Covid vaccines saving lives data

Many of the assumptions in the model are incorrect, and the estimated number of deaths averted by vaccines is implausible.

The COVID-19 pandemic is not a once in a lifetime risk, the next deadly virus could emerge sooner than we think. Western allies need to be prepared and should be on a constant war footing for the next outbreak.

Analysis by Airfinity shows the AstraZeneca and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines saved the most lives in the first year of the global vaccination campaign.

This Lancet paper on 'dangers of undervaccination' should never have been published

The world has bet the farm on vaccines as the solution to the pandemic, but the trials are not focused on answering the questions many might assume they are. Peter Doshi reports As phase III trials of covid-19 vaccines reach their target enrolments, officials have been trying to project calm. The US coronavirus czar Anthony Fauci and the Food and Drug Administration leadership have offered public assurances that established procedures will be followed.1234 Only a “safe and effective” vaccine will be approved, they say, and nine vaccine manufacturers issued a rare joint statement pledging not to prematurely seek regulatory review.5 But what will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared “effective”? To the public this seems fairly obvious. “The primary goal of a covid-19 vaccine is to keep people from getting very sick and dying,” a National Public Radio broadcast said bluntly.6 Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said, “Ideally, you want an antiviral vaccine to do two things . . . first, reduce the likelihood you will get severely ill and go to the hospital, and two, prevent infection and therefore interrupt disease transmission.”7 Yet the current phase III trials are not actually set up to prove either (table 1). None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus. View this table: Table 1 Characteristics of ongoing phase III covid-19 vaccine trials In a September interview Medscape editor in chief Eric Topol pondered what counts as a recorded “event” in the vaccine trials. “We’re not talking about just a PCR [polymerase …

Due to the importance of the issue of Covid-19 vaccinations to society at large, PANDA calls on Lancet to retract a seminal paper that is demonstrably incorrect in its assumptions.

This continuation of our inquiry into the drivers of excess deaths digs a little deeper into the vaccination data to see how many lives the Covid vaccines saved.

Rates of undervaccination against COVID-19 ranged from 32·8% to 49·8% across the four UK nations in summer, 2022. Undervaccination was associated with an elevated risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes.

Mathew Crawford just did an analysis showing that the data from the UK shows that the vaccines aren't saving any lives at all. Zero. Zip. Nada. So we're killing over 150K people to save no lives. Wow.

Theoretical Population Benefit Claim Found Invalid

The hypothesis (published in the medical journal THE LANCET Infectious Diseases on June 23, 2022) that the COVID “vaccinations” prevented 14 million “COVID deaths” and thus significantly mitigated the severity of the “pandemic” is based on unrealistic figures and demonstrably false calculations.

Modelling used to make wild claim

There is supposed to be a clear line between medical publishing and propaganda. No less so than in the pages of the Lancet

When the University of Oxford developed a vaccine that was effective against COVID-19, ensuring that it could be rolled out globally and in perpetuity for low- and middle-income countries was of

COVID-19 vaccines have been highly effective in reducing morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. While primary series vaccination rates are generally high in Southeast Asian (SEA) countries, v...

Mathematical models assume the same level of mortality susceptibility across all populations. This assumption is a fallacy and completely negates any of their “models.”

Updated model claims 3.26 million lives saved: Comments on State Capacity Covidology: Part 2

The policies adopted to combat Covid-19 are producing a worldwide inflationary economic meltdown. This macro outcome follows an endless array of individual suffering and tragedy. Yes, from Covid-19 itself, but also from lockdowns, closures, mandates, treatment limitations, and the resulting cascade of social, health, and microeconomic effects. The pandemic also provided opportunity to stomp on basic rights, as when government health and law enforcement agencies

Because it is being used to shut down debate about vaccine injuries and deaths

Is the existence of models to estimate lives saved by Covid-19 vaccines ever proof that lives were actually saved?

A comparison of non-Covid excess mortality rates in Denmark and the U.K. finds that they closely resemble each other at approximately 250 per million doses, i.e., a fatality rate of 0.025% or one every 4,000 doses.