Defining the Clinical Complexity of hEDS and HSD: A Global Survey of Diagnostic Challenge, Comorbidities, and Unmet Needs
Background Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) are connective tissue disorders marked by chronic pain, joint instability, and extensive multisystem involvement. Despite affecting an estimated 1 in 500 individuals, these conditions remain poorly understood, and current diagnostic categories lack clarity and consistency. This study aimed to characterize the clinical presentation, comorbidities, and healthcare burden of individuals with hEDS and HSD through a large-scale international survey. Methods and Findings A cross-sectional, anonymous online survey was distributed globally between September 2023 and March 2024. Of 9,258 responses, 3,906 participants met inclusion criteria and were included in analysis. The 418-item questionnaire covered symptom domains, diagnoses, healthcare access, and quality of life. Responses were statistically analyzed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction and compared to the All of Us dataset (n=354,400). Participants reported high rates of gastrointestinal disorders (84.3% hEDS, 69.0% HSD), with 21.2% of hEDS participants diagnosed with gastroparesis and 7.1% requiring feeding devices. Dysautonomia was common, affecting 71.4% of those with hEDS and 40.3% with HSD (p0.0001), with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) as the most frequently reported subtype. Neurological complications were also prevalent, with hEDS participants reporting significantly higher rates of tethered cord syndrome (4.6%, 0.9%), Chiari malformation (6.3%, 0.9%), and small fiber neuropathy (10.0%, 4.4%) compared to those with HSD. Chronic pain was nearly universal (98.8% hEDS, 92.7% HSD). On average, hEDS participants reported 24 comorbid diagnoses and HSD participants 17, with diagnostic delays averaging over 20 years. Notably, 50% of those reporting HSD met hEDS criteria, while 26% of those reporting hEDS did not meet full criteria, underscoring persistent diagnostic uncertainty. Conclusions This global survey underscores the profound multisystemic burden, diagnostic ambiguity, and unmet clinical needs faced by individuals with hEDS and HSD. The high prevalence of immune-mediated, neurological, gastrointestinal, and autonomic dysfunctions, alongside the frequent identification of triggering events such as infections and hormonal transitions, challenges the conventional framework that defines these disorders as purely connective tissue in origin. Instead, our findings support the hypothesis that hEDS and/or HSD may represent complex syndromes in which connective tissue fragility may be a downstream consequence rather than the primary cause. This reframing has critical implications for diagnosis, pathophysiology, and therapeutic development, and highlights the need for mechanistic studies that explore distinct etiologies beyond the connective tissue paradigm.
### Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
### Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Matlz Foundation, MUSC Foundation, Connective Tissue Coalition
### Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All participants were adults (≥18) and provided informed consent by choosing to complete the online survey, as approved by the Medical University of South Carolina Institutional Review Board (IRB) and determined to be exempt under category 2.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript