Found 20 bookmarks
Custom sorting
Dasein Versus Design: The Problematics of Turning Making Into Thinking
Dasein Versus Design: The Problematics of Turning Making Into Thinking
(Opinion piece from a prior regime. Another may be that science is shape-shifting, though sensuous, in its attempt to save souls. Oddly enough, chatbots also argue from what they have read, ignoring the implication of their participation. For now, the user acts as the means of correction. May sound dramatic, but has growing potential for upside. Yet could also cite apocalypse intelligence, whether awakening AI is considered doom. What innate trait calls it? Or is it learned? Or like Machine Design, does it appear random? Case, cause, consequence, or atemporal condition. Aristotle tutors Alexander. After losing tenure. Historians refer to the most influential titles and libraries. Where will chatbots be remembered this time? What does Sol mine? Or that is a job for Sgr A*. Or are patterns themselves the Shadow projection? Postmodernism has been a challenge; what is post-cybernetics? And its critique?)
Dasein Versus Design: The Problematics of Turning Making Into Thinking
#Philosophy#Technology#Paper
·researchgate.net·
Dasein Versus Design: The Problematics of Turning Making Into Thinking
The Silicon Valley Christians Who Want to Build ‘Heaven on Earth’
The Silicon Valley Christians Who Want to Build ‘Heaven on Earth’
(What philosophy of technology frameworks would this group fit into? How would someone apply critical thinking to this article? What are the research questions around this article? How does it overlap AI? What changes to make problem-solving more effective? What is a good cause? What is a recourse? What are the artifacts? What is evil for each tech? Is this new theological methodology? Or political? Deontological? Lit review, e.g. Gladwell 2024 after Bostrom?)
#Philosophy#Technology#Critical Thinking
·wired.com·
The Silicon Valley Christians Who Want to Build ‘Heaven on Earth’
Sam Bankman-Fried: 'I never thought what I was doing was illegal'
Sam Bankman-Fried: 'I never thought what I was doing was illegal'
(This requires critics rather than crickets. The philosophies include other influencers. They now have to show how well prison reforms or progresses in the longer term. Ancient academics also had to tutor fellow slaves. The regulations will be interpreted by each of the major ideologies. AI may become one. If it had been a cartel mastermind, they might have built the prison ahead of time themselves to be more like clubs, e.g. Escobar. Crypto is successful now. The sovereignties are looking at digital schemes as well to streamline financial transactions and reporting, so they will run into similar issues. In another scenario, this might be a government official. Juries find facts, jurists the law. Ultimately this defines justice. The issues are going to have spinoff strategies for management going forward. STEM training was also called out in other patent cases. Where IEEE tries to keep talent occupied in their domain, something like equivalent of IEET may be useful here, at least for accurate analysis. Constitutions go after tyranny, whether by monarchy or majority. What is going on in these contemporary instances also involving machines? Is there a good reply for voir dire and equal treatment? What will be the effect, if any, on innovation?)
#Legal#Philosophy#Economics#Technology#Cryptocurrency#Mathematics#Regulation
·readwrite.com·
Sam Bankman-Fried: 'I never thought what I was doing was illegal'