Tech

Technological innovation is outpacing our ability to thoughtfully apply it

opinionated

Riuscirà un algoritmo a trovare la strada verso quel cloud “sovrano” che da anni l'Unione europea insegue, senza successo? A stabilirlo sarà l'esito

PostgREST is a standalone web server that turns your PostgreSQL database directly into a RESTful API. The structural constraints and permissions in the database determine the API endpoints and operations.

Next-Gen Frameworks Deliver Instant Performance: Marko (39ms), SolidStart (35ms), SvelteKit (38ms), and Nuxt (38ms) all achieve essentially instant First Contentful Paint in the 35-39ms range. This is 12 to 13 times faster than Next.js at 467ms.

While site downtime causes 9% permanent user abandonment, slow performance causes 28% permanent abandonment. That’s over 3x worse. Even more revealing: slowdowns occur 10x more frequently than outages, resulting in roughly 2x total revenue impact despite lower per-hour costs

L’esperimento mentale è stato inizialmente pubblicato da Less Wrong — un forum e blog su razionalità, psicologia e intelligenza artificiale in generale — nel luglio 2010 da un utente chiamato Roko. Al livello più base del tutto, l’esperimento mentale parla delle condizioni in cui sarebbe razionale per una futura super-intelligenza artificiale uccidere gli umani che non hanno contribuito alla sua creazione.

se una super-intelligenza decide le sue azioni per fare sì che siano quanto più positive possibili per il benessere degli esseri umani, allora non si fermerà mai perché le cose possono sempre andare un po’ meglio.

Chiunque non stia lavorando per creare quella macchina si sta frapponendo al progresso e dovrebbe essere eliminato per riuscire a raggiungere più rapidamente quell’obiettivo.

ora che lo avete letto, siete tecnicamente coinvolti in esso. Non avete più una scusa per non contribuire alla creazione di questa super-intelligenza artificiale e se scegliete di non farlo, sarete uno dei primi obiettivi dell’intelligenza artificiale.

Quando Roko ha pubblicato la sua teoria del basilisco su Less Wrong, Yudkowsky si è piuttosto spazientito, a tal punto da cancellare il post e vietare ogni tipo di discussione sul basilisco dal forum per cinque anni. Quando Yudkowsky ha spiegato le sue azioni sulla subreddit Futurology qualche anno dopo il post originale, ha affermato che l’esperimento mentale di Roko dava per scontato di riuscire a superare una serie di ostacoli tecnici nella teoria delle decisioni, e anche se ciò fosse possibile, Roko stava efficacemente diffondendo delle idee pericolose, proprio come i cattivi della storia di Langford.

31% of responses showed serious sourcing problems – missing, misleading, or incorrect attributions.

20% contained major accuracy issues, including hallucinated details and outdated information.

Imagine if every time you got into your car, you had to manually approve the engine's use of oil, the tires' use of air, and the radio's use of electricity. It’s absurd, right? You’d set your preferences once, and the car would just work.

It Doesn't Actually Give Us Control: The illusion of choice is not choice. When the options are "Accept All" or "Spend Five Minutes in a Menu of Legalese," the system is designed to push you toward the path of least resistance.

COLUMN "It's always DNS" is a long-standing sysadmin saw, and with good reason: a disproportionate number of outages are at their heart DNS issues. And so today, as AWS is still repairing its downed cloud as this article goes to press, it becomes clear that the culprit is once again DNS. But if you or I know this, AWS certainly does.

• June, 2025: the Apple reasoning paper confirmed that even with “reasoning”, LLMs still can’t solve distribution shift, the core Achille’s heel in neural networks that I have been writing about for nearly 30 years.

One of the most common mistakes I’ve seen is developers using SELECT DISTINCT as a quick way to eliminate duplicates that appear after a bad join. It’s an easy fix, but it hides a deeper problem. Usually, the duplicates exist because the join condition is incomplete or the relationship between tables isn’t truly one-to-one

But with conventional software, someone with inside knowledge can usually deduce what’s going on,

worked for a dozen years — will have a good idea why. “Here’s what really terrifies me” about the current breed of artificial intelligence (AI), he says: “there is no such understanding”, even among the people building it.

Martin Wattenberg, a computer scientist at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, says that understanding the behaviour of LLMs could even help us to grasp what goes on inside our own heads.

stochastic parrots

some say more is going on, including reasoning and other startlingly human-like abilities

The researchers described the model’s behaviour as role-playing — doing more than parroting but less than planning.

When they asked their LLM whether it consented to being shut down, they found it drew on several source materials with the theme of survival to compose a compelling response (see ‘Lust for life’).

trained an LLM from scratch to play the board game Othello,

The team successfully trained a smaller model to interpret the internal activations of the AI, and discovered that it had constructed an internal map of the discs based on the text descriptions of the gameplay2

Because chatbots can chat, some researchers interrogate their workings by simply asking the models to explain themselves. This approach resembles those used in human psychology. “

The researchers first intentionally biased their study models by, say, giving them a series of multiple-choice questions for which the answer was always option A. The team then asked a final test question. The models usually answered A — whether correct or not — but almost never said that they chose this response because the answer is usually A

“It’s a little weird to study [LLMs] the way we study humans,” Bau says. But although there are limits to the comparison, the behaviour of the two overlaps in surprising ways.

“It is nonsensical to say that an LLM has feelings,” Hagendorff says. “It is nonsensical to say that it is self-aware or that it has intentions. But I don’t think it is nonsensical to say that these machines are able to learn or to deceive.”

Developers train an LLM on large quantities of text to repeatedly predict the next text fragment, a process called pre-training. Then, when the LLM is given a text prompt, it generates a continuation. Offered a question, it predicts a plausible answer. Most LLMs are then fine-tuned to align with developers’ goals

the interface might append a ‘system prompt’ to each user prompt

external documents

LLMs don’t copy-paste (or cut and paste) code. For instance, when you ask them to refactor a big file into smaller ones, they’ll "remember" a block or slice of code, use a delete tool on the old file, and then a write tool to spit out the extracted code from memory. There are no real cut or paste tools.

Is there a seahorse emoji? Let's ask GPT-5 Instant:

I prefer to communicate with them via email rather than chat messaging. There are many benefits in such a choice.

Technical taste is different from technical skill. You can be technically strong but have bad taste, or technically weak with good taste. Like taste in general, technical taste sometimes runs ahead of your ability: just like you can tell good food from bad without being able to cook, you can know what kind of software you like before you’ve got the ability to build it. You can develop technical ability by study and repetition, but good taste is developed in a more mysterious way.

The real work usually happens alongside coding, as the developer learns the domain, narrows down requirements, maps out relevant abstractions, considers side effects, tests features incrementally, and finally squashes bugs that survived this rigorous process. It looks something like this:

most software lives within complex systems, and since LLMs can't yet hold the full context of an application in memory at once, human review, testing, and integration needs will remain