Substrate

honestly AWS should be free unless your like doing some crazy shit or maybe only IF your doing crazy shit it should be free

As a writer, the question of worth is still one that plagues me. Today’s existential anxiety attack was set off by missing the compost drop off bc I was working on an essay. Not a solicited essay, one I want to write so I am (hopefully it'll be published but who knows) Especially on days when I’m not earning $, I put great stock in doing chores. Since I can’t contribute $ to the family, at least I can do the dishes, make dinner, dust, etc. This in part stems from my working class upbringing. And perhaps the masculine stereotype of “providing” So when I missed the compost drop off, I had a moment of absolute panic and an irrational dip of self-esteem. I had one job to do! Dropping off the goddamn compost. If I can't do that, then what good am I? As a partner, a dad, a human being. It got BIG real fast. Is it writing if it never gets published? Is it really work if I'm not being paid for it? I keep telling myself yes, hang in there, it’ll all work out, but some days I feel like I’m just mouthing the words and I don’t really believe them. Today has been one of those.

Internet debate is very effective at changing minds— Joe Groff (@jckarter) May 1, 2019

One of the most common patterns I see in software design with Objective-C (and sometimes Swift), is the use of enumeration types (enum) as configurations for...

Speaking of last year, in 2018, I flirted with the idea of moving into a management role. I spoke with a bunch of people about the idea but ultimately decided that it wasn’t the right time for me. ​ Through this process, I figured out the skills that I’d need to gain if I ever did end up wanting to be a manager, and I’ve been working on those skills since. Though, at this point in time, I still don’t think being a manager is the right path for me. Being a tech lead, on the other hand… ​ It felt kind of weird. While I had cultural credibility of my peers, I didn’t have institutional authority of the business.

Rasowa, zaprojektowana, by cieszyć. Młoda i piękna brunetka z dużymi cyckami.

The Chemex brew method is one of my favorite brew methods. It’s fast, flavorful, and pretty easy to master. In this post, I share my process and exact re...

more or less I don’t think corporations have feelings, which is why I’m a big fan of indie software, because indie software is made by individuals, and individuals care about things and have feelings.

my philosophy on blogging has shifted from “every essay must be a perfect, shimmering artifact” to “blog posts should be short, authentic, and flawed transportation devices”. they mark off from ten to noon and three to five as “engineering time”, and spend the intervening three hours doing anything but programming. I am growing more and more tempted to steal this for myself. those “correct” Sundays, where you flit from obligation to obligation and never grow tired enough to require pause.

have to make a conscious effort to balance the tempo between your ability to absorb a page

At Grailed we’ve started using RxSwift and functional programming to simplify our navigation.

This normalization of deviance means that people within an organization stop seeing problems as problems, making it impossible to learn from them. Stagnation kills resilience. ​ A change-resistant culture, however, risks burning out those new people, as they find that they are unable to make any meaningful changes. ​ Knowing what decisions were made and why can help prevent “we’ve always done it this way” as a fall-back reason for doing something. If you understand the constraints and trade-offs around why a past decision was made, you’ll be better equipped to understand if they are still relevant in your current context. ​ push authority for decision-making down closest to where the work gets done ​ If different members of an interview panel have very different views of how the organization works, that can be a sign of deeper issues. This often indicates implicit power structures or lack of clarity around process that can be frustrating to deal with and difficult to change.

fullness to the appearance and yet an emptiness to the quality

hello! here are my slides from my talk at @brooklyn_js - thanks again for your support, and i'd be happy to work with you/your company on more cute, creative tech projects

Like many of Apple’s biggest hits, it wasn’t immediately well-understood. ​ In hindsight, I think the rollout of the Apple Watch was unnecessarily complicated for a first-generation product. ​ it’s truly the kind of product that you need to use to understand it. ​ But despite the allure of recent models’ GPS capabilities and far nicer industrial design, I have not had the itch to upgrade. ​ it’s still a little strange to see so many people wearing the exact same watch every day. ​ Rather than augmenting what I already wear, it replaces something. ​ Finally, there’s something about wearing an Apple Watch with my AirPods in my ears while looking at an iPhone that makes me feel, well, a little bit dorky. I don’t want to make a big deal out of this; I’m sure it’s just elevated levels of self-consciousness that are more indicative of who I am than of the device. This is almost certainly a me problem. But, still. Akin to Ryan’s old Rule of Three tweet about Apple devices (https://twitter.com/ryandawidjan/status/930511618529746944). Or I can leave it in the bank and add to it for a watch that’s far more like a piece of jewellery than it is a wrist computer. Even the nicest stainless steel Apple Watch is still identifiable primarily as a device. I have also learned something over the last four years that I’ve used an Apple Watch: I learned that my hesitance to upgrade is not from a lack of new features — there are plenty of those — but almost the opposite. I don’t know that I want more of anything happening on my wrist; I guess I just want less.

Category theory and intelligence seem to be deeply linked - both are guided by the goal of organizing and layering abstractions. Automation of exactly that - organizing and layering abstractions - seems to be the quest of machine learning.

a lot of my maturation as a developer has come from realizing that intuition is a disease and a crutch rather than a thing that should be relied on in lieu of formal verifications: the goal should be to delay intuition until it is reified in a thing that exists beyond your mind.

Bonus content: here's how I'd shim it into a switch statement: pic.twitter.com/W4Wu7M0923— Ben Cohen (@AirspeedSwift) April 25, 2019

I'm excited to share the positive news and to be working on such an interesting project! I believe we have just begun to scratch the surface of applying category theory to understanding the universe around us and inside us. https://t.co/KgpHpkfEgA— Bruno Gavranović (@bgavran3) April 23, 2019

seems like teenagers are perpetually rediscovering that every identity is "manufactured" and "effortless identity" requires even more effort (and cognitive dissonance) to sustain— Rob Horning (@robhorning) April 24, 2019

Cross posted from http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Expert-to-Expert-Brian-Beckman-and-Erik-Meijer-Inside-the-NET-Reactive-Framework-Rx Erik Meijer and team (developer Wes Dyer, in particular) have created a profound and beautiful .NET library that will take managed event based programming to new levels. Of course, many of you wish that you could write LINQ expressions over events. Well, now you can thanks to Erik's and Wes Dyer's latest creation, Rx - .NET Reactive Framework. Erik, being a fundamentalist functional theoritician, can't create new programming abstractions without employing some form of monadic magic. Enter astrophysicist and monadic composition wizard Brian Beckman. The last time Brian was on C9 he taught us about the State Monad. At the end of that discussion he mentioned he wanted to teach us about the Continuation Monad next. So, who better to conduct this episode of Expert to Expert than Dr. Beckman? Yep. You guessed it! Rx employs the Continuation Monad in its composition. Erik is in the hot seat this time and it's always a real pleasure to converse with Erik and Brian in the same room at the same whiteboard. Now, what is Rx? The .NET Reactive Framework (Rx) is the mathematical dual of LINQ to Objects. It consists of a pair of interfaces IObserver/IObservable that represent push-based, or observable, collections, plus a library of extension methods that implement the LINQ Standard Query Operators and other useful stream transformation functions. Observable collections capture the essence of the well-known subject/observer design pattern, and are tremendously useful for dealing with event-based and asynchronous programming, i.e. AJAX-style applications. For example, here is the prototypical Dictionary Suggest written using LINQ query comprehensions over observable collections: Please subscribe to this Channel 9 interview to be notified when we have clearance to distribute Rx over the counter (lame puns intended Smiley. Tune in. This should prove to be an instant classic besides being a very important episode of E2E. Rx is deep, man. Deep. Enjoy!

Sharing suffering is actually one way to minimize suffering, and minimizing suffering is at the core of my beliefs on compassionate teams. ​ If you're a senior engineer wondering what's next, try turning your attention to your team. I would bet that you'll learning something worthwhile.

And as he stares into the sky, there are twice as many stars as usual.

The phrase doesn’t really refer to the internet; it refers to a place, but not one that exists in any substantive way, concretely or even conceptually. Instead, it uses “offline” as a metaphor for a place that is simply Not Here. ​ while also providing a catch-all that allows one to blame technology for the annoying tendencies of its users.

When we're struggling with something, it's easy to feel isolated. But the mind is a shared, human condition. Knowing we are not alone can make all the difference. Love this animation from the @Headspace creative team pic.twitter.com/priLSy8CuA— Andy Puddicombe (@andypuddicombe) April 19, 2019

There is, of course, a connection between your character and your follow-through. But this has gotten blurry. Because many “productive type things” get thrust upon us by other people. People who have expectations which they’ve projected upon us without our consent!

Jailbreaking gives iPhone users almost unfettered access to their devices, offering a slew of customizations, new features, and improved apps that you just can't get elsewise. Unfortunately, Apple ...

😭

How does test-driven development make the design of our code better?