Found 192 bookmarks
Custom sorting
Understated or overstated
Understated or overstated
It cannot be overstated that “it cannot be understated” will most likely be understood as infelicitous phrasing.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
Understated or overstated
You and *I, you and me
You and *I, you and me
I was driving when I said it: “people like you and I.” And I couldn’t believe that I had said it.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
You and *I, you and me
Geoffrey Pullum explains it all
Geoffrey Pullum explains it all
“Pullum constantly insists that all modern lexicographers, as well as all grammarians not called Pullum, are wrong about everything, which lends his book a slightly crazed tone of ‘Who are you gonna believe, me or your lying dictionaries?’”
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
Geoffrey Pullum explains it all
A review: Anne Curzan, Says Who?
A review: Anne Curzan, Says Who?
Again and again I found myself at odds with her perspective. Part of what put me off, wrongly or rightly, is the book's relentless cheeriness: the “kinder, funner ” of the title, the too-frequent use of exclamation points. A larger problem is Curzan’s division of the individual psyche into “grammando” and “wordie,” both a matter not of a speaker/writer but of a listener/reader responding to other people’s words.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
A review: Anne Curzan, Says Who?
John McWhorter on prepositions
John McWhorter on prepositions
John McWhorter in The New York Times, stating what ought to be obvious: “The ‘Rule’ Against Ending Sentences With Prepositions Has Always Been Silly.”
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
John McWhorter on prepositions
Efforting, or effort as a verb
Efforting, or effort as a verb
How to make it clear that someone is trying hard or that someone is trying too hard? By avoiding the use of effort as a verb. I hereby pronounce the verb effort a skunked term.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
Efforting, or effort as a verb
Whom is not calling
Whom is not calling
In yesterday’s Newsday Saturday Stumper, the clue “Receptionist’s pronoun” takes the answer WHOM. The answer appears to play on the well-known formula of telephone etiquette: “Whom should I say is calling?” The pronoun who, not whom is what’s appropriate there. I think the puzzle’s constructor, Matthew Sewell, must know that, but not every solver will.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
Whom is not calling
Dustin pronouns
Dustin pronouns
In today’s Dustin: Hayden speaks out against standardized tests and learns a valuable lesson about pronouns.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
Dustin pronouns
Oops
Oops
“If me and my co-counsel”: a lawyer for Kenneth Chesebro, in a televised hearing from a Fulton County courthouse just now.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
Oops
MSNBC, sheesh
MSNBC, sheesh
Chris Jansing, earlier this afternoon: “The Washington Post reports that Jack Smith is honing in on Trump’s post-election fundraising,” &c.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
MSNBC, sheesh
E.g. , i.e. , etc.
E.g. , i.e. , etc.
The Chicago Manual of Style explains their use.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
E.g. , i.e. , etc.
Red Pen
Red Pen
The first episode (forty-four minutes) is ostensibly about who and whom, but it’s really two friends talking, and their talking goes all over the place: Christopher Columbus, bad reviews of the Sistine Chapel, commercialism at Egypt’s pyramids, a Geocities fan page for Rage Against the Machine, Jay McInerney’s tweets, and looting at Duane Reade stores, with none of those topics touching upon who or whom.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
Red Pen
The reason is not because
The reason is not because
If “the reason is because” is far less common in writing, if it’s likely to stand out to many a reader as a known redundancy, it’s in a writer’s interest to change because to that. It doesn’t matter what Robert Frost did. Or Jane Austen.
·mleddy.blogspot.com·
The reason is not because