Research

Research

61152 bookmarks
Custom sorting
A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patients – the HEALTHY-CATH trial | BMC Nephrology | Full Text
A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patients – the HEALTHY-CATH trial | BMC Nephrology | Full Text
Background Tunnelled central venous dialysis catheter use is significantly limited by the occurrence of catheter-related infections. This randomised controlled trial assessed the efficacy of a 48 hour 70% ethanol lock vs heparin locks in prolonging the time to the first episode of catheter related blood stream infection (CRBSI). Methods Patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) via a tunnelled catheter were randomised 1:1 to once per week ethanol locks (with two heparin locks between other dialysis sessions) vs thrice per week heparin locks. Results Observed catheter days in the heparin (n=24) and ethanol (n=25) groups were 1814 and 3614 respectively. CRBSI occurred at a rate of 0.85 vs. 0.28 per 1000 catheter days in the heparin vs ethanol group by intention to treat analysis (incident rate ratio (IRR) for ethanol vs. heparin 0.17; 95%CI 0.02-1.63; p=0.12). Flow issues requiring catheter removal occurred at a rate of 1.6 vs 1.4 per 1000 catheter days in the heparin and ethanol groups respectively (IRR 0.85; 95% CI 0.20-3.5 p =0.82 (for ethanol vs heparin). Conclusions Catheter survival and catheter-related blood stream infection were not significantly different but there was a trend towards a reduced rate of infection in the ethanol group. This study establishes proof of concept and will inform an adequately powered multicentre trial to definitively examine the efficacy and safety of ethanol locks as an alternative to current therapies used in the prevention of catheter-associated blood stream infections in patients dialysing with tunnelled catheters. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12609000493246
·bmcnephrol.biomedcentral.com·
A randomised controlled trial of Heparin versus EthAnol Lock THerapY for the prevention of Catheter Associated infecTion in Haemodialysis patients – the HEALTHY-CATH trial | BMC Nephrology | Full Text
Catheter Locking Solution, SAI Infusion Technologies | VWR
Catheter Locking Solution, SAI Infusion Technologies | VWR
The antithrombotic characteristics of Heparin and the viscous nature of glycerol or dextrose are combined in a solution to promote and extend the patency of vascular cathetersThese infusion supplies are designed to be suitable for use in applications in data acquisition in laboratory environments ranging from mice to large animals. Tethers of various lengths and types are used to keep animals from running away, and swivels allow for a certain circumference of movement. All units are tested in pressures that exceed industry standards for laboratory testing, and parts that may come into contact with infused fluid are made of inert stainless steel and a fluoropolymer resin.
·us.vwr.com·
Catheter Locking Solution, SAI Infusion Technologies | VWR
Comparison of ethanol lock and heparin lock solution as prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hemodialysis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Journal of Indonesia Vascular Access
Comparison of ethanol lock and heparin lock solution as prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hemodialysis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Journal of Indonesia Vascular Access
Introduction: Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is a common complication of catheter use for vascular access in hemodialysis patients and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Preventive measures, including antibiotic lock, are inadequate due to the risk of resistance and insufficient effect against bacterial biofilm. Ethanol, an antimicrobial substance, is a potential prophylactic lock-in preventing CRBSI. This study aims to assess ethanol lock's effectiveness in preventing CRBSI in hemodialysis patients with a catheter as vascular access and its impact on catheter dysfunction. Methods: Researchers systematically searched online databases including Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published within 2011 until 2020. Relevant data were pooled in PICOs (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes) format and analyzed with Review Manager (version 5.3.5, Cochrane Collaboration, Denmark). Results: Seven RCTs involving 453 patients were assessed. The primary outcome indicates that prophylactic ethanol lock significantly reduces the incidence of CRBSI compared to that of heparin lock (RR=0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.83, p=0.02, heterogeneity I2=68%). The secondary outcome suggests no significant difference in the incidence of catheter dysfunction in ethanol lock and heparin lock (RR=0.75, 95% CI 0.23-2.40, p=0.63, heterogeneity I2=68%). Conclusion: Ethanol is a potential prophylactic lock agent in preventing CRBSI in hemodialysis patients with catheter access. Further research is needed to synchronize the procedural use of ethanol lock and evaluate its long-term effect.
·indovaccessjournal.org·
Comparison of ethanol lock and heparin lock solution as prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hemodialysis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Journal of Indonesia Vascular Access
Comparison of ethanol lock and heparin lock solution as prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hemodialysis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Journal of Indonesia Vascular Access
Comparison of ethanol lock and heparin lock solution as prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hemodialysis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Journal of Indonesia Vascular Access
Introduction: Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is a common complication of catheter use for vascular access in hemodialysis patients and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Preventive measures, including antibiotic lock, are inadequate due to the risk of resistance and insufficient effect against bacterial biofilm. Ethanol, an antimicrobial substance, is a potential prophylactic lock-in preventing CRBSI. This study aims to assess ethanol lock's effectiveness in preventing CRBSI in hemodialysis patients with a catheter as vascular access and its impact on catheter dysfunction. Methods: Researchers systematically searched online databases including Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published within 2011 until 2020. Relevant data were pooled in PICOs (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes) format and analyzed with Review Manager (version 5.3.5, Cochrane Collaboration, Denmark). Results: Seven RCTs involving 453 patients were assessed. The primary outcome indicates that prophylactic ethanol lock significantly reduces the incidence of CRBSI compared to that of heparin lock (RR=0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.83, p=0.02, heterogeneity I2=68%). The secondary outcome suggests no significant difference in the incidence of catheter dysfunction in ethanol lock and heparin lock (RR=0.75, 95% CI 0.23-2.40, p=0.63, heterogeneity I2=68%). Conclusion: Ethanol is a potential prophylactic lock agent in preventing CRBSI in hemodialysis patients with catheter access. Further research is needed to synchronize the procedural use of ethanol lock and evaluate its long-term effect.
·indovaccessjournal.org·
Comparison of ethanol lock and heparin lock solution as prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hemodialysis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Journal of Indonesia Vascular Access
Control of Line Complications with KiteLock (CLiCK) in the critical care unit: study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial investigating the effect of a novel locking fluid on central line complications in the critical care population | Trials | Full Text
Control of Line Complications with KiteLock (CLiCK) in the critical care unit: study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial investigating the effect of a novel locking fluid on central line complications in the critical care population | Trials | Full Text
Background Insertion of a central venous access device (CVAD) allows clinicians to easily access the circulation of a patient to administer life-saving interventions. Due to their invasive nature, CVADs are prone to complications such as bacterial biofilm production and colonization, catheter-related bloodstream infection, occlusion, and catheter-related venous thrombosis. A CVAD is among the most common interventions for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), exposing this vulnerable population to the risk of nosocomial infection and catheter occlusion. The current standard of care involves the use of normal saline as a catheter locking solution for central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines, and a citrate lock for hemodialysis catheters. Saline offers little prophylactic measures against catheter complications. Four percent of tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) fluid (marketed as KiteLock Sterile Locking Solution™) is non-antibiotic, possesses antimicrobial, anti-biofilm, and anti-coagulant properties, and is approved by Health Canada as a catheter locking solution. As such, it may be a superior CVAD locking solution than the present standard of care lock in the ICU patient population. Methods Our team proposes to fill this knowledge gap by performing a multi-center, cluster-randomized, crossover trial evaluating the impact of 4% tetrasodium EDTA on a primary composite outcome of the incidence rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheter occlusion leading to removal, and use of alteplase to resolve catheter occlusion compared to the standard of care. The study will be performed at five critical care units. Discussion If successful, the results of this study can serve as evidence for a shift of standard of care practices to include EDTA locking fluid in routine CVAD locking procedures. Completion of this study has the potential to improve CVAD standard of care to become safer for patients, as well as provides an opportunity to decrease strain on healthcare budgets related to treating preventable CVAD complications. Success and subsequent implementation of this intervention in the ICU may also be extrapolated to other patient populations with heavy CVAD use including hemodialysis, oncology, parenteral nutrition, and pediatric patient populations. On a global scale, eradicating biofilm produced by antibiotic-resistant bacteria may serve to lessen the threat of “superbugs” and contribute to international initiatives supporting the termination of antibiotic overuse. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04548713, registered on September 9th, 2020.
·trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com·
Control of Line Complications with KiteLock (CLiCK) in the critical care unit: study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial investigating the effect of a novel locking fluid on central line complications in the critical care population | Trials | Full Text
Full article: Reevaluation of lock solutions for Central venous catheters in hemodialysis: a narrative review
Full article: Reevaluation of lock solutions for Central venous catheters in hemodialysis: a narrative review
A significant proportion of incident and prevalent hemodialysis patients have central venous catheters for vascular access. No consensus is available on the prevention of catheter dysfunction or ca...
·tandfonline.com·
Full article: Reevaluation of lock solutions for Central venous catheters in hemodialysis: a narrative review
Routine Catheter Lock Solutions in Pediatric Cancer Care: A... : Cancer Nursing
Routine Catheter Lock Solutions in Pediatric Cancer Care: A... : Cancer Nursing
hrombolytic use, adverse events, and direct costs of catheter lock solutions. Methods A single-center, parallel-group, pilot randomized controlled trial was undertaken at a tertiary-referral pediatric hospital in Australia. Children 18 years or younger with an oncological or malignant hematological condition and a CVAD were eligible. Participants were 1:1 randomized to (1) normal or (2) heparinized (10–100 U/mL; CVAD-type dependent) saline lock solutions. Results Of 217 children assessed for eligibility, 61 were recruited and randomized to normal (n = 30; 3850 CVAD days) or heparinized (n = 31; 4036 CVAD days) saline. Eligibility (52%) and recruitment (54%) feasibility targets were not met. Protocol adherence was high (95% assessments), with no attrition. Parent/clinician satisfaction of interventions was high (median, 10/10 clinicians/parents). Complete CVAD occlusion occurred in heparin only (n = 2, 6.7% CVADs; incidence rate [IR], 0.49/1000 CVAD days [0.06–1.78]). Central venous access device partial occlusion was detected in 23.3% of CVADs in heparin (n = 7; IR, 2.73/1000 CVAD days [1.36–4.87]) and 13.8% of CVADs in normal saline (n = 4; IR, 2.59/1000 CVAD days [1.24–4.77]). Thrombolytic agents were used in 16.7% heparin (5 CVADs) and 3.5% normal saline (1 CVAD). Adverse events did not differ between groups. Conclusion Multisite randomized controlled trials examining CVAD locks are safe, but strategies and resources to increase recruitment and eligibility are required. Implications for Practice Both routine CVAD lock solutions seem safe but may not prevent all forms of CVAD-associated harm....
·journals.lww.com·
Routine Catheter Lock Solutions in Pediatric Cancer Care: A... : Cancer Nursing