Research

Judges have to have the humility to recognize that they operate within a system of precedent . . . . — Then-Judge John G. Roberts, Jr. [Stare...

Personal precedent is a judge’s presumptive adherence to her own previously expressed views of the law. This Essay shows that personal precedent both does...

Personal precedent is a judge’s presumptive adherence to her own previously expressed views of the law. This Essay shows that personal precedent both does...

Abstract Our system of stare decisis enables and encourages people to rely on judicial decisions to form expectations about their legal rights and duties...

Abstract Our system of stare decisis enables and encourages people to rely on judicial decisions to form expectations about their legal rights and duties...

In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court distinguished between different kinds of reliance interests — some that would support preserving a judicial precedent,...

“It is a settled and invariable principle,” Chief Justice Marshall once wrote, “that every right, when withheld, must have a remedy.” Not quite. Although some view the idea of a substantive constitutional right without a remedy as oxymoronic, rights to remedies have always had a precarious constitutional status, which the Supreme Court has lately subjected to multifaceted subversion. . . .

Courts have long held that Native American governments enjoy tribal sovereign immunity from suit, subject only to Congress’s plenary authority. Sixteen years ago, in...

Professor Karl Llewellyn famously demonstrated that for almost every canon of statutory interpretation, there exists an opposite and equally plausible countercanon. Fashioning a fencing...

Courts have long held that Native American governments enjoy tribal sovereign immunity from suit, subject only to Congress’s plenary authority. Sixteen years ago, in...

Asylum adjudications in American immigration courts often have life-and-death consequences. As mandated by the Refugee Act of 1980, applicants for asylum must demonstrate an...

Asylum adjudications in American immigration courts often have life-and-death consequences. As mandated by the Refugee Act of 1980, applicants for asylum must demonstrate an...

Read the latest content about Stare Decisis at Harvard Law Review.

A language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.

A Flash Player emulator written in Rust. Contribute to ruffle-rs/ruffle development by creating an account on GitHub.

A language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.

Add a sentence to the Neverending Story - started in 2000!

“[Y]ou have this tremendous advantage of reading something for the first time, which is an experience you never have again with the story. I mean, the first time is something which you cannot…

Quoted from: Stephan Berndt, Alois Irlmaier – Ein Mann sagt, was er sieht. If you feel the first half of this post emphasises the Catholic side of things, you’d be right. As I mentioned…

"/x/ - Paranormal" is 4chan's imageboard for the discussion of paranormal, spooky pictures and conspiracy theories.