Supporting Evidence

null

Pfizer Vaccine Petition Filed.pdf (texasattorneygeneral.gov) Trial Design: Pfizer designed the trial such that “defined COVID-19 cases” were counted starting only seven days after a participant received the second of two shots (at least 28 days after the first shot). Put differently, COVID-19 cases that occurred before that point—that is, between shot one and seven days after shot two—were not considered when evaluating the efficacy of Pfizer’s vaccine. That was a highly significant qualifier because

When the University of Oxford developed a vaccine that was effective against COVID-19, ensuring that it could be rolled out globally and in perpetuity for low- and middle-income countries was of

COVID-19 vaccines have been highly effective in reducing morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. While primary series vaccination rates are generally high in Southeast Asian (SEA) countries, v...

Mathematical models assume the same level of mortality susceptibility across all populations. This assumption is a fallacy and completely negates any of their “models.”

After months of enquiries, the FDA says it will not provide further comment on DNA contamination

Aaron Siri was finally able to force the CDC to relinquish their V-safe data, which showed over 10% of recipients suffered significant adverse reactions to vaccination. This article will explain why that is so important. Introduction One of the major challenges with the COVID-19 vaccination has been that it has been impossible to get any clear safety data on it. The two key issues have been:

A life ruined by the vaccine – and a new low in the battle for compensation

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a newly discovered coronavirus (SARS-CoV). No effective prophylactic or post-exposure therapy is currently available.We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection ...

A modified virus used in some candidates has been shown to increase HIV infection risk in other vaccine trials.

I am fortunate to possess content expertise on ethics and conflicts-of-interest (“COI”) in medicine and science, and I teach it in a variety of health professional settings. After reading the [...]More...

Patients and the public benefit when physicians and researchers collaborate with pharmaceutical, medical device, and biotechnology companies to develop products that benefit individual and public health. At the same time, concerns are growing that wide-ranging financial ties to industry may unduly influence professional judgments involving the primary interests and goals of medicine. Such conflicts of interest threaten the integrity of scientific investigations, the objectivity of professional education, the quality of patient care, and the public’s trust in medicine.

A history of influence, scandal, and denial.

Number dying in UK has reached highest level in 20 years but alarming trend going unaddressed worldwide

Just 30% of the public think the Government was honest about the need for Covid restrictions and just 40% of 18-35 year-olds think it was honest about Covid vaccines – new polling reveals plummeting public confidence.

It is eminently apparent, given all the information in this article, and in the preceding Part 1, that the BioNTach/Pfizer Covid mRNA vaccines were developed, manufactured, and authorized under military laws reserved for emergency situations involving biological warfare/terrorism, not naturally occurring diseases affecting the entire civilian population.

The FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccines was based on clinical trials and manufacturing processes conducted with no binding legal standards, no legally proscribed safety oversight or regulation, and no legal redress from the manufacturer for potential harms. (This last point is being challenged in multiple court cases, so far to no avail.)

Buy War on Ivermectin: The Medicine That Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the Pandemic by Kory, Pierre, McCarthy, Jenna, Bigtree, del (ISBN: 9781510773868) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.

The final phases of the Disinformation war on ivermectin kicks into high gear with the launch of the "Horse Dewormer" public relations campaign followed by the publication of Pharma corrupted trials.

In the wake of the FLCCC press conference, Senate Testimony and review paper retraction, suddenly Merck fires the first public salvo in the Disinformation war by posting brazen lies on their website.

My chronology of the Disinformation tactics deployed to paint ivermectin as an ineffective horse dewormer against Covid. Largely taken from the ever-evolving keynote lecture I give at conferences

In October 2020 Dr Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effect

An analysis of U.K. government data shows an unprecedented increase in cancer deaths among 15- to 44-year-olds following the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, according to a new report by data analyst Edward Dowd. The report has prompted renewed calls for further investigation.

New research has experts angered by the “complete and utter regulatory failure” to ensure patient safety.

Updated model claims 3.26 million lives saved: Comments on State Capacity Covidology: Part 2

The policies adopted to combat Covid-19 are producing a worldwide inflationary economic meltdown. This macro outcome follows an endless array of individual suffering and tragedy. Yes, from Covid-19 itself, but also from lockdowns, closures, mandates, treatment limitations, and the resulting cascade of social, health, and microeconomic effects. The pandemic also provided opportunity to stomp on basic rights, as when government health and law enforcement agencies

Because it is being used to shut down debate about vaccine injuries and deaths