GraphNews

Explore how using Neo4j Graph Database and Databricks together can deliver groundbreaking analytics and GenAI outcomes.

Graphs are changing the way we model, store, and query complex data. But when it comes to choosing the right type of graph model, the decision often boils do...

— Sergey Dorogovtsev (@dorogovtsev)

Excited to share that our recent work "Static Graph Approximations of Dynamic Contact Networks for Epidemic Forecasting" is published at Scientific Reports…

Latest findings in pre-training graphs and using them for link recommendation

Research on misinformation origins in social media posts and advertising for the 2024 presidential election.

Sign in or join now to see posts like this one and more.

🗣 TALK ALERT for GraphGeeks ℹ Abstracting Information for Human Understanding 📅 May 30th 🕘 09:00 am PT | 18:00 CEST Registration 👉…

Python scraper based on AI. Contribute to VinciGit00/Scrapegraph-ai development by creating an account on GitHub.

What are the concepts that have the most influence in language? For anyone that missed this fun language model + network science community talk, here's the…

Gemini 1.5 is so powerful that it can read all the Harry Potter books at once and generate a graph of the characters with perfect accuracy. All the books have… | 146 comments on LinkedIn

Free diagram visualization extension for JupyterLab and Jupyter Notebook.

Built upon the shoulders of graph theory, the field of complex networks has become a central tool for studying real systems across various fields of resear

🧠 Visualizing Automatically Generated AI Semantic Networks🧠 Yesterday I shared an #automation that leverages #Claude3 in an iterative process to create… | 17 comments on LinkedIn

🗣 TALK ALERT for GraphGeeks 🈂 Decoding Kanji Relationships 📅  April 30th 🕘  09:00 am PT | 18:00 CEST Registration 👉  https://lnkd.in/gkwGCczF  👈 Join…

The Rise of Graph Jobs, The Disappearance of Graph Technology? Join me for this fun presentation at KGC on May 8, 2024, in NYC, where I delve into a "State of…

See how TigerGraph has integrated their massively parallel processing graph database and analytics platform with NVIDIA cuGraph to deliver 100x performance

Are you tired of manually tracing package vulnerabilities across applications? The #AmazonNeptune team has a solution! As part of the newest release of the…

𝐔𝐧𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐡 𝐀𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐬: 𝟐𝟓 𝐓𝐨𝐩 𝐏𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐧 𝐋𝐢𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬, 𝐀𝐥𝐠𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐦𝐬, 𝐓𝐲𝐩𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝… | 27 comments on LinkedIn

Code for all my videos: https://github.com/sponsors/adumb-codes/Twitter: https://twitter.com/adumb_codesA deep dive into the network of Wikipedia and some of...

How to create synthetic datasets to improve graph-based anomaly detection models? Amazon researchers developed a new method for synthesizing training data for…

6 Rules to help you decide whether to use a graph or a table to solve your analytics problem.

Complex networks pervade various real-world systems, from the natural environment to human societies. The essence of these networks is in their ability to transition and evolve from microscopic disorder-where network topology and node dynamics intertwine-to a macroscopic order characterized by certain collective behaviors. Over the past two decades, complex network science has significantly enhanced our understanding of the statistical mechanics, structures, and dynamics underlying real-world networks. Despite these advancements, there remain considerable challenges in exploring more realistic systems and enhancing practical applications. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, coupled with the abundance of diverse real-world network data, has heralded a new era in complex network science research. This survey aims to systematically address the potential advantages of AI in overcoming the lingering challenges of complex network research. It endeavors to summarize the pivotal research problems and provide an exhaustive review of the corresponding methodologies and applications. Through this comprehensive survey-the first of its kind on AI for complex networks-we expect to provide valuable insights that will drive further research and advancement in this interdisciplinary field.

Translating visual networks into graphs using AI is a game changer for accelerating analytics on information that is historically difficult to access.

The spread of misinformation poses a threat to the social media ecosystem. Effective countermeasures to mitigate this threat require that social media platforms be able to accurately detect low-credibility accounts even before the content they share can be classified as misinformation. Here we present methods to infer account credibility from information diffusion patterns, in particular leveraging two networks: the reshare network, capturing an account’s trust in other accounts, and the bipartite account-source network, capturing an account’s trust in media sources. We extend network centrality measures and graph embedding techniques, systematically comparing these algorithms on data from diverse contexts and social media platforms. We demonstrate that both kinds of trust networks provide useful signals for estimating account credibility. Some of the proposed methods yield high accuracy, providing promising solutions to promote the dissemination of reliable information in online communities. Two kinds of homophily emerge from our results: accounts tend to have similar credibility if they reshare each other’s content or share content from similar sources. Our methodology invites further investigation into the relationship between accounts and news sources to better characterize misinformation spreaders.

Distributed ledger technologies have opened up a wealth of fine-grained transaction data from cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This allows research into problems like anomaly detection, anti-money laundering, pattern mining and activity clustering (where data from traditional currencies is rarely available). The formalism of temporal networks offers a natural way of representing this data and offers access to a wealth of metrics and models. However, the large scale of the data presents a challenge using standard graph analysis techniques. We use temporal motifs to analyse two Bitcoin datasets and one NFT dataset, using sequences of three transactions and up to three users. We show that the commonly used technique of simply counting temporal motifs over all users and all time can give misleading conclusions. Here we also study the motifs contributed by each user and discover that the motif distribution is heavy-tailed and that the key players have diverse motif signatures. We study the motifs that occur in different time periods and find events and anomalous activity that cannot be seen just by a count on the whole dataset. Studying motif completion time reveals dynamics driven by human behaviour as well as algorithmic behaviour.

A semantic layer for end-to-end, intelligent automation