Open New Learning Lab Resources

Open New Learning Lab Resources

1006 bookmarks
Newest
Just reviewed "The State of Digital Adoption 2025 - special AI Adoption" and the findings are really interesting! e.g. the AI adoption gap: 78% of executives are confident in their change approach, but only 28% of employees feel adequately trained on AI tools.
Just reviewed "The State of Digital Adoption 2025 - special AI Adoption" and the findings are really interesting! e.g. the AI adoption gap: 78% of executives are confident in their change approach, but only 28% of employees feel adequately trained on AI tools.
🔮 Where is the Future of AI-Powered Digital Adoption Foundational priorities By 2028, both executives and employees will prioritize security, efficiency, and proper infrastructure management over specific features. Evolution of DAPs Next-gen Digital Adoption Platforms are evolving to incorporate cross-application, contextual support that continuously improves through user interaction. Path to HyperProductivity Organizations that successfully implement AI while leveraging emerging technologies will achieve a state of HyperProductivity – where human capabilities and technology converge to achieve measurable gains in efficiency, innovation, and resilience. See some selected interesting pictures - or download the full report via the link in the comments. #DigitalAdoption #AITransformation #DigitalProductivity #FutureOfWork
·linkedin.com·
Just reviewed "The State of Digital Adoption 2025 - special AI Adoption" and the findings are really interesting! e.g. the AI adoption gap: 78% of executives are confident in their change approach, but only 28% of employees feel adequately trained on AI tools.
🤖 Interesting insights from Anthropicnes recent study on how university students are leveraging AI! 📈
🤖 Interesting insights from Anthropicnes recent study on how university students are leveraging AI! 📈
Key findings: - STEM students, particularly in Computer Science, are early adopters of AI tools like Claude, accounting for 36.8% of conversations despite representing only 5.4% of U.S. bachelor's degrees. - Students interact with AI in four primary ways: Direct Problem Solving, Direct Output Creation, Collaborative Problem Solving, and Collaborative Output Creation, each occurring at similar rates. - Claude is mainly used for creating and improving educational content (39.3%), technical explanations (33.5%), and higher-order cognitive functions like Creating (39.8%) and Analyzing (30.2%). Students are not just seeking quick answers; they're using AI as a collaborative tool to enhance their learning journey. This trend highlights the transformative potential of AI in higher education. And it shows: students are smarter than many teachers think or fear. I also liked this graphic which however is also nice marketing showing Claude being used for higher order thinking via creation something new… which is the strength of LLMs obviously. #AIinEducation #HigherEducation #STEM #Innovation #FutureofLearning
·linkedin.com·
🤖 Interesting insights from Anthropicnes recent study on how university students are leveraging AI! 📈
𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗺𝘀 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗞𝗻𝗼𝘄
𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗺𝘀 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗞𝗻𝗼𝘄
𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗺𝘀 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗞𝗻𝗼𝘄 — 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗦𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝟭. 𝗟𝗟𝗠 (𝗟𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲 𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹) → Helps computers understand and write human-like text → Examples: GPT-4, Claude, Gemini → Used in: Chatbots, coding tools, content generation 𝟮. 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗿𝘀 → The tech behind all modern AI models → Let models understand meaning, context, and order of words → Examples: BERT, GPT 𝟯. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 → Writing better instructions to get better AI answers → Includes system prompts, step-by-step prompts, and safety rules 𝟰. 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗲-𝗧𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 → Training an AI model on your data → Helps tailor it for specific tasks like legal, medical, or financial use cases 𝟱. 𝗘𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗱𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 → A way for AI to understand meaning and relationships between words or documents → Used in search engines and recommendation systems 𝟲. 𝗥𝗔𝗚 (𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹-𝗔𝘂𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻) → Combines AI with a database or document store → Helps AI give more accurate, fact-based answers 𝟳. 𝗧𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻𝘀 → The chunks of text AI reads and writes → Managing them controls cost and performance 𝟴. 𝗛𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 → When AI gives wrong or made-up answers → Can be fixed with fact-checking and better prompts 𝟵. 𝗭𝗲𝗿𝗼-𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘁 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 → When AI can perform a task without being trained on it → Saves time on training 𝟭𝟬. 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻-𝗼𝗳-𝗧𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 → AI explains its answer step-by-step → Helps with complex reasoning tasks 𝟭𝟭. 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗪𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗼𝘄 → The amount of info AI can see at once → Larger windows help with longer documents or conversations 𝟭𝟮. 𝗧𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 → Controls how creative or predictable AI is → Lower values = more accurate; higher values = more creative 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗡𝗲𝘅𝘁? → Multimodal AI (text, images, audio together) → Smaller, faster models → Safer, ethical AI (Constitutional AI) → Agentic AI (autonomous, task-completing agents) Knowing the terms is just step one — what really matters is how you 𝘶𝘴𝘦 them to build better solutions. | 51 comments on LinkedIn
·linkedin.com·
𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗺𝘀 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗞𝗻𝗼𝘄
𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗔𝗜 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗚𝗣𝗧-4.1 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲! It provides a detailed guide on how to steer GPT-4.1 with precision, including examples, tips, and advanced techniques.
𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗔𝗜 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗚𝗣𝗧-4.1 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲! It provides a detailed guide on how to steer GPT-4.1 with precision, including examples, tips, and advanced techniques.
You can access the full version for free below. ⬇️ 𝗜𝗻 𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗿𝘆, 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗸𝗲𝘆 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀: ➜ Be Clear with Your Instructions: GPT-4.1 is really good at following directions, but only if you're specific. The more clear and direct your prompt, the better the response. ➜ Break Down Complex Tasks: If you're working on something complicated, ask GPT-4.1 to “think step by step.” It helps the model give more accurate and thoughtful answers. ➜ Use Structure: If you need to share a lot of info, use clear structure—like markdown or bullet points. This helps GPT-4.1 understand and organize the info better. ➜ Format Your Prompts with Clear Sections: Structure your prompts for easier comprehension:   - Role and Objective   - Instructions (with subcategories)   - Reasoning Steps   - Output Format   - Examples   - Final instructions ➜ Put Important Instructions at the Start and End: For longer prompts, put your key instructions both at the beginning and the end. This helps the model stay on track. ➜ Guide It with Reminders: If you're designing a workflow or solving a problem, include reminders like “keep going until it’s fully resolved” or “plan carefully before acting.” This keeps the model focused. ➜ Use the Token Window Wisely: GPT-4.1 can handle a huge amount of text, but too much at once can slow it down. Be strategic about how much context you provide. ➜ Balance Internal and External Knowledge: For factual questions, tell GPT-4.1 to either “only use the provided context” or to mix that context with general knowledge. This helps you get the most accurate results. 𝗜𝗻 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘁: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗸𝗲𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗚𝗣𝗧-4.1 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿, 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗼𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿. 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘆! Access it here or download it below: https://lnkd.in/dCm6DeFW | 59 comments on LinkedIn
·linkedin.com·
𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗔𝗜 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗚𝗣𝗧-4.1 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲! It provides a detailed guide on how to steer GPT-4.1 with precision, including examples, tips, and advanced techniques.
97% of you are probably blissfully unaware of AI agents. However, they’re here and evolving fast!
97% of you are probably blissfully unaware of AI agents. However, they’re here and evolving fast!
I've covered an explainer of AI agents for non-techies before, see the comments for a link to that. For most non-techies, AI is viewed as one entity doing every thing on its own. With agents, we can create a team of specialists. That’s the idea behind multi-agent AI systems This image (from the brilliant folks at LangGraph) shows different ways you can set up teams of AI “agents.” Think of each agent like a little digital worker with a specific role - one plans, another checks facts, one executes tasks, and another reviews the results. Like any good team, they talk to each other, share ideas, and back each other up. Now, let's explain that image: 1️⃣ Single Agent This is your classic setup with one AI model doing all the work. It can use tools, but it’s working solo. Smart, but overworked. 2️⃣ Network Here, agents all talk to each other like a group chat. Everyone’s sharing, checking, and helping out. Great for collaboration, but can get noisy. 3️⃣ Supervisor This is the manager model where one central AI supervises others. It gives instructions and checks in. A bit like a project lead guiding a team. 4️⃣ Supervisor as Tools Flip it around: the main AI treats the others as tools. It doesn’t chat with them it just uses them to get stuff done. Efficient, but not very democratic. 5️⃣ Hierarchical This is like an org chart. Big boss on top, middle managers below, then the doers. Neat, structured, scalable. 6️⃣ Custom Everything everywhere all at once. No strict structure—just doing what works to get the job done. It can look a bit messy, but it’s great for handling tricky tasks that don’t fit in a neat box. → So why does this matter? Traditional AI is like having one brain trying to do everything. But now, we can build teams of AIs, each focused on a task—planning, checking, executing, or reviewing. Multi-agent systems might sound like Sci-Fi but they're already at work today. ↳ Image Credit: Google Agents Companion & LangGraph Multi-agent systems 📔 Source: Agents Companion Report 2025 by Google #education #artificialintelligence #learninganddevelopment
·linkedin.com·
97% of you are probably blissfully unaware of AI agents. However, they’re here and evolving fast!
2023: „AI wird meinen Job ersetzen.“ 2024: „AI ist mein Copilot.“ 2025: „AI ersetzt keine Freundschaft.
2023: „AI wird meinen Job ersetzen.“ 2024: „AI ist mein Copilot.“ 2025: „AI ersetzt keine Freundschaft.
2023: „AI wird meinen Job ersetzen.“ 2024: „AI ist mein Copilot.“ 2025: „AI ersetzt keine Freundschaft. Aber manchmal hilft sie beim Denken.“ Super spannendes Lesefutter von der Harvard Business Review. Marc Zao-Sanders hatte sich nach 12 Monaten seinen Artikel aus 2024 wieder angeschaut und ein Update veröffentlicht, wie viele von uns inzwischen wirklich mit Gen AI Tools arbeiten. Spoiler: Der Hype ist vorbei – und das ist gut so. Denn es wird super konkret: _Führungskräfte nutzen GPTs zur Strategieentwicklung. _Manager bauen sich ihre eigenen Helferlings. _Entwickler sparen 56 % Zeit beim Coden. _Teams automatisieren repetitive Tasks – und schaffen Raum für Kreativität. Die Grenze zwischen „Business Use Case“ und „Private Use Case“ verschwimmt zunehmend. Workflows, die am Küchentisch anfangen und in der Vorstandsetage landen. Die spannendste Erkenntnis: Der meistgenutzte GenAI-Use-Case 2025 ist - Nicht Coding. Nicht Präsentationen. Nicht Strategie. Sondern: Therapie. 🧠 Gespräche mit Chatbots über Stress, Selbstzweifel, Sinnfragen. 📓 Journaling mit KI als stillem Gegenüber. 🪞Selbstreflexion – strukturiert, aber menschlich. Laut HBR ist „mentale Gesundheit“ als Use Case für GenAI noch vor Business Productivity. Tools wie ChatGPT weniger Roboter als Spiegel. Dass wir in einer Welt leben, in der vielen genau das fehlt: ein geschützter Raum zum Denken, Reden, Fühlen. Und dass KI vielleicht nicht nur Arbeit, sondern auch Zugang demokratisiert – zu Support, der vorher unerschwinglich war. 🌀 Vielleicht ist das die eigentliche Disruption.
·linkedin.com·
2023: „AI wird meinen Job ersetzen.“ 2024: „AI ist mein Copilot.“ 2025: „AI ersetzt keine Freundschaft.
KI-Agenten werden zum Bildungscoach der Zukunft
KI-Agenten werden zum Bildungscoach der Zukunft
Bei Künstlicher Intelligenz an der Hochschule denken die meisten an KI in der Lehre. Sollen Studierende KI nutzen und falls ja, im Unterricht, bei den Übungen oder zu Hause bei den Ausarbeitungen? Sind bestehende Prüfungsformen noch zeitgemäß? Sollen Dozenten zeigen, wie KI benutzt werden kann und s
·linkedin.com·
KI-Agenten werden zum Bildungscoach der Zukunft
Yes, this is another take on that leaked Shopify CEO email on AI. But, I want to focus on its learning theme.
Yes, this is another take on that leaked Shopify CEO email on AI. But, I want to focus on its learning theme.
Very few companies I've encountered have been so direct and clear on "How we expect you to use AI at x company". I think this move empowers and allays the fears of those who are already using AI on the side. That's a big hurdle already cleared. One which can really amplify adoption. There's some bits I'm not sold on (looking at you point 5), yet, what I really liked here is the focus on learning together. What's clear for Shopify employees is: - They have access to AI tools - They have the endorsement to experiment and explore - They're actively being given places to share ideas and lessons - They know leveraging is a key skill for today and the future If you want to build these mythical learning cultures we all talk abt, you need more action like this. Often, people know what to do but until you open the door to that path as a company, you'll probably stagnate. Anyway, that's my two cents. → How are you approaching the mandate of AI at work? Let's chat abt that in the comments ↓ #education #learninganddevelopment #artificialintelligence
·linkedin.com·
Yes, this is another take on that leaked Shopify CEO email on AI. But, I want to focus on its learning theme.
The AI agent didnt scare me. The fact that this is still how we assess skills? That did.
The AI agent didnt scare me. The fact that this is still how we assess skills? That did.
I got a message last week that stopped me mid doom-scroll. "I just saw a video of an AI agent taking a test for someone. Aren't you worried about that?" Honestly? No. But probably not for the reason you'd expect. I've spent nearly 20 years in learning and education. I've seen trends, fads, and enough terrible multiple-choice quizzes to last a lifetime. The AI agent didn't scare me. The fact that this is still how we assess skills? That did. If your entire measurement of understanding relies on picking answers from lists, of course an AI can game it. So could a cheat sheet. So could your colleague who's got a memory like an elephant. This isn't about AI cheating the system. It's about the system being easy to cheat because it's broken. ❌ We don't need better tests. → We need a better approach. If we confirm 'skills' and 'understanding' through quizzes, then it's all just a game of who has the best memory, not who understands how to apply knowledge. I know millions of institutions and corporate learning experiences worship at the altar of the almighty multiple choice exam as the measurement stick for human intelligence, skills and expertise. ↳ Doesn't mean it's right. That's where AI can actually help. Not as a cheat code, but as a coach. To challenge, to question, to uncover the "how" behind your answer. In tomorrow's Steal These Thoughts! newsletter, I'll show you an AI-powered approach that could transform how we validate skills and knowledge, and help you build more meaningful assessment experiences. Join us by clicking 'subscribe to my newsletter' on this post and my profile. #education #learninganddevelopment #aritificialintelligence | 27 comments on LinkedIn
·linkedin.com·
The AI agent didnt scare me. The fact that this is still how we assess skills? That did.
I ve rolled out AI to 30+ companies and 25,000+ employees. Here is what I learned.
I ve rolled out AI to 30+ companies and 25,000+ employees. Here is what I learned.
Implementing AI isn't just about integrating new technology. It's about transforming the way people work. Without a structured change management approach, AI initiatives can face resistance, underperformance, and missed opportunities. Here are the key success factors for good AI change management: ✅ Clear vision and purpose: Define the goals and benefits of AI in your company. Make it aspiring. ✅ Strong leadership: Leaders must champion the change and guide their teams. Don't forget to communicate clear expectations. ✅ Effective communication: Regular updates and transparency to manage expectations and take away fear. ✅ Evangelists: Elect "Pro users" in each department to provide instant support. ✅ Training and development: Equip your team with the skills needed to leverage AI. ✅ AI platform: Ensure the platform has excellent UX to drive user adoption and engagement. UX is not UI! ✅ AI agents: Yes, this specific feature is key. Create and share AI agents that employees can use off the shelf. Significantly improves adoption! At Zive, it's our mission to make work efficient and enjoyable for everyone. We provide the best platform for it. But it doesn't work without good change management. Thankfully, we have amazing partners who support our customers with it. #AI #ChangeManagement #Leadership #Innovation #EmployeeEngagement #BusinessTransformation #UserExperience #AIagents | 18 comments on LinkedIn
·linkedin.com·
I ve rolled out AI to 30+ companies and 25,000+ employees. Here is what I learned.
Friends, this is the MOST IMPORTANT study on AI in 2025. The brilliant Ethan Mollick and team studied how AI impacts individuals and teams across Procter & Gamble - the results are stunning.
Friends, this is the MOST IMPORTANT study on AI in 2025. The brilliant Ethan Mollick and team studied how AI impacts individuals and teams across Procter & Gamble - the results are stunning.
Friends, this is the MOST IMPORTANT study on AI in 2025. The brilliant Ethan Mollick and team studied how AI impacts individuals and teams across Procter & Gamble- the results are stunning. Here’s what you need to know: The "Cybernetic Teammate" study was conducted in Summer 2024 by a research from Harvard and Wharton, in partnership with Procter & Gamble.  ++++++++++++++++++++ WHO WAS TESTED: The study involved 776 P&G professionals and replicated P&G's product development process across four business units. The experiment featured four distinct conditions: - Individuals working alone without AI - Individuals working alone with AI - Teams of two specialists (one commercial expert, one technical R&D expert) working without AI - Teams of two specialists working with AI ++++++++++++++++++++ KEY FINDINGS: INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE: AI improved individual performance by 37% TEAM PERFORMANCE: AI improved team performance by 39% BREAKTHROUGH SOLUTIONS: Teams using AI were 3x more likely to produce solutions in top 10% of quality EFFICIENCY GAINS Individuals using AI completed tasks 16.4% faster than those without Teams with AI finished 12.7% faster than teams without AI OUTPUT QUALITY Despite working faster, AI-enabled groups produced substantially longer and more detailed solutions EXPERTISE AND COLLABORATION EFFECTS Breaking Down Silos!! Without AI: Clear professional silos existed — R&D specialists created technical solutions while Commercial specialists developed market-focused ideas With AI: Distinctions virtually disappeared — both types of specialists produced balanced solutions integrating technical and commercial perspectives EXPERIENCE LEVELING: Less experienced employees using AI performed at levels comparable to teams with experienced members EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCE Positive Emotions: AI users reported significantly higher levels of excitement, energy, and enthusiasm Negative Emotions: AI users experienced less anxiety and frustration during work Individual Experience: People working alone with AI reported emotional experiences comparable to or better than those in human teams TEAM DYNAMICS Solution Types: Teams without AI showed a bimodal distribution (either technically or commercially oriented solutions) Balanced Input: AI appeared to reduce dominance effects, allowing more equal contribution from team members Consistency: Teams with AI showed more uniform, high-quality outputs compared to the variable results of standard teams We'll be talking about this study for a while. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ UPSKILL YOUR ORGANIZATION: When your company is ready, we are ready to upskill your workforce at scale. Our Generative AI for Professionals course is tailored to enterprise and highly effective in driving AI adoption through a unique, proven behavioral transformation. Check out our website or shoot me a DM. | 133 comments on LinkedIn
·linkedin.com·
Friends, this is the MOST IMPORTANT study on AI in 2025. The brilliant Ethan Mollick and team studied how AI impacts individuals and teams across Procter & Gamble - the results are stunning.
Sehr spannende Studie von der Harvard Business School (03/2025) die aufzeigt, dass der Einsatz generativer KI (GenAI) die zentralen Aspekte von Teamarbeit…
Sehr spannende Studie von der Harvard Business School (03/2025) die aufzeigt, dass der Einsatz generativer KI (GenAI) die zentralen Aspekte von Teamarbeit…
Sehr spannende Studie von der Harvard Business School (03/2025) die aufzeigt, dass der Einsatz generativer KI (GenAI) die zentralen Aspekte von Teamarbeit…
·linkedin.com·
Sehr spannende Studie von der Harvard Business School (03/2025) die aufzeigt, dass der Einsatz generativer KI (GenAI) die zentralen Aspekte von Teamarbeit…
𝗔𝗜 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀! Or Not? And what about the data?
𝗔𝗜 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀! Or Not? And what about the data?
"𝗔𝗜 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀!" 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗗𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺: ➜ Deploy AI Agents ➜ Automate everything ➜ Enjoy efficiency 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆: ➜ Messy, siloed, unreliable data ➜ AI hallucinations & compliance nightmares ➜ Enterprise AI initiatives stall as organizations spend more time fixing data issues than realizing AI-driven value. The Hard Truth: AI (agents) aren't failing—data strategies are. AI Agents are only as effective as the data beneath them. Without governed, high-quality data, AI adoption becomes an expensive experiment instead of a strategic advantage. Important to fix the data first. Kudos for this image to Armand Ruiz! | 258 comments on LinkedIn
·linkedin.com·
𝗔𝗜 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀! Or Not? And what about the data?