Errors contained in reference books - Internet Accuracy Project
Blog posts
Wikipedia:Errors in the Encyclopædia Britannica that have been corrected in Wikipedia
Soundsnap.com: Find and Share Free Sound Effects and Loops
Kapp Notes: Comparing 2D and 3D Synchronous Learning
techLEARNING.com | The Educator's Guide to Copyright and Fair Use
Second Life: Do You Need One? (Part 4) : July 2007 : THE Journal
A Wandering Eyre » Archive » Meetings, Meetings Everywhere and Not a Decision in Sight
<p>When you hold a meeting over chat, develop an idea on a wiki, discuss solutions to problems on a discussion board, or collectively edit a document, you leave little traces of the process everywhere. There are transcripts, different versions of documents, and there is an actual record of who made what comment and contributed what material.</p>
<p>In a f2f meeting, we rely on a person to take notes. We all know that Meeting Minutes are nothing more then a list of decisions and action items. Meeting minutes do not reflect the decision process, the tension a topic may have induced, or the crazy idea that got thrown on the table and very quickly was swept under the rug. Meeting minutes are the sanitized version of what really happened. Sometimes, they are so sanitized as to be completely useless to those who were not in attendance.</p>
<p>Conducting committee work on the web can be dirty, it can be chaotic, and, in most instances, it is open for all the world to see. Moving committee work to the web is the picture of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_transparency">radical transparency</a> and that scares people. Big organizations hate admitting failure and process can look like failure.</p>
<p>We have to get over the idea that conducting our work in the open is bad. We have to get over the idea that f2f meetings are the most productive way to work. They are not. They never will be. Get over it already.</p>
JOLT: Testing An Experimental Universally Designed Learning Unit
20 Ways To Aggregate Your Social Networking Profiles
JOLT: CREST+ Model: Writing Effective Online Discussion Questions
The CREST+ model, a model
for writing effective online discussion questions,
covers the cognitive nature of the question, the
reading basis, any experiential possibility, style
and type of question, and finally ways to structure
a good question. This model encourages students to
participate in online forum discussions, provides a
template for new online faculty to use in creating
effective discussion questions, and promotes a
higher level processing of the material.
The CREST+
model covers the cognitive nature of the question [C], the
reading basis [R], any experiential [E] possibility, style
and type of question [ST] , and finally ways to structure
a good question [+].
Top Desktop Diversions, 2007
TeacherTube - Perturbations and possibilities in the virtual classroom
Web Worker Daily » Blog Archive 15 Productive Uses for a Wiki «
Scissors and Cell Phones (Techlearning blog)
TrainingBlogs
It's Time to Drop E-Learning - 11 Jul 2007
Footnote - The place for original documents online
eSchool News online - Groups push for media-literacy education
According to SETDA and CIC, media literacy means knowing how to access, understand, analyze, evaluate, and create media messages on television, the internet, and other outlets. It also means "knowing how to use these and other technologies safely, productively, and ethically."
KartOO visual meta search engine
TouchGraph | Products: Google Browser
Second Life: Do You Need One? (Part 3) : July 2007 : THE Journal
Web of Connections
It’s not plagiarism, it’s an easy essay « Learn Online
Consensus: Podcasting Has No 'Inherent' Pedagogic Value
Tool Factory Podcasting
The Presidential Timeline of the Twentieth Century
Sample Size Calculator by Raosoft, Inc.
Margin of Error Calculator
Margin of Error and Confidence Levels Made Simple
Easy Peasy Rich Media - VoiceThreads » CogDogBlog