hey fck nyt

63K likes, 776 comments - wawog_now on July 16, 2025: "READ THE DOSSIER: The New York Times has been a zionist rag for decades. One look at the paper’s present and past staff proves that the paper’s racist and islamophobic coverage isn’t a matter of simple Western ignorance or run-of-the-mill media bias, but intentional and ideologically driven journalistic malpractice. In our new dossier, published at newyorkwarcrimes.com, we show how—across each section and rank of the warmongering Times—you will find explicit connections between the paper’s staff and the IOF, Zionist lobby groups, and Israeli think tanks. These connections to violent entities and the israel lobby should be considered conflicts of interest, but for the NY Crimes they are instead prerequisites. Reject imperial propaganda. Boycott, divest, and unsubscribe from the New York Times. Link in bio & below: newyorkwarcrimes.com/dossier".

3,551 likes, 38 comments - middleeasteye on July 15, 2025: "” Walk out of The New York Times.” Palestinian-Australian writer and academic @randaafattah tells @el.sayyed that she’s tired of her colleagues in the media quietly sending her messages of support, while staying silent in public. She says journalists in Gaza are being assassinated in large numbers, and prominent voices who aren’t using their platforms are just being performative. Watch the full interview on The Big Picture Podcast, available on YouTube and all podcast platforms.".

8,905 likes, 253 comments - k.w.bogen on July 15, 2025: "wow congratulations we’re so happy that you’re here 🫠✨".

The role of the New York Times in sealing the lips of its liberal readers on the Gaza genocide is so subtle (all the writers went to Yale, after all) and yet so outrageous once you notice it. Never collaborate with this **filthy** rag.

New York Times writers are legit some of the most batshit crazy people in our society. Casually cheering on war with Iran that will cause unspeakable human suffering because they want to weaken China. Insanity

This editorial approach is—I tend to use this word sparingly so as not to drain it of its meaning—evil

NYT wants you to not vote for Mamdani because he has only 5 years of experience in public office but they do want you to vote for Whitney Tilson, a man who has…0 years of experience in public office

The NYT editorial board can hardly hide its seething contempt for Muslim and Arabs. Calling the rampant hate and racism post 9/11 "a few fringe voices" is so ahistorical it borders on lunacy. Islamophobia is normalized across the political spectrum and the NYT wants to ensure it

Look at the framing in U.S. media. Israel “targets nuclear sites,” Iran “fires at Israel.” This language is deliberately used to justify Israel’s illegal attacks, while ignoring civilians killed and residential buildings targeted in Iran.

12K likes, 343 comments - ustaz_marwan on June 3, 2025: "Do not provide labour for those who are complicit in genocide. Do not cross the picket line. To clarify: I was approached by a recruiter about this position in the Arab edition of the NYT magazine (akin to Dazed MENA, Vogue Arabia, and others), which will launch in the near future.".

“Seeks to clear” is NYT’s euphemism for crimes against humanity.

The contempt that these folks have for the poor and under-privileged is galling. Yes, it is ethical to buy used books. Yes, it is ethical to borrow books from the library. Not everyone can afford to shop at Barnes & Noble, but everyone deserves the joy of reading.

was just reminded how the NYT shut down the entire poetry section after the editor, Anne Boyer, criticized the paper's Gaza coverage

9,827 likes, 146 comments - newscord_org on March 31, 2025: "Complain to the Guardian now using the link in our bio. Share widely and demand that outlets cover the Eid massacres and cover the massacring of the rescue workers more fairly. Follow for more.".

Hey @nytimes and @BBCWorld, would you run this headline?

The largest CHILD MASSACRE. Do you ever see the New York Times use the same language to describe Israel’s crimes?

Hey @nytimes, where is someone of "Palestinian heritage" from?

Jesus Christ, you absolute sick ghouls @nytimes

It is so infuriating to watch the country's biggest paper bow to the rich and powerful while they ignore legitimate and earned criticism https://t.co/YGau5dZjzj

This morning, New York Times op-ed columnist Pamela Paul made another play at becoming the paper’s least thoughtful dullard, through the publication of an article titled “In Defense of J.K. Rowling.” Does an extremely rich and famous person need a paper of record to defend her? Is there anything new to bring to this conversation? […]

the new york times has always been a shit stain publication working on behalf of the west to launder war crimes and imperialism. it has stood in the way of human rights in america and abroad, only giving voice to reactionaries. trump was a gift to rework their image to liberals.

What a monstrous headline by the @nytimes normalising & justifying dehumanisation & moral depravity