Found 35 bookmarks
Custom sorting
This morning, our six-year old first grader - a kid who has no experience with or conceptual understanding of school grades - showed us a "neat trick."
This morning, our six-year old first grader - a kid who has no experience with or conceptual understanding of school grades - showed us a "neat trick."
This morning, our six-year old first grader - a kid who has no experience with or conceptual understanding of school grades - showed us a "neat trick." On a piece of paper next to some of his writing (we'd been playing Boggle last night), he drew a lower case "f" next to a minus sign (-) and told us that "f minus is a bad grade." Oh, OK, we said. However, he slyly continued, "Look at this!" And then he drew a curved-ish line down, turning his lower case "f" into an upper case "A." With a finishing flourish, he also struck through the minus, turning that symbol into a plus (+). "It's an A plus," he exclaimed. "What does that mean?" we asked. He didn't know. And we have no idea where he picked up this knowledge of grading, perhaps from a chapter book because his first-grade teacher does not assign grades to the many projects he creates in class. He has never received a grade from an educator in his life, yet he's approximating the act of assigning a grade to himself and believes it's best to avoid an F- and aspire toward an A+. The logics of conventional schooling and success are so pervasive, are odd at face value, and are frankly incomprehensible to children unless they are first trained into a culture of what "counts" as rewarded achievement.
·linkedin.com·
This morning, our six-year old first grader - a kid who has no experience with or conceptual understanding of school grades - showed us a "neat trick."
Take It or Leave It with Liz Norell, Betsy Barre, and Bryan Dewsbury — Intentional Teaching
Take It or Leave It with Liz Norell, Betsy Barre, and Bryan Dewsbury — Intentional Teaching
Questions or comments about this episode? Send us a text message. We’re back with another Take It or Leave It panel. I invited three colleagues whose work and thinking I admire very much to come on the show and to compress their complex and nuanced thoughts on teaching and learning into artificial binaries! The panelists for this edition of Take It or Leave It are… Liz Norell, associate director of instructional support at the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning at the Univer…
·overcast.fm·
Take It or Leave It with Liz Norell, Betsy Barre, and Bryan Dewsbury — Intentional Teaching
Building Trust in Higher Education | Tony Laden (Higher Ed) — Ethics and Education
Building Trust in Higher Education | Tony Laden (Higher Ed) — Ethics and Education
In this special collaborative episode with the L&S Exchange Podcast, we explore how college changes what we trust and what higher ed can do to become more trustworthy. With special guest philosopher Tony Laden, author of Networks of Trust: The Social Costs of Higher Education and What We Can Do About Them (2024). Aftershow featuring the L&S Instructional Design Collaborative and UW–Madison philosophy professor Harry Brighouse. Notes: "20 Things Teachers Do" by Tim Brighouse Produced by Carrie Welsh and Jennifer McCord. Thanks to Avrie Marsolek, James Dempsey, and Tony Laden. And a special thanks to the L&S Exchange for collaborating with us on this episode. We are grateful to Merit library at UW–Madison for the use of their recording space.
·overcast.fm·
Building Trust in Higher Education | Tony Laden (Higher Ed) — Ethics and Education
Ian Linkletter on Twitter
Ian Linkletter on Twitter
We're one week away from Turnitin's AI text detection tool going live on April 4th. It is being rolled out to all customers with no ability to opt out or even test the functionality first. Instructors will be exposed to this unproven functionality before we can even react.— Ian Linkletter (@Linkletter) March 27, 2023
·twitter.com·
Ian Linkletter on Twitter
Charles Logan on Twitter
Charles Logan on Twitter
As a new academic year approaches, I urge institutions & educators to abandon online proctoring. It's racist, ableist tech that entrenches pedagogies of policing. Need evidence for abolishing online proctoring? Visit the Against Online Proctoring Library: https://t.co/p27UxMGJ5y— Charles Logan (@charleswlogan) August 14, 2022
·twitter.com·
Charles Logan on Twitter
Christina Moore on Twitter
Christina Moore on Twitter
My dissertation on #ungrading as an example of teaching development in online, social spaces is web-ready. I will be working on smaller pieces in the coming months (especially for @dbuckedu's pressbook), but for now I wanted get this out into the world. https://t.co/EkvS63tI6a
·twitter.com·
Christina Moore on Twitter