For years, HR and talent acquisition teams have been told to 'think like marketers.' That's mainly because marketing is known for adapting to changing market conditions and leveraging new technology to create differentiation and competitive advantage. Brand and customer experience (CX) are prime examples where marketing shines.  But do we, or rather should we, flip this thinking back on HR and TA? Maybe we've had it all wrong. Maybe marketing should actually own all aspects of the organization's brand. And at that point, if marketing is taking ownership of the employer brand, then what about the employee experience (EX)? Should

I'll admit that I started reading this article on how data can help make remote teams work better to see what kind of data they were looking at, but it's really a different article. The premise is that if you give your staff more of the data/context/info on how leadership makes its decisions, other staff will likely make similar decisions, Further, with that info, they can do better work with less oversight, thus supporting a more remote work space. Why should I care? Because this is a great way to show a candidate what you mean by "we give people lots of opportunity" or "we empower our staff," both of which are functionally meaningless. But talking about how much data and info you share internally to support this claims makes those brand claims infantely more believable, credible and clear.