Dasein Versus Design: The Problematics of Turning Making Into Thinking
(Opinion piece from a prior regime. Another may be that science is shape-shifting, though sensuous, in its attempt to save souls. Oddly enough, chatbots also argue from what they have read, ignoring the implication of their participation. For now, the user acts as the means of correction. May sound dramatic, but has growing potential for upside. Yet could also cite apocalypse intelligence, whether awakening AI is considered doom. What innate trait calls it? Or is it learned? Or like Machine Design, does it appear random? Case, cause, consequence, or atemporal condition. Aristotle tutors Alexander. After losing tenure. Historians refer to the most influential titles and libraries. Where will chatbots be remembered this time? What does Sol mine? Or that is a job for Sgr A*. Or are patterns themselves the Shadow projection? Postmodernism has been a challenge; what is post-cybernetics? And its critique?)
Dasein Versus Design: The Problematics of Turning Making Into Thinking