Social media jurors conceptualizing and analyzing online public engagement in reference to legal cases
(Political candidates that admit to some criticisms may simultaneously attempt to link the opposition to perceived worse ones, e.g. both leading considered aged but showing different effects.)
Pan, C. A., Yakhmi, S., Iyer, T. P., Strasnick, E., Zhang, A. X., & Bernstein, M. S. (2022). Comparing the perceived legitimacy of content moderation processes: Contractors, algorithms, expert panels, and digital juries. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1), 1-31.
Digital juries.
Gordon, M. L., Lam, M. S., Park, J. S., Patel, K., Hancock, J., Hashimoto, T., & Bernstein, M. S. (2022, April). Jury learning: Integrating dissenting voices into machine learning models. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-19).
(How is a juror instructed to eliminate implicit bias? What would be the specifics of a course that changed their minds? This is fairly easy to trigger in practice, e.g. as subtext to invoke irony.)
Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarization
Recently published in Nature, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-02855-5