Misleading the public with The Science (TM) | Is the existence of models to estimate lives saved by Covid-19 vaccines ever proof that lives were actually saved? | Law, Health and Technology
Is the existence of models to estimate lives saved by Covid-19 vaccines ever proof that lives were actually saved?
Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History
American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together “Pfizer”) have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products.
Our 4 previous entries concerned the safety of COVID vaccines, with a large focus on the questionable conduct of major COVID vaccine developer Pfizer. In 2009 Pfizer “agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products… The company will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the United States for any matter.”
Negative effectiveness & natural immunity in the MSM, and another expert comes round?
It was only a few days ago that we added to our ongoing reporting on COVID-19 vaccine negative effectiveness (the notion that the jabs make COVID-19 infection, and even death, more likely), and now we can add to that some more evidence and a source from the mainstream news.
Natural immunity conspiracy theory now obvious fact
As evidence continues to pour in, the COVID-19 skeptics continue to be proven right. NBC News has reported on a new study published in the Lancet, commenting: “The immunity generated from an infection was found to be “at least as high, if not higher” than that provided by two doses of an mRNA vaccine.” They also acknowledged that “the immunity acquired from infection did appear to wane more slowly than the immunity from two doses of an mRNA vaccine”.
A few “okay then” moments here. Despite the pandemic winding down and periods of excess mortality usually being followed by periods of mortality deficit (since so many of our most vulnerable have already died, a bit earlier than normal), we continue to see the problem of excess deaths throughout the developed world. Even though most people have had the ‘life-saving jabs’. For example, this is an issue in the US.
The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine: Exposing the crisis of credibility in clinical research
The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine: Exposing the crisis of credibility in clinical research : Jureidini, Jon, McHenry, Leemon B.: Amazon.co.uk: Books
Nature - It’s time to take trials out of the hands of pharmaceutical makers, argues the latest in a long line of books on corruption and the pharmaceutical industry.
Wait what? FDA wants 55 years to process FOIA request over vaccine data
Freedom of Information Act requests are rarely speedy, but when a group of scientists asked the federal government to share the data it relied upon in licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, the response went beyond typical bureaucratic foot-dragging.
FDA Doubles Down: Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until at Least the Year 2096 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data
The fed gov’t gives Pfizer billions in taxpayer money + makes Americans take its product + won’t let Americans sue for harm + shields disclosure of its licensure documents = 1984
We reported earlier that the Food & Drug Administration wanted to wait 55 years before sharing the data it relied upon in licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, an act that in turn paved the way for vaccine mandates. Even Reuters prepared an article asking, “Wait what?”, and reported that lawyer Aaron Siri, involved in legal action to acquire this data, notes that it took only 108 days for the “FDA to review the responsive documents for the far more intricate task of licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine”.
Everyone debating the merits of the COVID-19 vaccines needs to take these 4 journal articles into account. The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice’s hugely important unofficial series of articles on exaggerated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety claims, involving BMJ editor Peter Doshi and myself, has now concluded. The initial
Have victims 'died of' coronavirus or 'died with' coronavirus? Here's why that matters
If we know who is susceptible to dying with COVID-19 because of pre-existing conditions, public health responses could more effectively target and protect potentially vulnerable people and communities, writes Marc Trabsky and Courtney Hempton.
It was only last month that one of the anointed experts of the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr Leana Wen, effectively acknowledged COVID jabs’ negative effectiveness (at least in comparison with natural immunity), admitted that they can cause serious side effects, and indicated that the previously infected unjabbed should receive vaccine mandate exemptions. Clearly on a roll, Dr Wen just last week stated that, “We are overcounting covid deaths and hospitalizations.” While other experts now known as ‘conspiracy theorists’ had known this for the past 2-3 years, she notes that many people in hospital with COVID are there for other reasons and muses about cases where “the coronavirus was not the primary contributor to their death and often played no role at all”.
