Vaccine AE reporting systems

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

How are jab adverse events proved? The inaugural Understanding Vaccine Causation Conference brought together legal practitioners, doctors, scientists, advocacy groups, and more to discuss this key question.

In the United Kingdom, the COVID-19 vaccines were administered starting on December 8, 2020, and by May 6th, almost 39 million people there had received their first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, with 24 million people receiving two doses, hence completely vaccinated. Given this data accumulation sufficient information was available for a review of the UK’s Yellow Card -based safety and adverse event reporting system. Recently, the Director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy, Ltd and EbMC Squared CiC , Dr. Tess Lawrie wrote to the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) with concerns about what appear to be accumulating adverse event data. For example, Dr. Lawrie raises the awareness that just between January 4, 2021 and May 26, 2021 a total of 1,253 deaths and 888,196 adverse events were reported, which aren’t directly proven as correlated with the vaccine process but most certainly could be so. So this means that in the real world about 4.5% of those that receive the vaccine could possibly have had an adverse event if these incidents are correlated to the jab. But that’s not proven here. Nonetheless, Lawrie has mounting concerns for people in the UK.

Reporting systems for vaccine-associated adverse events are intended to raise red flags to guide definitive investigation.

Other countries more efficient at noticing issues.

Vaccine Adverse Events Reports spiked from 60,000 baseline to 1 million in 2021

A BMJ investigation has raised concerns that the VAERS system isn’t operating as intended and that signals are being missed. Jennifer Block reports Three weeks after receiving a second dose of a covid vaccine, Robert Sullivan collapsed at home on his treadmill. An anaesthesiologist in Maryland, USA, he was a particularly fit 49 year old: the week before falling ill, he’d been happily skiing at altitude in Colorado. Sullivan was given a diagnosis of sudden onset pulmonary hypertension, which is generally progressive, can be fatal, and in most cases can’t be cured. The condition is rare, especially in middle aged men. Sullivan decided to file a report in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which collects reports of symptoms, diagnoses, hospital admissions, and deaths after vaccination for the purpose of capturing post-market safety signals. But the submission process was a glitchy race against the clock. “The format is cumbersome and it times you out,” he tells The BMJ . For his troubles, Sullivan received a confirmation by email and a temporary “e-report” number. He learnt from his doctor’s office that a VAERS representative had requested medical records. Then he didn’t hear back for a year. VAERS is supposed to be user friendly, responsive, and transparent. However, investigations by The BMJ have uncovered that it’s not meeting its own standards. Not only have staffing levels failed to keep pace with the unprecedented number of reports since the rollout of covid vaccines but there are signs that the system is overwhelmed, reports aren’t being followed up, and signals are being missed. The BMJ has spoken to more than a dozen people, including physicians and a state medical examiner, who have filed VAERS reports of a serious nature on behalf of themselves or patients and were never contacted by clinical reviewers or …

The UK Medicine Regulator has confirmed that over a period of twelve months the Covid-19 Vaccines have caused five times more deaths than the total number of deaths due to all other available vacci…

Dr. Theresa Long, medical officer with the United States military, has testified in court that she was ordered by a superior to suppress Covid-19 vaccine injuries following the Biden regime’s mandate

In response to a Freedom of Information Request submitted by Children’s Health Defense, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last week admitted it never analyzed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System for safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines.

The attorneys that represent ICAN are representing the plaintiff in a lawsuit against the FDA to obtain Pfizer’s covid vaccine documents. They recently secured an unredacted copy of a previously produced post-authorization adverse event report. The lifted redactions reveal that within weeks of Pfizer’s vaccine being administered pursuant to emergency use authorization, Pfizer, apparently unexpectedly, had to hire 600 full time employees “to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports” being received by the company.

The v-safe protocol lists a series of 15 “Adverse Events of Special Interest” but, unbelievably, the v-safe program itself does not even track these adverse events!

Recently, we told you that vaccine manufacturers have to submit FOIA requests to the FDA to obtain additional information regarding serious adverse events, including deaths, following the use of their products that are submitted to VAERS. We know this because Janssen’s Chief Medical Officer (CMO) said so during his presentation at the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting, convened to investigate the safety of the J&J/Janssen vaccine.

Vaccine manufacturers, like the rest of the public, must submit a FOIA to the FDA to obtain additional information regarding serious adverse events, including deaths, submitted to VAERS. The problem: they are not doing it.

ICAN discovered 1,102 deleted reports from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System(VAERS). ICAN wrote CDC, FDA, and HHS demanding answers.

ICAN has obtained unreleased lot and dose data for the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines. OpenVAERS’ analyses of this data indicates several “hot lots.”

A federal judge has ordered the CDC to release all 7.8 million v-safe free text field entries over the next 12 months.

Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense for records and communications relating to the data contained in the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Defense (No. 1:22-cv-03043)).The Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch’s Defense Medical Epidemiology Database is a web-based tool designed to provide access to:

Serious AE's in 1 out of every 125 vaccinated; 40x underreporting factor for severe adverse events; government urged to take vaccine injury seriously, find solutions

Comprehensive investigation and analysis by Mathew Crawford

The Vaccine Wars Part XXXIII

They missed hundreds of serious adverse events that are more elevated than myocarditis. A new VAERS analysis done by Albert Benavides blows the doors off the "safe and effective" narrative.