Found 72 bookmarks
Newest
This morning, our six-year old first grader - a kid who has no experience with or conceptual understanding of school grades - showed us a "neat trick."
This morning, our six-year old first grader - a kid who has no experience with or conceptual understanding of school grades - showed us a "neat trick."
This morning, our six-year old first grader - a kid who has no experience with or conceptual understanding of school grades - showed us a "neat trick." On a piece of paper next to some of his writing (we'd been playing Boggle last night), he drew a lower case "f" next to a minus sign (-) and told us that "f minus is a bad grade." Oh, OK, we said. However, he slyly continued, "Look at this!" And then he drew a curved-ish line down, turning his lower case "f" into an upper case "A." With a finishing flourish, he also struck through the minus, turning that symbol into a plus (+). "It's an A plus," he exclaimed. "What does that mean?" we asked. He didn't know. And we have no idea where he picked up this knowledge of grading, perhaps from a chapter book because his first-grade teacher does not assign grades to the many projects he creates in class. He has never received a grade from an educator in his life, yet he's approximating the act of assigning a grade to himself and believes it's best to avoid an F- and aspire toward an A+. The logics of conventional schooling and success are so pervasive, are odd at face value, and are frankly incomprehensible to children unless they are first trained into a culture of what "counts" as rewarded achievement.
·linkedin.com·
This morning, our six-year old first grader - a kid who has no experience with or conceptual understanding of school grades - showed us a "neat trick."
Josh Eyler (@josheyler.bsky.social)
Josh Eyler (@josheyler.bsky.social)
I think author of this @insidehighered.com essay means to be helpful, and I like the shift from participation to engagement (plus he cites @cjdenial.bsky.social so that's always good!), but I think it still misses the mark significantly. 1/x https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/career-advice/teaching/2025/01/22/making-class-participation-grades-meaningful-opinion
·bsky.app·
Josh Eyler (@josheyler.bsky.social)
The Ungrading Learning Theory We Have Is Not the Ungrading Learning Theory We Need | CBE—Life Sciences Education
The Ungrading Learning Theory We Have Is Not the Ungrading Learning Theory We Need | CBE—Life Sciences Education
Ungrading is an emancipatory pedagogy that focuses on evaluative assessment of learning. Self-regulated learning (SRL) has consistently been referred to as the learning theory that undergirds ungrading, but SRL—with its deficit frame in the literature and in practice—fails to uphold ungrading’s emancipatory aims. An asset-framed learning theory—one that combines the cultural orientation of funds of knowledge with the power dynamics of community cultural wealth—is proposed as an alternative to SRL. The proposed learning theory aligns ungrading to its emancipatory aims and may provide an opportunity to better understand the learning that occurs in ungraded classrooms. Scholarly and practical impacts for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), and specifically biology, educational research and practice include investigating the plausibility of mixing learning theories, aligning learning theory to emancipatory aims and researching how faculty activate funds of knowledge and community cultural wealth, both individually and collectively, in ungraded STEM classrooms.
·lifescied.org·
The Ungrading Learning Theory We Have Is Not the Ungrading Learning Theory We Need | CBE—Life Sciences Education