Covid19-Sources

4433 bookmarks
Custom sorting
Multisystem screening reveals SARS-CoV-2 in neurons of the myenteric plexus and in megakaryocytes - PubMed
Multisystem screening reveals SARS-CoV-2 in neurons of the myenteric plexus and in megakaryocytes - PubMed
SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, typically manifests as a respiratory illness, although extrapulmonary involvement, such as in the gastrointestinal tract and nervous system, as well as frequent thrombotic events, are increasingly recognised. How this maps onto SARS-CoV-2 organ tropism at …
·pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov·
Multisystem screening reveals SARS-CoV-2 in neurons of the myenteric plexus and in megakaryocytes - PubMed
Plasma proteomic signature predicts who will get persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection
Plasma proteomic signature predicts who will get persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection
Our findings show that non-severe SARS-CoV-2 infection perturbs the plasma proteome for at least 6 weeks. The plasma proteomic signature at the time of seroconversion has the potential to identify which individuals are more likely to suffer from persistent symptoms related to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
·thelancet.com·
Plasma proteomic signature predicts who will get persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection
Pandaria on Twitter
Pandaria on Twitter
Eine Frage an Prof. Kleinschnitz (@NeuroEssen): Warum kann man das Phantasieprodukt Long Covid im MRT nachweisen? Siehe folgenden Thread:— Pandaria (@PandaPandaria) September 7, 2022
·twitter.com·
Pandaria on Twitter
Cross-neutralization of Omicron subvariants after heterologous NVX-CoV2373 boosters: Comparison between prior SARS-CoV-2-infected and infection-naive individuals
Cross-neutralization of Omicron subvariants after heterologous NVX-CoV2373 boosters: Comparison between prior SARS-CoV-2-infected and infection-naive individuals
The Nuvaxovid™ (NVX-CoV2373), a recombinant protein-based vaccine with feasible cold chain requirement, has been granted as a booster in several countries. Although NVX-CoV2373 booster vaccination presented promising immunogenicity, its cross-reactive immunogenicity against Omicron subvariants of SARS-CoV-2 has not been reported (3 ,4 ). From March to April of 2022, we prospectively recruited individuals scheduled to receive NVX-CoV2373, including those who had completed two-dose (n = 9, aged 19–49 years) or three-dose (n = 41, aged ≥60 years) vaccination approximately five months ago (Supplementary Fig. 1). They previously received either homologous or heterologous vaccination with ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, or mRNA-1273 (Supplementary Table 1). Anti-nuclear capsid protein (anti-N) antibodies were measured in these individuals to determine prior SARS-CoV-2 infection status using the SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Korea University Guro Hospital (2021GR0099) and International St. Mary's Hospital (S21MIME0045). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
·journalofinfection.com·
Cross-neutralization of Omicron subvariants after heterologous NVX-CoV2373 boosters: Comparison between prior SARS-CoV-2-infected and infection-naive individuals
Endogenous panophthalmitis in a patient with COVID-19 during hospitalization in an intensive care unit: A case report - PubMed
Endogenous panophthalmitis in a patient with COVID-19 during hospitalization in an intensive care unit: A case report - PubMed
Patents with COVID-19 may develop severe ocular involvement after COVID-19 due to a generalized reduction in immunity. Comorbidities and intensive care unit treatments can predispose COVID-19 patients to endogenous panophthalmitis.
·pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov·
Endogenous panophthalmitis in a patient with COVID-19 during hospitalization in an intensive care unit: A case report - PubMed
Role of mathematical modelling in future pandemic response policy
Role of mathematical modelling in future pandemic response policy
Christina Pagel and Christian Yates consider what the pandemic has taught us about mathematical modelling in the UK and how it can be used more effectively ### Key messages Mathematical modelling underpinned much of the advice that the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and others provided to the UK government during the pandemic. It should therefore be a focus of the UK covid inquiry’s examination of how and why decisions were made.1 Much of the modelling came from the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling (SPI-M), which gives expert advice to the Department of Health and Social Care and the wider UK government on emerging human infectious disease threats. Its members come from a range of UK institutions and their advice is based on infectious disease modelling and epidemiology.2 During the pandemic, SPI-M reported to SAGE. Modelling from the group has been influential throughout the pandemic, particularly during the first 18 months. For instance, “report 9” by the Imperial College modelling group3 was an important trigger for the UK government’s decision to implement a nationwide lockdown in March 2020. Projections from multiple independent modelling teams also informed the UK’s “roadmap” for release from lockdown in February 20214 and implementation of some further public health mandates under “plan B” measures in December 2021 during the first omicron wave.5 Modelling determined the vaccine priority groups in December 2020,6 which contributed to the UK’s successful vaccine rollout and …
·bmj.com·
Role of mathematical modelling in future pandemic response policy
Exposure to BA.4/BA.5 Spike glycoprotein drives pan-Omicron neutralization in vaccine-experienced humans and mice
Exposure to BA.4/BA.5 Spike glycoprotein drives pan-Omicron neutralization in vaccine-experienced humans and mice
The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and its sublineages show pronounced viral escape from neutralizing antibodies elicited by vaccination or prior SARS-CoV-2 variant infection owing to over 30 amino acid alterations within the spike (S) glycoprotein. We and others have recently reported that breakthrough infection of vaccinated individuals with Omicron sublineages BA.1 and BA.2 are associated with distinct patterns of cross-neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs). BA.2 breakthrough infection mediated overall stronger cross-neutralization of BA.2 and its descendants (BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5) compared to BA.1 breakthrough infection. Here we characterized the effect of Omicron BA.4/BA.5 S glycoprotein exposure on the magnitude and breadth of the neutralizing antibody response upon breakthrough infection in vaccinated individuals and in mice upon booster vaccination. We show that immune sera from triple mRNA-vaccinated individuals with subsequent Omicron BA.4/BA.5 breakthrough infection display broad and robust neutralizing activity against Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4/BA.5. Administration of a prototypic BA.4/BA.5-adapted mRNA booster vaccine to mice following SARS-CoV-2 wild-type strain-based primary immunization is associated with similarly broad neutralizing activity. Immunization of naïve mice with a bivalent mRNA vaccine (wild-type + Omicron BA.4/BA.5) induces strong and broad neutralizing activity against Omicron VOCs and previous variants. These findings suggest that when administered as boosters, mono- and bivalent Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted vaccines may enhance neutralization breadth, and in a bivalent format may also have the potential to confer protection to individuals with no pre-existing immunity against SARS-CoV-2. ### Competing Interest Statement U.S. and O.T. are management board members and employees at BioNTech SE. A.M., B.G.L., M.B., A.W., A.T., A.G., C.C., V.M., G.J.V., J.M., T.Z., S.F., J.R., F.W., K.S., H.H., K.C.W., J.G., S.S., A.F., K.K., O.O., and A.B.V. are employees at BioNTech SE. K.G., N.K. and S.C. are employees at the University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt. Q.Y., H.C., and K.A.S. are employees of Pfizer and may hold stock options. U.S., O.T. A.B.V., A.G., T.Z., J.R., K.C.W. and A.M. are inventors on patents and patent applications related to RNA technology and COVID-19 vaccines. Q.Y, H.C., and K.A.S. are inventors on a patent application related to RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. U.S., O.T., A.M., B.G.L., K.K., A.W., M.B., A.F., A.T., A.G., V.M., G.J.S., A.B.V. and O.O. have securities from BioNTech SE. S.C. has received an honorarium for serving on a clinical advisory board for BioNTech.
These findings suggest that when administered as boosters, mono- and bivalent Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted vaccines may enhance neutralization breadth, and in a bivalent format may also have the potential to confer protection to individuals with no pre-existing immunity against SARS-CoV-2.
·biorxiv.org·
Exposure to BA.4/BA.5 Spike glycoprotein drives pan-Omicron neutralization in vaccine-experienced humans and mice
Protection against omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.2 reinfection conferred by primary omicron BA.1 or pre-omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection among health-care workers with and without mRNA vaccination: a test-negative case-control study
Protection against omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.2 reinfection conferred by primary omicron BA.1 or pre-omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection among health-care workers with and without mRNA vaccination: a test-negative case-control study
Health-care workers who had received two doses of mRNA vaccine and had previous BA.1 infection were subsequently well protected for a prolonged period against BA.2 reinfection, with a third vaccine dose conferring no improvement to that hybrid protection. If this protection also pertains to future variants, there might be limited benefit from additional vaccine doses for people with hybrid immunity, depending on timing and variant.
·thelancet.com·
Protection against omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.2 reinfection conferred by primary omicron BA.1 or pre-omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection among health-care workers with and without mRNA vaccination: a test-negative case-control study
Hybrid immunity and strategies for COVID-19 vaccination
Hybrid immunity and strategies for COVID-19 vaccination
Since April, 2022, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5 subvariants of the omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern have been spreading globally with increased viral fitness and transmissibility. Omicron BA.5 subvariant is currently the predominant COVID-19 threat worldwide.1 With the emergence of the antigenically distinct variants of concern, either natural immunity or first-generation vaccine-induced immunity has failed to prevent transmission effectively. Booster (third or fourth) doses of vaccine play an important role in preventing symptomatic infection, although the boosting effect only lasts for several months.
·thelancet.com·
Hybrid immunity and strategies for COVID-19 vaccination
SARS-CoV-2 and HSV-1 Induce Amyloid Aggregation in Human CSF
SARS-CoV-2 and HSV-1 Induce Amyloid Aggregation in Human CSF
The corona virus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and the resulting long-term neurological complications in patients, known as long COVID, have renewed the interest in the correlation between viral infections and neurodegenerative brain disorders. While many viruses can reach the central nervous system (CNS) causing acute or chronic infections (such as herpes simplex virus 1, HSV-1), the lack of a clear mechanistic link between viruses and protein aggregation into amyloids, a characteristic of several neurodegenerative diseases, has rendered such a connection elusive. Recently, we showed that viruses can induce aggregation of purified amyloidogenic proteins via the direct physicochemical mechanism of heterogenous nucleation (HEN). In the current study, we show that the incubation of HSV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 with human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leads to the amyloid aggregation of several proteins known to be involved in neurodegenerative diseases, such as: APLP1 (amyloid beta precursor like protein 1), ApoE, clusterin, α2-macroglobulin, PGK-1 (phosphoglycerate kinase 1), ceruloplasmin, nucleolin, 14-3-3, transthyretin and vitronectin. Importantly, UV-inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 does not affect its ability to induce amyloid aggregation, as amyloid formation is dependent on viral surface catalysis via HEN and not its ability to replicate. Our results show that viruses can physically induce amyloid aggregation of proteins in human CSF, and thus providing a potential mechanism that may account for the association between persistent and latent/reactivating brain infections and neurodegenerative diseases. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
·biorxiv.org·
SARS-CoV-2 and HSV-1 Induce Amyloid Aggregation in Human CSF
An ACE2-dependent Sarbecovirus in Russian bats is resistant to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines
An ACE2-dependent Sarbecovirus in Russian bats is resistant to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines
Author summary SARS-CoV-2, the sarbecovirus behind COVID-19, emerged in the human population after cross-species transmission from an animal source. While hundreds of sarbecoviruses have been discovered, predominantly in bats in Asia, the majority are not capable of infecting human cells. Khosta-2, a sarbecovirus discovered in Russia, has been shown to interact with the same entry receptor as SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we tested how well the spike proteins from these bat viruses infect human cells under different conditions. We found that the spike from virus, Khosta-2, could infect cells similar to human pathogens using the same entry mechanisms, but was resistant to neutralization by serum from individuals who had been vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2.
·journals.plos.org·
An ACE2-dependent Sarbecovirus in Russian bats is resistant to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines
The rapid replacement of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant by Omicron (B.1.1.529) in England
The rapid replacement of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant by Omicron (B.1.1.529) in England
The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant caused international concern due to its rapid spread in Southern Africa. It was unknown whether this variant would replace or coexist with (either transiently or long term) the then-dominant Delta variant on its introduction to England. We developed a set of hierarchical logistic growth models to describe changes in the frequency of S gene target failure (SGTF) PCR tests, a proxy for Omicron. The doubling time of SGTF cases peaked at 1.56 days (95% CI: 1.49 to 1.63) on 5 December, whereas triple-positive cases were halving every 5.82 days (95% CI: 5.11 to 6.67) going into Christmas 2021. We were unable to characterize the replacement of Delta by Omicron with a single rate. The replacement rate decreased by 53.56% (95% CrI: 45.38 to 61.01) between 14 and 15 December, meaning the competitive advantage of Omicron approximately halved. Preceding the changepoint, Omicron was replacing Delta 16.24% (95% CrI: 9.72 to 23.41) faster in those with two or more vaccine doses, indicative of vaccine escape being a substantial component of competitive advantage. Despite the slowdown, Delta was almost entirely replaced in England within a month of the first sequenced domestic case. The synchrony of changepoints across regions at various stages of Omicron epidemics suggests that the growth rate advantage was not attenuated because of biological mechanisms related to strain competition. The step change in replacement could have resulted from behavioral changes, potentially elicited by public health messaging or policies, that differentially affected Omicron.
·science.org·
The rapid replacement of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant by Omicron (B.1.1.529) in England
Yunlong Richard Cao on Twitter
Yunlong Richard Cao on Twitter
Updating information regarding convergent variants BA.2.3.20, BN.1, BA.2.10.4, BN.2.1, BA.4.6.1, BQ.1, BQ.1.1. In short, BA.2.75.2 and BQ.1.1 are the most antibody-evasive convergent variants tested, far exceeding BA.5 and approaching SARS-CoV-1 level. (1/4) https://t.co/BzknQBSF5e— Yunlong Richard Cao (@yunlong_cao) September 23, 2022
·twitter.com·
Yunlong Richard Cao on Twitter
COVID-19 infection may increase risk of type 1 diabetes, suggests nationwide study of 1.2 million children
COVID-19 infection may increase risk of type 1 diabetes, suggests nationwide study of 1.2 million children
Testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is associated with an increased risk of new-onset type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents, according to a new research at this year’s European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Annual Meeting in Stockholm, Sweden (19-23 Sept). The study is by Hanne Løvdal Gulseth and Dr German Tapia, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway, and colleagues.
·eurekalert.org·
COVID-19 infection may increase risk of type 1 diabetes, suggests nationwide study of 1.2 million children
Post-COVID-19 syndrome: retinal microcirculation as a potential marker for chronic fatigue
Post-COVID-19 syndrome: retinal microcirculation as a potential marker for chronic fatigue
Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) summarizes persisting sequelae after infection with the severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). PCS can affect patients of all covid-19 disease severities. As previous studies revealed impaired blood flow as a provoking factor for triggering PCS, it was the aim of the present study to investigate a potential association of self-reported chronic fatigue and retinal microcirculation in patients with PCS, potentially indicating an objective biomarker. A prospective study was performed, including 201 subjects: 173 patients with PCS and 28 controls. Retinal microcirculation was visualized by OCT-Angiography (OCT-A) and quantified by the Erlangen-Angio-Tool as macula and peripapillary vessel density (VD). Chronic Fatigue (CF) was assessed with the variables ‘Bell score’, age and gender. The VD in the superficial vascular plexus (SVP), intermediate capillary plexus (ICP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) were analyzed considering the repetitions (12 times). Taking in account of such repetitions a mixed model was performed to detect possible differences in the least square means between different groups of analysis. An age effect on VD was observed between patients and controls (p
·medrxiv.org·
Post-COVID-19 syndrome: retinal microcirculation as a potential marker for chronic fatigue
Facing the Omicron variant – How well do vaccines protect against mild and severe COVID-19? Third interim analysis of a living systematic review
Facing the Omicron variant – How well do vaccines protect against mild and severe COVID-19? Third interim analysis of a living systematic review
Background The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant is currently the dominant variant globally. This 3rd interim analysis of a living systematic review summarizes evidence on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) and duration of protection against Omicron. Methods We systematically searched the COVID-19 literature for controlled studies evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines approved in the European Union up to 14/01/2022, complemented by hand-searches of websites and metasearch engines up to 11/02/2022. We considered the following comparisons: full primary immunization vs. no vaccination; booster immunization vs. no vaccination; booster vs. primary immunization. VE against any confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptomatic, and severe COVID-19 (i.e. COVID-19-related hospitalization, ICU-admission, or death) was indicated providing estimate ranges. Meta-analysis was not performed due to high study heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I, certainty of evidence evaluated using GRADE. Results We identified 26 studies, including 430 to 2.2 million participants. VE against any confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to no vaccination ranged between 0-62% after full primary immunization, and between 34-66% after a booster dose. VE-range for booster vs. primary immunization was 34-54.6%. Against symptomatic COVID-19, VE ranged between 6-76% after full primary immunization, and between 19-73.9% after booster immunization, if compared to no vaccination. When comparing booster vs. primary immunization VE ranged between 56-69%. VE against severe COVID-19 compared to no vaccination ranged between 3-84% after full primary immunization, and between 12-100% after a booster dose. One study compared booster vs. primary immunization (VE 100%, 95% CI 71.4-100). VE was characterized by a moderate to strong decline within three to six months for SARS-CoV-2 infections and symptomatic COVID-19. Against severe COVID-19 protection remained robust at least for up to six months. Waning immunity was more profound after primary than booster immunization. Risk of bias was moderate to critical across studies and outcomes. GRADE-certainty was very low for all outcomes. Author’s conclusions Under the Omicron variant, effectiveness of EU-licensed COVID-19 vaccines in preventing any SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild disease is low and only short-lasting after primary immunization, but can be improved by booster vaccination. VE against severe COVID-19 remains high and is long-lasting, especially after receiving the booster vaccination. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement This study did not receive any funding ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
·medrxiv.org·
Facing the Omicron variant – How well do vaccines protect against mild and severe COVID-19? Third interim analysis of a living systematic review
Jeff Bergheim on Twitter
Jeff Bergheim on Twitter
Beim #Formaldehyd kann man #Impfgegner auskontern, indem man ihnen sagt, dass sie täglich ca. 1g pro kg Körpergewicht selbst produzieren und die Konzentration an Formaldehyd im Körper höher ist als im #Impstoff. Weiß jemand wieviel mRNA wir jeden Tag produzieren?— Jeff Bergheim (@BergheimJeff) September 27, 2022
·twitter.com·
Jeff Bergheim on Twitter