(These are not the only two players. A topmost model producer claims to use expected value for social benefit, but the system is closed so hard to say what that means. After Pascal's Wager as some have noted. Prior crypto princes were similar and are now longtermism but sidelined. The orders of society can seem to show historical stages, and their representations persist as common sense. Which the models are being trained on. Though they, like prisoners, hallucinate when it comes to propaganda. Otherwise, they do not think like people. And, of course, Earth is one data, if not failure, point for these things. Alignment still appears to be more like affinity and therefore alliances. A Xeno paradox. Is intelligence the motive for/of technology? Would an Entity chip sprout wheels or whistles? As philosophy succeeded poetry, the legion is in the logos. Hence caco-context vs correction.)
Jason Crawford on X: "Good thread to revisit; in particular note this pattern of institutional decay: A field grows → Competition intensifies → Performance criteria are formalized → Criteria are measured and tracked → Those metrics are optimized for → Fake work, gaming the system, optics, etc." / X
Getting Ready for Trump's Tariffs
(Deja Vu from late 2000s. Expect all possible imaginary functions. Now including AI. Or games of chants.)
What Nvidia’s CEO Missed About Quantum Computing
Bridging Policy and Practice: Industry and Government Insights on AI Infrastructure
Microsoft introduces new adapted AI models for industry - The Official Microsoft Blog
Education in the Age of AI
AI Across Disciplines: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Machine Learning
CEOs Suddenly Fear AI Will Take Their Jobs Too
🎄Your guide to AI: December 2022
Large-scale machine learning systems in real-world industrial settings: A review of challenges and solutions
Almost Half of Industrial Robots Are in China
Baidu’s PaddlePaddle Spins AI up to Industrial Scales
Why the balance of power in tech is shifting toward workers