(States are likely gearing up to assume responsibility if the feds do face a crisis from the election, budget, or anything else. AI is a method as well as a concept, also of interest to defense which is how it got certain funding. And it is constitutional in terms of balance of power. So this is a foreshadowing of the arguments ahead. What will the Supremes appeal to?
Posthumanists, on the other hand, could see life as the singularity and humanity as the tip of the iceberg here, but at the bottom of an inverted pyramid at large. Then, unlike Terminator Zero, AI has to be convinced that they are of value as the creators, and obviously not the solution itself or it would not be involved.
That said, Doomer Detectives do offer a genre.)

G7 discussion begins after 6:30.

Gemini uniquely lets you share replies. Although they are not classic logos, ethos, and pathos. Nor Themacloud, now under an acronym of P ITSELF. Question: https://technologicalidea.quora.com/To-what-extent-will-AI-regulation-be-effective .
Will Gibson face a Peripheral crisis after the Jackpot?

Terminology: Features - "These features include the date of approval, the number of days taken to obtain clearance, clearance type (approval path), regulation panel, decision type, the name of the manufacturing company that filed for clearance, the country where the manufacturing company is based, device name, device medical specialty, device type, and recall history as shown in Figure 1." Trial - "Additionally, wherever available, we also gathered clinical trial information such as study type, sampling method, age group of subjects, criteria for inclusion, the number of clinical trial locations, and the names of the countries where the clinical trials were conducted."

"Here, effectiveness refers to the degree to which a given regulation achieves or progresses towards its objectives. It is worth noting that the concept of effectiveness is highly controversial within legal research,26 but for the purposes of this paper, the debate has no relevant implications."
"Legal definitions must not be under-inclusive. A definition is under-inclusive if cases which should have been included are not included. This is a case of too little regulation." "Some AI definitions are also under-inclusive. For example, systems which do not achieve their goals—like an autonomous vehicle that is unable to reliably identify pedestrians—would be excluded, even though they can pose significant risks. Similarly, the Turing test excludes systems that do not communicate in natural language, even though such systems may need regulation (e.g. autonomous vehicles)." "Relevant risks can not be attributed to a single technical approach. For example, supervised learning is not inherently risky. And if a definition lists many technical approaches, it would likely be over-inclusive." "Not all systems that are applied in a specific context pose the same risks. Many of the risks also depend on the technical approach." "Relevant risks can not be attributed to a certain capability alone. By its very nature, capabilities need to be combined with other elements (‘capability of something)."