(Gemini Deep Research: review of Callard, 2025, from secondary sources. The conclusion sums up the terms. See the book's Table of Contents for more. Also, Gemini 2.5 Pro can look for uniqueness of the author's interpretation of the Socratic Method. Or the dialectical styles and tensions of the popular Chatbots, for that matter. Gemini Personalization model can talk about the user's, hinting at core beliefs/interests, based on their history. Related references might include Penn's Writing the Shadow, or Allen's Why Plato Wrote. On a rhetorical triangle of speaker/content/audience, this might be somewhere between Quora and POE. Rather than only a synthesis like Plato or Hegel, or aporia like Derrida, this might look for alternatives. Google AI Mode casts this framework as a contrast to Aristotle's eudaimonia based on endoxa.)
Gemini - Follow-Up Research Questions Suggested
(Google AI Mode also appears to have gotten somewhat better with its definitions, e.g. systems thinking or structural functionalism, and how all these frameworks relate. Not an easy manuscript to bookmark since it already has a link alongside references, but requires login.)
Gemini - Follow-up Research Questions Generated
Gemini - Opposing Concepts: Research Plan
(Deep Research mode. BF himself used scientific method and enlightenment values. That advised a philosophical club, revolution, Continental Congress, and Constitution, as well as inventions and government infrastructure. It became the initial state in many strategies. Now seemingly under distillation or smelt for the essence. Would he have been disappointed upon meeting his heroes or goals?)
Callard's Questioning Strategies in Socrates_.pdf
Dialectical Method_ Essential Prompt Template_.pdf
(Compare to pro/con, evaluation, and rebuttal. The method of studying foreign languages would also show variations in thinking styles. This particular Deep Research topic did not include Mao on contradiction. In practice Gemini tends to simplify or conflate terms like cybernetics and post-cybernetics, e.g. when discussing critiques. That may be an invitation to write up more sources so it can expand or expound upon the blanks. Empirical research could demand its own models. Or may be able to setup the browser or an app so the options include a menu of methods or chatbots that the research agent can circulate among in its pursuit. Then it likely runs into the need to simulate a computer that could indeed solve the problem. Or maybe from the machine side, they emulate a virtual person. Yet another merger of dynasties.)