An open-source Python framework for real-time, graph-based knowledge in Neo4j

How LLMs can used in a knowledge extraction and visualization pipeline

We’re thrilled to announce new Text2Cypher models and Google’s MCP Toolbox for Databases from the collaboration between Google Cloud and Neo4j.

Choosing the Right Format: How Knowledge Graph Layouts Impact AI Reasoning ... 👉 Why This Matters Most AI systems blend knowledge graphs (structured data) with large language models (flexible reasoning). But there’s a hidden variable: "how" you translate the graph into text for the AI. Researchers discovered that the formatting choice alone can swing performance by up to "17.5%" on reasoning tasks. Imagine solving 1 in 5 more problems correctly just by adjusting how you present data. 👉 What They Built KG-LLM-Bench is a new benchmark to test how language models reason with knowledge graphs. It includes five tasks: - Triple verification (“Does this fact exist?”) - Shortest path finding (“How are two concepts connected?”) - Aggregation (“How many entities meet X condition?”) - Multi-hop reasoning (“Which entities linked to A also have property B?”) - Global analysis (“Which node is most central?”) The team tested seven models (Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, Llama, Nova) with five ways to “textualize” graphs, from simple edge lists to structured JSON and semantic web formats like RDF Turtle. 👉 Key Insights 1. Format matters more than assumed:   - Structured JSON and edge lists performed best overall, but results varied by task.   - For example, JSON excels at aggregation tasks (data is grouped by entity), while edge lists help identify central nodes (repeated mentions highlight connections). 2. Models don’t cheat: Replacing real entity names with fake ones (e.g., “France” → “Verdania”) caused only a 0.2% performance drop, proving models rely on context, not memorized knowledge. 3. Token efficiency:   - Edge lists used ~2,600 tokens vs. JSON-LD’s ~13,500. Shorter formats free up context space for complex reasoning.   - But concise ≠ always better: structured formats improved accuracy for tasks requiring grouped data. 4. Models struggle with directionality:   Counting outgoing edges (e.g., “Which countries does France border?”) is easier than incoming ones (“Which countries border France?”), likely due to formatting biases. 👉 Practical Takeaways - Optimize for your task: Use JSON for aggregation, edge lists for centrality. - Test your model: The best format depends on the LLM—Claude thrived with RDF Turtle, while Gemini preferred edge lists. - Don’t fear pseudonyms: Masking real names minimally impacts performance, useful for sensitive data. The benchmark is openly available, inviting researchers to add new tasks, graphs, and models. As AI handles larger knowledge bases, choosing the right “data language” becomes as critical as the reasoning logic itself. Paper: [KG-LLM-Bench: A Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Reasoning on Textualized Knowledge Graphs] Authors: Elan Markowitz, Krupa Galiya, Greg Ver Steeg, Aram Galstyan

Graph Data Modeling Without Graph Databases: PostgreSQL and Hybrid Approaches for Agentic Systems 🖇️ Organizations implementing AI systems today face a practical challenge: maintaining multiple specialized databases (vector stores, graph databases, relational systems) creates significant operational complexity, increases costs, and introduces synchronization headaches. Companies like Writer (insight from a recent Waseem Alshikh interview with Harrison Chase) have tackled this problem by implementing graph-like structures directly within PostgreSQL, eliminating the need for separate graph databases while maintaining the necessary functionality. This approach dramatically simplifies infrastructure management, reduces the number of systems to monitor, and eliminates error-prone synchronization processes that can cost thousands of dollars in wasted resources. For enterprises focused on delivering business value rather than managing technical complexity, these PostgreSQL-based implementations offer a pragmatic path forward, though with important trade-offs when considering more sophisticated agentic systems. Writer implemented a subject-predicate-object triple structure directly in PostgreSQL tables rather than using dedicated graph databases. This approach maintains the semantic richness of knowledge graphs while leveraging PostgreSQL's maturity and scalability. Writer kept the conceptual structure of triples that underpin knowledge graphs implemented through a relational schema design. Instead of relying on native graph traversals, Writer developed a fusion decoder that reconstructs graph-like relationships at query time. This component serves as the bridge between the storage layer (PostgreSQL with its triple-inspired structure) and the language model, enabling sophisticated information retrieval without requiring a dedicated graph database's traversal capabilities. The approach focuses on query translation and result combination rather than storage structure optimization. Complementing the triple-based approach, PostgreSQL with extensions (PG Vector and PG Vector Scale) can function effectively as a vector database. This challenges the notion that specialized vector databases are necessary, Treating embeddings as derived data leads to a more natural and maintainable architecture. This reframes the database's role from storing independent vector embeddings to managing derived data that automatically synchronizes with its source. But a critical distinction between retrieval systems and agentic systems need to be made. While PostgreSQL-based approaches excel at knowledge retrieval tasks where the focus is on precision and relevance, agentic systems operate in dynamic environments where context evolves over time, previous actions influence future decisions, and contradictions need to be resolved. This distinction drives different architectural requirements and suggests potential complementary roles for different database approaches. | 15 comments on LinkedIn

This blog post is part of a series that dives into various aspects of SAP’s approach to Generative AI, and its technical underpinnings. In previous blog posts of this series, you learned about how to use large language models (LLMs) for developing AI applications in a trustworthy and reliable manner...

Multi-Layer Agentic Reasoning: Connecting Complex Data and Dynamic Insights in Graph-Based RAG Systems 🛜 At the most fundamental level, all approaches rely… | 11 comments on LinkedIn

Build a graph for RAG application for a price of a chocolate bar! What is GraphRAG for you? What is GraphRAG? What does GraphRAG mean from your perspective? What if you could have a standard RAG and a GraphRAG as a combi-package, with just a query switch? The fact is, there is no concrete, universal

To gain competitive advantage from gen AI, enterprises need to be able to add their own expertise to off-the-shelf systems. Yet standard enterprise data stores aren't a good fit to train large language models.

David Hughes presented “Unleashing the Power of Multimodal GraphRAG: Integrating Image Features for Deeper Insights” at Data Day Texas 2025.

This study, sponsored by Graphwise, explores LLMs and RAG in enterprises and provides statistics from executives across various industries.

While retrieval-augmented generation is effective for simpler queries, advanced reasoning questions require deeper connections between information that exist across documents. They require a knowledge graph.

🧱Building Knowledge Graphs with LLM Graph Transformer A deep dive into LangChain’s implementation of graph construction with LLMs If you want to try out… | 32 comments on LinkedIn

The Pragmatic Evolution of Graph Data Models in Agentic Systems 🔬 The selection and implementation of appropriate graph paradigms for agentic systems…

Watch the first podcast of Paco Nathan's Graph Power Hour. This week's topic - Understanding Graph Rag: Enhancing LLM Applications Through Knowledge Graphs.

We are launching a series of benchmarks to prove the value of GraphRAG for question & answering on complex documents. The process is simple, we ingest the…

A GCP native, fully serverless implementation that you will replicate in minutes