U.S. tariffs don't violate NATO treaty, says NATO's Rutte
(One reason why dialectics are significant: international, multi-ideological reasoning. Not all historical in this case, e.g. alongside technological, cultural, or relational. Can models predict outcomes if not identify causes? How can they also innovate solutions or methods, e.g. mind the gap? Compared to hallucination. Self-organization vs. central planning. Sustainability and circular economy. Cells hint at learning models, possibly quantum, that invite cybernetics for ongoing comms and feedback so programming is not taken over by natural evolution, and that may be pluralist amid seemingly incomprehensible complexity. This would be a large-scale version. Computational Buy-ology. Post-rules. Markets, parties, or governments. AGI-inside and normal anxieties. Expect nationalist companies to pick up the breaks in supply chains. Now get to call either fanatics or proxies of the future. Not all synthesis or hybrid. The internet of things will be shocked, shocked. Cyber and space still have slower-rising barriers. Climate plays no favorites, although capitalism is going to have its reputation bickered about. Emerging Tech remains unregulated, however someone eventually is often left holding the bag. Finally, there is no time.. Grok concurred that the treaty discussion initiated by Norway was deemed irrelevant to defense as interpreted under semantic analysis, more a danse diplomatique than macabre.)