(Actually tricky since Big Tech is already not distributing models on some continents because of regulations there, or is sanctioning hardware sales. The innovation argument persists. So training is significant if the new waves are to find opportunities. In any case, democracy if not capitalism was supposed to proceed from the ground up rather than top-down like socialist or communist media. The internet is an interesting precedent that AI may exploit. However other analyses have not yet found a solution to inequality. Hence references to Marxist predictions about automation. These seminars do appear to appeal to competition for ideas on cooperation, so they fit evolution. Still, will it be determinism or discovered domains? Or yet another port of doom.
"a licence not to" -- Mallory to C, Spectre. Then again, tell it to Double Who.)

He likened the book to a particle accelerator that smashes atoms together to study their parts, such as quarks. In “Deep Utopia,” he said, he smashed values into one another to study their composition.
(The author also spreads the topics across a week. Each day, they go through sentiment, logic, and symbolism. So it may be mimicking how the parts of a brain do interpretation. Or that could be the journaling routine. As mnemonic for both self and reader.)