DOGE Timeline

DOGE Timeline

175 bookmarks
Newest
Inside DOGE’s Takeover of the Social Security Administration
Inside DOGE’s Takeover of the Social Security Administration
DOGE has ignored urgently needed reforms and upgrades at the Social Security Administration, according to dozens of insiders and 15 hours of candid interviews with the former acting chief of the agency, who admits he sometimes made things worse.
On Feb. 10, on the third floor of the Social Security Administration’s Baltimore-area headquarters, Leland Dudek unfurled a 4-foot-wide roll of paper that extended to 20 feet in length. It was a visual guide that the agency had kept for years to explain Social Security’s many technological systems and processes. The paper was covered in flow charts, arrows and text so minuscule you almost needed a magnifying glass to read it. Dudek called it Social Security’s “Dead Sea Scroll.” Dudek and a fellow Social Security Administration bureaucrat taped the scroll across a wall of a windowless executive office. This was where a team from the new Department of Government Efficiency was going to set up shop.
Even today, thousands of its physical records are stored in former limestone mines in Missouri and Pennsylvania. Its core software dates back to the early 1980s, and only a few programmers remain who understand the intricacies of its more than 60 million lines of code.
Several times over those first few days, Akash Bobba, a 21-year-old coder who’d been the first of them to arrive, held his face close to Dudek’s scroll, tracing connections between the agency’s venerable IT systems with his index finger. Bobba asked: “Who would know about this part of the architecture?”
Their senior leaders had already written out goals on a whiteboard. At the top: Find fraud. Quickly.
acting commissioner of the Social Security Administration, a position he held through May.
DOGE, he said, began acting like “a bunch of people who didn’t know what they were doing, with ideas of how government should run — thinking it should work like a McDonald’s or a bank — screaming all the time.”
Key DOGE team members have transitioned to permanent jobs at the SSA, including as the agency’s top technology officials. The 19-year-old whose self-anointed moniker — “Big Balls” — has made him one of the most memorable DOGErs joined the agency this summer.
The DOGE philosophy has been embraced by the SSA’s commissioner, Frank Bisignano, who was confirmed by the Senate in May.
For all the controversy DOGE has generated, its time at the Social Security Administration has not amounted to looming armageddon, as some Democrats warn.
while squandering the chance for systemic change at an agency that genuinely needs it.
They could have worked to modernize Social Security’s legacy software, the current and former staffers say. They could have tried to streamline the stupefying volume of documentation that many Social Security beneficiaries have to provide. They could have built search tools to help staff navigate the agency’s 60,000 pages of policies.
They did none of these things.
Dudek, a midlevel bureaucrat with blunt confidence and a preference for his own ideas, had failed in his one past attempt to manage a small team within the SSA, leading him and his supervisors to conclude he shouldn’t oversee others. Despite that, Trump made him the boss of 57,500 people as acting commissioner of the agency this spring.
Dudek asked people he knew at big tech companies for introductions to potential DOGE members
And unlike Michelle King, the acting agency chief at the time, Dudek was willing to speed up the new-hire training process to give DOGE access to virtually all of the SSA’s databases
“I confess,” he posted. “I helped DOGE understand SSA. … I confess. I … circumvented the chain of command to connect DOGE with the people who get stuff done.
Between February and May, when Dudek’s tenure ended, his erratic rhetoric and decisions routinely made front-page news. He was often portrayed as a DOGE patsy, perhaps even a fool. But in his interviews with ProPublica this summer, he revealed himself to be a much more complex figure, a disappointed believer in DOGE’s potential, who maintains he did what he could to protect Social Security’s mission under duress.
Yet Dudek had barely settled in as commissioner when Bobba unintentionally sparked a national misinformation firestorm: A table he created appeared as a screenshot in a grossly misleading Musk tweet about “vampires” over the age of 100 allegedly collecting Social Security checks.
Bobba had sorted people with a Social Security number by age and found more than 12 million over 120 years old still listed in the agency’s data.
Dudek watched in horror as Trump then shared the same statistics with both houses of Congress and a national television audience, claiming the numbers proved “shocking levels of incompetence and probable fraud in the Social Security program for our seniors
Inside the SSA, the DOGE team tried to find proof of the fraud that Musk and Trump had proclaimed, but it didn’t seem to know how to go about it, jumping from tactic to tactic
” It was the senior leaders who were issuing orders without heeding what the young DOGErs were learning.
Michelle Kowalski, an analyst who has since departed the agency, was instructed to take one of the DOGE people, Cole Killian, through earnings data and historical records to analyze the cases of extremely old people whose deaths had not been recorded in Social Security data. She found herself having to explain to him, again and again, that many of these people were born before states reported births and deaths to the federal government and decades before the advent of electronic record keeping. In the early days of the agency, some people didn’t even know their birthdays.
But he usually kept his camera turned off during video meetings. When he finally turned it on for one call, the face she saw seemed like that of a teenager.
Kowalski was exasperated by having to answer to such inexperience
Employees at headquarters took their time walking past the glass-walled conference room where DOGE staffers had set up, glaring in at them as they worked among stacks of laptops that they used for assignments at different agencies.
He decided to move the DOGE operatives to a more secluded area of the campus and assigned an armed security detail to protect them.
And he sent out insulting full-staff emails pressuring career employees to retire.
“There’s Lee, and then there’s Leland-performingly-Dudek.”)
which could in turn give him credibility as he kept trying to push them toward the real issues at Social Security.
Its demands usually came through Coulter, the DOGE lead with the Harvard and hedge fund background
“I really think it would be helpful if you were to do this tomorrow,” Coulter would say to Dudek about eliminating an entire division of the SSA or cutting more staff
Coulter would call a few hours later on the encrypted-messaging app Signal to ask, “You really aren’t catching on, are you?” and “Do you know how many times I’ve defended you?”
Coulter, who has been working for DOGE at NASA i
But instead of facilitating this effort at greater efficiency, Coulter told Dudek to close the office
Such was the case with the issue of phone fraud. Knowing that the DOGErs would perk up at the mention of anything fraud-related, Dudek and other officials made a point of explaining that they’d been working on an initiative to block bots that had been calling the agency.
The plans included running all phone-based requests for bank account changes against a Treasury Department database of suspicious accounts and analyzing such calls to verify whether they were being made from the vicinity of the address
he White House instructed Dudek to end all claims and direct-deposit transactions by phone.
Beneficiaries would have to verify their own identities by using an often-confusing web portal or by traveling to a field office to do it in person. For millions of elderly or disabled people, these were daunting or impossible options.
“Well, Lee, you just fired that team,” one official answered, referring to the Office of Transformation. (Dudek said he asked this question on purpose to make sure DOGE heard the answer.)
Over the course of six weeks under Dudek, the phone policy zigged and zagged a half dozen times — for example, the SSA adopted, then abandoned, a three-day waiting period to conduct an algorithmic fraud check on all calls — before finally ending up nearly where it began. Transactions could be carried out by phone again.
Throughout this saga, Dudek was still getting calls from White House officials — most often from Katie Miller, DOGE’s spokesperson and the wife of Stephen Miller
Frank Bisignano, in the oval office with President Donald Trump, was confirmed as commissioner of the Social Security Administration in May.
Yet, like DOGE, he appears to have embraced the appearance of efficiency rather than efficiency itself. He has repeatedly told staff that Social Security should be run more like Amazon, with AI handling more customer interactions
Bisignano has also fixated on how much time it takes to reach an agent on the SSA’s 800 number. In a July press release, he claimed that the average was down to six minutes, an 80% reduction from 2024. He achieved this in part by reassigning 1,000 field office employees to phone duty. That means initial calls are getting answered faster, but there are significantly fewer staff members available to handle complex, in-person cases.
·propublica.org·
Inside DOGE’s Takeover of the Social Security Administration
April 25, 2025 Treasury TIGTA Inspector General Probes Whether Trump, DOGE Sought Private Taxpayer Information or Sensitive IRS Material
April 25, 2025 Treasury TIGTA Inspector General Probes Whether Trump, DOGE Sought Private Taxpayer Information or Sensitive IRS Material
The request, spelled out in an email obtained by ProPublica, comes amid concerns that DOGE has overstepped its bounds in seeking highly restricted private information about taxpayers, public employees or federal agencies.
·propublica.org·
April 25, 2025 Treasury TIGTA Inspector General Probes Whether Trump, DOGE Sought Private Taxpayer Information or Sensitive IRS Material
Edward Coristine | DOGE Track
Edward Coristine | DOGE Track
A website tracking the various activities of the DOGE wrecking crew across government that is automatically regenerated as new data is added.
·dogetrack.info·
Edward Coristine | DOGE Track
DOGE Track BROOO
DOGE Track BROOO
An automatically-generated and frequently updated site for presenting data on DOGE’s rampage across government, designed to work on large screens and mobile phones.
·dogetrack.info·
DOGE Track BROOO
Feb 4. Statement Treasury Department Letter to Members of Congress Regarding Payment Systems
Feb 4. Statement Treasury Department Letter to Members of Congress Regarding Payment Systems
I am writing in response to your letter … regarding payment systems operated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.The Treasury Department’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) operates vital payment systems for the federal government, and those systems should promote financial integrity and operational efficiency. The Fiscal Service disburses nearly 90 percent of all federal payments, in over 1.2 billion transactions per year. Treasury is committed to ensuring that the Fiscal Service is functioning in a manner consistent with the highest levels of efficiency and in accordance with the expectations of taxpayers to prevent waste, fraud and abuse. Treasury has no higher obligation than managing the government’s finances on behalf of the American people, and its payments system is critical to that process.  In keeping with that mission, Treasury is committed to safeguarding the integrity and security of the system, given the implications of any compromise or disruption to the U.S. economy.  The Fiscal Service is confident those protections are robust and effective. Therefore, expanding on efforts that began under the prior Administration, Treasury has been undergoing a review of these systems to maximize payment integrity for agencies and the public.Importantly, the ongoing review of Treasury’s systems is not resulting in the suspension or rejection of any payment instructions submitted to Treasury by other federal agencies across the government.  In particular, the review at the Fiscal Service has not caused payments for obligations such as Social Security and Medicare to be delayed or re-routed.  To be clear, the agency responsible for making the payment always drives the payment process.  Currently, Treasury staff members working with Tom Krause, a Treasury employee, will have read-only access to the coded data of the Fiscal Service’s payment systems in order to continue this operational efficiency assessment.  This is similar to the kind of access that Treasury provides to individuals reviewing Treasury systems, such as auditors, and that follows practices associated with protecting the integrity of the systems and business processes.Mr. Krause is conducting this effort in coordination with veteran career Treasury officials, and all operational processes continue to be conducted only by career Treasury staff in accordance with all standard security, safety, and privacy standards.  Mr. Krause is a longtime technology executive.  His decades of experience in building companies and managing balance sheets as a chief financial officer are of great benefit to this review.  In order to allow him to perform this function, he has been hired as an expert/consultant by the federal government and designated in a role commonly used across Administrations—a “special government employee” —pursuant to applicable law.  This role involves a hiring process that includes a review of a candidate’s credentials and background, and demands the same ethical standards of privacy, confidentiality, conflicts of interest assessment, and professionalism of other government employees.[1] These assessments are conducted by career legal and ethics officials.  Mr. Krause is subject to the same security obligations and ethical requirements, including a Top Secret security clearance. Treasury will continue its efforts to promote efficiency and effectiveness in its operations, and to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse. [1]See https://extapps2.oge.gov/Training/OGETraining.nsf/xsp/.ibmmodres/domino/OpenAttachment/training/ogetraining.nsf/D006291C1FEC02448525869C005BD4B8/Body/EthicsLawsApplicabletoSGEs.pdf.
Importantly, the ongoing review of Treasury’s systems is not resulting in the suspension or rejection of any payment instructions submitted to Treasury by other federal agencies across the government.  In particular, the review at the Fiscal Service has not caused payments for obligations such as Social Security and Medicare to be delayed or re-routed.  To be clear, the agency responsible for making the payment always drives the payment process.  Currently, Treasury staff members working with Tom Krause, a Treasury employee, will have read-only access to the coded data of the Fiscal Service’s payment systems in order to continue this operational efficiency assessment.  This is similar to the kind of access that Treasury provides to individuals reviewing Treasury systems, such as auditors, and that follows practices associated with protecting the integrity of the systems and business processes.
·home.treasury.gov·
Feb 4. Statement Treasury Department Letter to Members of Congress Regarding Payment Systems
April 6. 3rd commissioner since jan quits melanie krause (feb to april 2025) IRS commissioner quits over scheme to sell out tax-paying immigrants
April 6. 3rd commissioner since jan quits melanie krause (feb to april 2025) IRS commissioner quits over scheme to sell out tax-paying immigrants
Acting IRS Commissioner Melanie Krause has quit the agency following a decision by the Trump administration to share IRS filings with the Department of Homeland Security. President Donald Trump ...
Krause is the third person to lead and quit the IRS since Trump was sworn in,
·dailykos.com·
April 6. 3rd commissioner since jan quits melanie krause (feb to april 2025) IRS commissioner quits over scheme to sell out tax-paying immigrants
Early to mid March staffers at DHS CP3 fired. Hired back Monday March 10. Put on leave Thursday Match 13 re 2 court rulings. Published between 3/16 and 3/18. They worked to prevent violence and terrorism at the agency created after 9/11. Then they got fired
Early to mid March staffers at DHS CP3 fired. Hired back Monday March 10. Put on leave Thursday Match 13 re 2 court rulings. Published between 3/16 and 3/18. They worked to prevent violence and terrorism at the agency created after 9/11. Then they got fired

William Braniff said that with his appointment to the director’s job ending soon, he decided the best thing he could do for the staffers and for the center was to “resign alongside of them, as some agencies and departments have rehired people in mission critical offices once they were made aware of the implications of those terminations.”

“CP3 is the inheritor of the primary and founding mission of DHS — to prevent terrorism,” he said, adding that the center’s approach “is as effective for preventing school shootings as it is for terrorism prevention.”

In a post on LinkedIn before he resigned, Braniff said grant applications last year increased 82% and 27 states were lined up to work with the center to create plans to address targeted violence and prevent terrorism; 16 states already had plans in place or were creating them.

The employees terminated included former social workers, mental health professionals and state public health officials.

Before the layoffs there had been more than 40 staff members at the center, with most based in Washington, D.C.

A federal program designed to prevent targeted violence and terrorism in the United States has lost 20% of its staff after layoffs hit its probationary staffers
Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships
That job became far more difficult after eight members of the center’s staff were fired in early March
According to a Department of Homeland Security employee and a center employee who was fired, the staffers were rehired late Monday but were then put on administrative leave, following two March 13 court decisions ordering the Republican administration to rehire fired probationary staffers.
William Braniff said that with his appointment to the director’s job ending soon, he decided the best thing he could do for the staffers and for the center was to “resign alongside of them, as some agencies and departments have rehired people in mission critical offices once they were made aware of the implications of those terminations.
“CP3 is the inheritor of the primary and founding mission of DHS — to prevent terrorism,” he said, adding that the center’s approach “is as effective for preventing school shootings as it is for terrorism prevention.” In a post on LinkedIn before he resigned, Braniff said grant applications last year increased 82% and 27 states were lined up to work with the center to create plans to address targeted violence and prevent terrorism; 16 states already had plans in place or were creating them. The employees terminated included former social workers, mental health professionals and state public health officials. Before the layoffs there had been more than 40 staff members at the center, with most based in Washington, D.
Tom Warrick, a former counterterrorism official at Homeland Security who’s now at the Atlantic Council, said the center, launched in 2021 under the Biden administration, was intended to develop projects that try to identify people before they turn violent, regardless of ideology or motivation, and steer them toward help through community health programs. Warrick said that the center has been doing “pioneering” work and that the payoff is “enormous” in terms of shootings and attacks averted.
to help them establish or grow their own programs to address targeted violence and terrorism.
·apnews.com·
Early to mid March staffers at DHS CP3 fired. Hired back Monday March 10. Put on leave Thursday Match 13 re 2 court rulings. Published between 3/16 and 3/18. They worked to prevent violence and terrorism at the agency created after 9/11. Then they got fired
May 25, 2025 Trump admin tells Supreme Court: DOGE needs to do its work in secret
May 25, 2025 Trump admin tells Supreme Court: DOGE needs to do its work in secret
DOJ complains of “sweeping, intrusive discovery” after DOGE refused FOIA requests.
President Trump's Justice Department sought an immediate halt to orders issued by US District Court for the District of Columbia. US Solicitor General John Sauer argued that the Department of Government Efficiency is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) as a presidential advisory body and not an official "agency."
US District Judge Christopher Cooper has so far sided with CREW. Cooper decided in March that "USDS is likely covered by FOIA and that the public would be irreparably harmed by an indefinite delay in unearthing the records CREW seeks," ordering DOGE "to process CREW's request on an expedited timetable."
DOGE then asked the district court for a summary judgment in its favor, and CREW responded by filing a motion for expedited discovery "seeking information relevant to whether USDS wields substantial authority independent of the President and is therefore subject to FOIA."
In an April 15 order, Cooper ruled that CREW is entitled to limited discovery into the question of whether DOGE is wielding authority sufficient to bring it within the purview of FOIA. Cooper hasn't yet ruled on the motion for summary judgment.
Trump's executive orders appear to support CREW's argument by suggesting "that USDS is exercising substantial independent authority," Cooper wrote. "As the Court already noted, the executive order establishing USDS 'to implement the President's DOGE Agenda' appears to give USDS the authority to carry out that agenda, 'not just to advise the President in doing so
the Trump administration tried to get Cooper's ruling overturned in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The appeals court ruled against DOGE last week
The appeals court temporarily stayed the district court order in April, but dissolved the stay on May 14 and denied the government's petition.
But "the discovery here is modest in scope and does not target the President or any close adviser personally. The government retains every conventional tool to raise privilege objections on the limited question-by-question basis foreseen here on a narrow and discrete ground."
Although the government protests that any such assertion of privilege would be burdensome, the only identified burdens are limited both by time and reach, covering as they do records within USDS's control generated since January 20," the ruling said. "It does not provide any specific details as to why accessing its own records or submitting to two depositions would pose an unbearable burden."
·arstechnica.com·
May 25, 2025 Trump admin tells Supreme Court: DOGE needs to do its work in secret
June 9, 2025. DOGE wins at Supreme Court; conservative majority ends limits on data access
June 9, 2025. DOGE wins at Supreme Court; conservative majority ends limits on data access

The court majority decided "that the application of these factors in this case warrants granting the requested stay." The preliminary injunction is now stayed while litigation continues at the 4th Circuit. The underlying case could make its way back to the Supreme Court

"We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work," the Supreme Court order said. The court also sided with the Trump administration in a different DOGE case, finding that a lower court's discovery order requiring DOGE to provide information about its government cost-cutting operations was too broad (more on that ruling later in this article

data-access ruling was in a case filed by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; the Alliance for Retired Americans; and American Federation of Teachers. US District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander previously issued a preliminary injunction, writing that DOGE "is essentially engaged in a fishing expedition at SSA, in search of a fraud epidemic, based on little more than suspicion." The District of Maryland judge found that plaintiffs are likely to win their case alleging that the government violated the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.

Today the Court grants "emergency" relief that allows the Social Security Administration (SSA) to hand DOGE staffers the highly sensitive data of millions of Americans. The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now—before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful. So it asks this Court to stay a lower court's decision to place temporary and qualified limits on DOGE's data access while litigation challenging DOGE's authority to access the data is pending. But the Government fails to substantiate its stay request by showing that it or the public will suffer irreparable harm absent this Court's intervention. In essence, the "urgency" underlying the Government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes.

Jackson said the court's emergency-docket practices have become "decoupl[ed] from the traditional harm-reduction justification for equitable stays." In the DOGE case, lower courts are "expeditiously assessing whether federal law permits the SSA to give DOGE staffers unfettered access to Americans' sensitive information," Jackson wrote. The only question before the Supreme Court "is what should happen to all of that data in the meantime," and the government "has not shown that it will suffer any concrete or irreparable harm" if the injunction is enforced while litigation continues, she wrote.

We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work," the Supreme Court order said. The court also sided with the Trump administration in a different DOGE case, finding that a lower court's discovery order requiring DOGE to provide information about its government cost-cutting operations was too broad (more on that ruling later in this article).
data-access ruling was in a case filed by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; the Alliance for Retired Americans; and American Federation of Teachers. US District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander previously issued a preliminary injunction, writing that DOGE "is essentially engaged in a fishing expedition at SSA, in search of a fraud epidemic, based on little more than suspicion." The District of Maryland judge found that plaintiffs are likely to win their case alleging that the government violated the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.
. The Trump administration filed an emergency application to the Supreme Court last month, arguing that the injunction is causing "irreparable harm to the executive branch" and thwarting DOGE's attempts to "eliminate waste and fraud
The court majority decided "that the application of these factors in this case warrants granting the requested stay." The preliminary injunction is now stayed while litigation continues at the 4th Circuit. The underlying case could make its way back to the Supreme Court.
Today the Court grants "emergency" relief that allows the Social Security Administration (SSA) to hand DOGE staffers the highly sensitive data of millions of Americans. The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now—before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful. So it asks this Court to stay a lower court's decision to place temporary and qualified limits on DOGE's data access while litigation challenging DOGE's authority to access the data is pending. But the Government fails to substantiate its stay request by showing that it or the public will suffer irreparable harm absent this Court's intervention. In essence, the "urgency" underlying the Government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes.
Jackson said the court's emergency-docket practices have become "decoupl[ed] from the traditional harm-reduction justification for equitable stays." In the DOGE case, lower courts are "expeditiously assessing whether federal law permits the SSA to give DOGE staffers unfettered access to Americans' sensitive information," Jackson wrote. The only question before the Supreme Court "is what should happen to all of that data in the meantime," and the government "has not shown that it will suffer any concrete or irreparable harm" if the injunction is enforced while litigation continues, she wrote.
Jackson said the ruling puts at risk personal information like Social Security numbers, birth dates, addresses, bank account numbers, and medical records. "Every person who has received a Social Security number appears in the SSA's data," and the agency administers various programs that collect other personal information, Jackson wrote. The Supreme Court ruling creates "grave privacy risks for millions of Americans," she wrote.
For example, Jackson wrote that Social Security Disability Insurance "collects detailed medical histories (describing, for example, prescriptions, mental-health treatments, and testing results for sensitive health conditions like HIV) from applicants and beneficiaries." The Privacy Act protects this kind of data, prohibiting agencies "from disclosing covered data except in narrow circumstances, such as where agency employees 'have a need for the record in the performance of their duties.'"
Previously, investigations would "start with access to high-level, anonymized data based on the least amount of data the analyst or auditor would need to know," Jackson wrote, referring to evidence given by a former SSA acting chief of staff.
The injunction was "minimally burdensome" because it "allows the SSA to provide DOGE staffers with access to redacted or anonymized data and SSA records, so long as DOGE staffers meet the training, background-check, and other requirements that generally govern such access," she wrote
The injunction also allowed access to non-anonymized data "if DOGE gives the agency a written explanation of its specific need for the records," Jackson wrote
The injunction "amounts to a short-term pause on giving DOGE unfettered and uniquely unprotected access to millions of Americans' sensitive, non-anonymized data, paired with reasonable conditions on data access in the interim," but the government was "dissatisfied with even those minor limitations," she wrote.
and it does so without any showing by the Government that it will actually suffer concrete or irreparable harm from having to comply with the District Court's order."
·arstechnica.com·
June 9, 2025. DOGE wins at Supreme Court; conservative majority ends limits on data access
May 30, 2025 'Sore subject': White House confirms physical brawl between key Trump allies
May 30, 2025 'Sore subject': White House confirms physical brawl between key Trump allies
A physical altercation between Elon Musk and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent precipitated the Tesla founder's quick ouster from the Trump administration, according to a report.The incident was previously reported as a "screaming match" between the two men, but the physical aspect has since been con...
·rawstory.com·
May 30, 2025 'Sore subject': White House confirms physical brawl between key Trump allies
Factba.se Trump's presidential calendar
Factba.se Trump's presidential calendar
Learn how Google Calendar helps you stay on top of your plans - at home, at work and everywhere in between.
·calendar.google.com·
Factba.se Trump's presidential calendar
September 15, 2018. Anonymous Op-ed NYT Opinion | I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration…
September 15, 2018. Anonymous Op-ed NYT Opinion | I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration…
archived 3 Jun 2025 16:04:33 UTC
We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous. But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic
It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.
public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us to allied, like-minded nations.
Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior. But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable
There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single one: Americans.
·archive.ph·
September 15, 2018. Anonymous Op-ed NYT Opinion | I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration…