Sciety related tweets

#postLights are now a fully integrated part of the @preLights website! Pioneers 🙌: @KKuhbandner @GwenKirschner @OliviaTidswell @JACoates @JKGrzymkowski @EthanEwe @sarur2 @tmonica86 @Kerryn_Elliott #NYUPeerReview. Image: https://t.co/QnohsPYhTR Updates: https://t.co/t0UZx9OP2X

This dawned on me when the best, most thorough peer review I received during grad school didnt even come from a journal https://t.co/UYjE5YsCqC— Diego del Alamo (@DdelAlamo) September 4, 2023

“@ju_berezutskaya @PLOS @eLife We're a big fan of eLife in my lab!”

“Here are some slides I show sometimes with data (from https://t.co/KjZF1X0Ji2) on skewed journal citation distributions. JIF is a preposterous and inappropriate measure of individual article quality. Don’t get beclowned by the JIF”

“*Huge* shoutout to the @scietyHQ team for helping us display the @ArcadiaScience @hypothes_is annotations from our #PreprintCommentClub and making it so authors can respond more easily to our preprint comments 🥰”

“@Maurice_Y_Lee I could, but that isn't as fun, you'd get my own personal bias in the selection, making it hard to know what others also think of it. The community reading and chatter around preprints was what made it special”

“@YufengShen07 @ShaiCarmi https://t.co/01xFweHcwT is working on a new feature similar to a bot trained on preprints that you've bookmarked. If you create a saved articles list on https://t.co/01xFweHcwT you might be able help test and improve the alpha version. #Sciety”

@clathrin@mastodon.social I’ve found that doing a specific curation activity can help make sure it happens more regularly — setting aside time to catch up sometimes feels futile since…well …there’s no real catching up :) Something like what I’ve got here: https://sciety.org/users/AvasthiReading/lists/saved-articles

This is essentially the model that we're experimenting with @BiophysicsColab. You can see the preprints that we've reviewed and endorsed here:https://t.co/QIiQA11WTk— Biophysics Colab (@BiophysicsColab) October 27, 2022

“@fraser_lab @mbeisen @AnnaHscientist @ProteinSociety @JohnKuriyan Y'all could get a Sciety group going to aggregate those reviews https://t.co/kcdAJVf35J”

“Currently, the space seems fragmented. Is there an online forum e.g. something like the bitcoin forum to bring us together outside of conferences?@LudoWaltman, @StephenPinfield I know @scietyHQ is an aggregator, yet it's not a forum.”

“Preprints mean immediate publication with the possibility of later peer review. Are preprints the future of #scholcomm? Only if #scholars make it so! Curate a list of your favourite preprints & keep track of new revisions or evaluations with @scietyHQ: https://t.co/HoaWctZMPp”

“@MITMbiomeClub @ArcadiaScience @biorxivpreprint How about posting the reviews from your party on @scietyHQ? @ArcadiaScience already posts their's on it. Happy to talk to you about that. 💥”

“@JenniferARegala @JopieNet @acochran12733 @kaveh1000 @JUrology @SCEdmunds @hypothes_is Sounds a great workflow. See also @scietyHQ for an example doing some of this. We've been using it to connect the ~2/3 of our papers with bioRxiv preprints and their corresponding reviews https://t.co/0SAP2SjLUD”

“💯💯💯💯 careful though, because if you admit this publicly, I might just sign you up to have an annotated reading list others can subscribe to (my @scietyHQ list here: https://t.co/VBoPtRUfNP)”

“RT @scietyHQ: 📜This article https://t.co/6TXZf0iStD is interesting that it has garnered: 👉 #OpenReview from two groups; @ReviewCommons and…”

“@chartgerink I suspect analogous curation platforms have a similar experience. E.g. @scietyHQ”

There is so much cool work on the @biorxivpreprint every day that sometimes I wish my job could just be 100% Professor of reading the @biorxivpreprint.— Lior Pachter (@lpachter) July 20, 2022