Principle 13 A-B on notes. Notebooks may include the verdict form. Juror questions are presented in the form of notes to the judge.
"Here, effectiveness refers to the degree to which a given regulation achieves or progresses towards its objectives. It is worth noting that the concept of effectiveness is highly controversial within legal research,26 but for the purposes of this paper, the debate has no relevant implications."
"Legal definitions must not be under-inclusive. A
definition is under-inclusive if cases which should have been included are not included. This is a case of too little regulation."
"Some AI definitions are also under-inclusive. For example, systems which do not achieve their goals—like an autonomous vehicle that is unable to reliably identify pedestrians—would be excluded, even though they can pose significant risks. Similarly, the Turing test excludes systems that do not communicate in natural language, even though such systems may need regulation (e.g. autonomous vehicles)."
"Relevant risks can not be attributed to a single technical approach. For example, supervised learning is not inherently risky. And if a definition lists many technical approaches, it would likely be over-inclusive."
"Not all systems that are applied in a specific context pose the same risks. Many of the risks also depend on the technical approach." "Relevant risks can not be attributed to a certain capability alone. By its very nature, capabilities need to be combined with other elements (‘capability of something)."
(Mock trials practice on videos. Actual trials do not do perparatory research in order to avoid prejudicing the members of the jury. They may or may not have access to transcripts and evidence, so they would rely on notes. Incidentally, when prompted for a template, Gemini offered pages on witenesses, events, issues, questions, and legal terms, as well as an index or organization page. Symbols for importance*, unclear?, and strong emotion!. The court itself has standard formats for all types of reports and correspondence. As for analysis, Themacloud could be reduced to an acronym like PIFEST without the numbers, or "L". Blogging is obviously not allowed during the proceedings. If notes are disallowed, they count on mnemonics or transcripts. The gist is instruction, evidence, and deliberation. Avoid disinformation. In Tyrell's case, the replicants could be cast as the old soldiers. Gemini also has ideas how to mix that with The Departed. Not NFTs of sneakers yet.)
(The probative objective is to reduce evidence to fact. Under conditions of adversarial contradiciton. After a presumption of innocence. Google NotebookLM was an alternative. Jurors may be limited to pen & paper if not provided laptops. Voir dire is an entire genre of apps. Current major chatbots can respond to prompts like "Create an exercise of a context and question that could occur for the jury about evidence in a trial to test the user's knowledge and confirm whether their reply is right." Or "Does the judge always have to follow the decision of the jury?" However other bookmarks show that regulation depends upon jurisdiction. In an election year, some are sensitive to gerrymander. Jurors send any questions for witnesses or clarifications to the judge. Governments have reference websites on legal topics and terminology.)