Corporate Revolutionary Library

Corporate Revolutionary Library

475 bookmarks
Newest
Is Yours a Learning Organization?
Is Yours a Learning Organization?
Reprint: R0803H An organization with a strong learning culture faces the unpredictable deftly. However, a concrete method for understanding precisely how an institution learns and for identifying specific steps to help it learn better has remained elusive. A new survey instrument from professors Garvin and Edmondson of Harvard Business School and assistant professor Gino of Carnegie Mellon University allows you to ground your efforts in becoming a learning organization. The tool’s conceptual foundation is what the authors call the three building blocks of a learning organization. The first, a supportive learning environment, comprises psychological safety, appreciation of differences, openness to new ideas, and time for reflection. The second, concrete learning processes and practices, includes experimentation, information collection and analysis, and education and training. These two complementary elements are fortified by the final building block: leadership that reinforces learning. The survey instrument enables a granular examination of all these particulars, scores each of them, and provides a framework for detailed, comparative analysis. You can make comparisons within and among your institution’s functional areas, between your organization and others, and against benchmarks that the authors have derived from their surveys of hundreds of executives in many industries. After discussing how to use their tool, the authors share the insights they acquired as they developed it. Above all, they emphasize the importance of dialogue and diagnosis as you nurture your company and its processes with the aim of becoming a learning organization. The authors’ goal—and the purpose of their tool—is to help you paint an honest picture of your firm’s learning culture and of the leaders who set its tone.
·hbr.org·
Is Yours a Learning Organization?
Building a Learning Organization
Building a Learning Organization
Continuous improvement programs are proliferating as corporations seek to better themselves and gain an edge. Unfortunately, however, failed programs far outnumber successes, and improvement rates remain low. That’s because most companies have failed to grasp a basic truth. Before people and companies can improve, they first must learn. And to do this, they need to look beyond rhetoric and high philosophy and focus on the fundamentals. Three critical issues must be addressed before a company can truly become a learning organization, writes HBS Professor David Garvin. First is the question of meaning: a well-grounded easy-to-apply definition of a learning organization. Second comes management: clearer operational guidelines for practice. Finally, better tools for measurement can assess an organization’s rate and level of learning. Using these “three M’s” as a framework, Garvin defines learning organizations as skilled at five main activities: systematic problem-solving, experimentation with new approaches, learning from past experiences, learning from the best practices of others, and transferring knowledge quickly and efficiently throughout the organization. And since you can’t manage something if you can’t measure it, a complete learning audit is a must. That includes measuring cognitive and behavioral changes as well as tangible improvements in results. No learning organization is built overnight. Success comes from carefully cultivated attitudes, commitments, and management processes that accrue slowly and steadily. The first step is to foster an environment conducive to learning. Analog Devices, Chaparral Steel, Xerox, GE, and other companies provide enlightened examples.
·hbr.org·
Building a Learning Organization
Waste Not, Want Not: A Simplified Value Stream Map for Uncovering Waste
Waste Not, Want Not: A Simplified Value Stream Map for Uncovering Waste
This article describes a simplified form of Value Stream Maps that makes it easy to visualize bottlenecks and inefficient processes in the software delivery lifecycle. It focuses on the two forms of Lean waste defined as Inventory and Waiting.
·infoq.com·
Waste Not, Want Not: A Simplified Value Stream Map for Uncovering Waste
SAFe Lean-Agile Principles - Scaled Agile Framework
SAFe Lean-Agile Principles - Scaled Agile Framework
The impression that ‘our problems are different’ is a common disease that afflicts management the world over. They are different, to be sure, but the principles that will help to improve the quality of product and service are universal in nature. —W. Edwards Deming, Out of the Crisis [1] SAFe Lean-Agile Principles Figure 1. SAFe Lean-Agile Principles Why the Focus on Principles? Building enterprise-class software and cyber-physical systems are among the most complex challenges our industry faces today. And, ofRead more
·scaledagileframework.com·
SAFe Lean-Agile Principles - Scaled Agile Framework
Misconceptions about Kanban | Extreme Uncertainty
Misconceptions about Kanban | Extreme Uncertainty
There is an enormous amount of confusion and misinformation about Kanban. This article will clear up some of the major misconceptions that surround this topic. Let's go through them one by one. You have to choose between Kanban and Scrum The most common misconception I’ve found is that people think you have to choose between
·extremeuncertainty.com·
Misconceptions about Kanban | Extreme Uncertainty