(Actually tricky since Big Tech is already not distributing models on some continents because of regulations there, or is sanctioning hardware sales. The innovation argument persists. So training is significant if the new waves are to find opportunities. In any case, democracy if not capitalism was supposed to proceed from the ground up rather than top-down like socialist or communist media. The internet is an interesting precedent that AI may exploit. However other analyses have not yet found a solution to inequality. Hence references to Marxist predictions about automation. These seminars do appear to appeal to competition for ideas on cooperation, so they fit evolution. Still, will it be determinism or discovered domains? Or yet another port of doom.
"a licence not to" -- Mallory to C, Spectre.
Then again, tell it to Double Who.)
Evolving Together: Human-AI Coevolution Is Said To Be Coming Whether Humanity Likes It Or Not
Group 1 | Robust International Coordination Mechanisms @ Intelligent Cooperation Workshop 2024
Greg Brockman on X: "One challenge with predicting the impact of a future technology is anticipating how the world will change in the interim. Describing Uber before the Internet, smartphones, and GPS seems quite hard—and yet for advanced AI we must. Fortunately, lots to learn from recent progress." / X
The Future of Human Agency
Interview with John Danaher: "Automation and Utopia: Human Flourishing in a World without Work"