Blog posts

2608 bookmarks
Custom sorting
Different Types of Learning Theories – Understanding the Basics | My Love for Learning
Different Types of Learning Theories – Understanding the Basics | My Love for Learning
An overview of learning theories: behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, social learning, connectivism, and adult learning. The connectivism description is questionable (or at least it's not Stephen Downes's version of connectivism, which I'm familiar with).
·mylove4learning.com·
Different Types of Learning Theories – Understanding the Basics | My Love for Learning
Retrieval Practice & Bloom’s Taxonomy: Do Students Need Fact Knowledge Before Higher Order Learning?
Retrieval Practice & Bloom’s Taxonomy: Do Students Need Fact Knowledge Before Higher Order Learning?
The title is a little misleading. This isn't about needing knowledge per se, but about what kinds of retrieval practice are more helpful for supporting higher order learning. Factual questions helped increase factual knowledge, but they didn't help higher order reasoning. Higher order retrieval practice (on its own or mixed with factual questions) resulted in better performance on the higher order reasoning. If we view this as practicing in context, then it makes sense that practicing skills of similar difficulty would produce better results. However, this is contrary to some of the research that factual knowledge has to be mastered first.
Although fact quizzes were beneficial for fact learning, they did not facilitate higher order learning, contrary to popular intuition based on Bloom’s taxonomy.
Contrary to popular intuition, building a foundation of factual knowledge via retrieval practice did not enhance students’ higher order learning. Instead, students’ final fact test and higher order test performance was greatest following retrieval practice that matched in cognitive complexity based on Bloom’s taxonomy: fact quizzes enhanced final fact test performance and higher order quizzes enhanced final higher order test performance. Retrieval practice increased learning by 20–30% under laboratory conditions with college students and also in an authentic K-12 classroom.
Why didn’t fact quizzes improve higher order learning in the present study, as many cognitive scientists and educators contend? First, students may have been unaware that information on fact quizzes was related to final higher order tests, thus they did not transfer their knowledge without explicit instructions to do so.
Mixed quizzes, comprising both fact and higher order questions, increased higher order test performance more than fact quizzes (in Experiment 2) and slightly more than higher order quizzes (in Experiment
If we want to reach the top of Bloom’s taxonomy, building a foundation of knowledge via fact-based retrieval practice may be less potent than engaging in higher order retrieval practice at the outset, a key finding for future research and classroom application.
·diigo.com·
Retrieval Practice & Bloom’s Taxonomy: Do Students Need Fact Knowledge Before Higher Order Learning?
Factual Knowledge Must (Not?) Precede Higher Order Thinking |Education & Teacher Conferences
Factual Knowledge Must (Not?) Precede Higher Order Thinking |Education & Teacher Conferences
Summary of Pooja Agarwal's research on retrieval practice for higher order thinking
That is: when students <span style="color: #000000;"><b>didn’t&nbsp;</b></span>review a particular set of facts, they could still reason with them — as long as they <strong>had practiced</strong> doing that kind of reasoning.
·learningandthebrain.com·
Factual Knowledge Must (Not?) Precede Higher Order Thinking |Education & Teacher Conferences
Generalist versus specialist? How about a misshapen comb
Generalist versus specialist? How about a misshapen comb
This is an expanded view of the T-shaped skills explained in Cammy Bean's "Accidental Instructional Designer." It's not a binary of generalist vs. specialist. Many of us have T-shaped skills; we have a broad base (the top of the T) with one set of deeper skills (the vertical in the T). If you have several deeper skills, a map of your skills looks more like a misshapen, uneven comb.
·uxdesign.cc·
Generalist versus specialist? How about a misshapen comb
Students Fall for Misinformation Online. Is Teaching Them to Read Like Fact Checkers the Solution? - The Chronicle of Higher Education
Students Fall for Misinformation Online. Is Teaching Them to Read Like Fact Checkers the Solution? - The Chronicle of Higher Education
This is a better way to teach digital literacy and fact checking. Instead of just focusing on deeply checking the source itself, use "lateral reading" to check other sources and circle back to the original.
·chronicle.com·
Students Fall for Misinformation Online. Is Teaching Them to Read Like Fact Checkers the Solution? - The Chronicle of Higher Education
GUEST POST: The Emerging Consensus — The Learning Scientists
GUEST POST: The Emerging Consensus — The Learning Scientists
This is an interesting summary of research, compiling conclusions from multiple types of research. While I'm skeptical of most claims about neuroscience research directly informing learning design, this tries to avoid that. Neuroscience research is used to explain results from cognitive psychology research. They also try to connect cognitive research on the other side with classroom experience.
·learningscientists.org·
GUEST POST: The Emerging Consensus — The Learning Scientists
Constructivism is a theory of learning, not a theory of pedagogy. Neuroscience explains why this is important | npj Science of Learning Community
Constructivism is a theory of learning, not a theory of pedagogy. Neuroscience explains why this is important | npj Science of Learning Community
This is intended to be a controversial position, but it seems to align with research. We construct our understanding in context, building and elaborating schema over time. Our schema are only partial representations though. Learning is supported by creating multiple, overlapping partial representations of knowledge. Repeated exposure and practice in varied contexts is important.
·npjscilearncommunity.nature.com·
Constructivism is a theory of learning, not a theory of pedagogy. Neuroscience explains why this is important | npj Science of Learning Community
13 eLearning Scenario Tips that 60 Experts Agree On – eLearningArt
13 eLearning Scenario Tips that 60 Experts Agree On – eLearningArt
Bryan Jones asked 60 people for their #1 tip for creating scenarios. He noted the top trends and collected these tips all in a single post. My tip is #23 about aligning the scenario to the objectives.
<p>these are the 13 most important elements:</p> <ol> <li><a href="#real">Keep it real</a></li> <li><a href="#relevant">Make it relevant</a></li> <li><a href="#structure">Follow a structured approach</a></li> <li><a href="#plan">Plan and analyze before you build</a></li> <li><a href="#objectives">Keep the learning objectives and outcomes in mind</a></li> <li><a href="#story">Tell a story</a></li> <li><a href="#context">Provide accurate context</a></li> <li><a href="#nuance">Find nuance in the scenario</a></li> <li><a href="#choice">Consider scenario choices carefully</a></li> <li><a href="#sme">Collaborate with your subject matter experts</a></li> <li><a href="#learner">Collaborate with your actual learners</a></li> <li><a href="#challenge">Challenge your learners</a></li> <li><a href="#consequences">Let learners experience consequences</a></li></ol>
<h3>Use your objectives&nbsp;to drive the action in your scenarios</h3> <blockquote><p>Align your scenario with your objectives. An engaging scenario that doesn’t help learners practice relevant decisions tied to your objectives is a waste of time and resources. Use scenarios to provide learners with a realistic context where they can make choices. In a scenario, the main character’s goal often reflects achieving or demonstrating the learning objective. Use your objectives to drive the action in your scenarios.</p></blockquote> <p>— <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="https://www.syniadlearning.com/">Christy Tucker</a></span></p>
·elearningart.com·
13 eLearning Scenario Tips that 60 Experts Agree On – eLearningArt
Products - Kognito
Products - Kognito
This vendor has a library of scenario-based courses using virtual coaches. One interesting note is how each decision has two parts. First, you choose which strategy to use. Second, you choose which sentence within that strategy to try in the conversation. You can ask for help from the virtual coach or undo your last action. While the 3D virtual characters are great, you could use that two-part technique in simulations built in other tools as well. Watch the trailers to get an idea of how the interactions work.
·kognito.com·
Products - Kognito
The Science of the Job Search, Part VII: You Only Need 50% of Job “Requirements” – TalentWorks
The Science of the Job Search, Part VII: You Only Need 50% of Job “Requirements” – TalentWorks
Job listings are descriptions of what they imagine the ideal candidate should have. Don't be afraid to apply to jobs because you can't check every single box. You can get interviews while meeting only about half the requirements.
<strong>You’re as likely to get a job interview m</strong><strong>eeting 50% of job requirements as meeting 90% of them.</strong>
You may have seen stories before about how women in particular&nbsp;<a href="https://hbr.org/2014/08/why-women-dont-apply-for-jobs-unless-theyre-100-qualified">don’t apply for jobs unless they’re 100% qualified</a>. We wondered if they were on to something – maybe there’s gender discrimination at play and hiring managers look for women to meet more of the requirements. Turns out,&nbsp;<strong>our findings apply just as much to women as to men</strong>, and actually, <strong>for women, the chances of getting an interview start increasing as soon as you meet 30% of requirements</strong>.
·talent.works·
The Science of the Job Search, Part VII: You Only Need 50% of Job “Requirements” – TalentWorks
Book — The Learning Scientists
Book — The Learning Scientists
Quick summaries of key points from each chapter in a book on learning science and effective strategies (spacing, elaboration, concrete examples, visuals, and retrieval practice). I wish the graphics were easier to read though. Medium blue italicized serif text on a lighter blue background isn't enough contrast. I don't think low contrast counts as desirable difficulty, just bad accessibility.
·learningscientists.org·
Book — The Learning Scientists
Learning Technology Mystery Series Presents “The Case of the Disengaged Learner” with Cara North - The Training, Learning, and Development Community
Learning Technology Mystery Series Presents “The Case of the Disengaged Learner” with Cara North - The Training, Learning, and Development Community
Cara North's recorded presentation on engagement in learning. Engagement can be cognitive, behavioral, or emotional. Additional resources at go.osu.edu/disengaged
·tldc.us·
Learning Technology Mystery Series Presents “The Case of the Disengaged Learner” with Cara North - The Training, Learning, and Development Community
The Mindset Controversy: Carol Dweck Speaks... |Education & Teacher Conferences
The Mindset Controversy: Carol Dweck Speaks... |Education & Teacher Conferences
A summary of Dweck's response to recent unsuccessful research on growth mindset. It's probably less important to teach the concept of mindset than to adjust methods of teaching and providing feedback.
<p>Dweck emphasizes that mindset interventions should not be one-time events.</p> <p>Anything that happens just once — “a chart at the front of the room, a lecture where you define the two mindsets” — isn’t likely to work.</p> <p>Instead, we should focus on “the policies and practices in the classroom. <em>It is not about teaching the concept alone</em>, it is much more about implementing practices that focus on growth and learning.” [emphasis added] </p>
·learningandthebrain.com·
The Mindset Controversy: Carol Dweck Speaks... |Education & Teacher Conferences