MHRA and regulatory

Freedom of Information requests have revealed that the MHRA did not follow up on nearly half of the reports of deaths following the Moderna Covid vaccine.

All-party group believe MHRA were aware of heart and clotting issues in February 2021 but did not highlight the problems for several months

'The most disgraceful period of recent history’ – MPs savage the MHRA

Untested – the mass-produced covid vaccines that skipped clinical trials

In a new FOI release the MHRA has finally come clean that it failed to test the safety of mass manufactured Covid vaccine batches, in contravention of its own regulations and public statements.

BREAKING Secret WhatsApp messages released today from Isabel Oakeshott reveal that Downing Street ordered the UK regulator the MHRA to knock down vax

How Safe was the “Great British” Jab?

In August 2023 we published this article describing Cheryl Grainger’s tenacious attempts to get MHRA to release the data it has been holding for 3 years now about the 2000 pregnant women who were vaccinated in the first half of 2021 who the MHRA were supposed to have been monitoring. The MHRA refused to release the data, citing exemption under Section 22 of the FOI Act; this exemption applies when a ‘future’ report is ‘planned’ to be issued containing the relevant information. They provided no date for when this ‘future’ report might be published. Consequently Cheryl wrote the following letter of complaint to the Information Commissioner's Office:

UK drugs regulator the MHRA has responded to an FOI request about the Covid vaccines but redacted crucial safety data. What is it hiding?

The MHRA held no safety data on the Covid vaccine it approved as it was a different product to the one used in the trial. But Hugo Keith KC fumbled his question to June Raine at the Covid Inquiry and let her off the hook.

How do you measure infectiousness?

@ClareCraigPath: Today saw the release of minutes for the working group set up to advise MHRA on the covid vaccines. They knew the issues but ignored them...🧵 On 27th November they briefly discussed a lack of...…

There are "unequivocal safety signals" for heart, blood and reproduction problems in Yellow Card vaccine data, a top U.K. scientist has warned, saying: "Withdraw them immediately."

A letter to the Health Select Committee sent by email on Friday 23 February 2024.

A letter to the Health Select Committee sent by email on 11 December 2023.

A letter to the Health Select Committee sent by email on 24 October 2023.

The MHRA has admitted that it doesn’t have a process for assessing the cause of Covid vaccine adverse events. Nor does it hold any information on the assessments it has carried out.

The MHRA was so flooded with Yellow Card adverse event reports for Covid vaccines that its statistical analysis was skewed and safety signals were buried, a new FOI release has revealed.

MHRA executive Samantha Atkinson has an in-house chuckle at the public's expense about inaccurate Covid testing. Dr Atkinson says from her position within the MHRA that the challenges need to be… — Dr Tess Lawrie (@lawrie_dr)

But the public has had enough, calling out the regulator for its hypocrisy and lack of transparency.

"I've never seen so many young people having cardiac MRIs in my entire career. There are people who've had heart damage, myocarditis, they've had heart problems"

Yes, it's got a green light for go!

Veteran Toxicologist: NO proper toxicology analysis was performed on the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA "vaccine" prior to its injection into hundreds of millions of people.

Internal emails show that the US Food and Drug Administration informs employees leaving for industry jobs that, despite restrictions on post-employment lobbying, they are still permitted to influence the agency. Peter Doshi reports During his final three years at the US Food and Drug Administration the physician scientist Doran Fink’s work focused on reviewing covid-19 vaccines. But a decade after joining the agency Fink had accepted a job with Moderna, the covid vaccine manufacturer, and was undergoing mandatory FDA exit requirements. As he left for the private sector, the FDA’s ethics programme staff emailed him guidelines on post-employment restrictions, “tailored to your situation.” The email, obtained by The BMJ under a freedom of information request, explained that, although US law prohibits a variety of types of lobbying contact,1 “they do not prohibit the former employee from other activities, including working ‘behind the scenes.’” The legal ability to work “behind the scenes” is enshrined in federal regulations2 and highlights a “critical, critical loophole” in US revolving door policy, says a leading consumer advocate. Craig Holman, a government affairs lobbyist for the organisation Public Citizen, told The BMJ that the rules forbid various forms of direct lobbying contact but permit lobbying activity that is indirect. “So, people will leave government service and can immediately start doing influence peddling and lobbying,” Holman explained. “They can even run a lobbying campaign, as long as they don’t actually pick up the telephone and …

Peter Doshi Investigates

We have all long been aware of the reluctance of mainstream news outlets to question any aspect of the Covid vaccination programme. It should be a matter of gravest concern for us all

In August 2023 we published this article describing Cheryl Grainger’s tenacious attempts to get MHRA to release the data it has been holding for 3 years now about the 2000 pregnant women who were vaccinated in the first half of 2021 who the MHRA were supposed to have been monitoring. The MHRA refused to release the data, citing exemption under Section 22 of the FOI Act; this exemption applies when a ‘future’ report is ‘planned’ to be issued containing the relevant information. They provided no date for when this ‘future’ report might be published. Consequently Cheryl wrote the following letter of complaint to the Information Commissioner's Office:

Meet the facilitator board

On August 23, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval (or licensure) to the first ever COVID-19 mRNA gene therapy product by Pfizer/BioNTech, which from the onset was misbranded as a ‘vaccine.’ The Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, M.D., said at the time: “The FDA’s approval of this vaccine is a milestone as we continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic. While this and other vaccines have met the FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for emergency use authorization, as the first FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine, the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product.”