The hacker is believed to have access to Uber's source code, email and other internal systems.

A week ago, I finally got round to implementing an idea I’d been toying with for years: what if your computer made a little bit of noise every time it sent data to Google? From studying logs, I’d long known just how many sites send all your visits and clicks to (at least) Google, but a log that you have to manually create first and then analyze is not very dramatic.

“3 weeks ago LAION-400M dataset (now a billion+), first Image-Alt-text pair dataset of this scale was released. @vinayprabhu, @MannyKayy & I dug into it https://t.co/6JG4c876tV Long tread 1/ Warning: paper contains NSFW content that may be disturbing, distressing &/or offensive”

As media partner for the upcoming DesignUp 2022 conference, YourStory presents speaker insights in our first preview article.

An EFF investigation of public records acquired from dozens of state and local law enforcement agencies has uncovered a widely-used mass surveillance technology. Americans are accustomed to hearing about how the National Security Agency (NSA), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and even the domestically-focused Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have illegally swept up massive amounts of data on people living in the United States—but what about the state and local police? Fog Data Science LLC, a previously unknown company, provides law enforcement with easy and often warrantless access to the precise and continuous geolocation of hundreds of millions of unsuspecting Americans, collected through their smartphone apps and then aggregated by shadowy data brokers.

The kidney allocation score determines who gets a life-saving transplant. Here’s how it was made.

Telling people to quit the platform is less effective than stopping influential elites from using the site in harmful ways.

Research must be ethical and UX is no exception. Let’s do better together.

The California Age-Appropriate Design Code would launch a huge online privacy experiment. And it won’t just affect children.

Presented by 2021 Nobel Peace Prize laureates Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov at the Freedom of Expression Conference, Nobel Peace Center, Oslo 2 September 2022We call for a world in which technology is built in service of humanity and where our global public square protects human rights above profits.Right now, the huge potential of technology to advance our societies has been undermined by the business model and design of the dominant online platforms. But we remind all those in power that true human progress comes from harnessing technology to advance rights and freedoms for all, not sacrificing them for the wealth and power of a few.We urge rights-respecting democracies to wake up to the existential threat of information ecosystems being distorted by a Big Tech business model fixated on harvesting people’s data and attention, even as it undermines serious journalism and polarises debate in society and political life.When facts become optional and trust disappears, we will no longer be able to hold power to account. We need a public sphere where fostering trust with a healthy exchange of ideas is valued more highly than corporate profits and where rigorous journalism can cut through the noise.Many governments around the world have exploited these platforms’ greed to grab and consolidate power. That is why they also attack and muzzle the free press. Clearly, these governments cannot be trusted to address this crisis. But nor should we put our rights in the hands of technology companies’ intent on sustaining a broken business model that actively promotes disinformation, hate speech and abuse.The resulting toxic information ecosystem is not inevitable. Those in power must do their part to build a world that puts human rights, dignity, and security first, including by safeguarding scientific and journalistic methods and tested knowledge. To build that world, we must:Bring an end to the surveillance-for-profit business modelThe invisible ‘editors’ of today’s information ecosystem are the opaque algorithms and recommender systems built by tech companies that track and target us. They amplify misogyny, racism, hate, junk science and disinformation – weaponizing every societal fault line with relentless surveillance to maximize “engagement”. This surveillance-for-profit business model is built on the con of our supposed consent. But forcing us to choose between allowing platforms and data brokers to feast on our personal data or being shut out from the benefits of the modern world is simply no choice at all. The vast machinery of corporate surveillance not only abuses our right to privacy, but allows our data to be used against us, undermining our freedoms and enabling discrimination.This unethical business model must be reined in globally, including by bringing an end to surveillance advertising that people never asked for and of which they are often unaware. Europe has made a start, with the Digital Services and Digital Markets Acts. Now these must be enforced in ways that compel platforms to de-risk their design, detox their algorithms and give users real control. Privacy and data rights, to date largely notional, must also be properly enforced. And advertisers must use their money and influence to protect their customers against a tech industry that is actively harming people.End tech discrimination and treat people everywhere equallyGlobal tech companies afford people unequal rights and protection depending on their status, power, nationality, and language. We have seen the painful and destructive consequences of tech companies’ failure to prioritize the safety of all people everywhere equally. Companies must be legally required to rigorously assess human rights risks in every country they seek to expand in, ensuring proportionate language and cultural competency. They must also be forced to bring their closed-door decisions on content moderation and algorithm changes into the light and end all special exemptions for those with the most power and reach. These safety, design, and product choices that affect billions of people cannot be left to corporations to decide. Transparency and accountability rules are an essential first step to reclaiming the internet for the public good.Rebuild independent journalism as the antidote to tyrannyBig tech platforms have unleashed forces that are devastating independent media by swallowing up online advertising while simultaneously enabling a tech-fueled tsunami of lies and hate that drown out facts. For facts to stand a chance, we must end the amplification of disinformation by tech platforms. But this alone is not enough. Just 13% of the world’s population can currently access a free press. If we are to hold power to account and protect journalists, we need unparalleled investment in a truly independent media persevering in situ or working in exile that ensures its sustainability while incentivizing compliance with ethical norms in journalism.21st century newsrooms must also forge a new, distinct path, recognizing that to advance justice and rights, they must represent the diversity of the communities they serve. Governments must ensure the safety and independence of journalists who are increasingly being attacked, imprisoned, or killed on the frontlines of this war on facts.We, as Nobel Laureates, from across the world, send a united message: together we can end this corporate and technological assault on our lives and liberties, but we must act now. It is time to implement the solutions we already have to rebuild journalism and reclaim the technological architecture of global conversation for all humanity.We call on all rights-respecting democratic governments to:1. Require tech companies to carry out independent human rights impact assessments that must be made public as well as demand transparency on all aspects of their business – from content moderation to algorithm impacts to data processing to integrity policies.2. Protect citizens’ right to privacy with robust data protection laws.3. Publicly condemn abuses against the free press and journalists globally and commit funding and assistance to independent media and journalists under attack.We call on the EU to:4. Be ambitious in enforcing the Digital Services and Digital Markets Acts so these laws amount to more than just ‘new paperwork’ for the companies and instead force them to make changes to their business model, such as ending algorithmic amplification that threatens fundamental rights and spreads disinformation and hate, including in cases where the risks originate outside EU borders.5. Urgently propose legislation to ban surveillance advertising, recognizing this practice is fundamentally incompatible with human rights.6. Properly enforce the EU General Data Protection Regulation so that people’s data rights are finally made reality.7. Include strong safeguards for journalists’ safety, media sustainability and democratic guarantees in the digital space in the forthcoming European Media Freedom Act. 8. Protect media freedom by cutting off disinformation upstream. This means there should be no special exemptions or carve-outs for any organisation or individual in any new technology or media legislation. With globalised information flows, this would give a blank check to those governments and non-state actors who produce industrial scale disinformation to harm democracies and polarise societies everywhere.9. Challenge the extraordinary lobbying machinery, the astroturfing campaigns and recruitment revolving door between big tech companies and European government institutions.We call on the UN to:10. Create a special Envoy of the UN Secretary-General focused on the Safety of Journalists (SESJ) who would challenge the current status quo and finally raise the cost of crimes against journalists.Signed by:Dmitry Muratov, 2021 Nobel Peace Prize laureateMaria Ressa, 2021 Nobel Peace Prize laureateEndorsed by:Amnesty International, 1977 Nobel Peace Prize laureateBeatrice Fihn, Executive Director, ICAN - the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, 2017 Nobel Peace Prize laureateKailash Satyarthi, 2014 Nobel Peace Prize laureateJody Williams, 1997 Nobel Peace Prize laureateJuan Manuel Santos, 2016 Nobel Peace Prize laureateLeymah Gbowee, 2011 Nobel Peace Prize laureateNadia Murad, 2018 Nobel Peace Prize laureateShirin Ebadi, 2003 Nobel Peace Prize laureateTawakkol Karman, 2011 Nobel Peace Prize laureateAlexandra Geese, Member of the European ParliamentBruce Mutsvairo, Associate Professor, Media and Performance Studies, University of UtrechtCan Dundar, Turkish journalist in exileCarole Cadwalladr, Guardian & Observer journalist & co-founder, The Real Facebook Oversight BoardChristophe Deloire, Chair of the Forum on Information and DemocracyDavid Carroll, Associate Professor of Media Design, The New SchoolFrances Haugen, Facebook WhistleblowerGerard Ryle, Director, International Consortium of Investigative JournalistsIrene Khan, UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression and opinionJulie Posetti, Deputy Vice President and Global Director of Research, International Center for JournalistsKhadija Patel, Chair of the International Press InstituteMarietje Schaake, Stanford Cyber Policy CenterMogens Blicher Bjerregård, International Advisor, Danish Union of JournalistsPeter Pomerantsev, Senior Fellow, Johns Hopkins UniversityPaul Tang, Member of the European ParliamentPhumzile van Damme, Ethical Tech Activist and Former South Africa MPRoger McNamee, former advisor to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg; author of Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook CatastropheSafiya Umoja Noble, MacArthur Fellow, Professor, and Author, Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce RacismShoshana Zuboff, Author, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism; Professor Emeritus Harvard Business School; Co-Chair Steering Committee, International Observatory on Information and DemocracyStaffan I. Lindberg, Professor of Political Science,

Twitter has largely abandoned an image-cropping algorithm after determining the automated system was biased. Some users complained it had a preference toward showing pictures of white people in previews of tweets.

"The goal was never to trick people," creator Curt Skelton tells Input. "They did that to themselves."

Kim Goodwin's talk on From Business to Buttons, on May 3 2019 in Stockholm. From Business to Buttons is the meeting place for everyone who wants hands-on advice on how to generate business value by creating great user experiences. http://frombusinesstobuttons.com/

how “average” design turns out to be a hassle for most people

“I absolutely admire the work of Professor Keith Hawton who noted that the positive predictive rate of suicide risk assessment is about 5%. In other word suicide risk assessment fails 95% of the time.”

As anxiety and depression soar among adolescents, researchers struggle to understand how exactly social media affects mental health.

Their innovations are already improving the lives of people around the world.

If recent television shows are anything to go by, we’re a little concerned about the consequences of technological development. Dystopian…

Discover the world’s best news coverage from over 100 premium sources, without ads, paywalls, or clickbait

Do tech leaders have an ethical responsibility when it comes to releasing and regulating their platforms? Tech ethics researcher Casey…

AI startups are increasingly adopting AI ethics precepts, though this is not as simple as it seems. Examples include the…

Apple is adding M1 MacBook Pros and Airs to its DIY repair program, but it still seems like the process…

Peiter Zatko has accused the company of ‘deliberate ignorance’ regarding the site’s spam accounts.

Well, I was booked to go on @BBCRadio4 PM to challenge @johannhari101 about assertions made in his new book. He has pulled out for "personal reasons", so I'll just leave a thread about my concerns about his use of sources. I hope someone else will raise these questions with him.— Matthew Sweet (@DrMatthewSweet) January 6, 2022

A hospital southeast of Paris has been the victim of an ongoing cyber attack since the weekend, with disruption to…

Tourists in Ukraine’s Russian-occupied Crimea unwittingly leaked the position of a Russian S-400 air defense system outside the town of Yevpatoria, the Russian service of Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty reported on Aug. 21.