Englisch

149 bookmarks
Custom sorting
Do I feel lucky? (Ways of talking about luck)
Do I feel lucky? (Ways of talking about luck)

Do I feel lucky? (Ways of talking about luck)

https://dictionaryblog.cambridge.org/2025/08/27/do-i-feel-lucky-ways-of-talking-about-luck/

Listen to the author reading this blog post.

 

d3sign / Moment

 

by Kate Woodford

Today’s post has a rather positive feel to it as I’m looking at the language we use to describe luck and feeling lucky.

Let’s start with the noun luck itself, which has a few useful phrases. For example, you might say with any luck before saying what you hope will happen:

With any luck, it will be sunny and we’ll be able to eat outside.

In British English, we talk about a bit of luck, meaning ‘a small amount of luck’:

With a bit of luck, we’ll be there before midday.

We use the phrase beginner’s luck to refer to the unexpected success that a person who is new to a particular activity sometimes experiences. Meanwhile, we talk about a stroke of luck meaning ‘a lucky event’:

I won this game the first time I played it, so I guess it was just beginner’s luck.

By a stroke of luck, James saw my message and responded.

The word ‘luck’ is used as a verb in two informal phrasal verbs that were originally American but are increasingly heard in British English, too. If you luck out, something happens to you that is very lucky, and if you luck into something good, you get or achieve it by chance:

We really lucked out with our accommodation. It was perfect and not at all expensive.

I lucked into the job – I just happened to apply when they needed someone.

Moving on to the adjective lucky, we talk about a lucky escape, meaning ‘a situation in which someone avoids harm or difficulty’ and if someone strikes it lucky, they suddenly have a lot of luck:

It turns out that not getting the job was a lucky escape, as the boss is apparently awful.

We really struck it lucky with our last recruit – she’s absolutely brilliant.

And what about synonyms for the adjective ‘lucky’? Fortunate is a slightly more formal alternative to ‘lucky’, and we sometimes say that we are or feel blessed, meaning that we feel lucky. (Note that in this sense, the pronunciation is /blest/):

I’m very fortunate to have a job that I enjoy so much.

I feel so blessed to have such wonderful friends.

I’ll finish with a nice idiom in this area. If someone is in the right place at the right time, they are able to take advantage of an opportunity that they get simply by chance:

Often, it’s not about talent so much as luck – you just have to be in the right place at the right time.

That concludes today’s post on luck. By the way, can anyone tell me which old movie the title of this post comes from? Answers below, please!

Englisch

via About Words – Cambridge Dictionary blog https://dictionaryblog.cambridge.org/

August 27, 2025 at 01:02PM

·dictionaryblog.cambridge.org·
Do I feel lucky? (Ways of talking about luck)
Londons Kampf gegen die Insel der Feuchttücher in der Themse
Londons Kampf gegen die Insel der Feuchttücher in der Themse

Londons Kampf gegen die Insel der Feuchttücher in der Themse

https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/europa/london-feuchttuecher-themse-100.html

Toilettenabfälle in der Themse Londons Kampf gegen die Insel der Feuchttücher

Stand: 26.08.2025 06:26 Uhr

"Wet Wipe Island" gilt als Schandfleck der Themse. Massen von Feuchttüchern, die Londoner über die Toilette entsorgt haben, hatten sich wie eine Insel am Flussufer aufgetürmt. Jetzt wird sie aufwändig abgetragen.

Sogar einen eigenen Eintrag auf Google Maps hat Londons berüchtigte Feuchttücher-Insel über die Jahre bekommen: "Wet Wipe Island" ganz in der Nähe der Hammersmith-Brücke im Südwesten Londons sei ein "kulturelles Wahrzeichen", steht dort. Darunter zahlreiche ironische Bewertungen, was für eine wunderbare Sehenswürdigkeit die Insel doch sei, gepaart mit Kommentaren wie "eklig", "einfach nur schockierend" oder "da muss doch mal aufgeräumt werden".

Genau das passiert jetzt - und zwar im Auftrag der London Port Authority, der Hafen- und Wasserstraßenbehörde der britischen Hauptstadt. Seit Mitte August ist täglich ein Bagger an diesem Abschnitt des Themse-Ufers im Einsatz. Wann immer es die Gezeiten erlauben, tastet er sich langsam vorwärts auf den Abschnitt zwischen Ufer und Flussbett und lässt dann seinen gitterartigen Baggerlöffel herunter in die schwarze, weiche Masse.

Die Insel aus Toilettenabfällen veränderte sogar den Verlauf der Themse in London.

Fläche zweier Tennisplätze

Auf den ersten Blick sieht sie aus wie schwarz-brauner Schlamm. Doch bei einem genaueren Blick erkennt man, wie tuchartige Fasern - die Rückstände der Feuchttücher - aus dem Flussbett gekämmt werden. Dann rüttelt der Fahrer so lange mit dem Greifer, bis der übrige Matsch wieder auf den Boden fällt.

"Das Rütteln ist der wichtigste Schritt, damit wir nur die Überreste der Feuchttücher entfernen und nichts vom Flussbett oder gar Lebewesen", sagt Emily McLean, die das Projekt vor Ort für die London Port Authority überwacht. "Wir sind froh, die Reinigung hier endlich anzugehen."

Die Insel aus den Toilettenabfällen hatte sich zu einer Fläche von der Größe zweier Tennisplätze angesammelt, stellenweise bis zu einem Meter hoch. Die Insel veränderte sogar den Flussverlauf und belastet durch Mikroplastik die Tier- und Pflanzenwelt. Nun werde sich die Wasserqualität wieder verbessern, meint McLean.

Emily McLean von der London Port Authority überwacht das Abtragen der Feuchttücher-Insel.

Ungefiltertes Abwasser in die Themse

Der Grund, dass die Überreste der Feuchttücher überhaupt hier sind: Die Bewohner Londons haben sie in der Toilette heruntergespült, statt die Tücher über den Restmüll zu entsorgen.

Außerdem gibt es in vielen britischen Städten ein veraltetes Kanalisationssystem, bei dem Regenwasser und Abwasser im selben Kanal laufen. Wenn etwa bei starkem Regen die viktorianische Kanalisation überläuft, leitet der umstrittene Wasserversorger Thames Water einen Teil des Mischwassers ungefiltert in die Themse - und damit auch die heruntergespülten Feuchttücher.

Nun sollen im Laufe mehrerer Wochen schätzungsweise 180.000 Tonnen der Feuchttücher-Masse abgetragen und entsorgt werden. Der Zeitpunkt dafür sei auch deshalb ideal, weil ein neuer, rund 25 Kilometer langer Abwassertunnel seit Anfang des Jahres dazu beitragen soll, dass die Feuchttücher sich in dieser Form nicht noch einmal ansammeln, so McLean. Denn durch den Tunnel, der weitgehend unter der Themse entlang führt, werden die Mischwasser-Überläufe aufgefangen und in eine Kläranlage geleitet.

Felicity Rhodes von der Umweltschutzorganisation Thames 21 fordert eine bessere Abwasserinfrastruktur in London.

Hersteller müssen plastikfreie Alternativen entwickeln

Die Umweltschützerin Felicity Rhodes von der Organisation Thames 21 steht am Ufer und beobachtet die Baggerarbeiten. Thames 21 hat sich auf den Schutz der Themse spezialisiert, und die Feuchttücher-Insel ist den Aktivistinnen und Aktivisten schon seit Jahren ein Dorn im Auge. "Hier in dieser Flussbiegung fließt das Wasser etwas langsamer, und die schweren Feuchttücher häufen sich und türmen sich auf zu kleinen Bergen oder wickeln sich um Zweige und Pflanzen." Dort sammelten sich dann immer mehr der "wet wipes" an.

Regelmäßig haben Aktivistinnen und Aktivsten von Thames 21 in mühsamer Handarbeit gezählt, wie viele Feuchttücher sich exemplarisch pro Quadratmeter angesammelt haben und sie dann entfernt. "Es war immer klar, dass hier ein Bagger ran muss, und es ist großartig, dass das jetzt passiert", sagt Rhodes.

Die Aktivistin fordert: "Jetzt müssen die Menschen aber auch aufhören, Feuchttücher einfach in die Toilette zu werfen." Aber auch das reiche nicht. "Feuchttuch-Hersteller müssen plastikfreie Alternativen entwickeln. Und Abwasserfirmen müssen in bessere Infrastruktur investieren, damit Feuchttücher gar nicht erst in unsere Flüsse gelangen."

180.000 Tonnen Feuchttücher-Masse sollen aus der Themse geborgen und entsorgt werden.

Ekelvideos sorgen für Aufmerksamkeit

Bereits im April 2024 kündigte die britische Regierung, damals noch unter Führung der Konservativen, ein Gesetz zum landesweiten Verkauf- und Lieferverbot von Feuchttüchern mit Plastik-Anteil an. Es soll Hersteller ermutigen, plastikfreie Alternativen anzubieten. Das Gesetz ist aber noch nicht verabschiedet. "Auch gesetzlich muss es endlich Fortschritt geben", sagt die Umweltaktivistin.

Die London Port Authority hofft ebenso wie Thames 21, dass die viele Aufmerksamkeit, die die Feuchttücher-Insel durch die Aufräumaktion in diesen Tagen im ganzen Land bekommt - insbesondere auch durch Ekelvideos in den Sozialen Medien -, mehr Menschen motiviert, Feuchttücher künftig über den Müll zu entsorgen.

Noch bis Anfang September werden die Arbeiten laufen. Aufschub ist schwierig, denn das betroffene Gebiet reicht bis auf das Gelände einer Londoner Privatschule, und dort beginnt dann wieder der Unterricht. Auf Google Maps jedenfalls ist "Wet Wipe Island" bereits kurz nach Beginn der Arbeiten verschwunden - wer die Änderung vorgeschlagen oder veranlasst hat, ist nicht bekannt.

Verschiedenes

via tagesschau.de - Die Nachrichten der ARD https://www.tagesschau.de/infoservices/alle-meldungen-100.html

August 26, 2025 at 06:28AM

·tagesschau.de·
Londons Kampf gegen die Insel der Feuchttücher in der Themse
Lesson Plan: Trump and the Nobel Peace Prize
Lesson Plan: Trump and the Nobel Peace Prize

Lesson Plan: Trump and the Nobel Peace Prize

https://annmichaelsen.com/2025/08/26/lesson-plan-trump-and-the-nobel-peace-prize/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lesson-plan-trump-and-the-nobel-peace-prize&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lesson-plan-trump-and-the-nobel-peace-prize

Grade Level / Audience

Upper-level secondary or university-level students—teachers, education professionals, or politically literate learners.

In this day and age, receiving a cold call at any time can be disarming, but Norway’s finance minister reportedly took a most surprising ring on the streets of Oslo earlier this month.

According to Norwegian newspaper Dagens Naeringsliv, the cold caller was U.S. President Donald Trump, and the request for Norway’s Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg, was how the American leader could be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. CNBC

Learning Objectives

By the end of the lesson, students will be able to:

Describe the nomination and selection process for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Identify notable past laureates and highlight cases of controversy.

Analyze how awards can backfire or become politically complicated.

Apply these insights to assess Donald Trump’s current pursuit of the Prize.

Lesson Components

  1. Warm-Up

Pose open-ended questions:

What purpose does the Nobel Peace Prize serve?

Do you think awards should be based on idealistic intentions, tangible achievements, or both? Students briefly discuss in pairs or small groups to surface their assumptions.

  1. Lecture & Guided Notes

A. Nobel Peace Prize Overview

Origin & Intent: Established by Alfred Nobel’s will to honor those “who have done the most or the best to advance fraternity between nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the promotion of peace congresses.”

Nomination Process:

Eligible nominators include national legislators, university professors, former laureates, and others.

Deadline is late January each year; deliberations are conducted by a five-member Norwegian Nobel Committee, appointed by the Norwegian Parliament. Secrecy is maintained for 50 years.

Selection Timeline:

Review, shortlisting, expert evaluation, and final decision by October; award ceremony in December in Oslo.

B. Past U.S. President Laureates

Theodore Roosevelt (1906) – mediated the Russo-Japanese War.

Woodrow Wilson (1919) – established the League of Nations.

Jimmy Carter (2002) – honored for humanitarian work post-presidency via the Carter Center.

Barack Obama (2009) – awarded early in his first term for extraordinary efforts to strengthen diplomacy; widely regarded as controversial because the prize predated any major accomplishments.

C. Historic Controversies & Backfires

1973: Henry Kissinger & Lê Đức Thọ – awarded jointly for negotiating a Vietnam truce; Thọ declined, two committee members resigned, and the prize was dubbed the “Nobel War Prize.”

1994: Arafat, Rabin & Peres – Arafat’s inclusion sparked outrage; a committee member resigned.

Barack Obama (2009) – again, seen as premature; critics argued the split between symbolism and substance.

General critiques:

Prize seen to favor politics, media visibility, or aspirations rather than concrete achievements. Some argue it can even undermine peace processes by politicizing peacemaking.

  1. Case Study: Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize Pursuit

A. Trump’s Current Status

Multiple nominations have been submitted—for example, by Israeli PM Netanyahu (Abraham Accords), Pakistan (India–Pakistan de-escalation), and others.

However, many of the claimed diplomatic successes are contested or fragile.

At least three of the five Nobel Committee members have voiced criticism of Trump’s leadership, citing erosion of democratic norms—one member (Asle Toje) showed some sympathy, but overall, his chances seem limited.

Observers argue that such nominations may be politically motivated rather than grounded in genuine peacemaking—and that the Prize may be undermined by awarding someone with divisive record.

B. Analysis Questions

Do Trump’s diplomatic claims meet the Nobel criteria of fraternity and peaceful resolution?

Are there precedents (like Obama’s early award) that suggest Trump could win based on potential over outcomes?

Could awarding Trump risk discrediting the Prize in the same way past controversial decisions did?

  1. Interactive Activity

Option A: Debate Split class into two groups:

Group 1 argues: Trump should receive the Nobel Peace Prize.

Group 2 argues: Trump should not receive it. Encourage them to draw on criteria, precedent, ethics, and institutional integrity.

Option B: Reflective Writing Students write a brief essay (200 words) evaluating Trump’s candidacy using lessons from past controversies.

  1. Wrap-Up & Homework

Wrap-Up: Summarize key points:

Nobel Peace Prize process is structured but secretive.

Several controversial awards in history show how politics and timing can undermine credibility.

Trump’s nominations highlight both the possibilities and perils of premature or politically-charged awards.

Homework: Write a reflective piece comparing Trump’s case with one past laureate controversy (e.g., Obama 2009 or Kissinger 1973), focusing on lessons about timing, peace legitimacy, and political optics.

Sources

Trump wants a Nobel Peace Prize. Here’s how it’s awarded. – Washington Post

The tarnished prize Trump desperately wants – Washington Post Opinion

Trump badly wants a Nobel Peace Prize. Most on the committee oppose him. – Washington Post Politics

Can Trump win a Nobel Peace Prize? – Reuters

What Trump’s Nobel nominations say about the prize – The Hilltop

Has Trump made his case for the Nobel Peace Prize? – IVN

Trump Nobel Peace Prize history explained – TIME

Trump’s “six wars ended” claim fact-checked – The Times

Trump claims to have solved multiple wars – El País

There’s one major problem with Trump’s Nobel dream – The Daily Beast

1973 Nobel Peace Prize (Kissinger & Lê Đức Thọ) – Wikipedia

Nobel Peace Prize overview – Wikipedia

The post Lesson Plan: Trump and the Nobel Peace Prize first appeared on The digital classroom, transforming the way we learn.

Schule

via Teaching English using web 2.0 https://annmichaelsen.com

August 26, 2025 at 03:11PM

·annmichaelsen.com·
Lesson Plan: Trump and the Nobel Peace Prize
NEW SERIES: To-do lists
NEW SERIES: To-do lists

NEW SERIES: To-do lists

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0lz1mkr

How long is your to-do list? Beth and Neil talk about the jobs they need to do, and our grammar guru Georgie explains the grammar of your to-do list. Learn to use 'need to', 'have to', 'got to' and 'needs doing'.

TRANSCRIPT AND WORKSHEET Find a full transcript for this episode and a worksheet ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/features/learning-english-grammar/250826

FIND BBC LEARNING ENGLISH HERE: Visit our website ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish Follow us ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/followus

LIKE PODCASTS? Try some of our other popular podcasts including: ✔️ 6 Minute English ✔️ 6 Minute Vocabulary ✔️ The English We Speak

They're all available by searching in your podcast app.

Englisch

via Learning English Grammar http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02pc9wq

August 26, 2025 at 12:24PM

·bbc.co.uk·
NEW SERIES: To-do lists
The Armed Takeover of US Cities by the President Is Not a Distraction
The Armed Takeover of US Cities by the President Is Not a Distraction

The Armed Takeover of US Cities by the President Is Not a “Distraction”

https://kottke.org/25/08/the-armed-takeover-of-us-cities-by-the-president-is-not-a-distraction

Jamelle Bouie on Democratic politicians who maddeningly cannot recognize and acknowledge what is going on in the country.

From my perspective, the story of American politics right now is that the president, who fashions himself a kind of king of America, is attempting to barricade himself in the capital by unleashing a military occupation on its residents. And he’s promised to extend this military occupation to other cities and other states that he views as political opponents.

That to me is the big story of American politics right now: a mad king openly exerting tyrannical power over Americans and threatening further tyrannical power against other Americans, all under a pretext of crime reduction.

Tags: Donald Trump · Jamelle Bouie · politics · USA

Englisch

via kottke.org https://kottke.org/

August 26, 2025 at 03:08PM

·kottke.org·
The Armed Takeover of US Cities by the President Is Not a Distraction
trepidation
trepidation

trepidation

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trepidation

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for August 26, 2025 is:

trepidation • \trep-uh-DAY-shun\  • noun

Trepidation refers to a feeling of fear that causes someone to hesitate because they think that something bad or unpleasant is going to happen.

// The students felt a sense of trepidation upon being summoned to the principal's office.

See the entry >

Examples:

"Met by some with cautious optimism, others with trepidation, and others with doomsday predictions, there is no doubt that AI is here to stay and changing work in ways yet to be fully revealed." — Laurel Donnellan, Forbes, 28 May 2025

Did you know?

If you've ever trembled with fright, you know something of both the sensation and etymology of trepidation. The word comes from the Latin verb trepidare, which means "to tremble." (Trepidare also gave English the verb trepidate, meaning "to feel nervous or apprehensive," but that word is now considered archaic.) Early meanings of trepidation, such as "tremulous motion" or "tremor," reflect its "shaky" origins. Over time, however, those senses gave way to our modern meaning referring to fearful hesitancy.

Englisch

via Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day https://www.merriam-webster.com/word-of-the-day

August 26, 2025 at 06:04AM

·merriam-webster.com·
trepidation
Take a Virtual Tour of Shakespeares Globe Theatre in London
Take a Virtual Tour of Shakespeares Globe Theatre in London

Take a Virtual Tour of Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre in London

https://www.openculture.com/2025/08/a-virtual-tour-of-shakespeares-globe-theatre.html

The story of the Globe Theatre, the ancestral home of Shakespeare’s plays, is itself very Shakespearean, in all of the ways we use that adjective: it has deep roots in English history, a tragic backstory, and represents all of the hodgepodge of London, in the early 17th century and today, with the city’s colorful street life, mingling of international cultures, high and low, and its delight in the play and interplay of languages.

“The first public playhouses,” notes the British Library, “were built in London in the late 1500s. Theatres were not permitted within the boundaries of the City itself”—theater not being considered a respectable art—”but were tolerated in the outer districts of London, such as Southwark, where the Globe was located. Southwark was notorious for its noisy, chaotic entertainments and for its sleazy low-life: its theatres, brothels, bear baiting pits, pickpockets and the like.”

The Globe began its life in 1599, in a story that “might be worthy,” writes the Shakespeare Resource Center, “of a Shakespearean play of its own.” Built from the timbers of the city’s first permanent theater, the Burbage, which opened in 1576, the Globe burned down in 1613 “when a cannon shot during a performance of Henry VIII ignited the thatched roof in the gallery.” Within the year, it was rebuilt on the same foundations (with a tiled roof) and operated until the Puritans shut it down in 1642, demolishing the famed open-air theater two years later.

In a twist to this so far very English tale, it took the tireless efforts of an expatriate American, actor-director Sam Wanamaker, to bring the Globe back to London. After more than two decades of advocacy, Wanamaker’s Globe Playhouse Trust succeeded in recreating the Globe, just a short distance from the original location. Opening in 1997, three-hundred and fifty-five years after the first Globe closed, the new Globe Theatre recreated all of the original’s architectural elements.

The stage projects into the circular courtyard, designed for standing spectators and surrounded by three tiers of seats. While the stage itself has an elaborate painted roof, and the seating is protected from the weather by the only thatched roof in London since the 1666 Great Fire, the theater’s courtyard is open to the sky. However, where the original Globe held about 2,000 standing and 1,000 seated playgoers, the recreation, notes Time Out London, holds only about half that number.

Still, theater-goers can “get a rich feel for what it was like to be a ‘groundling’ (the standing rabble at the front of the stage) in the circular, open-air theatre.” Short of that, we can tour the Globe in the virtual recreation at the top of the post. Move around in any direction and look up at the sky. As you do, click on the tiny circles to reveal facts such as “Probably the first Shakespeare play to be performed at the Globe was Julius Caesar, in 1599.”

If you don’t have the luxury of visiting the new Globe, taking a tour, or seeing a performance lovingly-recreated with all of the costuming (and even pronunciation) from Jacobean England, you can get the flavor of this wondrous achievement in bringing cultural history into the present with the virtual tour, also available as an app for iPhone and iPad users. This interactive tour supersedes a previous version we featured a few years back.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newsletter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bundled in one email, each day.

If you would like to support the mission of Open Culture, consider making a donation to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your contributions will help us continue providing the best free cultural and educational materials to learners everywhere. You can contribute through PayPal, Patreon, and Venmo (@openculture). Thanks!

Note: An earlier version of this post appeared on our site in 2018.

Related Content:

Behold Shakespeare’s First Folio, the First Published Collection of Shakespeare’s Plays, Published 400 Year Ago (1623)

Hear What Shakespeare Sounded Like in the Original Pronunciation

3,000 Illustrations of Shakespeare’s Complete Works from Victorian England, Presented in a Digital Archive

Read All of Shakespeare’s Plays Free Online, Courtesy of the Folger Shakespeare Library

A Playlist of 45 Shakespeare Film Trailers, from 1935 — 2021

Josh Jones is a writer and musician based in Durham, NC.

Schule

via Open Culture https://www.openculture.com/

August 25, 2025 at 11:53AM

·openculture.com·
Take a Virtual Tour of Shakespeares Globe Theatre in London
BOX SET: English vocabulary mega-class! Learn 8 'sporting' words!
BOX SET: English vocabulary mega-class! Learn 8 'sporting' words!

BOX SET: English vocabulary mega-class! 🤩 Learn 8 'sporting' words!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZHaEg6JIws

Improve your English vocabulary and speaking with this '2-word expressions' compilation box set from our series 'The English We Speak'! 🗣️ Do lots of listening practice and learn LOTS of new vocabulary! 🎧 👂

There are 8 programmes in this collection from BBC Learning English and each one explains the meaning and use of a real everyday British English expression with plenty of examples of how to use the words in real-life contexts!

Chapters: 00:00 Hard pass 01:58 Play a blinder 05:03 Fever pitch 06:50 Win hands down 08:56 Know the score 11:07 Run for the hills 13:12 Mental gymnastics 15:45 Jog your memory

More popular videos to help you improve your English: 'politics' vocabulary English mega-class 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCge2_xfujQ 10 useful English lessons in 10 minutes 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPl8MakNoR4 Formality at work 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54fo91QlpeA

🤩🤩🤩 SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more English videos and podcast English to help you improve your English 👉 http://tinyurl.com/ps3hplv

✔️ Visit our website 👉 https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish ✔️ Follow us on Instagram 👉 https://www.instagram.com/bbclearningenglish ✔️ Find us on Facebook 👉 https://www.facebook.com/bbclearningenglish.multimedia ✔️ Join us on TikTok 👉 https://www.tiktok.com/@bbclearningenglish

We like receiving and reading your comments - please use English when you comment 😊

learnenglish #bbclearningenglish #englishclass #speakenglish #englishidioms

Englisch

via BBC Learning English https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHaHD477h-FeBbVh9Sh7syA

August 24, 2025 at 12:11PM

·youtube.com·
BOX SET: English vocabulary mega-class! Learn 8 'sporting' words!
What Trump Doesnt Understand About America First
What Trump Doesnt Understand About America First

What Trump Doesn’t Understand About ‘America First’

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/08/europe-transatlanticism-vance-trump-america-first/683949/

In the summer of 1930, the U.S. secretaries of war and the Navy developed War Plan Red, a 94-page document laying out detailed plans to strangle the naval and trade capabilities of the United Kingdom in a hypothetical future that involved the U.S. and U.K. at war with each other. The centerpiece was a full-scale land invasion of Canada, a seaborne attack on Halifax, a blockade of the Panama Canal, the capture of British possessions throughout the Caribbean and the Bahamas and Bermuda, and a direct challenge of the Royal Navy by U.S. naval forces in the Atlantic.

Far from the sepia-tinted account of transatlantic relations that is so often evoked today, the union between the English-speaking nations that emerged after the First World War was neither fulsome nor uncritical. Rather, the experiences of the war provoked deep antipathy and suspicion among American decision makers toward the British empire. And the plans, though never approved by Congress or the president, were not merely theoretical—the U.S. built air bases, camouflaged as civilian airfields, along the Canadian border. Only after the threat of Nazism emerged in the mid-1930s was War Plan Red quietly shelved. It was not declassified until the 1970s.

War Plan Red’s existence is a useful reminder that so much of what people assume to be the granite-like permanence of the postwar transatlantic community—forged by the horrors of the Second World War and the exigencies of the Cold War—is in fact more recent and, as we are now discovering, more fragile. The misty-eyed nostalgia for a yesteryear of American and European unity has always been based on sentiment as much as reality. From President Dwight Eisenhower’s threat to crash the British pound during the Suez Crisis of 1956 to America’s opposition to French attempts to maintain control in Vietnam and Algeria, the decline of European power while the U.S. emerged as the undisputed hegemon was marked by naked rivalry as much as it was by the amity of “the West.”

So Donald Trump is drawing, however unwittingly, on historical precedent when he brandishes his own imperial designs on Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal. When he expresses his suspicions about Europe—the European Union, according to Trump, “was formed in order to screw the United States”—he does so too. The NATO Summit earlier this summer—an “orchestrated grovel at the feet of Donald Trump,” as the British journalist Martin Kettle put it—demonstrated how unbalanced the relationship has become. More recently, the Alaska summit at which Trump gave Russian President Vladimir Putin the red-carpet treatment only underscored the point. They discussed Putin’s invasion in the heart of Europe without a single European leader present. European leaders got what looked instead like a school photo in the White House alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky—a row of school pupils holding hands to confront an overbearing headmaster. Perhaps the past 80 years of American transatlantic leadership—which established one of the greatest security alliances in history and built a democratic bulwark against the threat of Soviet Communism—will turn out to be the exception, not the rule.

Anyone listening attentively to J. D. Vance’s broadsides earlier this year at the Munich Security Conference and the AI Action Summit in Paris will have noticed a new mix of menace and petulance from the U.S. government. In addition to delivering a familiar critique of Europe’s sluggish and overregulated economy, the speeches signaled a willingness to use American power—and European dependency on that power—to interfere in Europe’s internal democratic politics: “The threat that I worry the most about vis-à-vis Europe is not Russia; it’s not China; it’s not any other external actor,” Vance said in Munich. “What I worry about is the threat from within.”

After Vance endorsed Germany’s far-right AfD party and met its leader in the run-up to the German election, Chancellor Friedrich Merz did not mince his words: “The interventions from Washington were no less dramatic and drastic and ultimately outrageous than the interventions we have seen from Moscow.”

From the July 2025 Issue: The talented Mr. Vance

At a rally in Poland days before the presidential election there, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem seemed to suggest that the U.S. would continue to support Poland only if Trump’s preferred candidate—the conservative historian Karol Nawrocki—were to win: “He needs to be the next president of Poland. Do you understand me?” Noem said, adding that if Nawrocki was elected, Poland “will continue to have a U.S. presence here, a military presence.” (Nawrocki did win, and was inaugurated earlier this month.)

All of this makes the Trump-Vance agenda very clear. Far from espousing an isolationist “America First” doctrine, when it comes to Europe, the Trump administration is seeking to enforce a doctrine of “America Everywhere,” in which political parties that share the same nativist outlook are actively supported by Washington, and those who do not are ceaselessly criticized.

Like so many Europeans of my generation, I am a product of transatlanticism. My father was one of the lucky few children to be moved to safety in the United States during the height of the Nazi bombardment of London; my Dutch mother was released from a Japanese-run prisoner-of-war camp in Indonesia following the U.S. victory over Japan. I studied as a post graduate at the University of Minnesota, and did a stint as a fact-checker at The Nation magazine in the early 1990s. Later, as an EU trade negotiator and member of the European Parliament, I was part of an effort, working with successive U.S. administrations, to build a rules-based global trading system. As Britain’s deputy prime minister from 2010 to 2015, I worked with the Obama administration on an array of shared endeavors, including counterterrorist operations and commercial agreements. And recently I spent seven years as a senior executive at Meta, on the front line of the technological revolution—and blazing controversies—emanating from Silicon Valley.

In short, a world in which Europe and America don’t walk tall and in tandem with each other, even when they disagree, is hard for me to contemplate. I fervently believe that the world is safer, stronger, and wealthier because of this unique relationship. But now is the time to imagine the previously unimaginable: a world in which deep-rooted transatlanticism gives way to shallow transactionalism.

Part of what is pulling the relationship apart is, ironically, the demonstrable nature of America’s supremacy over Europe, a supremacy delivered in no small part by the statecraft of previous U.S. administrations: an open trading system built on the undisputed role of the dollar as a global reserve currency; the deployment of overwhelming defense and security capabilities; the gravitational pull of a world-leading university system (despite, for now at least, the current administration’s attack on American academe); and economic prowess built on American domination of both international finance and technology. The U.S. has, on all of these benchmarks, comprehensively pulled ahead of Europe. When I served as deputy prime minister, the GDPs of Europe and the U.S. were roughly the same; today, the U.S. GDP is almost one and a half times larger.

No wonder some Silicon Valley investors now talk of Europe as a “dead” place—an adjective I’ve heard in various conversations—as if a continent of 500 million people and centuries of scientific and cultural discovery can be dismissed as little more than a hemispheric museum. In many ways, the tech elite is merely repeating the mockery directed at supposed European decadence by generations of American commentators (H. L. Mencken’s caustic assertion that “there are two kinds of Europeans: the smart ones, and those who stayed behind” comes to mind). Of course, their scorn has been fully matched by a long tradition of European snobbery toward supposedly uncouth Americans.

Michael Scherer: Trump says he decides what ‘America first’ means

Yet the divisions seem starker now. Rather than gentle ribbing between Old World and new, or specific disagreements between otherwise aligned allies, they are increasingly framed in zero-sum terms. A new class of American nationalists frets about the end of Western civilization, advancing a blood-and-soil ideology that elevates faith, family, and fealty to the nation over democratic ideals. Rather than seeking cooperation between political systems regardless of who is in power, they seek to elevate their ideological bedfellows at the expense of everyone else. It is the subjugation of diplomacy to virulent partisanship, egged on by outriders in business and politics who smell opportunity and personal advancement in populism.

A persistent theme in the U.S.’s critique of Europe has to do with America’s culture of free speech, derived from the First Amendment. A standard trope among the MAGA faithful is that Europe is a continent cowed by censorship. But this argument reeks of double standards: In Trump’s America, saying the wrong thing can get you defunded—or deported. Everyday travelers to America now nervously expunge anything from their social-media feeds that could be interpreted as criticism of the Trump administration for fear of being arraigned at the border. So much for free speech.

For all the flaws in Europe’s approach to free expression, European universities do not typically advise American and other foreign students to delete private messages for fear of attracting the attention of the authorities. Yet Europeans would be well advised to recognize that there is a significant kernel of truth in some of the critiques. Recent EU laws governing online content are a s

·theatlantic.com·
What Trump Doesnt Understand About America First
Wachsender Protest gegen Asylunterkünfte in Großbritannien
Wachsender Protest gegen Asylunterkünfte in Großbritannien

Wachsender Protest gegen Asylunterkünfte in Großbritannien

https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/europa/proteste-asylunterkuenfte-uk-100.html

Großbritannien Wachsender Protest gegen Asylunterkünfte

Stand: 23.08.2025 08:23 Uhr

Die Zahl der Asylanträge in Großbritannien ist zuletzt stark gestiegen. Tausende Asylsuchende sind mangels Alternativen in Hotels untergebracht. Der Unmut in den Gemeinden wächst.

Etwa 250 Protestierende haben sich am Abend in Cheshunt nördlich von London versammelt, um gegen die Asylpolitik der Regierung zu demonstrieren. Die Demonstrierenden schwenkten die britische und die englische Fahne, auf Bannern war zu lesen: "Schützt unsere Kinder". Auch Gegendemonstranten versammelten sich.

Diejenigen, die hier auf die Straße gegangen sind, befürchten offenbar, dass weitere Migranten in einem Hotel im Ort untergebracht werden, in dem bereits Asylsuchende wohnen. Denn ein Gericht hatte in dieser Woche angeordnet, dass die Migranten im Nachbarort Epping aus einem Hotel woanders untergebracht werden müssen - möglicherweise also bei ihnen im Ort in Cheshunt, so die Vermutung. Belege dafür gibt es nicht. Auch in anderen Städten gingen Menschen auf die Straße, die Demonstrationen blieben weitgehend friedlich.

Protestwochenende erwartet

Großbritannien erlebt ein weiteres Wochenende mit zahlreichen Demonstrationen gegen die Asylpolitik der Regierung, für die Schließung der Hotels, in denen Migranten untergebracht sind. Viele auf den Straßen fordern Abschiebungen. Vor mindestens 26 Hotels im Vereinigten Königreich sind Proteste geplant.

Zur Verschärfung der Lage hat ein Vorfall in Epping vor einigen Wochen beigetragen, als ein Asylbewerber gegenüber einer Teenagerin sexuell übergriffig geworden sein soll. Die Behörden ermitteln noch.

In Großbritannien sind etwa 32.000 Asylsuchende in rund 200 Hotels untergebracht. Die konservative Regierung, die bis Juli 2024 im Amt war, hatte diese Politik eingeleitet und Verträge mit Hotelbetreibern ausgehandelt, weil andere Einrichtungen teurer waren und Unterbringungsplätze fehlten.

Das "Bell Hotel" in Epping darf nach einem Gerichtsbeschluss nicht mehr zur Unterbringung von Asylsuchenden genutzt werden.

Abkommen mit Frankreich noch ohne Resultate

Premierminister Keir Starmer hat mit Amtsantritt versprochen, die Zahl der sogenannten illegalen Einwanderung zu reduzieren und vor allem die Überfahrten über den Ärmelkanal nach England zu unterbinden. Doch damit blieb er bislang erfolglos. Er versprach, Schleuserbanden aufzuspüren und hat ein Abkommen mit Frankreich geschlossen.

Die französische Regierung erklärte sich bereit, Flüchtlinge aufzunehmen, die mit dem Schlauchboot nach England kommen. Im Gegenzug soll Großbritannien wiederum Asylsuchende aus Frankreich aufnehmen. So sollen Geflüchtete abgeschreckt werden, die Überfahrt anzutreten.

Doch bislang wurden eben noch keine Personen nach Frankreich zurückgebracht. Viele Britinnen und Briten haben den Eindruck, die Regierung bleibe in der Asylpolitik erfolglos.

Triumph für Rechtspopulisten

Die politische Lage spitzt sich für Premier Starmer nun zu, vor allem nach dem Gerichtsurteil zum Hotel in Epping bei London. Geklagt hatte die dortige Stadtverwaltung nach teils gewaltsamen Protesten. Viele Menschen vor Ort begrüßten den Schritt. Daraufhin kündigten Gemeinden, in denen die rechtspopulistische Partei Reform UK an der Macht ist, an, auch gegen die Unterkünfte im Ort zu klagen.

Die Parteichefin der Konservativen, Kemi Badenoch, empfahl konservativen Stadträten ebenfalls, rechtlich gegen die Unterbringung von Asylsuchenden in den Hotels vorzugehen. Für die Partei Reform UK ist die Situation ein Triumph. Parteichef Nigel Farage sprach von einer "Krise" und forderte Massendeportationen.

Die Labour-Regierung wehrt sich nun gegen die Gerichtsentscheidung und will Einspruch einlegen. Ein Staatssekretär aus dem Innenministerium, Dan Jarvis, argumentierte, auch Labour wolle die Hotels schließen. Er warb dafür, dass für einen geregelten Ablauf Zeit nötig sei.

Deutlich wird, dass der Rückstau bei den Asylentscheidungen im Vereinigten Königreich groß ist. Im abgelaufenen Jahr bis Juni 2025 haben 111.000 Menschen Asyl beantragt - ein neuer Höchststand. 91.000 Personen warten auf eine Entscheidung.

Verschiedenes

via tagesschau.de - Die Nachrichten der ARD https://www.tagesschau.de/infoservices/alle-meldungen-100.html

August 23, 2025 at 08:30AM

·tagesschau.de·
Wachsender Protest gegen Asylunterkünfte in Großbritannien
Neue Weltordnung: Das Ende des Westens
Neue Weltordnung: Das Ende des Westens

Neue Weltordnung: Das Ende des Westens

https://taz.de/Neue-Weltordnung/!6106064/

I m US-Wahlkampf 1916 warben die Demokraten mit dem Slogan „Er hat uns aus dem Krieg herausgehalten“. Gemeint waren der Krieg in Europa und Präsident Woodrow Wilson, der skeptisch gegenüber globalem Engagement war. Das schloss keineswegs aus, in Nachbarstaaten zu intervenieren. Die USA operierten in Wilsons Amtszeit in Haiti, Nicaragua, der Dominikanischen Republik, Mexiko. Die USA maßten sich laut der Monroe-Doktrin das Recht an, als Regionalmacht willfährige Regime zu installieren. 1917 Wilson änderte seine Meinung und schickte zwei Millionen Soldaten nach Europa. Der Eintritt der USA in den Ersten Weltkrieg besiegelte die Niederlage des Deutschen Reiches – und war der Beginn des amerikanischen Jahrhunderts.

Wilson war überzeugt, dass „die göttliche Vorsehung“ die „friedfertigen“ Vereinigten Staaten beauftragt hatte, global „für Freiheit und Menschenrechte“ zu streiten. An die Stelle des zerfallenden osmanischen und Habsburger Reiches sollten Demokratien, Kapitalismus und nationale Selbstbestimmung treten. Hunderttausende feierten den US-Präsidenten im Dezember 1918 in Frankreich als Retter. Die Umsetzung von Wilsons forschem 14 Punkteprogramm, gedacht als gerechter Frieden, erwies sich angesichts der komplexen europäischen Wirklichkeit als schwieriger als gedacht. Der französische Ministerpräsident Georges Clemenceau bemerkte bei den Friedensverhandlungen in Versailles spitz, Wilson führe sich auf wie Gott – der habe aber nur zehn Gebote erlassen, der US-Präsident gleich 14.

Woodrow Wilson verkörperte jene Mixtur aus Machtwillen und Idealismus, überlegener Feuerkraft und messianischer Moral, die für die USA in den folgenden hundert Jahren charakteristisch sein sollte. Sein politischer Traum, die Gründung des Völkerbunds, der künftig Kriege durch ein Regelwerk überflüssig machen sollte, scheiterte: Der US-Senat lehnte den Beitritt der USA ab. Schon im Moment des Aufstiegs der USA zur globalen Hegemonialmacht war die Spannung zwischen Universalismus und nationalem Egoismus, zwischen Vernunft und religiöser Verklärung spürbar.

Imperiale Überdehnung der USA

Das amerikanische Jahrhundert ist vorbei. Die USA sind im Stadium jener imperialen Überdehnung angekommen, die, wenn man dem britischen Historiker Paul Kennedy folgt, zyklisch den Aufstieg von Großmächten beendet und deren Verfall einleitet.

Es gibt in diesem Prozess ein paar zentrale Stationen, etwa den illegalen Angriffskrieg gegen den Irak 2003. Der damalige Präsident George W. Bush war, wie Wilson 1916, erst skeptisch gegen einen Kriegseinsatz, dann folgte er der Hybris der Neocons und glaubte, die göttliche Vorsehung werde den Irak mit US-Bomben in eine blühende Demokratie verwandeln. Der klägliche Rückzug aus Kabul 2021 und das Desaster in Bagdad zeigten, dass die USA mit der Rolle des Weltpolizisten überfordert waren.

Der Trumpismus ist kein Alptraum, aus dem wir aufwachen werden. Die USA und Europa haben nicht mehr die gleichen Interessen

Das Ende der globalen US-Vorherrschaft hat früher, unblutig und sachlich, begonnen – mit dem Beitritt China zur Welthandelsorganisation WTO 2001. Der politische Westen, die USA und Europa produzierten 2001 mehr als 40 Prozent aller Waren und Dienstleistungen weltweit, China damals nur drei Prozent. Heute ist der Anteil der USA und der EU auf je 14 Prozent gesunken, der chinesische hat sich auf 20 Prozent vervielfacht. Die Wohlstandsexplosion in China hat das globale Machtgefüge tiefer und radikaler verändert als jeder Krieg.

Abgehängt wie Großbritannien

Einen solch atemberaubend rasanten Aufschwung gab es Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts schon einmal. Damals überholten die USA und das Deutsche Reich in extrem kurzer Zeit Großbritannien bei der Stahlproduktion. Das kündigte den Niedergang des britischen Empires und den Beginn des amerikanischen Jahrhunderts an. In gewisser Weise wiederholt sich diese Figur. Die USA heute ähneln mit sinkenden Patenten und gigantischer Verschuldung dem damals im Abstieg befindlichen britischen Weltreich, China mit seinem Innovationsgeist und machtpolitischen Ambitionen den einst aufstrebenden USA.

Es mag nahe liegen, den aktuellen Präsidenten mit seiner Mischung aus Autoritärem und intellektueller Dürftigkeit, Selbstüberschätzung und Kurzsichtigkeit für den Autor des Niedergangs der USA zu halten. Doch das ist analytisch falsch und politisch illusionär. Donald Trump ist das Symptom dieses Niedergangs.

Die Kosten, den globalen Garanten der liberalen Weltordnung zu spielen, sind mit dem Aufstieg Chinas für die USA schlicht zu hoch geworden. Die USA verfügen zwar als einziger Staat über ein globales Netz von Militärstützpunkten. Sie geben mehr Geld für Rüstung aus als alle anderen Nato-Staaten, China und Russland zusammen. Aber sie sind ökonomisch eine Macht im Niedergang.

Trump ist eine weiten Teils deformierte Antwort auf Probleme, auf die die liberalen Eliten keine Lösungen haben. Von der Hyperglobalisierung seit 1990 haben die Superreichen im Westen und die Mittelschichten in China und in den aufstrebenden Staaten profitiert. Den Mittelschichten in den USA hat sie geschadet. Trumps Zollpolitik ist erpresserisch, ökonomisch schädlich, aber auch das Versprechen, die zerstörerischen Folgen der kapitalistischen Globalisierung für die US-Mittelschicht abzufedern.

Außenpolitik wie Roosevelt

Außenpolitisch markiert Trumps Politik des Rückzugs und der ökonomischen Abschottung via Zöllen eine Rückkehr zu Wilson im Wahlkampf 1916, zum Isolationismus. Theodore Roosevelt, einer von Wilsons Vorgängern, begründete 1918 seine Abneigung gegen den Völkerbund knapp und deutlich: „Wir sind keine Internationalisten, wir sind amerikanische Nationalisten“. Trump klingt heute nicht anders.

Mit dem Rückzug der USA aus der Rolle des Weltpolizisten zerfällt auch der politische Westen, die Achse Washington-Europa. Die Nato existiert zwar noch. Noch immer sind rund 80.000 US-Soldaten in Europa stationiert. Aber der Kern, das (atomare) Abschreckungsversprechen der USA für Europa, hat Trump aufgelöst, als er bekundete, Putin könne in Europa machen, was er will.

Oder ist das ein Irrtum? Auf diese Idee konnte man kommen, als Trump kürzlich Bundeskanzler Friedrich Merz und die Staatschefs Emmanuel Macron, Giorgia Meloni, Keir Starmer und Wolodymyr Selenskyj im Weißen Haus empfing und Europas Führer in einer spektakulären live Übertragung Einigkeit mit dem gut aufgelegten US-Präsident demonstrierten.

Trump scheint – jedenfalls momentan – von der Idee ergriffen, wie Wilson 1917, Roosevelt 1941 und Clinton 1995, einen Krieg in Europa zu beenden. Waren die Untergangsprognosen also übereilt? Ist der Westen als Machtfaktor doch robuster als es scheint?

Unkalkulierbarkeit als Machtinstrument

Wer genau hinsah, entdeckte hinter der neuen transatlantischen Harmonie etwas anderes: Panik. Merz & Co versuchten fast alles zu vermeiden, was den wankelmütigen US-Präsidenten verstören könnte. Sie waren fluchtartig nach Washington gereist, um zu verhindern, dass Trump nach Putins Einflüsterungen in Alaska Selensky ein weiteres Mal öffentlich demütigen und von Hof jagen könnte. Dies war ein gut choreografierter Notfalleinsatz, geboren aus berechtigtem Misstrauen – aber keine Wiedergeburt des politischen Westens.

Hinzu kommt, dass sich Trump launisch wie ein Kind verhält, das bei jedem neuen Spielzeug das alte liegen lässt. Verlass ist bei Trump nur auf seine Unzuverlässigkeit. Rationaler formuliert: Der US-Präsident setzt, typisch für Autokraten, Unkalkulierbarkeit als Machtinstrument ein. Die USA streifen die Rolle des Welthegemon ab und verwandeln sich in eine Regionalmacht. Trumps territoriale Drohungen Richtung Panama, Grönland und Kanada wirken wie eine Wiederbelebung der Monroe-Doktrin aus dem 19. Jahrhundert.

Entsprechend geringer fällt das Interesse der posthegemonialen USA an Europa und dessen Sicherheit aus. Dass die USA Kiew irgendwann endgültig opfern, ist noch immer wahrscheinlicher als eine Renaissance des Westens in einer Anti-Putin-Allianz.

Sicherheit als Auslaufmodell

Was bedeutet das für Europa? Die USA garantierten seit 1945 die Sicherheit (West-)Europas. Das ist ein Auslaufmodell. Daher nimmt man hierzulande das Ende des Westens – gerade angesichts des russischen Revanchismus – mit einer Mischung aus Nostalgie und Angst wahr. Europa allein zu Haus. Doch sich an ein besseres Gestern zu klammern, ist selten klug.

Der Trumpismus ist kein Alptraum, aus dem wir aufwachen werden. Nüchtern betrachtet haben die USA und Europa in der postwestlichen Welt nicht mehr die gleichen Interessen. Die USA zertrümmern derzeit die internationale regelbasierte Ordnung, die Wilson und Franklin D. Roosevelt mit erschufen.

Trump ist aus der Weltgesundheitsorganisation WHO, dem Klimaabkommen, UNESCO, dem UN-Menschenrechtsrat ausgestiegen. Er hat das Iran-Atom-Abkommen und den INF Abrüstungsvertrag ruiniert. Die USA ersetzen die Stärke des Rechts durch das Recht des Stärkeren.

Europa braucht neue Bündnispartner

Europa aber ist auf eine halbwegs funktionierende rechtliche globale Ordnung angewiesen. Die EU ist selbst ein Regelwerk, das sich ohne akzeptierte Normen in Luft auflösen würde. Europa muss sich künftig Bündnispartner jenseits der USA suchen. Und es muss unabhängig werden, um in der neuen gewalttätigeren Weltordnung weder von den USA noch von Russland wirtschaftlich noch militärisch erpressbar zu sein. Das wird ein steiniger, absturzgefährdeter Weg.

Vielleicht aber ist das Ende des Westens nicht nur ein Verlust. Zur Pax Americana gehörten auch ungerechte Kriege, brutale Machtpolitik, Putsche gegen demokratisch gewählte Politiker. Der Historiker Jürgen Osterhammel hat vor ein paar Jahren bemerkt, dass der Westen von Beginn an immer minderwertige Gegner brauchte: „Kein Westen ohne Zivilisationsgefälle“. Europa nach dem Untergang des Westens ist auch die Möglichkeit, diese finstere Seite, die arrogante Überlegenheit, zu überwinden

·taz.de·
Neue Weltordnung: Das Ende des Westens
How to Use WOULD | English Grammar Explanation & Practice
How to Use WOULD | English Grammar Explanation & Practice

How to Use “WOULD” | English Grammar Explanation & Practice

https://www.engvid.com/how-to-use-would-english-grammar-explanation-practice/

“It would be great if someone explained how to use ‘would’ in real life.” I agree! It’s why I made this advanced English grammar lesson. In this class, you will learn (and PRACTICE!) how to use would for offers, preferences, requests, hypothetical situations, reported speech, and more. If I were you, I would watch this video, answer my questions, and do the quiz to double-check your understanding.

Englisch

via engVid https://www.engvid.com

August 23, 2025 at 12:06AM

·engvid.com·
How to Use WOULD | English Grammar Explanation & Practice
Classic Stories: Frankenstein
Classic Stories: Frankenstein

Classic Stories: Frankenstein

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0lyfbyf

Enjoy a classic story in English and learn 10 uses of ‘make’ - in 5 minutes.

FIND BBC LEARNING ENGLISH HERE:

Visit our website ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish

Follow us ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/followus

LIKE PODCASTS? Try some of our other popular podcasts including: ✔️ 6 Minute English ✔️ Learning English from the News ✔️ Learning English Conversations

They're all available by searching in your podcast app.

Englisch

via Learning English Stories http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02pc9s1

August 22, 2025 at 10:00AM

·bbc.co.uk·
Classic Stories: Frankenstein
RFK Jr.s Wi-Fi and 5G conspiracies appear to make it into MAHA report draft
RFK Jr.s Wi-Fi and 5G conspiracies appear to make it into MAHA report draft

RFK Jr.‘s Wi-Fi and 5G conspiracies appear to make it into MAHA report draft

https://arstechnica.com/health/2025/08/maha-draft-takes-on-electromagnetic-radiation-echoing-rfk-jr-s-conspiracies/

The Trump administration's plans to improve Americans' health will include a push to review the safety of electromagnetic radiation, echoing long-held conspiracy theories and falsehoods about Wi-Fi and 5G touted by health secretary and anti-vaccine advocate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

On Friday, Politico obtained a draft version of the "Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy," a highly anticipated report from the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission intended to steer the administration's health policy. The report, which has not been adopted by the White House, is being viewed as friendly to industry, and it contains little to no policy recommendations or proposed regulations. For instance, it includes no proposed restrictions on pesticides or ultra-processed foods, which are top priorities of the MAHA movement.

Otherwise, the document mainly rehashes the talking points and priorities of Kennedy's health crusades. That includes attacking water fluoridation, casting doubt on the safety of childhood vaccines, pushing for more physical activity in children to reduce chronic diseases, getting rid of synthetic food dyes, and claiming that children are being over-prescribed medications.

Notably, the report does not mention the leading causes of death for American children, which are firearms and motor vehicle accidents. Cancer, another top killer, is only mentioned in the context of pushing new AI technologies at the National Institutes of Health. Poisonings, another top killer, are also not mentioned explicitly.

While the importance of water quality is raised in the report, it's only in the context of fluoride and not of any other key contaminants, such as lead or PFAS. And although the draft strategy will prioritize "whole, minimally processed foods," it offers no strategy for reducing the proportion of ultra-processed food (UPF) in Americans' diets. The strategy merely aims to come up with a "government-wide definition" for UPF to guide future research and policies.

Technologie

via Ars Technica - All content https://arstechnica.com

August 18, 2025 at 07:27PM

·arstechnica.com·
RFK Jr.s Wi-Fi and 5G conspiracies appear to make it into MAHA report draft
Suffixes free and -less
Suffixes free and -less

Suffixes –free and -less

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0lxm4xr

Carefree or careless? The suffixes -free and -less.

FIND BBC LEARNING ENGLISH HERE: Visit our website ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish Follow us ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/followus

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER: ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/newsletters

LIKE PODCASTS? Try some of our other popular podcasts including: ✔️ Learning English for Work ✔️ Learning English from the News ✔️ Learning English Stories

They're all available by searching in your podcast app.

Englisch

via Learning English Vocabulary http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02pc9xz

August 18, 2025 at 02:51PM

·bbc.co.uk·
Suffixes free and -less
The story of diversity in America is more complicated than it might seem
The story of diversity in America is more complicated than it might seem

The story of diversity in America is more complicated than it might seem

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/11/14/population-us-race-mixed-race/

For decades, the racial composition of the American population could be described with two terms, Black and White. There were members of other racial groups in the U.S. too, of course — immigrants from South America and Asia and other regions of the world — but most non-White Americans were Black in part because of federal limits on immigration.

via Washington Post - Politics https://www.washingtonpost.com

November 14, 2024 at 10:28PM

·washingtonpost.com·
The story of diversity in America is more complicated than it might seem
BOX SET: English In A Minute 26 TEN English lessons in 10 minutes!
BOX SET: English In A Minute 26 TEN English lessons in 10 minutes!

BOX SET: English In A Minute 26 – TEN English lessons in 10 minutes!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ujfl_c12G8I

Only got 10 minutes to learn English? Don't worry! Our English in a Minute box set is the perfect resource for you. Sit back, relax, and learn essential English words and grammar with some of your favourite BBC Learning English teachers!

00:00 Meanings of 'quality' 01:05 How to use 'capacity' 02:09 Meanings of 'cause' 03:15 How to use 'appropriate' 04:19 Meanings of 'consider' 05:21 How to use 'over' 06:13 Meanings of 'paint' 07:13 How to use 'general' 08:19 Meanings of 'energy' 09:19 Verbs to use with 'problem'

For more English In A Minute materials including transcripts, quizzes, vocabulary and activities, visit our website 👉 https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/english/course/eiam

More popular videos to help you improve your English:

😍 How to say hello like a British English speaker 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hK8KwiGOWb4 😍 Long Vowel - /ɑː/ - 'father’, ‘start’ & ‘hard’ 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDHMuMQdBNw 😍 How to disagree better 👉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWHGKGS7zSc

SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos to help you improve your English 👉 https://www.youtube.com/bbclearningenglish

Visit our website 👉 https://www.bbclearningenglish.com Find us on Instagram 👉 https://www.instagram.com/bbclearningenglish Follow us on Facebook 👉 https://www.facebook.com/bbclearningenglish.multimedia Join us on TikTok 👉 https://www.tiktok.com/@bbclearningen...

We like receiving and reading your comments - please use English when you comment 😊

LearnEnglish #EnglishVocabulary #EnglishInAMinute

Englisch

via BBC Learning English https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHaHD477h-FeBbVh9Sh7syA

August 17, 2025 at 12:30PM

·youtube.com·
BOX SET: English In A Minute 26 TEN English lessons in 10 minutes!
glitch
glitch

glitch

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/glitch

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for August 17, 2025 is:

glitch • \GLITCH\  • noun

Glitch is an informal word referring to an unexpected and usually minor problem. It is used especially for a minor problem with a machine or device, such as a computer.

// The email went out to everyone in the company because of a technical glitch.

See the entry >

Examples:

“Britain’s postal system, once overseen directly by a government minister, became a (government-owned) statutory corporation in 1970. In time, parts of it were spun off—since the days of Margaret Thatcher, the nation has pursued privatization more aggressively than most other countries—and the legal and oversight structure was subjected to continual tinkering. In a deal originating as a ‘public-private partnership’ arrangement, the Post Office in the late 1990s computerized its accounting and other operations. ... Glitches in the software soon resulted in hundreds of rural postmasters being falsely accused of theft and summarily fired.” — Cullen Murphy, The Atlantic, 3 June 2025

Did you know?

There’s a glitch in the etymology of glitch—it may come from the Yiddish glitsh, meaning “slippery place,” but that’s not certain. Print use of glitch referring to a brief unexpected surge of electrical current dates to the mid-20th century. Astronaut John Glenn, in his 1962 book Into Orbit, felt the need to explain the term to his readers: “Literally, a glitch is a spike or change in voltage in an electrical circuit which takes place when the circuit suddenly has a new load put on it.” Today, the word can be used of any minor malfunction or snag. If you’re a gamer you might even take advantage of a glitch that causes something unexpected, and sometimes beneficial, to happen in the game.

Englisch

via Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day https://www.merriam-webster.com/word-of-the-day

August 17, 2025 at 06:06AM

·merriam-webster.com·
glitch
4 Brain Breaks for World Language Learners
4 Brain Breaks for World Language Learners

4 Brain Breaks for World Language Learners

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p76Tu9-HMV8

When students who are learning a new language engage in playful games that include movement, they return to the lesson more energized and refreshed.

Spanish teacher Jamie Midyette understands just how taxing learning a language can be. At times in her class at Albert Hill Middle School in Richmond, VA, she sees her students lose eye contact, look sleepy, or get distracted. It’s at those times when she knows to turn to a valuable tool for her world language learners: brain breaks.

To find more teaching strategies for world language classrooms, visit: https://www.edutopia.org/subject/world-languages

Join the Edutopia community today to get articles, videos, and more delivered via email every Wednesday—all tailored to you and your unique role: https://edut.to/3wEVHUh

Follow us here: Official Website: https://edutopia.org YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/edutopia Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/edutopia Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/edutopia BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/edutopia.org

worldlanguages #studentengagement #brainbreaks

© 2025 George Lucas Educational Foundation

Schule

via SCH ::: Edutopia https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdksaQxXH13BMeHo09MorBg

August 14, 2025 at 02:32AM

·youtube.com·
4 Brain Breaks for World Language Learners
As Trump Pushes International Students Away Asian Schools Scoop Them Up
As Trump Pushes International Students Away Asian Schools Scoop Them Up

As Trump Pushes International Students Away, Asian Schools Scoop Them Up

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/14/business/us-international-students-trump.html

The president’s hostility toward foreign students has made American higher education a riskier proposition for them. Other countries are eager to capitalize.

Schule

via NYT - Education https://www.nytimes.com/section/education

August 14, 2025 at 06:03AM

·nytimes.com·
As Trump Pushes International Students Away Asian Schools Scoop Them Up
Get over it hook up blow away: 10 Everyday English Expressions
Get over it hook up blow away: 10 Everyday English Expressions

“Get over it”, “hook up”, “blow away”: 10 Everyday English Expressions

https://www.engvid.com/get-over-it-hook-up-blow-away-10-everyday-english-expressions/

Understand and start using ten common, casual phrasal verbs that native English speakers use in everyday conversation. I explain how and when to use phrases like get out, bend over backward, bust out, have at it, get over it, chill out, hook up, and more. You’ll also hear about the informal or risky meanings some of these can have. Hear and practice the correct pronunciation with me so you can use these expressions confidently in conversation.

Englisch

via engVid https://www.engvid.com

August 13, 2025 at 05:33AM

·engvid.com·
Get over it hook up blow away: 10 Everyday English Expressions
The Presidents Police State
The Presidents Police State

The President’s Police State

https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/08/trump-national-guard-dc/683839/

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.

For years, prominent voices on the right argued that Democrats were enacting a police state. They labeled everything—a report on homegrown extremism, IRS investigations into nonprofits—a sign of impending authoritarianism. Measures taken by state governments to combat the spread of COVID? Tyranny. An FBI search of Mar-a-Lago? The weaponization of law enforcement.

Now that a president is actually sending federal troops and officers out into the streets of the nation’s cities, however, the right is in lockstep behind him. This morning, Donald Trump announced that he was declaring a crime emergency, temporarily seizing control of the Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police Department and deploying the D.C. National Guard to the nation’s capital.

“This is liberation day in D.C.,” Trump said. Nothing says liberation like deploying hundreds of uniformed soldiers against the wishes of the local elected government. District residents have made clear that they would prefer greater autonomy, including congressional representation, and they have three times voted overwhelmingly against Trump. His response is not just to flex power but to treat the District of Columbia as the president’s personal fiefdom.

Trump’s move is based on out-of-date statistics. It places two officials without municipal policing experience in positions of power over federalization and the MPD, and seems unlikely to significantly affect crime rates. What the White House hopes it might achieve, Politico reports, is “a quick, visually friendly PR win.” Trump needs that after more than a month of trying and failing to change the subject from his onetime friend Jeffrey Epstein.

But what this PR stunt could also do is create precedent for Trump to send armed forces out into American streets whenever he declares a spurious state of emergency. Some of Trump’s supporters don’t seem to mind that fact: “Trump has the opportunity to do a Bukele-style crackdown on DC crime,” Christopher Rufo, the influential conservative personality, posted on X, referring to Nayib Bukele, the Trump ally who is president of El Salvador. “Question is whether he has the will, and whether the public the stomach. Big test: Can he reduce crime faster than the Left advances a counternarrative about ‘authoritarianism’? If yes, he wins. Speed matters.”

Rufo seems to view everything in terms of a political battle to be won via narratives; the term authoritarianism appears to mean nothing to him, and maybe it never meant anything to others on the right who assailed Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Democratic governors. It does have a real meaning, though, and Bukele is its poster boy. Despite the constitution having banned it, he ran for a second term in office; his party then changed the constitution to allow “indefinite” reelection. Lawmakers in his party also brazenly removed supreme-court justices, and his government has forced journalists into exile and locked up tens of thousands of people without due process. This is apparently the America that Chris Rufo wants.

To justify the crackdown, Trump has cited an alleged carjacking attempt that police records say injured the former DOGE employee Edward “Big Balls” Coristine. But MPD has already arrested two Maryland 15-year-olds for unarmed carjacking. That’s good news. Carjacking is a serious crime and should be punished. But Trump has used the incident to claim that violent crime is skyrocketing in Washington. This is, put simply, nonsense. During a press conference today, Trump cited murder statistics from 2023, and said that carjackings had “more than tripled” over the past five years. He didn’t use more recent numbers because they show that these crimes are down significantly in Washington. Murder dropped 32 percent from 2023 to 2024, robberies 39 percent, and armed carjackings 53 percent. This is in line with a broad national reduction in crime. MPD’s preliminary data indicate that violent crime is down another 26 percent so far this year compared with the same timeframe in 2024, though as the crime-statistics analyst Jeff Asher writes, this drop is probably overstated.

Trump’s descriptions of Washington as a lawless hellscape bear little resemblance to what most residents experience. Not only is D.C. not "one of the most dangerous cities anywhere in the World,” as Trump claims, but his prescription seems unlikely to help. He said he is appointing Attorney General Pam Bondi and Terry Cole, the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, to help lead the federalization effort and MPD, but neither has any experience with municipal policing. They have not said what they will do differently. If the administration deploys its forces to high-profile areas such as the National Mall, they won’t have much impact on violent crime, because that’s not where it happens; if they go to less central areas with higher crime rates, they won’t get the PR boost they seek, because tourists and news cameras aren’t there.

Throughout his two presidencies, Trump has treated the military as a prop for making statements about which issues he cares about—and which he doesn’t. He deployed the D.C. National Guard during protests after the murder of George Floyd in summer 2020. Earlier this summer, he federalized the California National Guard and sent Marines to Los Angeles to assist with immigration enforcement, but they were sent home when it became clear that they had nothing to do there. Yet according to testimony before the January 6 panel, Trump did not deploy the D.C. National Guard when an armed mob was sacking the U.S. Capitol in 2021 to try to help Trump hold on to power.

Good policing is important because citizens deserve the right to live in safety. Recent drops in crime in Washington are good news because the district’s residents should be able to feel safe. But Trump’s militarization of the city, his seizure of local police, and his lies about crime in Washington do the opposite: They are a way to make people feel unsafe, and either quiet residents’ dissent or make them support new presidential power grabs. Many of Trump’s defenders are angry when he’s called an authoritarian, but not when he acts as one.

Related:

Trump’s farcical D.C. crackdown

Emergency powers are about to be tested. (From January)

Here are three new stories from The Atlantic:

Bono: Israel and Gaza, held hostage by fundamentalism

Jonathan Chait: Donald Trump doesn’t really care about crime.

Extreme Home Makeover: White House Edition, by Alexandra Petri

Today’s News

An explosion at a U.S. Steel plant in Clairton, Pennsylvania, killed at least one person and injured at least 10. Authorities are investigating the cause as rescue efforts continue, with one person still missing.

A federal judge denied the Department of Justice’s request to unseal grand-jury records in Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case, adding that they offer no “meaningful new information” beyond what was revealed at trial.

President Donald Trump said his administration is considering reclassifying marijuana as less dangerous and will decide in the coming weeks.

Dispatches

The Wonder Reader: Isabel Fattal compiles a list of beach-read recommendations for all moods.

The Weekly Planet: A new study found that, in hundreds of clean-energy futures, the world fell short of key resources, Alexander C. Kaufman writes.

Explore all of our newsletters here.

Evening Read

Illustration by Jonelle Afurong / The Atlantic*

A Cheat Code for Parents Isn’t Working Anymore

By Shirley Li

Julia, a Muppet on Sesame Street, is a 4-year-old girl with bright-orange hair who likes singing, painting, and playing with her stuffed bunny, “Fluffster.” She’s also autistic—which means, as the show made clear during the character’s TV debut, in 2017, that Julia expresses herself in a manner some might not understand. When Big Bird worries that Julia’s silence means she doesn’t like him, his fellow Muppet Abby explains that Julia does things “in a Julia sort of way.” By the end of the episode, Big Bird and Julia are friends, even harmonizing in song.

Neurodivergence is rarely portrayed authentically on-screen, let alone in a way children can grasp. But Julia, who went on to become a regular presence on the show, is the result of a collaboration between Sesame Workshop, the nonprofit company behind Sesame Street, and a team of researchers who study child development and autism. And her introduction did more than demonstrate what neurodivergence can look like; the show emphasized that she has an identity of her own and is as worthy of friendship as anyone else. Those are complex concepts, carefully constructed for young viewers to comprehend.

In the years ahead, such meticulous work may be harder to accomplish.

Read the full article.

More From The Atlantic

A tech rule that will “future-proof” your kids

The elite-university presidents who despise one another

The facial-recognition sham

Elaina Plott Calabro: Canada is killing itself.

No one in the White House knows how to stop Ebola.

Trump invites Putin to set foot in America.

Yes, a moon base.

Culture Break

Illustration: Louise Zergaeng Pomeroy. Sources: Edoardo Fornaciari / Getty; Evening Standard / Getty.

Examine. The novelist Muriel Spark was more than just a wit; she was also a religious writer.

Read. “Surface Support,” a poem by Michael D. Snediker:

“Meniscus augur & hour of errors as the mercury rag spills its rings / from his last good pore, his teeth shaped in greenhouse suet or little / expectant pots of orchid balm in snow.”

Play our daily crossword.

P.S.

Today’s non-Atlantic recommended reading comes from David D. Kirkpatrick at The New Yo

·theatlantic.com·
The Presidents Police State
Trumps Farcical D.C. Crackdown
Trumps Farcical D.C. Crackdown

Trump’s Farcical D.C. Crackdown

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/08/trump-dc-national-guard/683835/

In the summer of 2020, as demonstrators gathered in Washington, D.C., to protest against the murder of George Floyd, President Donald Trump directed the National Guard and officers from various federal law-enforcement agencies to patrol the streets of the nation’s capital. The results were a disaster from the perspective of crowd control but a delight to a wannabe authoritarian  obsessed with good TV: Troops and police buzzed peaceful protesters with a helicopter and fired pepper balls at them as Trump walked across Lafayette Square for a photo shoot.

Now, five years later, Trump has once again decided to impose his idea of law and order upon Washington. This time, however, the city is quiet, and he’s not responding to any protests. He’s sending in the troops because he can—because D.C., as a federal enclave with few protections from presidential overreach, makes for a uniquely soft target. This ostensible show of strength is more like an admission of weakness. It is the behavior of a bully: very bad for the people it touches, but not a likely prelude to full authoritarian takeover.

The inciting incident for this particular round of repression was the attempted carjacking last week of Edward Coristine, better known as Big Balls, a 19-year-old member of Elon Musk’s DOGE inner circle. This sent Trump into a frenzy. “Crime in Washington, D.C., is totally out of control,” he wrote on Truth Social. “I am going to exert my powers, and FEDERALIZE this City.”

One could raise a few objections to this. First, violent crime in the District, including carjackings, has declined dramatically from its post-pandemic highs to the lowest rate in 30 years. Second, if Trump is deeply concerned about safety in D.C., why did his Department of Homeland Security slash federal security funding for the city almost in half in recent months? (Why, for that matter, did he refuse for hours to deploy the National Guard on January 6, 2021, when a violent mob assaulted law-enforcement officers?) And third, the president cannot unilaterally “federalize” the city. D.C. is under the direct authority of the federal government, but the Home Rule Act of 1973 provides the city with significant control over its own affairs—something that can be removed only by an act of Congress.

What Trump can do, and what he announced he would do in a press conference this morning, is direct the D.C. National Guard onto the streets of the city, along with a variety of federal agencies that the president listed off in a bored, singsong tone (“FBI, ATF, DEA, Park Police, the U.S. Marshals Service, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security …”). He also declared his intention to take control of D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department under a never-before-used provision of the Home Rule Act that allows the president to direct local police for up to 30 days given “special conditions of an emergency nature.” Congress can extend the authorization, but Senate Republicans might well have to surmount a Democratic filibuster to do so. Whether Trump’s use of the statute can be challenged in court is unclear.

[Quinta Jurecic: Trump is exploiting D.C.’s lack of statehood]

The idea of armed officers under presidential control patrolling the streets of a free city is not a reassuring one. So far, however, the surge in law enforcement—which began a few days ago, before this morning’s announcement—appears mostly farcical. Footage from WUS9, a local news station, showed a pack of Drug Enforcement Administration agents lumbering awkwardly along the Mall in bulletproof vests as joggers streaked past. (For those unfamiliar with D.C., the Mall—a green expanse frequented by tourists and ice-cream trucks—is not exactly a hotbed of crime, especially on a sunny summer morning.) Near my quiet neighborhood in D.C.’s Northwest quadrant, federal officers have been patrolling a tiny park whose chief menace, in my experience, has been the occasional abandoned chicken bone scarfed down by my dog. Over the weekend, I watched a Secret Service car drive slowly in circles around my block. At first I assumed that the agents had gotten lost.

Trump is fresh off his deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, which he launched with great fanfare in June to intimidate anti-ICE protesters, then quietly withdrew weeks later after grinding down the Guard’s morale with what some service members described to The New York Times as a “fake mission.” On the surface, deploying the Guard and federal law enforcement to D.C., and taking control of its entire police force, is an escalation of this project. In a deeper sense, however, it’s an admission of weakness. D.C.’s unique legal status means that Trump can personally direct the city’s National Guard, and even its police, with far fewer restrictions than he faced in Los Angeles. The same day that Trump announced his crackdown on the capital, a federal judge in San Francisco began a three-day trial over the legality of the Los Angeles deployment, in response to a lawsuit filed by California Governor Gavin Newsom.

The District, which is both heavily Democratic and plurality Black, has long served as a useful boogeyman in the Republican imaginary. During Trump’s press conference, he rambled about crime in not only D.C. but also Baltimore, Chicago, and Oakland, and appeared to suggest in one confusing moment that he was going to get rid of cashless bail in Chicago. (The president cannot do this.) These cities, like D.C., all have Black mayors and significant Black populations—and, for that matter, falling crime rates—but, unlike the capital, they are protected by blue-state governments with significant authority to push back against the president.

The good news, such as it is, is that Trump’s latest seizure of power is probably not the prelude to an autogolpe. The bad news is that, nine years into the Trump era, this sort of thing has become much more familiar: the president identifying a loophole in the law that allows him to wield force with little constraint. To the extent that his D.C. crackdown is real, those who will suffer the most are those who are already vulnerable, especially people living on the streets, whom Trump has declared are no longer welcome in the city. As Trump’s rhetoric heated up last week, the D.C. attorney general, Brian Schwalb, sent out a notice warning local hospitals to expect a surge of patients should law enforcement begin clearing homeless encampments.

After the 2020 National Guard deployment to D.C., congressional Democrats briefly rallied around the idea of finally granting the District statehood. After January 6, they pushed for legislation that would secure mayoral control over the Guard. Neither initiative went anywhere. Any future effort to patch up American democracy should understand that securing D.C.’s autonomy is part of the necessary work of limiting the tools available to malicious interference.

via Best of The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/

August 11, 2025 at 11:17PM

·theatlantic.com·
Trumps Farcical D.C. Crackdown
Extra-strong nicotine pouches packaged like children's sweets
Extra-strong nicotine pouches packaged like children's sweets

Extra-strong nicotine pouches packaged like children's sweets

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cnv75dd3v37o

Extra-strong nicotine pouches packaged like children's sweets

Katie McEvinney BBC Disclosure

BBC

The nicotine pouches are being sold in packaging that looks like children's sweets

Extra-strong nicotine products designed to appeal to children – including some which have ripped off the logos of popular sweet brands – are being openly sold in shops, BBC Scotland has found.

A Disclosure reporter, filming undercover, bought nicotine pouches which mimic the name and branding of the well-known "Millions" sweets in a shop in the east end of Glasgow.

The shop worker who sold the pouches claimed they contained 100mg of nicotine, which would make them about 10 times the strength of a cigarette.

Tests later showed a lower level of 17mg, which would still be defined as extra strong by most legitimate manufacturers.

Trading Standards said they were concerned about products with a "worrying child appeal" as well as flavours and "eye-catching packaging" that mimicked sweets.

However, there is no law restricting the age of sale for nicotine pouches, so any child can legally enter a shop and buy the addictive products.

Getty Images

The pouches are small sachets that contain nicotine

The pouches are small, pillow-like sachets that contain nicotine - a chemical found in tobacco which acts as a stimulant.

There are no restrictions on the strength of the nicotine in the pouches.

They are placed under the top lip, against the gum and deliver a nicotine hit which can be stronger than cigarettes or vapes.

Some people use them as a way to quit smoking, though they are not recommended by the NHS.

What are the potential side effects of nicotine pouches?

The pouches are significantly less harmful than cigarettes, and because chemicals do not enter the lungs, they may carry fewer risks than vapes.

However, they can cause a variety of side effects including nicotine addiction, oral health issues and gastrointestinal problems.

People may experience gum irritation and recession. The pouches can also lead to increased heart rate, blood pressure and increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases.

Kate Pike, from the Chartered Institute of Trading Standards, said it was "outrageous" that products were mimicking popular sweet brands in a bid to target children.

A BBC reporter, filming undercover, bought nicotine pouches with branding that mimicked sweets in a shop in Glasgow

For the BBC Disclosure documentary Nicotine Pouches: What's the Problem?, a reporter was secretly filmed buying a tub of orange-flavoured Millions pouches for £7.50.

The shop worker who sold the product told her: "They're special."

The product did not have all of the required hazard warnings, nor did it have traceable manufacturer details.

The design on the tub featured photos of the Millions sweets, made by Scottish confectionery manufacturer Golden Casket Ltd.

It told the BBC it had no connection to nicotine pouches and was "appalled" its branding was being used in this way.

Another brand called "Candys", with pictures of gummy bears, was also for sale.

The makers of the Candys brand did not respond.

Ms Pike told the BBC: "Millions sweets are clearly a product for children and there is no reason to link them with nicotine pouches unless you want to attract children.

"If this was alcohol, there would be an outcry. A child coming across that would think it's for them and nicotine is a highly addictive substance.

"Retailers should be more responsible for what they are offering in their communities."

Prof Crawford Moodie, of the University of Stirling, has been researching the marketing of tobacco and nicotine products for years.

He said: "It makes you question what these companies are trying to do. I mean, clearly, they don't have consent to do that.

"But the fact that companies are putting these on the market and retailers are quite happy to sell them shows that we are not in a good place with respect to controlling the nicotine pouch market and protecting young people in particular.

"There's very little in the packaging to tell you that they're not sweets and the potential for abuse and detrimental effects for young people are clearly there."

When contacted by the BBC, the retailer said it had now taken the Millions product off its shelves.

Alex said he had never tried smoking or vaping before taking nicotine patches

The Disclosure programme spoke to young people who said they had used pouches.

Alex started taking them two years ago when he was 15 in school and became addicted.

He said he had never tried smoking or vaping before.

It was the packaging, how the different flavours were advertised and seeing his friends take the pouches, that made him want to try them himself.

He said: "I think it was just something different.

"It went from one a day to three a day to - at my highest - I was using probably 15 a day.

"If I didn't take them, I'd just get withdrawals and just feel demotivated and like I didn't want to do anything until I took another one."

Nicotine pouches are currently unregulated and can be sold legally to under-18s.

The Tobacco and Vapes Bill is going through the House of Lords but there are calls for government to speed up the legislation to shut down loopholes.

The bill will ban the sale of nicotine pouches to under-18s and will restrict things like where they can be positioned in shops as well as limiting flavours, strengths, packaging and how they are advertised.

"We are receiving widespread reports from across the UK that these nicotine pouches are being sold to children," said Ms Pike, Trading Standards' lead officer for tobacco and vaping.

"Parents are getting in touch assuming we can take action and are shocked when we tell them we can't.

"At the moment it's perfectly legal and there's nothing we can do."

The BBC contacted several of the biggest manufacturers of nicotine pouches and all of them supported forthcoming legislation.

British American Tobacco said its pouches "should never be used by those under-age", manufacturer Phillip Morris said nicotine pouches had proved "hugely successful" for adults to quit cigarettes, and Japan Tobacco International said "minors should never use or access nicotine-containing products".

via BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news

August 7, 2025 at 12:59PM

·bbc.com·
Extra-strong nicotine pouches packaged like children's sweets
Practical English: Responding to good news
Practical English: Responding to good news

Practical English: Responding to good news

https://www.espressoenglish.net/practical-english-responding-to-good-news/

Download lesson PDF Everyday Speaking Course Do you ever hear good news in English… and you’re not sure how to respond? Don’t just say “okay” or “nice” – use one of the natural and expressive phrases from this video! When someone shares their good news, your response matters – and the right phrase shows that […]

The post Practical English: Responding to good news appeared first on Espresso English.

Englisch

via Espresso English https://www.espressoenglish.net/

August 10, 2025 at 02:02PM

·espressoenglish.net·
Practical English: Responding to good news