Digital Ethics

I’m Is there a point at which the sane part of the world just goes “maybe, just maybe we should stop, take a breath and ask ourselves ‘Is this a direction we want to be travelling’” before enacting first principles based regulation to alter the default trajectory? How a leader in the field unilaterally ran a test to see if there’s any pushback to him amplifying his voice via an AI trained to defer to his opinions? What possible additional warning would you need? How can we have binders of law and regulation on TV and Radio and Print, for good reasons and … fail for decades to regulate platforms? How long can the cognitive dissonance between “there will be growth and this is all teething problems on the way to tech utopia” and the clear and present trajectory to civilization collapse before model collapse can be maintained? How much longer will we be forced to endure performative AI ethics summits talking about aligning a technology whose makers have taken control of societies control mechanism and are long beyond alignment? Are we so far down the drain that no global government dares to pull the off switch on X out of fear of the oligarch controlling it or the US government and the platform having zero economic upsides, barely any jobs anymore? Can we get serious now? Break the whole AI and Agent ketamine haze for a moment and actually talk about how we deal with this all before it’s too late? Can we talk about how fundamental flaws like prompt injection destroy any chance for the technology to be made useful in the far marjority of hinted usecases in the next few years? How it forces us to abandon cybersecurity and corporate sovereignty to reap the “benefits”, how the “AI Layoffs” are not because the technology is working out but because it’s expensive. - before talking about “AI adoption”. How it’s essentially outsourcing, with all warts like knowledge transfer and disintermediation risk, but you pay for failed results too, per token, and the vendor forces you to do all the QA and shoulders no responsibility? Can we have leaders who lead instead of endlessly trying to just keep things running? Because we’re going to need that. We need bold leaders with understanding and vision. Globally. Not managers who just try to keep the box from falling apart, because the box is on the train tracks. | 17 comments on LinkedIn

Jevons Paradox in action! 📈 NVIDIA likes talking about how each generation of AI hardware is getting more efficient -- with Blackwell using 50x less energy per token than Hopper in 2022 -- but LLM usage (conservatively) went up from 100B tokens per month to 2T tokens per month 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿, according to Open Router (https://lnkd.in/evAWESXX). This means that efficiency gains are being outpaced by the growth in usage, by far! Focusing on efficiency alone is missing the forest for the trees... | 13 comments on LinkedIn

We live in an era where moral corruption is the current economic priority – an economy built on shortcuts, cutting corners, and breaking the law. All, of course…

A security vulnerability in McDonald's AI-powered hiring system has exposed the personal information of potentially 64 million job applicants.

An embarrassing exploit just uncovered the personal data of some 64 million McDonald's applicants sitting right out in the open.

Model Evaluation and Threat Research is an AI research charity that looks into the threat of AI agents! That sounds a bit AI doomsday cult, and they take funding from the AI doomsday cult organisat…

New research found our relationship to the technology is driven not only by what it can do, but also how we perceive it.

Signal Foundation President Meredith Whittaker warns that agentic A.I. could breach app-level security, threatening privacy for millions of users.

The NYT published a fascinating article last month on the conundrum of AI accuracy and reliability. They found that even as AI models were getting more powerful, they generated more errors, not fewer. In OpenAI’s own tests, their newest models hallucinated at higher rates than their previous models. One of their benchmarks is called a

Most of us don’t realise how much digital systems govern access to our basic public services, like education, health and housing. Even more terrifying is how...

Amendment to law will strengthen protection against digital imitations of people’s identities, government says

To comply with a Trump executive order, Microsoft recently suspended the email account of an International Criminal Court prosecutor in the Netherlands who was investigating Israel for war crimes.

Ben Collins explains how The Onion is thriving by saying what others won’t—and why human-created satire matters in a media landscape increasingly saturated by noise and A.I. slop.

One of the popular uses of "AI" that I truly do not understand involves "brainstorming" – and okay, I admit, I truly do not understanding using "AI" at all with what we know about its politically, psychologically, cognitively, and environmentally destructive effects. I've written before about how "brainstorming" is a Cold War invention, and how marketing has convinced us that we're lacking something that only its products or services can fulfill, that "creativity" is something special that few p

The 'Empire of AI' author joins our new weekly Q&A series with cultural tastemakers to explore the intersection of their craft and the news.

AI in schools isn’t progress — it’s a sign of how far we’ve strayed from the purpose of education.

"This is the endgame of our isolation."

Elon Musk is obsessive about the design of his supercars, right down to the disappearing door handles. But a series of shocking incidents – from drivers trapped in burning vehicles to dramatic stops on the highway – have led to questions about the safety of the brand. Why won’t Tesla give any answers?

Would you pay $169 for an introductory ebook on machine learning with citations that appear to be made up? If not, you might want to pass on purchasing Mastering Machine Learning: From Basics to Ad…

This was originally titled “I miss when computers were fun”. But in the course of writing it, I discovered that there is a reason computers became less fun, a dark thread woven through a number of events in recent history. Let me back up a bit.

This was originally titled “I miss when computers were fun”. But in the course of writing it, I discovered that there is a reason computers became less fun, a dark thread woven through a number of events in recent history. Let me back up a bit.

We discovered how easily a model’s safety training falls off, and below that mask is a lot of darkness.

Increase influenced by datacentre growth, with estimated power required by 2026 equalling that of Japan’s

On 1,200 acres of cornfield in Indiana, Amazon is building one of the largest computers ever for work with Anthropic, an artificial intelligence start-up.

To Penguin Random House, HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster, Hachette Book Group, Macmillan, and all other publishers of America: We are standing on a precipice. At its simplest level, our job as …

ENVISIONING CARDS. A VALUE SENSITIVE DESIGN TOOLKIT Use the Envisioning Cards to create ethical technology and improve your design practice. The 2nd Edition consists of 42 Envisioning Cards downloadable in PDF format.   DOWNLOAD & PRINT   The Envisioning Cards … Continued

I’m not anti-AI. I’m anti-bullshit. For those struggling to reconcile my work in AI product and strategy with the things I’ve been saying - let me make it plain. Yes, I help teams build real AI products. And yes, I refuse to prop up fantasies just because they’re lucrative. These aren’t contradictions. They’re what make me credible. I know what this tech can do. I also know what it can’t. And I know exactly how it’s being spun to look like something it isn’t - not to help people, but to sell illusions dressed up as inevitability. We’re deliberately engineering the illusion of cognition. Not building minds - just engineering machines that mimic well enough to blur the line. Augmentation is promised whilst replacement is sold. And when the flaws emerge - hallucinations, cascading failure modes, confidently wrong outputs at scale - the spin kicks in: “That’s just temporary.” “That’s just a data problem.” “That’s just a prompt away.” It’s not. It’s structural. It’s endemic to the heart of this technology. Calling that out doesn’t make me anti-AI. It makes me more qualified to work in this field - because I don’t have to lie to make it useful. That’s why I’m valuable in what I do. I don’t just know what to build - I know what not to build. I understand what we’re building toward. I understand the moral, ethical, philosophical, reputational, financial implications. I’m not high on my own supply. So no I won’t dress this tech in a halo. I won’t help gaslight the world into trusting a system that doesn’t understand a word it says. But if you want real clarity - the kind that holds up after the hype collapses - then yes, I’m someone worth talking to. This moment doesn’t need more AI evangelists. It needs realism. It needs judgment. It needs people who can filter the bullshit and advise with clarity, those who see the cracks and still deliver. And that’s exactly what I do. On here, on the frontline, and in the boardroom. | 124 comments on LinkedIn

AI and digital tools are revolutionizing occupational safety and health. Today, robots are operating in hazardous environments, doing the heavy lifting, managing toxic materials and working in extreme temperatures. They take on repetitive and monotonous tasks, while digital devices and sensors can detect hazards early on. At the same time, in the absence of adequate OSH measures, digital technologies can lead to accidents, ergonomic risks, work intensification, reduced job control and blurred boundaries. On the occasion of World Day for Safety and Health at Work 2025 this event brings together ILO constituents and international experts to explore how AI and digitalization are reshaping OSH systems across sectors and countries.