Supporting Evidence

1535 bookmarks
Newest
The Vaccination Debate
The Vaccination Debate
Today we investigate one of the biggest medical controversies of our time: vaccines. There’s little dispute about this much-- vaccines save many lives, and rarely, they injure or kill. A special federal vaccine court has paid out billions for injuries from brain damage to death. But not for the form of brain injury we call autism.
·fullmeasure.news·
The Vaccination Debate
JCVI scientists ‘in dark’ over whether children will be offered Covid vaccines
JCVI scientists ‘in dark’ over whether children will be offered Covid vaccines
Scientists on the Government's vaccines advisory group have been left "in the dark" about whether children will be offered Covid jabs, health sources have said. The Joint Committee on Vaccines and Immunisation (JCVI) has "reached its conclusion" on the contentious issue but the decision is now "stuck" in Government. Last week, The Telegraph revealed that ministers would be advised against the mass rollout of Covid jabs to children until scientists obtain more data on the risks. Senior JCVI membe
·news.yahoo.com·
JCVI scientists ‘in dark’ over whether children will be offered Covid vaccines
If this government is “following the science” why are they ignoring the advice of the WHO who say children should NOT have the Covid Vaccine?
If this government is “following the science” why are they ignoring the advice of the WHO who say children should NOT have the Covid Vaccine?
The MHRA recently decided the Pfizer vaccine was proven to be safe and effective for use in children aged 12 – 15 despite the fact 86% of children taking part in the rushed trial suffered an …
·expose-news.com·
If this government is “following the science” why are they ignoring the advice of the WHO who say children should NOT have the Covid Vaccine?
Covid has emboldened our modern censors
Covid has emboldened our modern censors
The past year has accelerated all kinds of trends that were already moving through our societies. Social atomisation, the decline of the high street and communities, the rise of the nanny state — Covid and lockdown have brought all of these to the fore. Among the most concerning is the rise of Big Tech censorship,
·spectator.co.uk·
Covid has emboldened our modern censors
Facebook Whistleblowers LEAK DOCS Detailing Effort to Secretly Censor Vax Concerns on Global Scale
Facebook Whistleblowers LEAK DOCS Detailing Effort to Secretly Censor Vax Concerns on Global Scale
Donate: https://www.projectveritas.com/donate Get emails: https://confirmsubscription.com/h/j/EC8A17570A033FCC Follow: Telegram: https://t.me/project_veritas FB: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVeritas IG: https://www.instagram.com/project_veritas/ Telegram: https://t.me/JamesOKeefeIII Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/jamesokeefeiii IG: https://www.instagram.com/jamesokeefeiii/ Mission Statement Investigate & expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical & transparent society. Core Values MORAL COURAGE - Courage is the virtue that sustains all others. We choose to overcome our fears. WE ARE ALL LEADERS - Turning people into leaders. Completed staff work. Ownership. COLLABORATION - Best not to work in silos. No one individual is as smart as all of us. RESILIENCE - Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. Never, ever, ever give up. We don't let mistakes or setbacks discourage us. Pursue perfection, knowing full well you will never attain it. MISSION DRIVEN - The best people are motivated by purpose. We are passionate and truly believe in our cause. We must be externally focused, not internally focused. MAKE THE STATUS QUO DO THE IMPOSSIBLE - We move mountains. Failure is not an option. We do whatever it takes. THE TIP OF THE SPEAR - We are a loss leader. We do not shy away from conflict or litigation. Ethical Values Rule #1 – Truth is paramount. Our reporting is fact based with clear and irrefutable video and audio content. Truth is paramount. We never deceive our audience. We do not distort the facts or the context. We do not “selectively edit.” Rule #2 – We do not break the law. We maintain one-party consent when recording someone is inherently moral and ethical. We never record when there is zero-party consent. In areas where we are required to have consent from all parties, we seek legal guidance regarding the expectation of privacy’s impact on our right to record. Rule #3 – We adhere to the 1st Amendment rights of others. During our investigations we do not disrupt the peace. We do not infringe on the 1st Amendment rights of others. Rule #4 – The Zekman Test. The undercover investigations we pursue are judged by us to be of “vital public interest” and “profound importance.” The Zekman Test is our baseline. Undercover investigative reporting is necessary because, “...there’s no other way to get the story...” Whereas the Society of Professional Journalists allows for undercover techniques, if undercover techniques are necessary to expose issues of vital public importance; we believe they are not only allowed but required. Rule #5 – We Protect the Innocent When Possible - Embarrassing private details are not to be investigated. We stay away from irrelevant embarrassingly intimate details about private citizens personal lives. We look for individual wrong-doing and judge its public importance. The irrelevant religious or sexual dispositions of our targets are not to be investigated. Rule #6 – Transparency. Our methods & tactics must be reasonable and defensible. We use the “Twelve Jurors on Our Shoulder” rule. The work has to be done with such a degree of integrity that it can withstand scrutiny in both law & ethics. We are comfortable with transparency. We must be willing to be ready to disclose our methods upon publication. Rule #7 – Verifying and Corroborate Stories – Evaluate impact on third parties and Newsworthiness of Statements Alone.We consistently consider the probable truth or falsity of statements, examine any reasons to doubt the veracity of underlying assertions and whether the assertions are newsworthy. When possible, we will confirm with our subjects that their statements captured on video are accurate & truthful. At the very least, we will give our subjects an opportunity to elaborate and/or respond. In all matters, we rely on the 1st Amendment to protect our ability to publish newsworthy items after our internal deliberations. On whether there is an obligation to ensure the veracity of statements made on video, 1.) consider whether the remarks may potentially impact an innocent third party. (Factors in support of releasing the content) and 2.)The Newsworthiness of the statement alone by itself. (Factors against releasing the content). Rule #8 – Raw Video. In certain circumstances we may release the “raw” video to the press and or the public. But as a rule, we do not. Rule #9 – Subject Anonymity. We investigate & question sources before promising anonymity. Once we confirm, we will do everything in our power to protect the identity of our confidential sources. Rule #10 – Being Accountable. Admit mistakes & correct them promptly. Rule #11 – We do not manufacture content. We do not put words in our investigative subjects' mouths. We do not lead the horse to water. Our purpose is to elicit truth. Rule #12 – With Great Power comes Great Responsibility.
·youtube.com·
Facebook Whistleblowers LEAK DOCS Detailing Effort to Secretly Censor Vax Concerns on Global Scale
Vitamin D and COVID-19: is there a role?
Vitamin D and COVID-19: is there a role?
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders - The COVID-19 pandemic requires a rapid understanding of the pathogenesis of the spectrum of the disease and factors associated with varied clinical...
·link.springer.com·
Vitamin D and COVID-19: is there a role?
Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us
Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us
The world has bet the farm on vaccines as the solution to the pandemic, but the trials are not focused on answering the questions many might assume they are. Peter Doshi reports As phase III trials of covid-19 vaccines reach their target enrolments, officials have been trying to project calm. The US coronavirus czar Anthony Fauci and the Food and Drug Administration leadership have offered public assurances that established procedures will be followed.1234 Only a “safe and effective” vaccine will be approved, they say, and nine vaccine manufacturers issued a rare joint statement pledging not to prematurely seek regulatory review.5 But what will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared “effective”? To the public this seems fairly obvious. “The primary goal of a covid-19 vaccine is to keep people from getting very sick and dying,” a National Public Radio broadcast said bluntly.6 Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said, “Ideally, you want an antiviral vaccine to do two things . . . first, reduce the likelihood you will get severely ill and go to the hospital, and two, prevent infection and therefore interrupt disease transmission.”7 Yet the current phase III trials are not actually set up to prove either (table 1). None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus. View this table: Table 1 Characteristics of ongoing phase III covid-19 vaccine trials In a September interview Medscape editor in chief Eric Topol pondered what counts as a recorded “event” in the vaccine trials. “We’re not talking about just a PCR [polymerase …
·bmj.com·
Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us
Big Tech Silencing Physicians: A Very Dangerous Road for American Medicine - AAPS | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
Big Tech Silencing Physicians: A Very Dangerous Road for American Medicine - AAPS | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
By Lionel Lee, DO, FACOEP “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” The Constitution plainly and […]
·aapsonline.org·
Big Tech Silencing Physicians: A Very Dangerous Road for American Medicine - AAPS | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2
First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2
We report on an 86-year-old male resident of a retirement home who received vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Past medical history included systemic arterial hypertension, chronic venous insufficiency, dementia and prostate carcinoma. On January 9, 2021, the man received lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine BNT162b2 in a 30 μg dose. On that day and in the following 2 weeks, he presented with no clinical symptoms (Table 1). On day 18, he was admitted to hospital for worsening diarrhea.
·ijidonline.com·
First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2
Committed Grants | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Committed Grants | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
This database includes grant commitments made by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and previous foundations of the Gates family (William H. Gates Foundation, Gates Library Foundation, and Gates Learning Foundation) from 1994 onward.
·gatesfoundation.org·
Committed Grants | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation