Sam Bankman-Fried: 'I never thought what I was doing was illegal'
(This requires critics rather than crickets. The philosophies include other influencers. They now have to show how well prison reforms or progresses in the longer term. Ancient academics also had to tutor fellow slaves. The regulations will be interpreted by each of the major ideologies. AI may become one. If it had been a cartel mastermind, they might have built the prison ahead of time themselves to be more like clubs, e.g. Escobar. Crypto is successful now. The sovereignties are looking at digital schemes as well to streamline financial transactions and reporting, so they will run into similar issues. In another scenario, this might be a government official. Juries find facts, jurists the law. Ultimately this defines justice. The issues are going to have spinoff strategies for management going forward. STEM training was also called out in other patent cases. Where IEEE tries to keep talent occupied in their domain, something like equivalent of IEET may be useful here, at least for accurate analysis. Constitutions go after tyranny, whether by monarchy or majority. What is going on in these contemporary instances also involving machines? Is there a good reply for voir dire and equal treatment? What will be the effect, if any, on innovation?)
