Indigenous Rights Movements & the Law

How did activist Amanda Blackhorse feel when the announcement to change the name of Washington D.C.'s football team was made? "I am very cynical when it comes to the team and their intentions, just because of their history and how they've interacted or not interacted with native people."Want to support 1A? Give to your local public radio station and subscribe to this podcast. Have questions? Find us on Twitter @1A.

The American Law Institute is the leading independent organization in the United States producing scholarly work to clarify, modernize, and otherwise improve the law.

Kathryn talks with Thomasina Real Bird, Angelique EagleWoman, Paulene Abeyta, Christina McDonogh, and Aidan Graybill about the exclusion of Native voices in The Center for Women in Law and The NALP Foundation's study, “Women of Color – A Study of Law Student Experiences”. They discuss the NALP study, then walk through the 4 identified issues with the survey. They also talk about the NALP response to the criticisms and why that isn't a sufficient response. Finally, they discuss the unique issues facing Native American law students and what work is needed to address them.   Episode Resources Thomasina Real Bird:   Angelique EagleWoman: Paulene Abeyta:     Episode Highlights The guests for today’s episode - 0:46 A Women of Color study - 2:30 Native voices - 5:05 Exclusion of Native Americans from the study - 5:53 Concerns with the study - 6:47 Their feelings about the study - 12:25 Having a wrong reaction - 13:40 Law school students - 16:28 Increasing diversity in the legal profession - 17:51 Trying to increase visibility - 21:02 Working and being inclusive - 24:00   Subscribe, Share and Review To get the next episode subscribe with your favorite podcast player. Subscribe with Follow on Leave a review on

In this lecture, Dr. Lindsey Robertson gives an historical introduction to the complicated issues surrounding Native Americans and the Constitution. From the time of ratification onward, a gradual process of incorporating Indians into the American constitutional system has resulted in a somewhat idiosyncratic scheme of rights and powers retained by Indian tribes.

This program is sponsored by the American Indian Library Association and the International Responsibilities Task Force of the Social Responsibilities Round Table The struggle to defend the treaty rights of Native Americans has been long and difficult. But the Covid-19 pandemic has presented new challenges to the protection of the voting rights, the environment, and the health and safety of Native American communities. Our panel will address these issues, and what you can do to help. (This webinar was recorded on June 29, 2020) Panelists: Tadd Johnson - Senior Director of American Indian Tribal Nations Relations, University of Minnesota Winona LaDuke - Activist and Executive Director of Honor the Earth Dallin Maybee - Assistant Director of Development, Native American Rights Fund Moderators: Cindy Hohl - President-Elect of the American Indian Library Association Tom Twiss - Co-Chair, SRRT's International Responsibilities Task Force Learn more about the ALA Social Responsibilities Round Table (SRRT) on their website: http://www.ala.org/rt/srrt

OPENING BLESSING Jonathan Perry (Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head [Aquinnah]), tribal councilman WELCOME (7:36) Lizabeth Cohen, dean of the Radcliffe Institute and Howard Mumford Jones Professor of American Studies in the Department of History, Harvard University INTRODUCTION (19:28) Daniel Carpenter, faculty director of the social sciences program at the Radcliffe Institute, member of the Provost’s Advisory Council on Native and Indigenous Issues, and Allie S. Freed Professor of Government in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University PANEL 1: NATIVE LAW AND LEGAL STRATEGY (33:10) Moderated by Maggie McKinley (Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Ojibwe), Climenko Fellow and lecturer on law, Harvard Law School (39:13) Richard Guest, attorney, Tribal Supreme Court Project, Native American Rights Fund (1:06:22) Diane J. Humetewa (Hopi), United States district judge, United States District Court, District of Arizona Q&A (1:36:59)

Film deals with the work of the Native American Rights Fund in its efforts to protect the rights of American Indians in cases involving treaty rights, ownership of natural resources on tribal lands, and trust relationships with the Federal Government. AV 2962 From the Ford Foundation records, Audiovisual materials Series 1, Ford Foundation Films Finding Aid: FA750 Color, Sound, English language Originally 16mm film on VHS Duration: 60 minutes

The Treaty of Fort Laramie is an agreement between the United States and the Oglala, Miniconjou, and Brulé bands of Lakota people, Yanktonai Dakota, and Arapaho Nation, following the failure of the first Fort Laramie treaty, signed in 1851.

The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851 was signed on September 17, 1851 between United States treaty commissioners and representatives of the Cheyenne, Sioux, Arapaho, Crow, Assiniboine, Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nations. Also known as Horse Creek Treaty, the treaty set forth traditional territorial claims of the tribes.

The Tribal Court Clearinghouse - Complete Text of Indian Civil Rights Act

When we think of the system of government in the United States, many of us typically think of the federal and the state governments. But tribal governments are also significant systems of law that have been integral to the formation of democracy in the U.S.

Fall 2006 issue of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Challenges to institutionalized racism have been largely framed in terms of equitable access to, and redistribution of, the wealth and power accumulated and con

Aboriginal, Native American, Indian, or Indigenous Peoples laws all generally refer to American laws relating to Native Americans, also known as American

While treaties between Indigenous peoples and the United States affect virtually every area in the USA, there is as yet no official list of all the treaties. The US National Archives holds 374 of the treaties, where they are known as the Ratified Indian Treaties. Here you can view them for the first time with key historic works that provide context to the agreements made and the histories of our shared lands.

Many Native American tribes have received official recognition from the US government and have been granted economic, political, social, and cultural rights.

Over the last two decades, the environmental justice movement has evolved into a recognized social movement within the United States that merges civil rights with environmental protection.

Below you will find tips and historical information on legal protections for Native Americans and other native peoples. Choose a link to get started.Protecting the

Published in History: Reviews of New Books (Vol. 3, No. 8, 1975)

By Meredith Capps In an “on-demand” session offered to AALL 2021 Virtual Meeting attendees, Darla W. Jackson moderated a discussion regarding current efforts to publish Native American tribal law o…

The DA says eight people who avoided jail completed more than 320 hours of community service.

Native peoples in the U.S. are often citizens of both the United States and of autonomous Native nations. That makes Native environmental justice issues more complex.

A leading United Nations human rights body has issued a report blasting the United States for its systematic abrogation of its treaties with Native Americans, stealing of reservation land, and the loss of billions of dollars of Native American money, among other things. It demanded that the United States grant American Indians and Native Hawai’ians the same basic protections under U.S. law that it grants to nonindigenous Americans.

A novel lawsuit is taking advantage of a local ‘rights of nature’ measure passed in November in effort to protect wetlands

Violence is on the rise at a North Dakota reservation. And tribal officers are often powerless to stop it.

Despite a legal obligation of the United States to provide health care to Native Americans, this group faces significant inequity in health care compared to other U.S. populations.