Englisch

119 bookmarks
Custom sorting
behemoth
behemoth

behemoth

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/behemoth

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for August 9, 2025 is:

behemoth • \bih-HEE-muth\  • noun

A behemoth is something of monstrous size, power, or appearance. Behemoth (usually capitalized) is also the name of a mighty animal described in the biblical book of Job.

// The town will be voting on whether or not to let the retail behemoth build a store on the proposed site.

See the entry >

Examples:

"The author ... recounts how his grandfather turned a family spinach farm into an industrial behemoth, and exposes the greed and malfeasance behind the prosperous facade." — The New York Times, 6 July 2025

Did you know?

In the biblical book of Job, Behemoth is the name of a powerful grass-eating, river-dwelling beast with bones likened to bronze pipes and limbs likened to iron bars. Scholars have speculated that the biblical creature was inspired by the hippopotamus, but details about the creature’s exact nature are vague. The word first passed from the Hebrew word bĕhēmōth into Late Latin (the Latin used by writers in the third to sixth centuries), where, according to 15th century English poet and monk John Lydgate it referred to "a beast rude full of cursednesse." In modern English, behemoth functions as an evocative term for something of monstrous size, power, or appearance.

Englisch

via Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day https://www.merriam-webster.com/word-of-the-day

August 9, 2025 at 06:06AM

·merriam-webster.com·
behemoth
Trump calls for major changes to census amid GOP redistricting effort
Trump calls for major changes to census amid GOP redistricting effort

Trump calls for major changes to census amid GOP redistricting effort

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/08/07/trump-calls-major-changes-census-amid-gop-redistricting-effort/

President Donald Trump said Thursday that he plans to conduct a new census that would not count people present in the country illegally, an order that clashes with the Constitution and would almost certainly face a series of legal challenges.

Subscribe for unlimited access to The Post

You can cancel anytime.

Subscribe

Trump wrote on his social media site, Truth Social, that he had “instructed our Department of Commerce to immediately begin work on a new and highly accurate CENSUS based on modern day facts and figures.”

The census takes place every 10 years by law, and was last held in 2020. It is meant to provide a full accounting of everyone present in the United States, including people living in the U.S. without authorization. It is unclear if Trump is ordering a new Census to be conducted immediately, or if he is saying he wants to redesign the process ahead of the planned 2030 census. Neither the White House nor a spokesperson for the Census Bureau responded to a request for comment.

The new Census, Trump wrote, would use the “results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024,” and would not count “people who are in our Country illegally.”

Follow Trump’s second term

The order is part of Trump’s broader fight over redistricting. Typically, redistricting — the process that allocates congressional representation — follows a census. The census, which is mandated by Article 1, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, is used to determine how many seats in the House of Representatives each state receives, as well as the disbursement of billions of dollars in federal funding.

Trump has recently spearheaded an attempt by Texas Republicans to force a mid-decade redistricting effort that would consolidate Republican power in the state and likely add seats to the House that are guaranteed to be held by Republicans.

While Trump says Republicans are “entitled” to five additional seats in Texas based on the strength of his showing there in the 2024 election, the redistricting attempt has set off a nationwide fight, with Democrats responding by threatening to redistrict in deep blue states, like California.

A census that excludes undocumented immigrants could shrink the congressional representation of some blue states, many of which have sizable undocumented populations. But it could reduce the caucuses of red states as well.

A Pew Research Center study in 2020 found that removing undocumented immigrants from the Census count would result in California, Florida and Texas — the three states with the largest undocumented populations — ending up with one less House seat than they would have had. Alabama, Minnesota and Ohio would each hold onto one seat they would have otherwise lost, according to the study.

By redoing the census, Trump seemingly believes he will be able to strengthen Republican power further, however. This is not the first time Trump has tried to change the count. During his first term in office, the Trump administration made repeated attempts to influence the 2020 Census, records obtained in a lawsuit by the nonpartisan legal organization The Brennan Center revealed, including an effort to remove undocumented people in the United States from the count.

The United States Supreme Court in 2019 struck down the Trump administration’s plan to include a citizenship question on the 2020 Census form sent to every U.S. household, arguing that the federal government had provided a “contrived” reason for wanting the information. Trump lashed out at the court for the decision, writing that it was “totally ridiculous” that the government “cannot ask a basic question of Citizenship in a very expensive, detailed and important Census.”

“I have asked the lawyers if they can delay the Census,” he added. It ultimately went ahead.

The 2020 Census, which the Government Accountability Office found cost over $13 billion, was impacted by the coronavirus pandemic, and the Census Bureau announced in 2022 that the survey undercounted Hispanics, Blacks and other minority groups and overcounted Whites and Asians.

Any attempt by the Trump administration to conduct a new Census would be met with swift legal challenges, especially because the Constitution explicitly states the Census is to be made “every subsequent term of ten years” and the 14th Amendment to the Constitution requires states count “the whole number of persons in each State.”

Adriel I. Cepeda Derieux, the deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s voting rights project, said the organization is prepared for a legal fight if Trump tries to go forward with dropping the undocumented population from the Census count. The ACLU successfully sued to block the first Trump administration’s 2019 attempt to add a citizenship question to the Census.

“Our reaction is, ‘We’ve been here before with President Trump trying to weaponize the Census against immigrant communities and particularly against undocumented immigrants,’” said Adriel I. Cepeda Derieux, the deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s voting rights project. “The goal, of course, is erasing millions of immigrants from the country with the idea they would take political power away from diverse communities where they live. Any attempt to threaten these communities in the way the first administration did … we would be ready to meet them in court.”

None of this means Trump won’t attempt to conduct a new Census or that a protracted fight over a new Census couldn’t happen, but because Congress codified the Census in the 1950s, it is likely the legislative body would need to be involved, too.

Trump has yet to nominate a candidate to lead the Census Bureau after Robert Santos, who had been nominated by former president Joe Biden and confirmed by the Senate in 2021, resigned from the position earlier this year. Ron S. Jarmin is currently the acting director of the Census Bureau.

Whether Trump can initiate an updated Census or not, he will be able to influence the 2030 Census even though his term ends in 2029. Because the process takes years to plan, the Census Bureau is required by federal law to submit the questions it plans to ask Americans no later than two years in advance, well before Trump leaves office.

via Washington Post - Politics https://www.washingtonpost.com

August 7, 2025 at 06:59PM

·washingtonpost.com·
Trump calls for major changes to census amid GOP redistricting effort
Trump Administration to Require Universities to Submit Data on Applicants Race
Trump Administration to Require Universities to Submit Data on Applicants Race

Trump Administration to Require Universities to Submit Data on Applicants’ Race

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/07/us/politics/trump-schools-race-data.html

Trump Administration to Require Universities to Submit Data on Applicants’ Race

nytimes.com

via News - Trending on BuzzSumo https://app.buzzsumo.com/rss/trending/MGtqaGFrc2RoYWto/bmV3c2tqaGFrc2RoYWto

August 8, 2025 at 08:54AM

·nytimes.com·
Trump Administration to Require Universities to Submit Data on Applicants Race
Classic Stories: Oliver Twist
Classic Stories: Oliver Twist

Classic Stories: Oliver Twist

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0lpjrp7

Enjoy a classic story in English and learn 7 uses of ‘light’ - in 5 minutes.

FIND BBC LEARNING ENGLISH HERE:

Visit our website ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish Follow us ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/followus

LIKE PODCASTS? Try some of our other popular podcasts including: ✔️ 6 Minute English ✔️ Learning English from the News ✔️ Learning English Conversations

They're all available by searching in your podcast app.

Englisch

via Learning English Stories http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02pc9s1

July 11, 2025 at 12:00PM

·bbc.co.uk·
Classic Stories: Oliver Twist
Time expressions
Time expressions

Time expressions

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0lq0rhz

Neil and Catherine look at time expressions with 'in', 'at' and 'on'.

FIND BBC LEARNING ENGLISH HERE: Visit our website ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish Follow us ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/followus

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER: ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/newsletters

LIKE PODCASTS? Try some of our other popular podcasts including: ✔️ Learning English for Work ✔️ Learning English from the News ✔️ Learning English Stories

They're all available by searching in your podcast app.

Englisch

via Learning English Vocabulary http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02pc9xz

July 14, 2025 at 10:30AM

·bbc.co.uk·
Time expressions
What is degrowth?
What is degrowth?

What is degrowth?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0lryq8x

Should we shrink the economy to save the planet? Today, Phil is joined by Hannah from BBC podcast What in the world who explains the idea of degrowth.

Find a full transcript, worksheet and interactive quiz for this episode at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/english/features/6-minute-english_2025/ep-250724

Watch episodes of What in the World on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxxrFOqY6Iw&list=PLz_B0PFGIn4eMOlGZclzdcHmv7s8BFQE6 Or listen here https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w13xtvrv

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER: ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/newsletters

TRY LEARNING ENGLISH FROM THE NEWS:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/english/features/learning-english-from-the-news_2025

FIND BBC LEARNING ENGLISH HERE:

Visit our website ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish

Follow us ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/followus

LIKE PODCASTS?

Try some of our other popular podcasts including: ✔️ Learning English Stories ✔️ Learning English from the News ✔️ Learning English for Work

They're all available by searching in your podcast app.

Englisch

via 6 Minute English http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02pc9tn

July 24, 2025 at 10:21AM

·bbc.co.uk·
What is degrowth?
The past perfect
The past perfect

The past perfect

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0lswx3j

Where had John already gone when Mary rang his doorbell? We give you the answer.

Have you tried our podcast 'Real Easy English'? Find it with a free worksheet and transcript here: ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/english/features/real-easy-english

Subscribe to our newsletter ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/newsletters

FIND BBC LEARNING ENGLISH HERE: Visit our website ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish Follow us ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/followus

For more of our podcasts, search for these in your podcast app: ✔️ Learning English for Work ✔️ Learning Easy English ✔️ Learning English from the News ✔️ Learning English Stories ✔️ 6 Minute English ✔️ Learning English Conversations ✔️ Learning English Vocabulary

Englisch

via Learning English Grammar http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02pc9wq

July 29, 2025 at 11:16AM

·bbc.co.uk·
The past perfect
BBC Learning English - 6 Minute English / What is the manosphere?
BBC Learning English - 6 Minute English / What is the manosphere?

BBC Learning English - 6 Minute English / What is the manosphere?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/english/features/6-minute-english_2025/ep-250731



Try more episodes of 6 Minute English:


Introduction

Have you heard of 'the manosphere'? Recent years have seen an increase in social media content that promotes controversial ideas about masculinity, and vulnerable young men are falling under its influence. Phil and Georgie discuss this and teach you some new vocabulary.

This week's question

According to men's self-help group the Movember Foundation, what proportion of British young men regularly engage with masculinity influencers online?

a)    two thirds b)    three quarters c)    eight tenths

Listen to the programme to hear the answer.

Vocabulary

easy target someone who is vulnerable or easily taken advantage of

bravado show of bravery or confidence to impress other people

quote unquote used to show you are repeating someone else's words, especially if you do not agree

distorted changed and misshapen so that it looks strange or unnatural

us versus them phrase used to show hostility between two opposing groups

paint everyone with the same brush (idiom) unfairly think that everyone has the same bad qualities as another person

TRANSCRIPT

Note: This is not a word-for-word transcript.

Phil Hello, this is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English. I'm Phil.

Georgie And I'm Georgie.

Phil We hear a lot about the difficulties young men face growing up in the modern world, and how many of them are looking online for answers. This has created a situation which has been given the name 'the manosphere'. What exactly is the manosphere? Here's Anita Rani, presenter of BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour, with one definition:

Anita Rani The manosphere consists of online communities and influencers that promote the idea that emotional control, material wealth, physical appearance and dominance, especially over women, are markers of male worth.

Phil The manosphere describes attitudes expressed online that men are superior. You won't find any website named www.manosphere.com, but in social media posts, TikTok videos and other online content, ideas about how to be a man are finding a young male audience, sometimes with damaging results.

Georgie In this episode we'll hear from Will Adolphy, a young British man who followed the manosphere until, in his mid-twenties, he suffered a breakdown. And as usual, we'll learn some useful new words and phrases. And remember – you'll find all the vocabulary from this episode on our website, bbclearningenglish.com.

Phil But first, I have a question for you, Georgie. According to men's self-help group the Movember Foundation, a majority of British young men regularly engage with masculinity influencers online, but how many exactly? Is it:

a)    two thirds, b)    three quarters, or c)    eight tenths?

Georgie I'm going to guess a) two thirds.

Phil OK. Well, we'll find out the answer later in the programme. The manosphere includes the idea that the world is biased against men. According to the social media influencers who promote these views, being a man means being strong, rich and controlling others, especially women.

Georgie As a young boy, Will Adolpy was unlike other boys at school, and as he grew into a teenager, he started engaging with some of these ideas. Here, he tells BBC Radio 4 programme Woman's Hour how it all started:

Will Adolphy I didn't quite fit in the box – you know, I was doing ballet, I wanted to be an actor, I wrote poetry – and I was an easy target. By the time I got to 14 years old, if you look at pictures of me, you can see bravado, you can see a mask – I see it. I unknowingly did my best to adhere to what we call the 'man box', which is a kind of rigid set of ideals and rules that I may feel pressure as a boy to follow, in order to be a quote unquote 'real man'.

Georgie The teenage years can be difficult for someone who's different. Will enjoyed poetry and ballet, and he says this made him an easy target – someone who's vulnerable and easily taken advantage of.

Phil Will responded with bravado – a show of bravery to impress other people but which often hides someone's true feelings.  He felt pressure to present himself as a quote unquote 'real man'. The phrase quote unquote can be used to show you're repeating someone else's words, especially if you don't agree with them.

Georgie But behind the bravado, Will struggled to get a girlfriend or hold down a job. Offline, his life seemed to reflect messages he saw in the videos he was watching online: that his problems were caused by women. Here's Will again, sharing more with BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour:

Will Adolphy When I went online to search for answers, I had an influencer telling me, "The world hates men," which really felt true. And it, kind of, distorted my worldview, where it got painted over – this whole brush… where I started to feel that was really true: that everyone hates men, so it was an us versus them.

Phil Will's view of the world became distorted – twisted out of shape and unrealistic. He started seeing everyone as an enemy. Will says he painted everyone with the same brush – an idiom meaning to unfairly think everyone has the same bad qualities as a certain person.

Georgie Will saw the world as us versus them – a phrase which is used to show hostility between two opposing groups: in this case, the men in the manosphere and everyone else, especially women, progressives and the mainstream media, who he believed wanted to limit their power.

Phil Luckily for Will, his experiences in the online world of the manosphere ended, but not before his mental health had declined to the point of a breakdown. Now, he visits schools around the UK telling his story to young people, reminding them always to question what they see and hear online.

Georgie OK. Phil, I think it's time to reveal the answer to your question.

Phil Yes, I asked you how many British young men regularly engage with masculinity influencers online?

Georgie And I said a) two thirds.

Phil …which was the correct answer. Well done!

Georgie Thank you. OK. Let's recap the vocabulary we've learned, starting with an easy target – a vulnerable person who is easily taken advantage of.

Phil Bravado is a show of bravery or confidence to impress people.

Georgie The phrase quote unquote can be used to show you are repeating someone else's words, especially if you do not agree.

Phil Something which is distorted has become misshapen so that it looks strange or unnatural.

Georgie The phrase us versus them is used to show hostility between two opposing groups.

Phil And finally, if you paint everyone with the same brush, you unfairly think everyone has the same bad qualities of one person. Once again, our six minutes are up, but if you enjoyed this episode, why not check out the worksheet and quiz, both available now at bbclearningenglish.com! Goodbye for now!

Georgie Goodbye.

 

Next

If you liked this topic, try this episode about making male friends.

Have you tried Learning English from the News?

Englisch

via BBC Learning English - Feature: 6 Minute English https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/english/features/6-minute-english

July 31, 2025 at 09:55AM

·bbc.co.uk·
BBC Learning English - 6 Minute English / What is the manosphere?
palimpsest
palimpsest

palimpsest

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/palimpsest

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for August 2, 2025 is:

palimpsest • \PAL-imp-sest\  • noun

Palimpsest in its original use refers to writing material (such as a parchment manuscript) used one or more times after earlier writing has been erased; the underlying text is said to be “in palimpsest.” Palimpsest in extended use refers to something that has usually diverse layers or aspects apparent beneath the surface.

// Scholars believe the motive for making palimpsests was often economic—reusing parchment was cheaper than preparing a new skin.

// The ancient city is an architectural palimpsest.

See the entry >

Examples:

“My aim was to trace the course of … the Aqua Marcia, built between 144 and 140 B.C. by Julius Caesar’s ancestor Quintus Marcius Rex. … The original tuff arches carried the Marcia across a steep ravine. Subsequent retaining walls and buttresses have transformed the bridge into a palimpsest of building styles.” — David Laskin, The New York Times, 24 Apr. 2024

Did you know?

Long ago, writing surfaces were so highly valued that they were often used more than once. Palimpsest in its original use referred to an early form of recycling in which an old document was erased to make room for a new one when parchment ran short. (The word is from the Greek palimpsēstos, meaning “scraped again.”) Fortunately for modern scholars, the erasing process wasn’t completely effective, so the original could often be distinguished under the newer writing. De republica, by Roman statesman and orator Cicero, is one of many documents recovered from a palimpsest. Nowadays, the word palimpsest can refer not only to such a document but to anything that has multiple layers apparent beneath the surface.

Englisch

via Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day https://www.merriam-webster.com/word-of-the-day

August 2, 2025 at 06:05AM

·merriam-webster.com·
palimpsest
shitanium
shitanium

shitanium

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shitanium

[Engineering] term defining any kind of crapppy material / alloy that is not up to the job it's supposed to do. This includes also the material used plastic parts often used in [automotive] for knobs and handles that will snap or shatter during normal use. The french [translation] is Merdanium

Englisch

via Urban Word of the Day http://www.urbandictionary.com/

August 2, 2025 at 12:34PM

·urbandictionary.com·
shitanium
BOX SET: English vocabulary mega-class! Learn 8 action verbs!
BOX SET: English vocabulary mega-class! Learn 8 action verbs!

BOX SET: English vocabulary mega-class! 🤩 Learn 8 action verbs!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97U5wwPXzs8

Improve your English vocabulary and speaking with this 'action verbs' compilation box set from our series 'The English We Speak'! 🗣️ Do lots of listening practice and learn LOTS of new vocabulary! 🎧 👂

There are 8 programmes in this collection from BBC Learning English and each one explains the meaning and use of a real everyday British English expression with plenty of examples of how to use the words in real-life contexts!

Chapters: 00:00 - Hits different 02:16 - Call dibs 04:32 - Fly by night 06:44 - Touch grass 09:14 - Rinse and repeat 11:16 - Clutch at straws 14:17 - Throw one's toys out the pram 17:09 - Slow walk

More popular videos to help you improve your English: 'politics' vocabulary English mega-class 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCge2_xfujQ 10 useful English lessons in 10 minutes 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPl8MakNoR4 Formality at work 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54fo91QlpeA

🤩🤩🤩 SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more English videos and podcast English to help you improve your English 👉 http://tinyurl.com/ps3hplv

✔️ Visit our website 👉 https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish ✔️ Follow us on Instagram 👉 https://www.instagram.com/bbclearningenglish ✔️ Find us on Facebook 👉 https://www.facebook.com/bbclearningenglish.multimedia ✔️ Join us on TikTok 👉 https://www.tiktok.com/@bbclearningenglish

We like receiving and reading your comments - please use English when you comment 😊

learnenglish #bbclearningenglish #englishclass #speakenglish #englishidioms

Englisch

via BBC Learning English https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHaHD477h-FeBbVh9Sh7syA

August 3, 2025 at 12:14PM

·youtube.com·
BOX SET: English vocabulary mega-class! Learn 8 action verbs!
Hiroshima: 80 years since atomic bomb: BBC Learning English from the News
Hiroshima: 80 years since atomic bomb: BBC Learning English from the News

Hiroshima: 80 years since atomic bomb: BBC Learning English from the News

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJjlnD6UwHg

It's 80 years since the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. 🔎For a free worksheet, and all the vocabulary and definitions: https://bbc.in/3UgdLwg For more Learning English from the News: bit.ly/4e4IMMq

(Photo by Buddhika Weerasinghe/Getty Images)

00:00 Introduction 00:37 The story 01:22 Headline 1 03:33 Headline 2 05:58 Headline 3

Your turn: can you use some of the vocabulary and phrases from this programme in a comment? Note: our YouTube channel is a space for everyone to practise their English and learn from each other. Please use English in the comments section 👇👇👇

More popular programmes: Earthquake hits Japan on New Year's Day 👉 https://youtu.be/folK5d4XhqY How green is nuclear energy? 👉 https://youtu.be/naB_3XYRtew 5 linkers for natural conversation 👉 https://youtube.com/shorts/B-URHF4gGbs

🤩🤩🤩 SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more English videos and podcast English to help you improve your English 👉 http://tinyurl.com/ps3hplv

✔️ Visit our website 👉 https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish ✔️ Follow us on Instagram 👉 https://www.instagram.com/bbclearningenglish ✔️ Find us on Facebook 👉 https://www.facebook.com/bbclearningenglish.multimedia ✔️ Join us on TikTok 👉 https://www.tiktok.com/@bbclearningenglish

learnenglish #bbclearningenglish #hiroshima

Englisch

via BBC Learning English https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHaHD477h-FeBbVh9Sh7syA

August 6, 2025 at 02:47PM

·youtube.com·
Hiroshima: 80 years since atomic bomb: BBC Learning English from the News
English in a Minute: Phrases with face
English in a Minute: Phrases with face

English in a Minute: Phrases with face

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0ltb9jd

What phrases use the word 'face'? Beth has the answer in this podcast.

TRANSCRIPT Find a free transcript for this episode and more programmes to help you with your English at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/english/features/s5english_in_a_minute

FIND BBC LEARNING ENGLISH HERE: Visit our website ✔️https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish Follow us ✔️https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/followus

LIKE PODCASTS? Try some of our other popular podcasts including: ✔️ Learning Easy English ✔️ 6 Minute English ✔️ Learning English Conversations

They're all available by searching in your podcast app.

Englisch

via Learning English Vocabulary http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02pc9xz

August 6, 2025 at 03:06PM

·bbc.co.uk·
English in a Minute: Phrases with face
Things Arent Going Donald Trumps Way
Things Arent Going Donald Trumps Way

Things Aren’t Going Donald Trump’s Way

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/08/trump-ukraine-gaza-economy/683786/

Donald Trump has almost certainly complained more about journalists than any of his predecessors have, maybe more than all of them combined. So when Trump deemed a query “the nastiest question” he’s ever gotten from a member of the press, it was notable.

The moment came in May, when CNBC’s Megan Cassella asked Trump about “TACO,” an acronym for “Trump always chickens out.” The phrase had gained popularity in the financial sector as a derisive shorthand for the president’s penchant for backing down from his tariff threats. During an otherwise routine Oval Office event, Trump sputtered angrily at Cassella, claiming that his shifting tariff timelines were “part of negotiations” and admonishing, “Don’t ever say what you said.”

Trump’s appetite for confrontation is being tested again this week, with the arrival of two of the most important self-imposed deadlines of his second term, related to the tariffs and the conflict in Ukraine. Both present fraught decisions for Trump, and they come at a time when he faces a confluence of crises. A president who, less than a year ago, staged a historic political comeback and moved to quickly conquer Washington and the world now confronts more obstacles than at any point since his inauguration. Some of his central campaign promises—that he would end the wars in Ukraine and Gaza and boost the economy—are in peril. And for the first time in his 200 days back in office, the White House has begun to worry about members of the president’s own party defying him.

Tomorrow, the clock runs out on the two-week window that Trump gave Russia to reach a cease-fire with Ukraine. The president has been upset by his inability to end the war. Without an agreement, he has said, he will impose sanctions on Russia. But doing so would represent the first time in his decade in politics that he has truly punished President Vladimir Putin. Trump likewise has grown exasperated with Israel’s prosecution of the war in the Gaza Strip, a conflict that could soon escalate; Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyhu said today that his military plans to fully occupy the famine-plagued Strip.

[Tom Nichols: Putin’s still in charge]

The other deadline is Trump’s latest vow on tariffs, which go into effect today for 60 nations, with rates ranging from 10 to 41 percent. This time, Trump appeared to relish declaring that there would not be another TACO moment, writing on social media last night, “IT’S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW FLOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!” Since the panic triggered by Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcement in April, Wall Street has learned to shrug off Trump’s scattershot statements. But the economy has shown new signs of weakness, with stubbornly high prices potentially set to rise again because of the tariffs and, most potently, a recent jobs report poor enough that Trump lashed out against the bureaucrat who compiled it; last week, he fired the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner, claiming, without evidence, that the jobs numbers were bogus. That unprecedented act of petulance risks undermining Wall Street’s confidence in the economy and undercutting Trump’s campaign pledge to give the United States another economic “golden age.”

Those geopolitical and economic headwinds have been joined by forceful political ones. Since going out on August recess, Republican lawmakers have been heckled at town halls while trying to defend the president’s signature legislative accomplishment, the One Big Beautiful Bill. And some of those same Republicans, in a rare act of rebellion, have questioned Trump’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter, a scandal that the president, try as he may, simply has been unable to shake.

The mood in the White House has darkened in the past month, as the president’s challenges have grown deeper. The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war has become intensely frustrating for Trump, two White House officials and a close outside adviser told me. The president had truly believed that his relationship with Putin would bring about a quick end to the conflict. But instead, Putin has taken advantage of Trump’s deference to him and has openly defied the president—“embarrassed him,” one of the officials told me—by ignoring his calls for a cease-fire and ratcheting up his strikes on Ukrainian cities. Trump has sharply criticized his Russian counterpart in recent weeks as he’s mulled what to do.

Yesterday, Trump said that his personal envoy, Steve Witkoff, had a productive meeting with Putin in Moscow, leading the U.S. president to return to his original plan to end the war: a summit. A third White House official told me that Trump has informed European leaders that he wants to meet with Putin as soon as next week in a new effort to get a cease-fire. A Kremlin spokesperson accepted the White House offer but said its details needed to be finalized. Trump also told European leaders that he would potentially have a subsequent meeting with both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, but the Kremlin did not immediately agree to that.

One of the officials told me that Trump is still considering how and whether to directly punish Putin if Moscow doesn’t hit tomorrow’s deadline. The U.S. does little trade with Russia, so direct levies would be useless, and the West Wing is divided as to the merits of slapping secondary sanctions on nations that do business with Moscow. Trump signed off on sanctioning India this week because, the official told me, he was already annoyed at the lack of progress on a trade deal with Delhi. But he is far more leery of sanctioning China—another major economic partner of Russia’s—for fear of upending ongoing trade negotiations with Beijing.

Witkoff’s visit to Moscow came just days after he had been in Gaza to urge Netanyahu to ease a blockade and allow more aid and food to reach Palestinians. Although Israel agreed this week to allow some more food in, the humanitarian crisis has not abated. Trump, who badly wants the conflict to end, believes that Netanyahu is prolonging the war and has told advisers that he is wary of Israel’s new push to capture Gaza. Even so, officials told me, Trump is unlikely to break with Netanyahu in any meaningful way.

Any president, of course, can be vexed by events outside his nation’s borders. Trump’s superpower at home has long been to command intense loyalty from fellow Republicans. Yet that power might be hitting its limit. He was able to pressure the GOP to pass his One Big Beautiful Bill last month, but some Republicans, seeing its shaky poll numbers, have already tried to distance themselves from it; Senator Josh Hawley, for instance, has said he wants to roll back some of the Medicaid cuts that the bill, which he voted for, included. And lawmakers who are trying to defend the bill are facing voter anger. Representative Mike Flood was loudly heckled by a hostile crowd at a town hall in his Nebraska district on Monday. One of the White House officials told me that the West Wing has told House leadership to advise Republican members against holding too many in-person town halls.

Then there is Epstein. Trump has desperately wished the story away. He feels deeply betrayed by his MAGA supporters who believed him when he intimated during the campaign that something was nefarious about the government’s handling of the case, and who now have a hard time believing him when he says their suspicions are actually bogus. The president has snapped at reporters asking about Epstein, told House Speaker Mike Johnson to send Congress home early to avoid a vote on whether to release the Epstein files, and sued his on-again, off-again friend Rupert Murdoch for $10 billion after The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had sent Epstein a lewd birthday card in 2003. Murdoch hasn’t backed down. Neither have a number of MAGA luminaries and Republican lawmakers who keep demanding to see the files.

[Read: Inside the White House’s Epstein strategy]

Trump’s own efforts to manage the story have only fed it. His account of why he and Epstein had a falling-out two decades ago has shifted multiple times. One of the White House officials and the outside ally told me that advisers have told Trump repeatedly to stop saying he has the right to pardon Epstein’s former partner Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking and related offenses, to avoid drawing more attention to his previous friendship with Epstein. Despite hopes that the story would dissipate over the August recess, the White House is preparing for Trump to take more heat from Republicans in the weeks ahead.

Some Trump allies still believe that the president, even as a lame duck, will keep Republicans in line. “Having survived Russiagate, Hillary Clinton, two impeachments, four trials designed to put him in jail, and two assassination attempts,” former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told me, “it’s unlikely the current situation will be much of a problem.”

The White House also pushed back against the idea that Trump is in a perilous moment. “Only the media industrial complex and panicans would mischaracterize this as a challenging time. They simply haven’t learned anything after covering President Trump for the last 10 years,” the spokesperson Steven Cheung told me in a statement. “The successes of the first 200 days have been unprecedented and exactly what Americans voted for, which is why this country has never been hotter.”

But others in the party sense signs of trouble. “He’s spending the political capital he’s accumulated for a decade,” Alex Conant, a GOP strategist who worked in President George W. Bush’s White House and on then-Senator Marco Rubio’s presidential campaign, told me. “Below the surface of the Republican Party, there’s an intense battle brewing over what a post-Trump GOP

·theatlantic.com·
Things Arent Going Donald Trumps Way
Heres where the money from Trumps tariffs will go
Heres where the money from Trumps tariffs will go

Here’s where the money from Trump’s tariffs will go

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/08/07/trump-tariffs-revenue/

President Donald Trump’s tariffs finally took effect Thursday, setting the stage for upheaval in global trade and new costs for American businesses and consumers.

They may also bring in a significant amount of new revenue, according to administration officials.

Subscribe for unlimited access to The Post

You can cancel anytime.

Subscribe

Republicans in Washington have been hopeful that the administration’s tariff policies would bring in money that can help offset a new tax law that is expected to add more than $3.4 trillion to the debt over the next 10 years.

via Business https://www.washingtonpost.com

August 7, 2025 at 09:10PM

·washingtonpost.com·
Heres where the money from Trumps tariffs will go
Trump-Kreuzzug gegen Klimaforschung: NASA soll Satelliten zerstören
Trump-Kreuzzug gegen Klimaforschung: NASA soll Satelliten zerstören

Trump-Kreuzzug gegen Klimaforschung: NASA soll Satelliten zerstören

https://winfuture.de/news,152759.html

Sollen erfolgreiche Klimasatelliten im Wert von 750 Millionen Dollar zerstört werden, nur weil sie vermeintlich ideologisch nicht passen? Die Trump-Regierung fordert genau das von der NASA. Die Folgen wären weitreichender als gedacht.

Trump-Regierung möchte keine Klimamessung

Die Trump-Regierung hat NASA-Mitarbeiter angewiesen, Pläne für die Beendigung von mindestens zwei wichtigen Satellitenmissionen zu erstellen. Sollten diese Anweisungen tatsächlich umgesetzt werden, würde eine der Missionen dauerhaft beendet, da der Satellit in der Atmosphäre verglühen würde.

Die beiden Missionen sammeln Daten, die von Wissenschaftlern, (paradoxerweise auch) Öl- und Gasunternehmen sowie Landwirten für detaillierte Informationen über Kohlendioxid und Pflanzengesundheit genutzt werden. Sie sind die einzigen beiden Bundes-Satellitenmissionen, die speziell zur Überwachung klimaschädlicher Treibhausgase entwickelt und gebaut wurden.

Vorstellung des Klimasatelliten Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2

Laut NPR berichteten mehrere aktuelle und ehemalige NASA-Mitarbeiter von den Plänen für dieses scheinbar völlig unnötige Aus. Konkret betrifft die Entscheidung die Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO)-Missionen, die wohlgemerkt bereits eine turbulente Vergangenheit haben.

Milliarden-Investition steht auf dem Spiel

Der ursprüngliche OCO-Satellit ging 2009 bei einem spektakulären Startfehler verloren, als sich die Nutzlastverkleidung der Taurus-Rakete nicht öffnete und der Satellit im Indischen Ozean nahe der Antarktis abstürzte. Der Verlust war ein schwerer Rückschlag für die Klimaforschung, da die Mission bereits Jahre in der Entwicklung war.

OCO-2 startete am 2. Juli 2014 als Ersatz für die verlorene Mission und wurde zu einem der erfolgreichsten Erdbeobachtungssatelliten der NASA. OCO-3 folgte im Mai 2019 und wurde an der Internationalen Raumstation ISS installiert, wo er von der einzigartigen Umlaufbahn der Station profitiert.

Orbiting Carbon Observatory 3: Die NASA stellt OCO-3 näher vor

Die beiden Missionen kosteten etwa 750 Millionen Dollar für Design, Bau und Start, während die jährlichen Betriebskosten nur etwa 15 Millionen Dollar betragen. David Crisp, ein pensionierter NASA-Wissenschaftler, betont: "Aus wirtschaftlicher Sicht ergibt es überhaupt keinen Sinn, NASA-Missionen zu beenden, die unglaublich wertvolle Daten liefern."

Unerwarteter Nutzen für die Landwirtschaft

Die Missionen heißen Orbiting Carbon Observatories, weil sie ursprünglich zur Messung von Kohlendioxid in der Atmosphäre entwickelt wurden. Kurz nach dem Start erkannten Wissenschaftler jedoch, dass sie auch das Pflanzenwachstum auf der Erde messen können.

Während der Fotosynthese geben Pflanzen eine spezifische Lichtwellenlänge ab, die die OCO-Instrumente im Weltraum über den gesamten Planeten messen können. Diese als Solar-Induced Fluorescence (SIF) bekannte Eigenschaft war ein unerwarteter wissenschaftlicher Durchbruch.

Diese Fähigkeit ist nützlich für Landwirte, Weideland- und Dürreüberwachung sowie Waldkartierung. Das US-Landwirtschaftsministerium und viele private Agrarberatungsunternehmen nutzen die Daten zur Vorhersage und Verfolgung von Ernteerträgen, Dürrebedingungen und mehr. Scott Denning, ein Klimawissenschaftler der Colorado State University, erklärt: "NASA und andere haben diesen glücklichen Zufall in unglaublich wertvolle Karten der Pflanzenfotosynthese auf der ganzen Welt verwandelt."

Rechtliche Bedenken und Widerstand

Die OCO-Missionen haben bereits die Finanzierungszusage vom Kongress bis zum Ende des Haushaltsjahres 2025 erhalten, das am 30. September endet. Entwürfe für das nächste Jahr sehen eine weitgehend gleichbleibende NASA-Finanzierung vor. Demokratische Kongressabgeordnete warnen vor den geplanten Kürzungen.

Der Kongress hat die Haushaltsmacht, nicht Trump oder Vought. Die Eliminierung von Mitteln für erdbeobachtende Satelliten wäre katastrophal. Die Trump-Regierung zwingt die vorgeschlagenen Kürzungen ihres Haushaltsantrags für 2026 bereits bewilligten Mitteln für 2025 auf. Das ist illegal.

Zoe Lofgren, ranghöchste Demokratin im Wissenschaftsausschuss des Repräsentantenhauses

NASA sucht inzwischen nach privaten Gruppen, die möglicherweise die Kosten für die Wartung des an der ISS befestigten Instruments übernehmen könnten. Während OCO-3 bei einer Missionsbeendigung möglicherweise gerettet werden könnte, wäre das Ende von OCO-2 endgültig - der Satellit würde beim Wiedereintritt in die Erdatmosphäre verglühen.

Was meint ihr zu dieser Entscheidung der Trump-Regierung? Teilt eure Gedanken zu den möglichen Auswirkungen auf Klimaforschung und Landwirtschaft in den Kommentaren! Siehe auch:

Technologie

via WinFuture News https://winfuture.de/

August 6, 2025 at 03:08PM

·winfuture.de·
Trump-Kreuzzug gegen Klimaforschung: NASA soll Satelliten zerstören
Key sections of the US Constitution deleted from governments website
Key sections of the US Constitution deleted from governments website

Key sections of the US Constitution deleted from government’s website

https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/06/key-sections-of-the-us-constitution-deleted-from-governments-website/

Several sections of Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution appear to have been removed from the official U.S. government website, as pointed out by sleuths on the internet and as seen by TechCrunch.

The changes were made in the past month, according to the Wayback Machine, which shows the full original text on Congress’ website as of July 17.

Several Reddit threads identified the changes in Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution: large parts of Section 8 have been removed, and Sections 9 and 10 have been deleted altogether. In the screenshot below, you can see the archived version of the site on the Wayback Machine on the left, and the current site on the right — the text highlighted in yellow has been removed.

These sections largely relate to the powers that Congress has and does not have, as well as limitations on the powers of individual states. The removal includes sections relating to habeas corpus, the powers that protect citizens from unlawful detention.

Some of the sections’ text appears missing, as indicated by a trailing semicolon at the end of Section 8, where text used to follow.

It’s not clear why the sections of the Constitution were removed from the website. Changing the U.S. Constitution’s text on the website does not change or have any effect on U.S. law, but it nevertheless follows senior Trump administration official Stephen Miller’s threats earlier this year to suspend habeas corpus.

A White House spokesperson did not immediately return a request for comment.

Techcrunch event

Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda

Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They’re here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise on August 7.

Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda

Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They’re here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don’t miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise.

San Francisco | October 27-29, 2025

Large sections of the U.S. Constitution were removed from the U.S. government’s official page.Image Credits:TechCrunch (screenshot)

Technologie

via TechCrunch https://techcrunch.com/

August 6, 2025 at 05:35PM

·techcrunch.com·
Key sections of the US Constitution deleted from governments website
The killing code: strange symbols in a WA settlers diaries lay bare frontier atrocities
The killing code: strange symbols in a WA settlers diaries lay bare frontier atrocities

The killing code: strange symbols in a WA settler’s diaries lay bare frontier atrocities

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/ng-interactive/2025/aug/04/the-killing-code-strange-symbols-in-a-wa-settlers-diaries-lay-bare-frontier-atrocities-ntwnfb

Exclusive: Stories of murders passed down by Yamatji elders are confirmed by a cipher hidden in the 1850s journals of prominent Western Australian pastoralist Major Logue. Now descendants on both sides want to break the shame and silence

• Read more from Guardian Australia’s series The Descendants here

By Lorena Allam, Sarah Collard and Ella Achibald-Binge. Photographs: Tamati Smith. Interactive: Nick Evershed, Andy Ball and Victoria Hart

Warning: This article contains historical records that use racist and offensive language, and descriptions of events that will be distressing to some readers

It’s early morning in the Battye library in Perth, Western Australia, and we’re scrolling through microfilm pages of the diary of a prominent and powerful colonist called Major Logue.

Logue kept the diary for 50 years, until his death in 1900. He wrote in it almost every day. Entries are written in looping script, sometimes neat and measured, other times messy and cramped. Pages are peppered with sketches of horses and faces, designs for a house, mud maps, lists of crops and stock. It’s all fairly mundane. Most entries simply recount the work done on the farm by Logue and his men: fences mended, potatoes planted, cattle lost and found.

Major Logue

There is some sort of code hidden in the diary, Guardian Australia has been told. But we’re not sure what to look for. The microfilm machine we’re using to view it is an analogue artefact. It’s hooked up to a computer so we can adjust light and contrast and take screenshots. It’s already crashed several times.

To view each page we wind the film gently from one side of the light box to the other. The machine takes a while to pull each one into focus. Even so, some of the writing is impossible to read. The ink on the page has faded with age and the photographs are grainy. The diary was copied to film in the 1950s and has lain undisturbed on the public catalogue ever since.

But then, suddenly, there it is. A line of strange, angular symbols slips on to the screen. As the years spin by – 1851, 1852, 1853 – the code, a series of right-angled shapes, some with dots, appears more frequently.

It stands out. If Logue used it to hide something, he failed. It’s easier to make out than his handwriting.

There’s one person who knows for sure what it says, and we’re going to Geraldton, about 400km north of Perth, to meet her.

She has spent the past several years removing this code – and what she knows it says – from Logue’s diaries to prepare them for publication.

The strange symbols represent a horrific story buried in the banality of early colonial farm life. It is the story of murder and massacre, of a family divided, of shame and fear and the shattering of colonial silence.


Major Logue was an early settler of Western Australia.

Born in Ireland, the young Major – his given name, not a military title – arrived in the colony as a child and acquired pastoral property near Geraldton in 1850. Landed and respectable, he served in the state’s Legislative Council from 1870 to 1874 as the first MP for Geraldton.

That’s the official version.

Logue was also a killer of Aboriginal people. But he hid his exploits in this diary that has remained secret – until now.

He wrote about who he killed, where, when and how, using the code.

On 16 March 1852 Logue wrote that some cattle went missing, so he “ SHOT THREE OF THEM FOR IT. ”

Logue was not alone in this endeavour. On 24 March he wrote that the “natives at Mr Burgess’ had been stealing sheep AND THAT THE WHITE FELLOWS HAD SHOT SEVERAL OF THEM FOR IT.”

On 4 April he was among a group of armed men who set out to find “natives who had taken the cattle”.

Started after breakfast and accompanied by Carsons we pushed in search of the natives who had taken the cattle saw smoke about 2 miles from Walkaway reached within a mile of it… proceeded from a native encampment tied up our horses in a thicket as the [ground] was very rough and crawled on our hands and knees within 200 yards when the natives saw us and scattered

FIRED BOTH BARRELS OF MY GUN AND WOUNDED ONE FELLOW IN THE RUMP. THOMSON AND DICKY SHOT ONE DEAD

There are 11 coded diary entries between 1851 and 1853 that describe shooting and killing people; witnessing others in his employ doing the shooting; going on a “campaign” to kill natives; and later riding over the “battlefield” and seeing the bodies of those he had killed lying dead or “hastily buried”.

By his own account he was part of groups who shot and killed at least 19 Yamatji people around what is now called Ellendale, Walkaway and the Greenough River.

On 23 June, 1852, Logue wrote that he had been part of a party who killed three Yamatji people.

Wednesday started after breakfast and [Karney] and I [went round] on our side of the [tracks] Menzies and Norries took the other after a couple of hours tracking we met at an appointed place and were all equally puzzled by the number of tracks [travelling] in every direction. Tom [Karney] returned home and we went on toward the flats to see whether we could find where the cattle had finally gone at [noon/nine] being on a hill we saw a fire at a distance and supposing it to be an encampment of natives we kept ourselves out of sight of it and rode round to try and get close and [obtain] some information from the natives concerning the cattle. Saw some natives

AND RODE AT THEM RECTOR SHIED AND PUT HIS FOOT IN A HOLE AND FELL CRUSHING MY LEFT HAND AND KNEE AND KNOCKING THE CAP OFF MY PISTOL CAUGHT RECTOR AND GAVE CHASE TO A NIGGER APPLIED PILL MENZES AND NARRIER DID FOR 2 MORE

Lost my helmet trying to stop some of the natives to enquire about the cattle. Returned toward Glengary Called at the sheep station and heard that the natives had stolen some [fillies] got to Glengary at dusk Kenneth was at home Gregory had been there and was expected next morning on his way to Perth heard that Thomson had been [kicking] up a [indecipherable] about my having taken a horse and same had heard that the [indecipherable] had been found on the [Arwin]

Two days later he described a “battlefield”.

Friday After breakfast we [started] 7 in number well mounted and armed to look for the enemy at 9 AM [perceived] some natives on a hill

GALLOPED UP TO THEM AND MADE A TOLERABLE HAUL SEIZED ALL THEIR ARMS AND BURNT THEM

[Went] on some distance and [perceived] another party

OUT OF WHICH WE GOT TWO MORE

Rode round some distance and then started for [Quegiaruna] but after going some time we missed Ben and [Norries] so we [steered] for [Eyerama] to wait for them some time after we got there they came in and told us that they had met with a large [party] of natives and had been

ENGAGED WITH THEM AND AFTER FIRING OFF ALL THEIR AMMUNITION AND BEEN

Oblidged to [run] away and come home [Saw] a lot of [blacks] and determined to go and look for these [insolent vagabonds] Started about 3 o’clock and returned to the place Ben had seen them but could not find them

WE FOUND EVERY THING ON THE BATTLEFEILD JUST AS WE HAD LEFT IT EXEPT THAT 2 OF THE BODIES HAD BEEN BURIED OUT OF A BUSH AND LAID CLOSE TOGETHER AND THE DEAD DOG REMOVED

After searching about for [same] I returned to [Eyerama] and the remainder returned to Glengary a note from Cousins came by a native

The original large leather-bound ledgers have been in the private collection of a descendant, who declined to speak on the record. But they were loaned for copying to the State Library of Western Australia in 1955 and have been available for public reading in the stacks of the Battye library ever since.

Some of Logue’s other descendants, and those of other colonist families in the Geraldton region, have spoken to Guardian Australia. They want to break the silence surrounding their ancestors’ involvement in frontier violence. They have begun meeting with the Yamatji descendants of the survivors.

Australia’s archives contain many colonial diaries. They are how we are able to understand just how widespread frontier murders and massacres were; how commonplace it was among colonists to shoot and kill Aboriginal men, women and children on sight, for no reason and without consequences.

What makes Logue’s diaries unique is that he wrote about these exploits using code at a time when such killings were frowned upon by colonial society. And, because he kept those diaries for 50 years from his arrival in the Geraldton region until his death, we can see how he materially benefited from those killings.

Historian Nan Broad at Greenough Museum, south of Geraldton

A ‘pathetically simple’ code

A Geraldton-based historian and author, Nan Broad, has spent the past six years transcribing and decoding Logue’s diaries. Broad came across them in the late 1990s while researching her PhD on stock routes and communication in the north of WA. She knew the Logues, having grown up in one of the prominent colonial families in the area – where “everyone knows everyone”.

She’s preparing to publish a version of the diaries this year.

“I knew it was very, very unique to have 50 years straight of a diary,” she says, adding that as a historian: “I knew the value of the things.”

Wednesday Tom, Liffy and Bryant started at day break to gather the cattle found and got in 82 before breakfast after breakfast Bryant went to look for the others Thomson and [family] went home … told by Thomson that the [indecipherable] was at the Greenough looking for the cattle again

AND THAT HE AND PARTY HAD SHOT 3 NATIVES THE OTHER DAY AND THAT EGO IS AMONG THE NUMBER

When she first saw the diaries about 30 years ago, they were in boxes under a bed. Their owner gave her access. When she began editing them

·theguardian.com·
The killing code: strange symbols in a WA settlers diaries lay bare frontier atrocities
untitled
untitled

untitled

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/gaza-war-destruction-aerial-airdrop/

Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Create profiles for personalised advertising. Use profiles to select personalised advertising. Create profiles to personalise content. Use profiles to select personalised content. Measure advertising performance. Measure content performance. Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources. Develop and improve services. Store and/or access information on a device. Use limited data to select content. Use limited data to select advertising.

via The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com

August 2, 2025 at 08:00PM

·washingtonpost.com·
untitled
Europes trade deal with the US was dead on arrival it needs to be buried. Heres how to do it | Georg Riekeles and Varg Folkman
Europes trade deal with the US was dead on arrival it needs to be buried. Heres how to do it | Georg Riekeles and Varg Folkman

Europe’s trade deal with the US was dead on arrival – it needs to be buried. Here’s how to do it | Georg Riekeles and Varg Folkman

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/aug/02/us-europe-trade-deal-ursula-von-der-leyen-donald-trump

Ursula von der Leyen’s Turnberry golf course deal has been rightly called a capitulation and a humiliation for Europe. Assuming such an accord would put an end to Donald Trump’s coercion and bullying was either naive or the result of a miserable delusion. The EU should now steel itself and reject the terms imposed by Trump.

Is this deal really as bad as it sounds? Unfortunately, it is, for at least three reasons.

The blow to Europe’s international credibility is incalculable in a world that expects the EU to stand up for reciprocity and rules-based trade, to resist Washington’s coercion as Canada, China and Brazil have, rather than condoning it.

Economically, it’s a damaging one-way street: EU exporters lose market access in the US while the EU market is hit by more favoured US competition. Core European industrial sectors such as pharma and steel and aluminium are left by the wayside. The balance also tilts in the US’s favour in important sectors such as consumer goods, food and drink, and agriculture. Tariffs tend to stick, so this is long-term damage. The EU even gives up its right to respond to future US pressures through duties on digital services or network fees.

To top it off, von der Leyen’s defence and investment pledges (for which she had no mandate) go against Europe’s interest. The EU’s competitiveness predicament is precisely one of net investment outflows. As international capital now reallocates under the pressures of Trumponomics and a weakening dollar, the case for Europe to become a strategic investment power was strengthening. Von der Leyen’s promise of $600bn in EU investment in the US is therefore disastrous messaging.

How could this happen? All EU member states wanted to avoid Trump’s 30% tariff threat and a trade war, but none perhaps as much as Germany and Ireland, supported by German carmakers and US big tech firms. Yet Irish sweetheart digital tax deals, as well as BMW and Mercedes’s plans to move production hubs to the US (also to serve the EU market), cannot be Europe’s future.

EU governments were distinctly unhelpful in building the EU’s negotiating position. But in the end, it was von der Leyen who blinked and she has to take responsibility. Her close team took control in the closing weeks and went into the final meeting manifestly prepared only to say yes, which made Trump’s steamrolling inevitable.

Let’s think of the counterfactual: if von der Leyen had stepped into the room and rejected these terms, Trump’s wrath and some market turmoil may have ensued. But ultimately it would very likely have come to a postponement, a new negotiation and, at some point, a different deal that would not be so lopsided or unilaterally trade away deep and long-term European interests and principles. Instead, von der Leyen became a supplicant to a triumphant Trump.

The situation is reminiscent of the final rounds of the Brexit negotiations five years ago when von der Leyen similarly was giving in to unacceptable demands from Boris Johnson, only to U-turn under pressure from a steelier EU chief negotiator and a quartet of member states.

Today, von der Leyen runs Brussels with a strong presidential hand and has largely done away with internal checks and balances inside the commission. That is her prerogative and her style, but the upshot should not be weak, ineffective and unprincipled dealings on Europe’s major geopolitical challenges, from Trump to Gaza.

The “deal” in Scotland is in reality an unstable interim accord. Nothing is yet inked or signed; Washington and Brussels are already locking horns on its interpretation and negotiations on the finer (and broader) points are ongoing. The 27 EU governments will inevitably get involved as the final deal needs to be translated into an international agreement and EU law. Some big powers – Germany and Italy seemingly – are on board, reluctant or not. However, internal political dynamics may change their calculations. Opposition parties and rightwing contenders who are a real political threat to leaders in Germany and France are already lambasting the deal.

Unless von der Leyen strikes a dirty bargain with the member states, the European parliament will also have a say. The longtime chair of its trade committee, Bernd Lange, has set the tone for how the deal would be viewed there, calling it “asymmetry set in stone” and even “a misery”. As details seep out on what von der Leyen has really agreed toand what the US expects from the EU, and all the consequences become clear, an already unpalatable deal may become even more so.

Weakening US economic data and returning stock market jitters show that Trump’s negotiation footing is fragile. His new tariff threats come with new extensions, up to 90 days in the case of Mexico, as his position is overstretched. For Europe, the lesson from the Brexit negotiations – one that von der Leyen ought to have grasped before now – is that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. There is now an opportunity for EU governments and the European parliament to course correct and salvage something from this train wreck.

via Business | The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/uk/business

August 2, 2025 at 11:12AM

·theguardian.com·
Europes trade deal with the US was dead on arrival it needs to be buried. Heres how to do it | Georg Riekeles and Varg Folkman
The Rule of Law Is Dead in the US
The Rule of Law Is Dead in the US

The Rule of Law Is Dead in the US

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/the-rule-of-law-is-dead-in-the-us/

The Rule of Law Is Dead in the US

The rule of law presupposes that there are rules that provide a consistent, repeatable, and knowable set of outcomes. That’s no longer the case.

Copy Link

Facebook

X (Twitter)

Bluesky

Pocket

Email

Edit

US President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn of the White House after arriving on Marine One in Washington.

(Bonnie Cash / UPI/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

I did not write an “end of term” Supreme Court review piece this year because… what’s the point? The intellectual exercise of parsing how the conservative supermajority bends and breaks legal principles to achieve the Republican agenda feels unimportant when plotted against the court’s refusal to apply any legal standards whatsoever to Donald Trump or his administration. Complaining about the Supreme Court’s decisions in this case or that case feels like a guy on the Titanic complaining about the song selection from the band.

The rule of law presupposes that there are, well, rules. These rules are supposed to provide a consistent, repeatable, and, most important, knowable set of outcomes. Predictability is the key feature of a functioning rules-based system, because people have to know the rules—and the consequences of  breaking them—before they act. The difference between living under the rule or law and living by the whims of a madman is that the rights, responsibilities, prohibitions, and privileges of your situation do not  change radically every time a person in power throws a hissy fit.

But the Supreme Court has decided that rules and laws do not apply to Trump, and they don’t protect anybody from Trump. That means that the rule of law is functionally dead in this country (which shouldn’t be entirely surprising, given that this country almost never respects the rule of law in other countries). Nobody can know if the rights they have today will be the rights they have tomorrow. Nobody can know if a thing that is illegal for the government to do to them today will be illegal for the government to do to them tomorrow.

We see the truth of this country’s descent into lawlessness every single day. All you have to do is pick up a newspaper, turn on the television, or go to Trump’s social media account. Nearly every “news” story you’ll see falls into one of two categories: Trump did something, or Trump threatens to do something. Nobody can reliably say whether those actions or threats are “legal” because everybody knows (whether they will admit that to you are not) that rules and laws no longer apply to the Trump regime.

That is why following the news feels the way it does right now. Humans like predictability. It’s hardcoded into our species. But Trump can threaten anything, literally anything at all, and nobody can know if he can be stopped. Whether or not Trump’s policies come to fruition is more about how serious Trump is about making that policy happen, not about whether there are any rules or structures in place that will prevent those policies from happening.

I’m a freaking expert on “the law” and I can no longer tell you if the latest thought bubble out of Trump’s mouth is “constitutional.” Anybody who claims they can is straight-up lying to you at this point. I can perhaps tell you how the Supreme Court will make whatever thing Trump wants to do legal. What I can’t tell you is what would happen if the court told Trump “no.” Would such a ruling stop him? Would he ignore it? Right now, there just isn’t a lot of evidence that Trump would be stopped by an adverse Supreme Court ruling. To the contrary, there is a mountain of evidence that Trump would ignore a decision that he didn’t like: a new study showed that the Trump administration has defied one in three judicial orders.

Current Issue

When it comes to the rule of law, two out of three is indeed very bad. You do not live in a lawful society if the laws apply only two out of three times. A rule that works only 66 percent of the time is not a law, it’s a suggestion. The fact that Trump follows the law sometimes, but not other times, means that laws only matter if Trump thinks they should.

I can imagine some people arguing that the fact that the president operates beyond the rule of law does not mean that the rule of law is dead. These people would be wrong: the rule of law exists in opposition to the rule of one man. If the president can both change the rules at will and is not himself subject to consequences for breaking the law, then the rule of law does not functionally exist.

I am not naive: I am well aware that the rich and powerful generally operate outside the rules and laws as they are applied to most regular people. What makes the Trump administration unique (in the American context) is that the lawlessness doesn’t just apply to him personally, it applies to any person, official, or institution he bestows his favor on. Homeland Security Secretary Kirsti Noem operates outside the rule of law as long as what she’s doing pleases Trump. Elon Musk operated outside the rule of law until he displeased Trump. ICE seemingly has the power to abduct people and brutalize citizens, non-citizens, and even elected officials that get in their way. And, thanks to the ubiquitous pardons Trump has granted to his cronies and cult followers who attacked the Capitol on January 6, any barbeque-splattered thug in a MAGA hat might also operate beyond the rule of law as long as they’re doing something Trump wants them to do.

We see this in the news all the time. Is Alina Habba allowed to be the U.S. Attorney for New Jersey? Based on the rule of law, no, of course not. Based on the rule of Trump, who can know? Can RFK Jr. make measles great again? Can Lee Zeldin overturn the Clean Air Act? Can Pete Hegseth orchestrate bombing operations over Signal? Can Sean Duffy run NASA? The answer to all these questions is “maybe?” because whether or not Trump or anybody in his administration can do this or that thing is not based on any rule or law governing that thing.

The analogy I’ve often used to explain our current legal system comes from the first Pirates of the Caribbean movie. I’m being entirely serious. There’s a brilliant little scene where Captain Jack Sparrow is trying to explain the law of the high seas to the naive Will Turner. Sparrow says: “The only rules that really matter are these: what a man can do and what a man can’t do.” He explains that he can kill Turner right there on the spot, but that he can’t bring the ship they’re on into port all by himself. Sparrow’s inability to do what he wants long term is the only thing constraining him from doing what he wants to do right now.

A pirate ship is not a democracy, it is a dictatorship. So too is the current American ship of state. The only thing constraining what Trump does today is what he wants to do tomorrow. The only people and institutions allowed to function are the ones Trump needs to help him accomplish his future aims. And the rules and laws do not exist to limit Trump, his officials, or his supporters; they exist to limit the options of people and forces who oppose Trump.

Again, if you don’t believe me, just pick up a paper. Point to the thing you are sure Trump is not allowed to do, and tell me who you imagine is going to stop him. You will quickly realize that what we’re pinning our hopes on is not the rule of law. What we’re hoping for is a mutiny.

Elie Mystal is The Nation’s justice correspondent and a columnist. He is also an Alfred Knobler Fellow at the Type Media Center. He is the author of two books: the New York Times bestseller Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution and Bad Law: Ten Popular Laws That Are Ruining America, both published by The New Press. You can subscribe to his Nation newsletter “Elie v. U.S.” here.

More from The Nation

With Trump’s popularity in freefall, 2026 should be a gimme for the opposition. But there are signs that the Dems could sleepwalk into disaster.

Chris Lehmann

Trump’s bizarre claim that he fell out with the indicted child sex trafficker because Epstein “stole” workers from Mar-a-Lago only raises more lurid questions.

Joan Walsh

The doom-obsessed Democratic Party remains as unpopular as ever—but there is another path.

Jeet Heer

In-home care workers spoke to The Nation about their fears of ICE’s expansion and losing their jobs and healthcare coverage under the GOP’s shameful law.

Joan Walsh

Wisconsin’s governor was well positioned to win a third term. Instead, he cleared the way for a new generation of Democrats to run. Others should take note.

John Nichols

via Article | The Nation https://www.thenation.com/article/

July 30, 2025 at 08:48PM

·thenation.com·
The Rule of Law Is Dead in the US
The End of America as a Center of Science
The End of America as a Center of Science

The End of America as a Center of Science

https://kottke.org/25/07/the-end-of-america-as-a-center-of-science

Ross Anderson writes about how scientific empires, from the ancient Sumerians to the Nazis to the Soviet Union in the 1950s, have crumbled (or been willfully dismantled by ideologues) and the clear signs that the same thing is happening here in the United States under the conservative regime.

The very best scientists are like elite basketball players: They come to America from all over the world so that they can spend their prime years working alongside top talent. “It’s very hard to find a leading scientist who has not done at least some research in the U.S. as an undergraduate or graduate student or postdoc or faculty,” Michael Gordin, a historian of science and the dean of Princeton University’s undergraduate academics, told me. That may no longer be the case a generation from now.

Foreign researchers have recently been made to feel unwelcome in the U.S. They have been surveilled and harassed. The Trump administration has made it more difficult for research institutions to enroll them. Top universities have been placed under federal investigation. Their accreditation and tax-exempt status have been threatened. The Trump administration has proposed severe budget cuts at the agencies that fund American science — the NSF, the NIH, and NASA, among others — and laid off staffers in large numbers. Existing research grants have been canceled or suspended en masse. Committees of expert scientists that once advised the government have been disbanded. In May, the president ordered that all federally funded research meet higher standards for rigor and reproducibility — or else be subject to correction by political appointees.

And so:

Funding for American science has fluctuated in the decades since [World War II]. It spiked after Sputnik and dipped at the end of the Cold War. But until Trump took power for the second time and began his multipronged assault on America’s research institutions, broad support for science was a given under both Democratic and Republican administrations. Trump’s interference in the sciences is something new. It shares features with the science-damaging policies of Stalin and Hitler, says David Wootton, a historian of science at the University of York. But in the English-speaking world, it has no precedent, he told me: “This is an unparalleled destruction from within.”

Tags: Donald Trump · politics · Ross Anderson · science · USA

Englisch

via kottke.org https://kottke.org/

July 31, 2025 at 05:57PM

·kottke.org·
The End of America as a Center of Science
To See How America Unraveled Go Back Five Years
To See How America Unraveled Go Back Five Years

To See How America Unraveled, Go Back Five Years

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/07/george-floyd-summer-2020-riots/683697/

The social-justice movement that began in earnest with Trayvon Martin’s shooting in 2012, and culminated eight years later, after George Floyd’s murder, once looked unstoppable. By the summer of 2020, a slew of recorded killings of Black people had seemed to convince a pivotal bloc of Americans that the persistence of racial injustice was both inarguable and intolerable.

Yet the ensuing riots—and the disorder they appeared to countenance—prefigured a surge of white grievance that still hasn’t subsided. Throughout the summer of 2020, many on the left exalted lawlessness and violence as pardonable offenses, if not political virtues. Within a few months, this impulse had migrated to the right, yielding even worse damage to the liberal order, most notably on January 6, 2021. The mass unrest of the preceding year certainly did not cause the sacking of the Capitol. But that winter siege amounted to an outgrowth of the summer revolt—the rotten fruit of imitation.

This article has been adapted from Williams’s forthcoming book.

At the moment of his death, two George Floyds came into public view. First, there was the mortal man, the son and brother, unemployed when law enforcement encountered him dozing in a parked car that long May weekend in Minneapolis. Methamphetamines and fentanyl flowed through his system. Moments earlier, he had allegedly passed a counterfeit banknote, which even the cashier seemed embarrassed to report. This George Floyd had survived a bout of COVID-19, only to be asphyxiated in broad daylight by a police officer he’d once worked with at a nightclub. The mortal man’s biography fixed him in a specific time, when the coronavirus pandemic—and Donald Trump’s mismanagement of it—had primed the nation for protest.

Then there’s the immortal George Floyd, whose last breaths exist in a wretched loop that can be conjured on our screens. The man spawned a meme, as Richard Dawkins defined the term—an idea that spreads by means of imitation. In a 10-minute-and-eight-second clip, many Americans found evidence of an idea that had long simmered in the national psyche: By perpetrating violence, the state forfeits its legitimacy and must be resisted, even if that means inflicting violence in return. This immortal Floyd was put to death by horizontal crucifixion in a midwestern Golgotha. A man who died for all Americans on that squalid pavement, not asking why his father had forsaken him but calling for his deceased mother instead.

David A. Graham: George Floyd’s murder changed Americans’ views on policing

Floyd’s killing inspired a summer of revolt that seemed, to much of the country, obviously justified. The postracial promise of the Barack Obama era had subsided. Some Black Americans and many more of their supporters saw little hope of achieving equality, let alone safety, without rebellion. The following January, this same underlying idea—that the unheard must speak through violence—was used to justify terrible wrong. (A different group of Americans naturally regarded that wrong as indisputably right.) In this way, the summer of 2020 and the siege of the Capitol are fratricidal twins. They imbued all factions of American society with antipathy and certitude, a perilous combination that continues to touch virtually every aspect of our public lives, and much of our private ones also.

During the season of rebellion that followed Floyd’s death, nearly 8,000 Black Lives Matter rallies took place across the nation—not to mention the mass protests that erupted in places as far away as Paris, Amsterdam, London, Seoul, Taiwan, and Helsinki. Millions of Americans rose up, disgusted by what they saw, taking part in what was likely the largest demonstration against racism in the history of humanity.

Hundreds of the protests in the United States involved violence or property destruction, or both—a fact that much of the media addressed by noting that most of the protests were peaceful. That incessant refrain was true, but it obscured the extent of the bedlam that Americans of all political persuasions were witnessing. In Minnesota, the Twin Cities alone incurred some $500 million in damage.

Much of this chaos was unrelated to racial injustice. In New York City, one week after Floyd’s death, “hundreds of people who had no apparent connection to the protests commanded the streets of Manhattan’s SoHo district,” The Intercept reported. “They looted businesses, and robbed each other, with impunity. Burglar alarms blended with the roaring of getaway engines, the chaotic medley punctuated every few moments by tumbling plywood, crashing plate glass, and grating steel. Then a gunshot went off, as a 21-year-old man was shot.” That same night, an off-duty security guard told a New York Times reporter, “I don’t think this has anything to do with Black Lives Matter. It’s just chaos. People are just using this as an excuse to act crazy.” The reporter noted that “the man declined to give his name, because he, too, was looting.”

Why did all this come to pass in the summer of 2020 but not after any number of previous killings? In 2014, a New York City police officer, Daniel Pantaleo, dragged the unarmed Eric Garner to the sidewalk for the crime of peddling loose cigarettes, compressing Garner’s windpipe beneath his forearm, deafening himself to the dying man’s protests. That was when Americans first heard the phrase I can’t breathe, which Floyd would echo in Minneapolis (and protesters in Paris would learn to chant in English).

Two years later, Philando Castile bled out on Facebook Live in front of his girlfriend and her daughter. Castile had done nothing wrong; in fact he’d done everything right, calmly announcing after being pulled over that he was carrying a licensed firearm. Protests broke out when a jury found the cop who’d shot Castile not guilty, but they didn’t compare to what was coming.

Sue Rahr: The myth propelling America’s violent police culture

These are just two examples from a long list of Black men, women, and children whose outrageous deaths could well have triggered sustained nationwide protest. But none of them did—not until the pandemic overturned American life. By May 2020, many of us were sidelined from our daily routines, homeschooling and working remotely or panicking about not working, anxious about a juvenile president whose ineptitude had turned lethal.

That’s when a fatal confrontation in Georgia came across our screens. Ahmaud Arbery, a young Georgia man, had been ambushed and shot while jogging in a predominantly white neighborhood. A few weeks after Arbery was killed, Kentucky police broke into the home of a young medic named Breonna Taylor and shot her to death. Then the turning point: Derek Chauvin knelt on Floyd’s neck.

“To draw momentous conclusions from a single video shot on the sidewalks of Minneapolis might seem excessive,” the author Paul Berman wrote in the journal Liberties. “Yet that is how it is with the historic moments of overnight political conversion.” Berman cited the case of Anthony Burns, who’d fled slavery in Virginia and been captured in Boston, where his ensuing trial inspired protests that drew national attention and galvanized the abolitionist movement. “There were four million slaves in 1854,” Berman wrote, “but the arrest of a single one proved to be the incendiary event.”

For a significant portion of the American left and center—and even some of the right—the possibility that the country had a racial sickness suddenly seemed undeniable. Many in this group were white people aware of the disproportionate toll COVID-19 was taking on communities they did not belong to. In those early months of the pandemic, whatever illusions these Americans may have had about the robustness of their society, and the general direction of progress within it, was obliterated.

Secular social-justice rhetoric took on a religious fervor. In particular, “whiteness” was reconceived as an original sin. Adherents of this idea became convinced that they were implicated in a constellation of racism and implicit bias. And they believed that these structures had allowed a madman like Trump to hazard American lives with the same lack of concern that a policeman evinced as he knelt on the neck of a handcuffed, writhing civilian.

These Americans felt the need to revolt against something. While Trump and his supporters rebelled against stay-at-home orders, progressives found their own outlet for rebellion in the protest against police brutality. They saw their opponents on the right as exacerbating a scourge that disproportionately killed Black people, whose lives they saw themselves as fighting to save. This dichotomy opened a furious new front in intra-white status jockeying. It created a renewed opportunity for “those who see themselves as (for lack of a better term) upper-whites,” as Reihan Salam wrote in 2018, “to disaffiliate themselves from those they’ve deemed lower-whites.”

An understandable and even noble regard for the health and safety of Black communities metastasized into something else: an oppressive moral panic in response to Floyd’s murder that chased after all real and perceived racial inequity, and resorted to violence and property destruction to make its argument. It helped spawn a counterreaction that America still hasn’t escaped.

I’ve rarely felt farther from America than when I was hunched over my smartphone in Paris, watching dozens of people scale the sides of the Capitol.

As I witnessed the event in real time—and replayed clips over and over again—I was struck by its artificiality. Rioters wore costumes, draping themselves in tawdry Trump paraphernalia and Stars and Stripes; some came dressed as Founding Fathers. Many wore expressions of disbelief as they meandered the halls of Congress, marveling like tourists amid the pandemonium. O

·theatlantic.com·
To See How America Unraveled Go Back Five Years
How late-night television lost its relevance
How late-night television lost its relevance

How late-night television lost its relevance

https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/tv/2025/07/30/late-night-tv-decline-colbert-trump-paramount/

Late night isn’t dead. Yet.

But its future, which was never exactly bright, might be cratering. The hoary format’s downward slide has, up until this point, been comparatively slow, with advertising dollars dwindling and viewership declining as audiences drift to faster, more casual platforms. But the financial pressures, together with a vengeful president and a corporate culture willing to appease him, might be more than the genre can withstand.

via Television https://www.washingtonpost.com

July 30, 2025 at 04:24PM

·washingtonpost.com·
How late-night television lost its relevance