 JavaScript must be enabled to view this content small(lower boundary) range: 30000-30127 Range properties Values service-node-port-range 30000-30127 Band Offset min(max(16, 128/32), 128) = min(max(16, 4), 128) = min(16, 128) = 16 Static band start 30000 Static band end 30015 Dynamic band start 30016 Dynamic band end 30127 pie showData title 30000-30127 "Static" : 16 "Dynamic" : 112 JavaScript must be enabled to view this content large(upper boundary) range: 30000-34095 Range properties Values service-node-port-range 30000-34095 Band Offset min(max(16, 4096/32), 128) = min(max(16, 128), 128) = min(128, 128) = 128 Static band start 30000 Static band end 30127 Dynamic band start 30128 Dynamic band end 34095 pie showData title 30000-34095 "Static" : 128 "Dynamic" : 3968 JavaScript must be enabled to view this content very large range: 30000-38191 Range properties Values service-node-port-range 30000-38191 Band Offset min(max(16, 8192/32), 128) = min(max(16, 256), 128) = min(256, 128) = 128 Static band start 30000 Static band end 30127 Dynamic band start 30128 Dynamic band end 38191 pie showData title 30000-38191 "Static" : 128 "Dynamic" : 8064 JavaScript must be enabled to view this content
·kubernetes.io·
Blog: Kubernetes 1.27: Avoid Collisions Assigning Ports to NodePort Services
Building the Micro Mirror Free Software CDN
Building the Micro Mirror Free Software CDN
As should surprise no one, based on my past projects of running my own autonomous system , building my own Internet Exchange Point , and bui...
·blog.thelifeofkenneth.com·
Building the Micro Mirror Free Software CDN
Blog: Kubernetes 1.27: Safer, More Performant Pruning in kubectl apply
Blog: Kubernetes 1.27: Safer, More Performant Pruning in kubectl apply
Authors: Katrina Verey (independent) and Justin Santa Barbara (Google) Declarative configuration management with the kubectl apply command is the gold standard approach to creating or modifying Kubernetes resources. However, one challenge it presents is the deletion of resources that are no longer needed. In Kubernetes version 1.5, the --prune flag was introduced to address this issue, allowing kubectl apply to automatically clean up previously applied resources removed from the current configuration. Unfortunately, that existing implementation of --prune has design flaws that diminish its performance and can result in unexpected behaviors. The main issue stems from the lack of explicit encoding of the previously applied set by the preceding apply operation, necessitating error-prone dynamic discovery. Object leakage, inadvertent over-selection of resources, and limited compatibility with custom resources are a few notable drawbacks of this implementation. Moreover, its coupling to client-side apply hinders user upgrades to the superior server-side apply mechanism. Version 1.27 of kubectl introduces an alpha version of a revamped pruning implementation that addresses these issues. This new implementation, based on a concept called ApplySet , promises better performance and safety. An ApplySet is a group of resources associated with a parent object on the cluster, as identified and configured through standardized labels and annotations. Additional standardized metadata allows for accurate identification of ApplySet member objects within the cluster, simplifying operations like pruning. To leverage ApplySet-based pruning, set the KUBECTL_APPLYSET=true environment variable and include the flags --prune and --applyset in your kubectl apply invocation: KUBECTL_APPLYSET = true kubectl apply -f directory/ --prune --applyset= name By default, ApplySet uses a Secret as the parent object. However, you can also use a ConfigMap with the format --applyset=configmaps/name . If your desired Secret or ConfigMap object does not yet exist, kubectl will create it for you. Furthermore, custom resources can be enabled for use as ApplySet parent objects. The ApplySet implementation is based on a new low-level specification that can support higher-level ecosystem tools by improving their interoperability. The lightweight nature of this specification enables these tools to continue to use existing object grouping systems while opting in to ApplySet's metadata conventions to prevent inadvertent changes by other tools (such as kubectl ). ApplySet-based pruning offers a promising solution to the shortcomings of the previous --prune implementation in kubectl and can help streamline your Kubernetes resource management. Please give this new feature a try and share your experiences with the community—ApplySet is under active development, and your feedback is invaluable! Additional resources For more information how to use ApplySet-based pruning, read Declarative Management of Kubernetes Objects Using Configuration Files in the Kubernetes documentation. For a deeper dive into the technical design of this feature or to learn how to implement the ApplySet specification in your own tools, refer to KEP 3659 : ApplySet: kubectl apply --prune redesign and graduation strategy . How do I get involved? If you want to get involved in ApplySet development, you can get in touch with the developers at SIG CLI . To provide feedback on the feature, please file a bug or request an enhancement on the kubernetes/kubectl repository.
·kubernetes.io·
Blog: Kubernetes 1.27: Safer, More Performant Pruning in kubectl apply
Blog: Spotlight on SIG Network
Blog: Spotlight on SIG Network
Networking is one of the core pillars of Kubernetes, and the Special Interest Group for Networking (SIG Network) is responsible for developing and maintaining the networking features of Kubernetes. It covers all aspects to ensure Kubernetes provides a reliable and scalable network infrastructure for containerized applications. In this SIG Network spotlight, Sujay Dey talked with Shane Utt , Software Engineer at Kong, chair of SIG Network and maintainer of Gateway API, on different aspects of the SIG, what are the exciting things going on and how anyone can get involved and contribute here. Sujay : Hello, and first of all, thanks for the opportunity of learning more about SIG Network. I would love to hear your story, so could you please tell us a bit about yourself, your role, and how you got involved in Kubernetes, especially in SIG Network? Shane : Hello! Thank you for reaching out. My Kubernetes journey started while I was working for a small data centre: we were early adopters of Kubernetes and focused on using Kubernetes to provide SaaS products. That experience led to my next position developing a distribution of Kubernetes with a focus on networking. During this period in my career, I was active in SIG Network (predominantly as a consumer). When I joined Kong my role in the community changed significantly, as Kong actively encourages upstream participation. I greatly increased my engagement and contributions to the Gateway API project during those years, and eventually became a maintainer. I care deeply about this community and the future of our technology, so when a chair position for the SIG became available, I volunteered my time immediately. I’ve enjoyed working on Kubernetes over the better part of a decade and I want to continue to do my part to ensure our community and technology continues to flourish. Sujay : I have to say, that was a truely inspiring journey! Now, let us talk a bit more about SIG Network. Since we know it covers a lot of ground, could you please highlight its scope and current focus areas? Shane : For those who may be uninitiated: SIG Network is responsible for the components, interfaces, and APIs which expose networking capabilities to Kubernetes users and workloads. The charter is a pretty good indication of our scope, but I can add some additional highlights on some of our current areas of focus (this is a non-exhaustive list of sub-projects): kube-proxy & KPNG Those familiar with Kubernetes will know the Service API, which enables exposing a group of pods over a network. The current standard implementation of Service is known as kube-proxy , but what may be unfamiliar to people is that there are a growing number of disparate alternative implementations on the rise in recent years. To try and give provisions to these implementations (and also provide some areas of alignment so that implementations do not become too disparate from each other) upstream Kubernetes efforts are underway to create a more modular public interface for kube-proxy . The intention is for implementations to join in around a common set of libraries and speak a common language. This area of focus is known as the KPNG project, and if this sounds interesting to you, please join us in the KPNG community meetings and #sig-network-kpng on Kubernetes Slack . Multi-Network Today one of the primary requirements for Kubernetes networking is to achieve connectivity between pods in a cluster, satisfying a large number of Kubernetes end-users. However, some use cases require isolated networks and special interfaces for performance-oriented needs (e.g. AF_XDP , memif , SR-IOV ). There’s a growing need for special networking configurations in Kubernetes in general. The Multi-Network project exists to improve the management of multiple different networks for pods: anyone interested in some of the lower-level details of pod networking (or anyone having relevant use cases) can join us in the Multi-Network community meetings and #sig-network-multi-network on Kubernetes Slack. Network Policy The NetworkPolicy API sub-group was formed to address network security beyond the well-known version 1 of the NetworkPolicy resource. We’ve also been working on the AdminNetworkPolicy resource (previously known as ClusterNetworkPolicy ) to provide cluster administrator-focused functionality. The network policy sub-project is a great place to join in if you’re particularly interested in security and CNI, please feel free to join our community meetings and the #sig-network-policy-api channel on Kubernetes Slack. Gateway API If you’re specially interested in ingress or mesh networking the Gateway API may be a sub-project you would enjoy. In Gateway API , we’re actively developing the successor to the illustrious Ingress API, which includes a Gateway resource which defines the addresses and listeners of the gateway and various routing types (e.g. HTTPRoute , GRPCRoute , TLSRoute , TCPRoute , UDPRoute , etc.) that attach to Gateways. We also have an initiative within this project called GAMMA, geared towards using Gateway API resources in a mesh network context. There are some up-and-coming side projects within Gateway API as well, including ingress2gateway which is a tool for compiling existing Ingress objects to equivalent Gateway API resources, and Blixt, a Layer4 implementation of Gateway API using Rust/eBPF for the data plane, intended as a testing and reference implementation. If this sounds interesting, we would love to have readers join us in our Gateway API community meetings and #sig-network-gateway-api on Kubernetes Slack. Sujay : Couldn’t agree more! That was a very informative description, thanks for highlighting them so nicely. As you have already mentioned about the SIG channels to get involved, would you like to add anything about where people like beginners can jump in and contribute? Shane : For help getting started Kubernetes Slack is a great place to talk to community members and includes several #sig-network-project channels as well as our main #sig-network channel. Also, check for issues labelled good-first-issue if you prefer to just dive right into the repositories. Let us know how we can help you! Sujay : What skills are contributors to SIG Network likely to learn? Shane : To me, it feels limitless. Practically speaking, it’s very much up to the individual what they want to learn. However, if you just intend to learn as much as you possibly can about networking, SIG Network is a great place to join in and grow your knowledge. If you’ve ever wondered how Kubernetes Service API works or wanted to implement an ingress controller, this is a great place to join in. If you wanted to dig down deep into the inner workings of CNI, or how the network interfaces at the pod level are configured, you can do that here as well. We have an awesome and diverse community of people from just about every kind of background you can imagine. This is a great place to share ideas and raise proposals, improving your skills in design, as well as alignment and consensus building. There’s a wealth of opportunities here in SIG Network. There are lots of places to jump in, and the learning opportunities are boundless. Sujay : Thanks a lot! It was a really great discussion, we got to know so many great things about SIG Network. I’m sure that many others will find this just as useful as I did.
·kubernetes.dev·
Blog: Spotlight on SIG Network