Twitter

12788 bookmarks
Custom sorting
President Trump’s decision to limit AP reporters' access is as much fight over the Gulf of America as it is a protest of what White House advisers say is years of liberal word choices that AP’s influential stylebook has spread across mainstream mediahttps://t.co/H7hJrsY44r— Marc Caputo (@MarcACaputo) February 17, 2025
President Trump’s decision to limit AP reporters' access is as much fight over the Gulf of America as it is a protest of what White House advisers say is years of liberal word choices that AP’s influential stylebook has spread across mainstream mediahttps://t.co/H7hJrsY44r— Marc Caputo (@MarcACaputo) February 17, 2025
·x.com·
President Trump’s decision to limit AP reporters' access is as much fight over the Gulf of America as it is a protest of what White House advisers say is years of liberal word choices that AP’s influential stylebook has spread across mainstream mediahttps://t.co/H7hJrsY44r— Marc Caputo (@MarcACaputo) February 17, 2025
Was it anti-free speech when any other outlets reporters weren't invited to join the White House briefing room? Or just the AP reporters? Not getting access is NOT cutting off anyone's free speech.— Save California (@BethBridges) February 17, 2025
Was it anti-free speech when any other outlets reporters weren't invited to join the White House briefing room? Or just the AP reporters? Not getting access is NOT cutting off anyone's free speech.— Save California (@BethBridges) February 17, 2025
·x.com·
Was it anti-free speech when any other outlets reporters weren't invited to join the White House briefing room? Or just the AP reporters? Not getting access is NOT cutting off anyone's free speech.— Save California (@BethBridges) February 17, 2025
Marc you aren't very bright, nor do know how the 1st amendment works. A seat in the White House press briefing room is a privilege not a right and not getting a seat has nothing to do with the 1st amendment. Remember, once upon a time there wasn't a briefing room at all. Idiot.— eb in oregon (@OregonEb) February 17, 2025
Marc you aren't very bright, nor do know how the 1st amendment works. A seat in the White House press briefing room is a privilege not a right and not getting a seat has nothing to do with the 1st amendment. Remember, once upon a time there wasn't a briefing room at all. Idiot.— eb in oregon (@OregonEb) February 17, 2025
·x.com·
Marc you aren't very bright, nor do know how the 1st amendment works. A seat in the White House press briefing room is a privilege not a right and not getting a seat has nothing to do with the 1st amendment. Remember, once upon a time there wasn't a briefing room at all. Idiot.— eb in oregon (@OregonEb) February 17, 2025
Not letting someone sit in a particular room when something happens is exactly like not letting them exercise their freedom to speak and publish. This whole thing is rather silly and petty but it has nothing to do with freedom of speech or the press.— pentamom65 (@pentamom65) February 17, 2025
Not letting someone sit in a particular room when something happens is exactly like not letting them exercise their freedom to speak and publish. This whole thing is rather silly and petty but it has nothing to do with freedom of speech or the press.— pentamom65 (@pentamom65) February 17, 2025
·x.com·
Not letting someone sit in a particular room when something happens is exactly like not letting them exercise their freedom to speak and publish. This whole thing is rather silly and petty but it has nothing to do with freedom of speech or the press.— pentamom65 (@pentamom65) February 17, 2025
It isn't, it's because they are fruit of the poisoned tree. The accepted USAID money to produce propaganda. They can write whatever they want. But there are a lot of journalists, that didn't accept money, with a much larger following that are being rotated in.— Darla Scheuerman (@DarlaScheu5344) February 17, 2025
It isn't, it's because they are fruit of the poisoned tree. The accepted USAID money to produce propaganda. They can write whatever they want. But there are a lot of journalists, that didn't accept money, with a much larger following that are being rotated in.— Darla Scheuerman (@DarlaScheu5344) February 17, 2025
·x.com·
It isn't, it's because they are fruit of the poisoned tree. The accepted USAID money to produce propaganda. They can write whatever they want. But there are a lot of journalists, that didn't accept money, with a much larger following that are being rotated in.— Darla Scheuerman (@DarlaScheu5344) February 17, 2025
x.com
x.com
·x.com·
x.com
The problem is that they think "freedom of the press" means the corporate press. It's freedom of the printing press. It's the idea that every American can think, write, say and publish what they want in private and in public without govt interference. (Exclusions excluded.)— Mr. Wheat (@EnblocPing) February 17, 2025
The problem is that they think "freedom of the press" means the corporate press. It's freedom of the printing press. It's the idea that every American can think, write, say and publish what they want in private and in public without govt interference. (Exclusions excluded.)— Mr. Wheat (@EnblocPing) February 17, 2025
·x.com·
The problem is that they think "freedom of the press" means the corporate press. It's freedom of the printing press. It's the idea that every American can think, write, say and publish what they want in private and in public without govt interference. (Exclusions excluded.)— Mr. Wheat (@EnblocPing) February 17, 2025