The Limits of AI Research for Real Writers
To produce interesting writing, more is not necessarily better.
AI-text-detectors can be evaded using simple tricks in academic writing, as repeatedly shown by folks like Dr Mike Perkins and Dr Mark A.
AI-text-detectors can be evaded using simple tricks in academic writing, as repeatedly shown by folks like Dr Mike Perkins and Dr Mark A. Bassett. Advice for how to do this is abundant on YouTube, in videos aimed at students, viewed millions of times. Some videos are about how to ‘cheat’, but others have more positive titles like ‘how to study with AI’.
Is there any point trying to stop students using AI to write essays? Or even any value to using asynchronous written essays as summative assessments?
New paper from the great Tomas Foltynek and some bloke called Phil Newton
https://rdcu.be/eKCko
Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content
h/t Jasper Roe on LinkedIn
Humans Prefer AI-Generated Content, New Research Suggests
An MIT study showed human subjects rated AI-generated content as better than that created by professional writers.
Mushtaq Bilal, PhD on Twitter: "Jenni is an AI-powered app that will revolutionize your academic writing — think of it as ChatGPT x 10. But most academics don't know about it. Here's what Jenni is capable of (and how to use it):" / Twitter
Jenni is an AI-powered app that will revolutionize your academic writing — think of it as ChatGPT x 10.But most academics don't know about it.Here's what Jenni is capable of (and how to use it):— Mushtaq Bilal, PhD (@MushtaqBilalPhD) March 10, 2023