hey fck nyt

hey fck nyt

65 bookmarks
Custom sorting
NYT dutifully liberal-washes Trump’s bombing of Venezuela and abduction of its leader by embracing the “captured” framework. Maduro isn’t wanted by any international or legitimate legal regime, his “fugitive” status is pure assertion by only one UN member state out of 193.
NYT dutifully liberal-washes Trump’s bombing of Venezuela and abduction of its leader by embracing the “captured” framework. Maduro isn’t wanted by any international or legitimate legal regime, his “fugitive” status is pure assertion by only one UN member state out of 193.
·x.com·
NYT dutifully liberal-washes Trump’s bombing of Venezuela and abduction of its leader by embracing the “captured” framework. Maduro isn’t wanted by any international or legitimate legal regime, his “fugitive” status is pure assertion by only one UN member state out of 193.
Only toward the end of this article does NYT speculate that maybe some people turned against Israel after seeing massive war crimes committed by the Israeli army rather than antisemitism. And even then it was couched in the language of those crimes being a social media conspiracy
Only toward the end of this article does NYT speculate that maybe some people turned against Israel after seeing massive war crimes committed by the Israeli army rather than antisemitism. And even then it was couched in the language of those crimes being a social media conspiracy
·x.com·
Only toward the end of this article does NYT speculate that maybe some people turned against Israel after seeing massive war crimes committed by the Israeli army rather than antisemitism. And even then it was couched in the language of those crimes being a social media conspiracy
Mondoweiss on Instagram: "More than 300 writers, scholars, and public figures are boycotting the New York Times Opinion section until three demands are met. The coalition accuses the Times of anti-Palestinian bias in its Gaza war coverage, including reprinting Israeli government claims as fact, avoiding terms like "ethnic cleansing," and maintaining staff ties to Israeli military and lobby groups. 🔗 in bio to read the full statement."
Mondoweiss on Instagram: "More than 300 writers, scholars, and public figures are boycotting the New York Times Opinion section until three demands are met. The coalition accuses the Times of anti-Palestinian bias in its Gaza war coverage, including reprinting Israeli government claims as fact, avoiding terms like "ethnic cleansing," and maintaining staff ties to Israeli military and lobby groups. 🔗 in bio to read the full statement."
11K likes, 173 comments - mondoweiss on October 27, 2025: "More than 300 writers, scholars, and public figures are boycotting the New York Times Opinion section until three demands are met. The coalition accuses the Times of anti-Palestinian bias in its Gaza war coverage, including reprinting Israeli government claims as fact, avoiding terms like "ethnic cleansing," and maintaining staff ties to Israeli military and lobby groups. 🔗 in bio to read the full statement.".
·instagram.com·
Mondoweiss on Instagram: "More than 300 writers, scholars, and public figures are boycotting the New York Times Opinion section until three demands are met. The coalition accuses the Times of anti-Palestinian bias in its Gaza war coverage, including reprinting Israeli government claims as fact, avoiding terms like "ethnic cleansing," and maintaining staff ties to Israeli military and lobby groups. 🔗 in bio to read the full statement."
19 months of famine later ICJ makes clear the “UNRWA Hamas” lie pushed by the NYT and WSJ was total horseshit and Israel refused to provide any evidence whatsoever. But thankfully western media helped launder “Israeli intelligence” in an effort to condemn 100,000s to starvation
19 months of famine later ICJ makes clear the “UNRWA Hamas” lie pushed by the NYT and WSJ was total horseshit and Israel refused to provide any evidence whatsoever. But thankfully western media helped launder “Israeli intelligence” in an effort to condemn 100,000s to starvation
·x.com·
19 months of famine later ICJ makes clear the “UNRWA Hamas” lie pushed by the NYT and WSJ was total horseshit and Israel refused to provide any evidence whatsoever. But thankfully western media helped launder “Israeli intelligence” in an effort to condemn 100,000s to starvation
‘The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases”’—This NYT memo was issued in November and has been regularly updated since. It shows that despite all the criticism, they are resolutely anti-Palestinian and committed to this genocide.
‘The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases”’—This NYT memo was issued in November and has been regularly updated since. It shows that despite all the criticism, they are resolutely anti-Palestinian and committed to this genocide.
·x.com·
‘The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases”’—This NYT memo was issued in November and has been regularly updated since. It shows that despite all the criticism, they are resolutely anti-Palestinian and committed to this genocide.
this is the worst thing the NYT has published since the discredited Oct 7 rape story and that's saying something. There is no excuse for this, and in this moment, are you fucking kidding me? Shame on AIPAC stooge Bret Stephens and shame on the New York Times, beyond disgraceful
this is the worst thing the NYT has published since the discredited Oct 7 rape story and that's saying something. There is no excuse for this, and in this moment, are you fucking kidding me? Shame on AIPAC stooge Bret Stephens and shame on the New York Times, beyond disgraceful
·x.com·
this is the worst thing the NYT has published since the discredited Oct 7 rape story and that's saying something. There is no excuse for this, and in this moment, are you fucking kidding me? Shame on AIPAC stooge Bret Stephens and shame on the New York Times, beyond disgraceful
Assal Rad (@AssalRad) on X
Assal Rad (@AssalRad) on X
In headline after headline, NYT refuses to say ISRAEL is killing starving Palestinians trying to get food. It’s not an accident and it’s not journalism.
·x.com·
Assal Rad (@AssalRad) on X
@aipacxposed • Instagram reel
@aipacxposed • Instagram reel
7,294 likes, 211 comments - aipacxposed on July 26, 2025: "@mafarina does a deep, damning dive into the @nytimes’ Zionist entanglements, exposing just how compromised the publication is. Unsurprisingly, AIPAC is the mothership of this operation, but it most certainly does not operate alone; it sits atop a vast, coordinated web of Zionist influence that filters through every major institution shaping public opinion, and The New York Times is just one of their many satellites. Think of it as a tree: • At the top is AIPAC, directing policy and political loyalty. • Branching out from it are groups like the ADL, AIEF, and pro-Israel think tanks like WINEP and FDD, all working to control the narrative, suppress dissent, and rebrand apartheid as democracy. • And within its branches: the New York Times, with ex-IDF soldiers on staff, Israeli policy advisors influencing coverage, and a long track record of sanitizing occupation as “conflict”, and pushing pro-Israel talking points. When people say “even the NYT is covering it,” remind them: the Times isn’t neutral, it’s an AIPAC-driven propagandist. And it’s been complicit in downplaying genocide while laundering Israeli talking points as journalism. But this isn’t journalism. It’s narrative warfare. BOYCOTT the NYT. Cancel your subscription. Unfollow.".
·instagram.com·
@aipacxposed • Instagram reel
the New York Times was the one that first laundered the genocidal hoax that Hamas was working with UNRWA to steal aid. The Israeli regime directly fed this line to NYT Mossad asset Ronen Bergman and Patrick Kingsley, they destroyed UNRWA, and now they admit it was all a lie:
the New York Times was the one that first laundered the genocidal hoax that Hamas was working with UNRWA to steal aid. The Israeli regime directly fed this line to NYT Mossad asset Ronen Bergman and Patrick Kingsley, they destroyed UNRWA, and now they admit it was all a lie:
·x.com·
the New York Times was the one that first laundered the genocidal hoax that Hamas was working with UNRWA to steal aid. The Israeli regime directly fed this line to NYT Mossad asset Ronen Bergman and Patrick Kingsley, they destroyed UNRWA, and now they admit it was all a lie:
Writers Against the War on Gaza on Instagram: "READ THE DOSSIER: The New York Times has been a zionist rag for decades. One look at the paper’s present and past staff proves that the paper’s racist and islamophobic coverage isn’t a matter of simple Western ignorance or run-of-the-mill media bias, but intentional and ideologically driven journalistic malpractice. In our new dossier, published at newyorkwarcrimes.com, we show how—across each section and rank of the warmongering Times—you will find explicit connections between the paper’s staff and the IOF, Zionist lobby groups, and Israeli think tanks. These connections to violent entities and the israel lobby should be considered conflicts of interest, but for the NY Crimes they are instead prerequisites. Reject imperial propaganda. Boycott, divest, and unsubscribe from the New York Times. Link in bio & below: newyorkwarcrimes.com/dossier"
Writers Against the War on Gaza on Instagram: "READ THE DOSSIER: The New York Times has been a zionist rag for decades. One look at the paper’s present and past staff proves that the paper’s racist and islamophobic coverage isn’t a matter of simple Western ignorance or run-of-the-mill media bias, but intentional and ideologically driven journalistic malpractice. In our new dossier, published at newyorkwarcrimes.com, we show how—across each section and rank of the warmongering Times—you will find explicit connections between the paper’s staff and the IOF, Zionist lobby groups, and Israeli think tanks. These connections to violent entities and the israel lobby should be considered conflicts of interest, but for the NY Crimes they are instead prerequisites. Reject imperial propaganda. Boycott, divest, and unsubscribe from the New York Times. Link in bio & below: newyorkwarcrimes.com/dossier"
63K likes, 776 comments - wawog_now on July 16, 2025: "READ THE DOSSIER: The New York Times has been a zionist rag for decades. One look at the paper’s present and past staff proves that the paper’s racist and islamophobic coverage isn’t a matter of simple Western ignorance or run-of-the-mill media bias, but intentional and ideologically driven journalistic malpractice. In our new dossier, published at newyorkwarcrimes.com, we show how—across each section and rank of the warmongering Times—you will find explicit connections between the paper’s staff and the IOF, Zionist lobby groups, and Israeli think tanks. These connections to violent entities and the israel lobby should be considered conflicts of interest, but for the NY Crimes they are instead prerequisites. Reject imperial propaganda. Boycott, divest, and unsubscribe from the New York Times. Link in bio & below: newyorkwarcrimes.com/dossier".
·instagram.com·
Writers Against the War on Gaza on Instagram: "READ THE DOSSIER: The New York Times has been a zionist rag for decades. One look at the paper’s present and past staff proves that the paper’s racist and islamophobic coverage isn’t a matter of simple Western ignorance or run-of-the-mill media bias, but intentional and ideologically driven journalistic malpractice. In our new dossier, published at newyorkwarcrimes.com, we show how—across each section and rank of the warmongering Times—you will find explicit connections between the paper’s staff and the IOF, Zionist lobby groups, and Israeli think tanks. These connections to violent entities and the israel lobby should be considered conflicts of interest, but for the NY Crimes they are instead prerequisites. Reject imperial propaganda. Boycott, divest, and unsubscribe from the New York Times. Link in bio & below: newyorkwarcrimes.com/dossier"
Middle East Eye on Instagram: "” Walk out of The New York Times.” Palestinian-Australian writer and academic @randaafattah tells @el.sayyed that she’s tired of her colleagues in the media quietly sending her messages of support, while staying silent in public. She says journalists in Gaza are being assassinated in large numbers, and prominent voices who aren’t using their platforms are just being performative. Watch the full interview on The Big Picture Podcast, available on YouTube and all podcast platforms."
Middle East Eye on Instagram: "” Walk out of The New York Times.” Palestinian-Australian writer and academic @randaafattah tells @el.sayyed that she’s tired of her colleagues in the media quietly sending her messages of support, while staying silent in public. She says journalists in Gaza are being assassinated in large numbers, and prominent voices who aren’t using their platforms are just being performative. Watch the full interview on The Big Picture Podcast, available on YouTube and all podcast platforms."
3,551 likes, 38 comments - middleeasteye on July 15, 2025: "” Walk out of The New York Times.” Palestinian-Australian writer and academic @randaafattah tells @el.sayyed that she’s tired of her colleagues in the media quietly sending her messages of support, while staying silent in public. She says journalists in Gaza are being assassinated in large numbers, and prominent voices who aren’t using their platforms are just being performative. Watch the full interview on The Big Picture Podcast, available on YouTube and all podcast platforms.".
·instagram.com·
Middle East Eye on Instagram: "” Walk out of The New York Times.” Palestinian-Australian writer and academic @randaafattah tells @el.sayyed that she’s tired of her colleagues in the media quietly sending her messages of support, while staying silent in public. She says journalists in Gaza are being assassinated in large numbers, and prominent voices who aren’t using their platforms are just being performative. Watch the full interview on The Big Picture Podcast, available on YouTube and all podcast platforms."
Having this many people on staff who served in a foreign military is unusual, and even more so when those people lead the coverage of said military. It would be like handing coverage of the US national security beat to a team of former Army officers (which the Times doesn't do
Having this many people on staff who served in a foreign military is unusual, and even more so when those people lead the coverage of said military. It would be like handing coverage of the US national security beat to a team of former Army officers (which the Times doesn't do
·x.com·
Having this many people on staff who served in a foreign military is unusual, and even more so when those people lead the coverage of said military. It would be like handing coverage of the US national security beat to a team of former Army officers (which the Times doesn't do