Board

Life is also a form of self storytelling. We're continually retelling ourselves our life story, but very few people think of themselves as authors of their story, not mere subjects. People with extraordinary high-agency realize this early in life and start maximizing the interestingness of their life story.

If your IDE is a car, Repl.it is a motorcycle. If your IDE is a desktop computer, Repl.it is an iPad. If your IDE is a skyscraper, Repl.it is a cozy vacation house.

Repl.it is a tool for exploratory programming. It's for playing with ideas.

One thing we should take a look: Low-Code and No-Code development environment. Do you think that a business person (non-developer) would understand the eight fallacies of distributed computing? I don’t think so, so for them we need to make the abstraction level higher than before:

At the end of the day not all of us need to develop operating systems or low level stuffs. Many of us will “just” build high-level applications for many business domains.

My recommendation: enjoy your last day writing code which is full of technical error handlings. Welcome to the new world of pure business code and stay optimistic, we’ll get there… as always 😉😅

“It’s just matter of time that we won’t care whether we have in-process or remote calls. Everything will be transparent for developers. No semantic difference. No network or in-process difference. All will be abstracted so that developers have only the in-process semantics”.

In categories where private data is needed, there is less risk of all the value being captured directly by the models. To be clear, even in ones that require private data, many application companies may pop up in the same space, but all of the application companies will have some benefit of workflow/switching cost for the customers they serve, that will prevent them from being fully commoditized by the models, at least.

In these cases, the companies are bringing AI into the existing tool/workflow, rather than creating a new tool from the ground up. While sometimes these businesses seem a bit niche, the approach can serve as a good wedge to then expand further. In addition, there have been numerous examples of large companies built as say plugins in Powerpoint (ThinkCell) and other products. But the risk they face is that the incumbents may integrate these indirectly, in which case they will always need to be multiple times better to stay ahead or relevant.

An important note is that this is more of a spectrum than a hard choice, and there isn’t one right choice. For example, take the UI design space: Diagram is building a plugin within Figma, Galileo is building a standalone application that uses AI to generate an interface design that can be edited in Figma, Uizard is building a standalone AI-powered design product that can essentially replace Figma for some designers.

A fund is how you generate the most carry with the fewest people, you're just optimizing the mechanism. A firm, on the other hand, is (1) generating exceptional returns, but also (2) building enduring enterprise value.