These scientists aren’t using ChatGPT — here’s why
Some researchers find AI chatbots helpful for writing, coding and gathering information. Others are choosing to avoid the craze.
The possibilities for using ChatGPT for scientific purposes have so far been quite limited due to the likelihood of hallucination.
Now, with ResearchGPT, a promising further development appears on the horizon: the coupling of ChatGPT with the scientific database of consensus.
My first attempts already looked quite good. The articles that ResearchGPT refers to are not „invented“ by ResearchGPT. Unfortunately, I haven't yet figured out how to go directly to the articles, but copy&paste to Google Scholar works.
In any case, I will test ResearchGPT more intensively in the near future when I write a scientific article.
Have you already tried ResearchGPT?