Supporting Evidence

In this video presentation at World Council for Health General Assembly Meeting #54, Dr. Phillip Altman joined us from Australia to share results from his new

Julian Gillespie, a retired Australian lawyer and former barrister, gave testimony at Covid Under Question hosted by Senator Malcolm Roberts on 23 March 2022.   He is currently managing p…

New research finds results from fewer than half of COVID-19 vaccines trials and just 7% of contracts published

US company faces scrutiny over Covid profits after UK agrees to secrecy clause

It's like rolling the dice for what you get in your vial. Both the FDA and EMA knew this but kept this out of the public view because if it were known, nobody would take the vaccines.

Fact: The total number of COVID fatalities in the United States in the last 4 months is 500 times higher than the fatalities in Uttar Pradesh in the same period.

Earlier this year, a Board member from a Bavarian insurer, part of a larger umbrella of insurers known as BKK Insurers with 10.9 million members, wrote a letter raising disturbing issues associated with the COVID-19 vaccines. Addressing the letter to Professor Dr. Klaus Cichutek, the current president of the Paul Ehrlich Institute (the German federal agency, medical regulatory body and research institute for vaccines and biomedicines), Board member Andreas Schöfbeck also addressed the letter to Germany’s National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds, German Medical Association, and National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. While this letter contained what some might consider bombshell information about COVID-19 vaccine safety, no mainstream media in the United States picked up on this communication, nor commented on its implications. Organizations considered by mainstream media pounced on the information, circulating tweets that nearly 4% of Germany’s COVID-19-vaccinated population experienced some kind of injury—a disastrous situation. Yet soon after this letter, Andreas Schöfbeck would be destroyed, his career seemingly ruined in the health payer industry.  A lesson learned in the developed world—make strong enough ripples about the COVID-19 vaccines and you might just get swept away by a tsunami of corporate and government-coordinated responses drowning one’s career. Yet perhaps Mr. Schöfbeck’s infamous letter did some good as, months later, the German Health Ministry became one of the first developed (rich) nations to identify the condition, albeit, rare, called “Post-vac Syndrome.” Still recommending vaccination (risk-benefit analysis), a milestone for the vaccine-injured occurred in Germany. Will America follow? In the letter Mr. Schöfbeck sent to the head of the apex biomedical research institute is a troubling message—a “Strong warning signal for coded vaccination side effects after corona vaccination.”

New advice warns expectant mothers to avoid paint fumes, or buying new fabrics, furniture and cars while expecting or breastfeeding.

Health regulators have said there’s no increased thrombosis risk from the Covid vaccine, but has the damage been done?

Young people have as much chance of winning the lottery as of getting serious blood clots from the AstraZeneca vaccine

Families fighting for VDPS reform to the UK compensation scheme for Covid-19 vaccine injured and bereaved

Some trial volunteers were given shots half the planned strength, so how does that affect the results?

Recent evidence uncovered in our Missouri v. Biden suit suggests the most egregious, coordinated, massive violation of First Amendment free speech rights by the federal government in U.S. history.

by Rhoda Wilson In an article published yesterday, Steve Kirsch detailed the proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the Covid “vaccines” and then deliberately covered it up. “Israel didn’t start to gather safety data until a year into the vaccine program. They gathered 6 months’ worth of data and found that the vaccines weren’t safe so they lied to the world about it,”

Team behind Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid vaccine awarded world’s oldest scientific prize as Royal Society reveals scientific medal and award winners.

Students at North American universities risk disenrollment due to third dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates. We present a risk-benefit assessment of boosters in this

An analysis of 27 years of “ongoing, systematic wrongdoing” by the pharmaceutical industry reveals the U.S. Department of Justice has levied billions of dollars worth of fines against pharma companies, often under the False Claims Act. The fines support government budgets but do nothing to reform the industry’s criminal behavior.

Pfizer court-ordered, released data reveals the miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%. The true rate may be higher or lower, as Pfizer did not record or report pregnancy outcomes for 238 of the 274 women known to be pregnant during the trial.

A summary of an important paper on mRNA vaccine safety.

An Indian court ordered Bill Gates, the Indian government and the Serum Institute of India — the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer — to provide formal responses relating to a case filed by the father of a 33-year-old doctor who died after receiving AstraZeneca’s Covishield COVID-19 vaccine.

Many of us are familiar with the following conundrum: on one hand, highly credentialed scientists and doctors have written numerous research papers explaining the dangerous mechanisms of action underlying mRNA/DNA “platform” technologies.  The papers are meticulously researched and depict, correctly in my opinion, many terrifying consequences of the technology that breaches the innate protective mechanisms of human cells.  Furthermore, these theoretical papers are validated by the observed outcomes, such as for example, increases in all-cause mortality in high correlation. with increases in rates of vaccination in a given territory, unprecedented increases in the adverse events and deaths recorded by various passive reporting systems, astonishingly high reports of the adverse events and deaths from the pharmas’ own pharmacovigilance systems, and autopsy findings in vaccinated post-mortem showing the mechanisms of mRNA technology damage in histopathologic evaluations.  On the other hand, many who have received the injections report no adverse effects and deem the points above a “crazy conspiracy”.  The question from the uninjured seems to be – why don’t we see MORE deaths if what you say about mRNA products is true?  Setting aside ethical limitations of this question, here is a possible answer why:  The mRNA shots do not conform to their label specifications. In practice both “blank” and "lethal" vials and anything in between is produced.

People who received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine were 44% more likely to be infected, a study from Oxford University on English data for 2021 has found, contradicting the basis of global vaccine policy.

There is evidence to date of the collusion between the manufacturers, the global regulatory agencies, and the US Department of Defense that led to the commercial release of the Covid-19 countermeasures that do not comply with the current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP). The video describes public data from CDC's VAERS database as well as various documents that have been obtained through FOIA releases and other sources. Evidence includes Moderna's non-clinical study summaries, Pfizer’s Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls documentation, and contracts between pharma and the DOD for supply of the mRNA/DNA products. It reveals disregard for established safety rules, regulations, and safety practices throughout the development, manufacture, and distribution of these products.

Advanced Purchase Agreement for COVID-19 Vaccines for EU Member States

Informed consent was impossible. This toxic soup should never have been injected into humans.

The US CDC estimates that SARS-CoV-2 has infected more than 100 million Americans, and evidence is mounting that natural immunity is at least as protective as vaccination. Yet public health leadership says everyone needs the vaccine. Jennifer Block investigates When the vaccine rollout began in mid-December 2020, more than one quarter of Americans—91 million—had been infected with SARS-CoV-2, according to a US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate.1 As of this May, that proportion had risen to more than a third of the population, including 44% of adults aged 18-59 (table 1). View this table: Table 1 Estimated total infections in the United States between February 2020 and May 2021* The substantial number of infections, coupled with the increasing scientific evidence that natural immunity was durable, led some medical observers to ask why natural immunity didn’t seem to be factored into decisions about prioritising vaccination.234 “The CDC could say [to people who had recovered], very well grounded in excellent data, that you should wait 8 months,” Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease specialist at University of California San Francisco, told Medpage Today in January. She suggested authorities ask people to “please wait your turn.”4 Others, such as Icahn School of Medicine virologist and researcher Florian Krammer, argued for one dose in those who had recovered. “This would also spare individuals from unnecessary pain when getting the second dose and it would free up additional vaccine doses,” he told the New York Times .5 “Many of us were saying let’s use [the vaccine] to save lives, not to vaccinate people already immune,” says Marty Makary, a professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University. Still, the CDC instructed everyone, regardless of previous infection, to get fully vaccinated as soon as they were eligible: natural immunity “varies …

How Seattle’s cancer research center became a nexus for coordinating and understanding vaccine studies.